To make room for agriculture, trees and other plants are often cleared away so that farmers have space to grow crops. The clearing of forests forces many animals from their homes. They often flee the area in search of a new place to live. There is a big downside to that. Some of those animals are natural predators. They control pest populations. They can help to clear the fields of rats, mice, and other rodents that eat and damage crops.
This happened at one small farming village in Indonesia. After land was cleared for farming, rats and mice began appearing in large numbers. Villagers tried to target the animals by smoking them out and hunting them. But the villagers were unsuccessful.
So, one farmer decided to try another method- a natural one.
Pujo Arto brought owls to his farm. Owls, after all, are experts at hunting rodents. It is what they do. And it worked! However, Pujo Arto didn't stop with his own field. He set up a Natural Predator Program. Now, owls are busy catching rats and mice in the fields around the village of Tlogoweru. There is a huge upside: no need for chemical pesticides which can harm not only rodents, but other creatures.
In 2011, the Indonesian man began setting up boxes where the owls live. He is also raising owlets in the village. After about four months, the young birds are released. These facilities have raised more than owls. They have also raised awareness in the community about the importance of owls. They raised awareness within their community by building homes for those owls. At the same time, government officials helped to create laws to protect those owls.
In addition to controlling pests naturally, there is another upside to the program. His village is now a popular stop for eco-tourists. People interested in learning more about owls, wildlife protection and natural pest control come to his village to learn more.
1. Why did the owls get away from the land around the village?A.There was no food to eat. |
B.There were too many rats and mice. |
C.They were smoked away. |
D.They had no place to live. |
A.to use owls to catch the crop-damaging rodents |
B.to attract eco-tourists to the village |
C.to raise awareness of protecting forests |
D.to control pests by using chemical pesticides |
a. introducing owls
b. pests being controlled naturally
c. rodents appearing in large numbers.
d. clearing forests
A.abcd |
B.bcda |
C.dcab |
D.dabc |
A.The importance of protecting owls. |
B.Indonesian village uses owls to protect crops. |
C.The advantages of using natural predators in agriculture. |
D.The government's role in using owls to control pests. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Life on this planet, in all its wide diversity, is disappearing more quickly now than it was at any time in human history, and about 1 million species of plants and animals face extinction, a new research from the IPBES, an organization of the United Nations, has found.
The IPBES published a full report about the new research. The future for the species that we share the planet with — and on which we depend — is dire, according to the report.
On land, the number of animals has decreased by an average of 20 percent, mostly in the last 120 years. Moreover, 1 million square kilometers(386,000 square miles) of tropical forest have been lost since 1980. In the ocean, about a third of corals and marine mammals(海洋哺乳动物) face possible extinction.
Humans have played a major role in these declines, from the way in which we use the land and oceans, such as farming, fishing to logging and mining. The chemicals we use pollute the air and water. Global warming caused by population explosion, air pollution, ecological destruction and so on has forced some species to leave their traditional habitats. All of these have left their mark on Earth’s biodiversity, the report says.
Many experts said that the report demonstrates the need for urgent action. “The IPBES report makes it clear that our response to protecting natural systems must be stronger than ever,” John Robinson said. “The IPBES report on the global state of biodiversity is shocking but not entirely surprising,” said Andrew Norton. “The question is how many evidences and repeated warnings it will take to wake us up to the urgency and act.”
1. What does the underlined word “dire“ in paragraph 2 mean?A.Inspiring. | B.Worthless. | C.Terrible. | D.Excellent. |
A.By analyzing the cause. | B.By listing data. |
C.By answering questions. | D.By making comparisons. |
A.We need more time to think before we take steps. |
B.It is high time to take action to protect biodiversity. |
C.Our response to protecting natural systems is stronger than ever. |
D.Humans have already realized the urgency of protecting biodiversity. |
A.A Rapid Decline in Biodiversity | B.Humans’ Efforts to Save Nature |
C.Experts’ Opinions on the IPBES Report | D.A Slow Response to Protecting the Biodiversity |
【推荐2】Humans have been known to develop strong connections with dangerous animals. Werner Freund has spent several decades in the company of wolves. While why the former soldier became attached to these beautiful wild animals is a little unclear, he has been caring for them since 1972. The army experience leaves him a strong body and energetic state.
This, however, does not happen by chance.
What may sound a little cruel is how the position of hierarchy(等级制度) is built in the animal world.
Wolves, the largest member of the dog family, are mistakenly believed to be dangerous.
They are beautiful gentle souls, whose reputation has been spoiled by fairy tales like Little Red Riding Hood!
A.But in reality they rarely attack humans |
B.They are considered as the smartest beasts. |
C.Werner works on it with a simple act every day |
D.Werner seems to know where wolves come from. |
E.It is always the strongest male that gets the first meal |
F.The wolves treat Werner as if he were one of their own. |
G.Therefore,Werner can survive the wolves and get along with these cold-blooded creatures. |
【推荐3】Olivia Sievers, a flight instructor in Germany, is a wonderful person who loves animals. Her flights frequently took her to Buenos Aires, where she had to spend 2 days in a guesthouse. Olivia was walking toward her guesthouse one day when she noticed a stray dog(流浪狗)in front of the hotel room door. She turned her head to this dog and fed him. Seeing him got cold, Olivia covered him with a blanket. The next day Olivia continued to feed the dog because she realized she couldn’t avoid interacting with him. Then it was time to go back to Germany. When Olivia got out of the guesthouse, she saw the dog standing outside in a respectful manner to see her off.
The dog seemed to form a relationship with the woman and started to wait for her at the entrance gate from that day forward. Olivia gave him the name Rubio. Rubio would always obey Olivia’s instructions. He gladly rolled his eyes, lay down on one side, and decided to wait for Olivia to touch his stomach. He desired the focus he once received. Sometimes animals require love and affection(感情).
Olivia had to fly to Buenos Aires every 3 months. The guesthouse staff informed her that the dog had visited the hotel each day for months, looking forward to meeting her. Then he decided to wait for Olivia patiently. Olivia requested that Rubio be taken in by a local shelter. They consented, but nothing came of it: Rubio fled from the shelter and returned to the guesthouse.
Olivia Sievers eventually chose to adopt the dog and bring him to Germany, where Rubio had a happy fresh start. The cheerful dog quickly adjusted to his new life.
1. Why did Olivia go to Buenos Aires?A.To visit a guest. | B.To help a dog. |
C.To go on a vocation. | D.To go on a business trip. |
A.He preferred Olivia’s food. | B.He fell ill and needed attention. |
C.He was disappointed with Olivia. | D.He desired Olivia’s love and care. |
A.Refused. | B.Hesitated. | C.Agreed. | D.Understood. |
A.Kind and caring. | B.Creative and brave. |
C.Polite and gifted. | D.Determined and proud. |
【推荐1】Iran’s Lake Urmia was once the second-largest saltwater lake in the world, covering more than 2,000 square miles at its deepest in the 1990s. In the past two decades, the lake has dried out, decreasing at times to less than 20% of its average size.
It’s not a story of climate change, though that certainly contributed. It’s a case of water mismanagement. Researches blame water overuse and inefficiency in agriculture, new dams(大坝)and irrigation(灌溉)projects, a bridge cutting across the lake, declining rainfall and rising temperature for much of the drying out.
“For me this is a really important topic: the environmental problems in the world,” says photographer Maximilian Mann, who traveled to Iran three times. His photos are collected from all three trips.
Lake researchers say there have been encouraging signs in the past few years. This past spring, massive flooding in Iran helped the lake regain water level as well. Mann’s photos were taken before that flooding.
“The floods certainly helped and increased the water levels,” says Amir AghaKouchak, a professor at the University of California, who has studied the lake. “However, one or a series of floods won’t have a long-term influence. The main issue in the basin is that the water demand is much higher than the renewable water in the basin. If the water demand in the basin is not managed, after a while the lake will continue to dry out. And the situation remains really worrying.”
1. How does the author begin the text?’A.By giving an example. | B.By describing an event. |
C.By making a comparison. | D.By expressing an opinion. |
A.Water overuse and inefficiency in industry. |
B.Massive flooding. |
C.Rising rainfall and declining temperature. |
D.New dams and irrigation projects. |
A.It used to be the second largest lake in the world. |
B.It had 2000 miles in depth in the 1990s. |
C.It is linked to a new dam by a bridge. |
D.It has regained some water level in the past few years. |
A.Pessimistic. | B.Hopeful. | C.Uncaring. | D.Unclear. |
【推荐2】A study has shown how ecotourism in the Philippines has changed people’s attitudes towards marine (海洋的) conservation (保护).
Researchers from the University of Victoria and other institutes in Philippines visited three sites where tourists pay to swim with whale sharks in the wild. They interviewed a range of locals in Oslob, Donsol and Pintuyan, including fishers and ex-whale shark hunters. At Oslob, the largest of the three sites, people were more likely to speak about the resulting improvements to their quality of life and an increase in job opportunities. At the smaller, less profitable sites, responses were more likely to be about the changes in how people behaved towards the whale sharks.
Dr. Jackie Ziegler, leader of the team of researchers, said, “Many of the people reported they now care about and value whale sharks because of tourism activities. They also expressed the community’s emotional connection to the species and the strong need to protect them. Before the introduction of tourist activities, most of the locals admitted harming the sharks by hitting them with stones or riding them.” In terms of attitudes towards the wider marine environment, the majority of respondents now actively encourage others to care for the ocean and they also use more sustainable (可持续的) fishing practices.
The study also acknowledged the possible negative effects of tourism on the marine environment, such as effects on the health of local coral reefs (珊瑚礁) and of the sharks. It concluded that further studies were needed to assess these effects before firm conclusion could be drawn on the positive effect of whale sharks tourism on ocean conservation.
Nevertheless, the researchers say their work suggests ecotourism can be an effective means of strengthening protection. “Bringing in the views of the local tour operation to the study was necessary in uncovering the true effect of whale shark tourism and the wider benefit to the ocean conservation in the Philippines,” Dr Ziegler added.
1. When interviewed, local people did NOT talk about __________?A.Improvement of life. | B.Behaviours towards sharks. |
C.Increases of work chances. | D.Relationships between people. |
A.Protective. | B.Satisfying. | C.Unsustainable. | D.Suitable. |
A.Improve local living conditions. |
B.Draw a firm conclusion about the effect. |
C.Encourage fishers to hunt more whale sharks. |
D.Assess possible negative effects tourism may bring. |
A.Ecotourism Transforms Locals’ Attitudes to Marine Conservation. |
B.Ecotourism Does Much Good to Marine Life as Before. |
C.Marine ecotourism Gives Rise to a New Kind of Business. |
D.Ecotourism Has Brought Large Benefits to People. |
【推荐3】The "30 by 30" campaign to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, supported by more than 70 nations, is known mostly for ambition and few achievements so far. Just 7% of the seas are protected and only 2.7% are highly protected.
Setting aside nearly a third of the oceans, the fishers say, is an idea developing nations in South America and elsewhere can hardly afford. That argument against a large expansion of sea protected areas is heard around the world, and the gap between conservationists and fishers has grown wider as fish population declines and the appetite for seafood grows along with the global population.
Research published recently aims to dramatically change that situation. The study suggests that protecting 30% of the oceans not only could restore biodiversity to ocean habitats, it could also increase the annual global catch by eight million tons about 10% of the catch today. After all, the only way to get more food from the ocean is to protect more. And, as a bonus, it would provide a "cheap, natural solution" to climate change by reducing the amount of seafloor carbon emitted (排放)into the seas by fishing trawlers (拖网渔船).
In the study, an international team of 26 scientists analyzed the world's unprotected ocean waters to calculate which are threatened by overfishing, habitat destruction, and release of carbon. The team then mapped locations globally where protections would provide the greatest benefits to fish resources, biodiversity and climate.
The findings can be used by nations to address the three related aspects separately or in combination. Fully addressing all three will require that at least 30% of the oceans be protected, but nations can still realize significant protections by focusing on key areas, and global cooperation to strategically locate protected areas can be nearly twice as effective as individual nations working alone.
1. What are the first two paragraphs mainly about?A.The wide support for the campaign. |
B.The challenges of protecting the oceans. |
C.The worldwide efforts to resist illegal fishing. |
D.The achievements in reducing ocean pollution. |
A.It keeps sea species stable. |
B.It improves the global climate. |
C.It helps to increase fish population. |
D.It removes carbon from the seafloor. |
A.To discuss the methods of fishing sustainably. |
B.To stress the importance of biological balance. |
C.To appeal for building ocean protected areas globally. |
D.To introduce the background of the "30 by 30" campaign. |
A.Environment. | B.Geography. | C.Travel. | D.Economy. |