组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 语篇范围 > 体裁分类 > 说明文
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:342 题号:9488993

How’s this for a coincidence (巧合)? Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born in the same year, on the same day: Feb. 12, 1809. Although people hardly think of them together, yet we want to say that they belong together. It’s not just because they were both great men, and not because they happen to live at the same time. Rather, it’s because the scientist and the politician each started a revolution that changed the world.

They were both revolutionaries in the sense that both men changed the realities when they were born. They seem and sound modern to us, because the world they left behind them is more or less the one we still live in. So, considering the joint greatness of their contributions and the coincidence of their birthdays ---- it is hard to wonder: who was the greatest man? It’s an apples and oranges--- or Superman vs. Santa---comparison. But if you limit the question to influence, very quickly the balance tips in Lincoln’s favor.

As great as his book on evolution is, it does no harm to remember that Darwin hurried to publish The Origin of Species because he thought he was about to be scooped (抢先) by his fellow naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace. Lincoln, however, is unique. True, his election as the president did cause the recession (衰退) and the war, but that war seems certain to happen---not a question of if but when. Certainly we know what happened after he was murdered: Reconstruction was organized and then abandoned, leaving the issue of racial (种族的) equality unsolved for another century.

Surely we should not deny Darwin’s accomplishment. But their same birthdays gave us a great opportunity to observe these men of their time.

1. Why does the author say Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln belong together?
A.They were born on the same day.
B.They lived in the same period of time.
C.They started revolutions changing the world.
D.They were both great men in the history.
2. What does the author mean by “an apples and oranges---- or Superman vs. Santa --comparison” ?
A.It is hard to tell which one is greater as they are both outstanding.
B.The comparison between Darwin and Lincoln is easy and obvious.
C.It is difficult to compare them as they are as famous as Superman and Santa.
D.There is no point comparing them because they were born on the same day.
3. Lincoln’s contribution to the world can be best described as__________
A.narrow.B.aggressive.
C.independent.D.ground-breaking.
4. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Lincoln’s success in election caused reconstruction.
B.Lincoln had tried to solve the racial problem.
C.Darwin was unique compared with Lincoln.
D.Darwin’s theory is similar to Lincoln’s belief.
【知识点】 说明文 科学家 政治家

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约510词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。作者通过这篇文章向我们介绍了未来服装店里的试衣间的镜子可以巧妙的调整你的影像,让你看上去很漂亮并且感觉到很开心,从而使你喜欢上你看到的东西,这就是日本东京大学的繁熊吉田和同事开发的情绪系统背后的理念,这个系统能通过呈现给你一个你自己的笑脸或者哭脸来控制你的情绪以及个人偏好。

【推荐1】“Does my smile look big in this?” Future fitting-room mirrors in clothing stores could subtly adjust your reflection to make you look—and hence feel—happier, encouraging you to like what you see.

That’s the idea behind the Emotion Evoking System developed by Shigeo Yoshida and colleagues at the University of Tokyo in Japan. The system can manipulate, or in other words, control your emotions and personal preferences by presenting you with an image of your own smiling or frowning face.

The principle that physiological changes can drive emotional ones—that laughter comes before happiness, rather than the other way around—is a well-established idea.

The researchers wanted to see if this idea could be used to build a computer system that manipulates how you feel. The system works by presenting the user with a web-camera image of his or her face—as if they were looking in a mirror. The image is then subtly altered with software, turning the corners of the mouth up or down and changing the area around the eyes, so that the person appears to smile or frown.

Without telling them the aim of the study, the team recruited 21 volunteers and asked them to sit in front of the screen while performing an unrelated task. When the task was complete, the participants rated how they felt. When the faces on screen appeared to smile, people reported that they felt happier. On the other hand, when the image was given a sad expression, they reported feeling less happy.

Yoshida and his colleagues tested whether manipulating the volunteers’ emotional state would influence their preferences. Each person was given a scarf to wear and again presented with the altered webcam image. The volunteers that saw themselves smiling while wearing the scarf were more likely to report that they liked it, and those that saw themselves not smiling were less likely.

The system could be used to manipulate consumers’ impressions of products, said the researchers. For example, mirrors in clothing-store fitting rooms could be replaced with screens showing altered reflections. They also suggest people may be more likely to find clothes attractive if they see themselves looking happy while trying them on.

“It’s certainly an interesting area,” says Chris Creed at the University of Birmingham, UK. But he notes that using such technology in a shop would be harder than in the lab, because people will use a wide range of expressions. “Attempting to make slight differences to these and ensuring that the reflected image looks believable would be much more challenging,” he says.

Of course, there are also important moral questions surrounding such subtly manipulative technology. “You could argue that if it makes people happy, what harm is it doing?” says Creed. “But I can imagine that many people may feel manipulated, uncomfortable and cheated if they found out.”

1. What’s the main purpose of the Emotion Evoking System?
A.To see whether laughter comes before happiness.
B.To see whether one’s facial expressions can be altered.
C.To see whether one’s feeling can be unconsciously affected.
D.To replace the mirrors in future clothing-store fitting rooms.
2. What can we learn about the web-camera image in the study?
A.It gave the volunteers a false image.
B.It attempted to make the volunteers feel happier.
C.It recorded the volunteers’ performance in the task.
D.It beautified the volunteers’ appearance in the mirror.
3. What does Creed mention as a limitation of the technology?
A.It only works in clothing stores.
B.It only makes subtle changes to people’s expressions.
C.It only changes the areas around the mouth and the eyes.
D.It only deals with a limited number of facial expressions.
4. What does Creed’s comment on the moral issues with this technology imply?
A.Nothing is more important than happiness.
B.Technology is unable to manipulate people.
C.People should neglect the harm of the technology.
D.People should have the right to make decisions independently.
2022-05-24更新 | 412次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了研究表明较弱的社会关系比较强的社会关系对工作流动性有更大的有利影响,鼓励求职者将自己的联系范围扩大到直接的朋友和同事之外。文章解释了研究开展的经过以及研究发现带来的启示。

【推荐2】What if your next job is just a weak tie away? A recent study, conducted by a team from Stanford University and LinkedIn, revealed that weaker social connections have a greater beneficial effect on job mobility (流动性) than stronger ties. Stanford Professor Erik Bryson suggests a practical outcome of this study is to encourage job seekers to expand their reach beyond immediate friends and colleagues. Weak ties, he explains, often provide more unique, beneficial information and connections.

The advantage of weak ties theory is based on the idea that weak ties allow distant group of people to access novel information that can lead to new opportunities and innovation. Weak ties are more likely to introduce new job information to a wider social network.

The research team conducted a five-year experimental study with LinkedIn, involving 20 million global participants and 600,000 new jobs created. Using LinkedIn’s “People You May Know” (PYMK) algorithm (算法), the researchers tested the weak tie theory’s impact on the job market. The team randomly assigned LinkedIn users to receive either more weak or strong tie recommendations from the PYMK algorithm, then tracked the labor mobility of these groups over five years.

Their findings confirm that weaker ties enhance job mobility. Besides, the researchers looked at differences across industries and found that adding weak ties creates significantly more job opportunities in digital and high-tech industries. “This may reflect the fact that there is more rapid change and need for novel information and connections in those industries,” Bryson said.

He points out that the traditional methods used by policymakers to analyze labor markets are quickly becoming outdated. “They need to recognize that the labor market, like all aspects of the economy, is being digitized,” Bryson said. “It is important that we understand how the algorithms used by digital platforms like LinkedIn impact the labor market.”

1. According to paragraph 1, what should job seekers do?
A.Expand network to include weak ties.B.Limit the search to their current industry.
C.Strengthen connections with close friends.D.Rely on strong connections for opportunities.
2. How did the researchers test the weak tie theory?
A.By carrying out on line surveys.B.By interviewing LinkedIn employers.
C.By tracking user data and job mobility.D.By conducting a large-scale job fair.
3. What can we learn about digital and high-tech industries?
A.They are fast-paced and value novelty.B.They cause weak ties among employees.
C.Strong ties are the main source of mobility.D.Weak ties do not contribute to job mobility.
4. What might Bryson advise policymakers to do?
A.Prioritize traditional methods only.B.Ignore the impact of digital platforms.
C.Recognize the influence of digitization.D.Understand the rules on digital platforms.
2024-01-09更新 | 125次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了拍太多照片不利于人们铭记瞬间的美好,作者鼓励人们应有目地、有计划地拍照。

【推荐3】The sun is setting, brightening your kids’ faces as they play in the waves. You reach for your phone for this perfect moment. But before you do, here’s a bit of surprising science: Taking photos is not the perfect way to keep memory as you think.

Taking too many pictures could actually harm the brain’s ability to keep memories, says Elizabeth Loftus, a psychology professor at the University of California, Irvine. So we get the photo but kind of lose the memory.

Photography “outsources” memories. It works in two ways: We either shake off the responsibility of remembering moments when taking pictures, or we’re so distracted (分散注意力的) by the process that we miss the moment altogether.

The first explanation is the loss of memory. People know that their camera is recording that moment, so they don’t try to remember. Similarly, if you write down someone’s phone number, you’re less likely to remember it offhand because your brain tells you there’s just no need. That’s all well and good — until that piece of paper goes missing.

The other is distraction. We’re distracted by the process of taking a photo—how we hold our phone, composing the photo, such as smiling faces, the background to our liking and clear image, all of which uses up our attention that could otherwise help us memorize.

However, taking photos can benefit memory — when done mindfully. While taking a photo may be distracting, the act of preparation by focusing on visual details around has some upsides. When people take the time to zoom in (拉近镜头) on specific things, memories become strengthened.

Another benefit is that we recall moments more accurately with the photos. Memory has been reshaped with the help of new information and new experiences. Thus, photos or videos help us recall moments as if they really happened.

Memories die away without a visual record backing them up. Therefore, a photo is an excellent tool to help remember when done purposefully, which is worth exploring further.

1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?
A.To call on readers not to take photos.B.To introduce the topic.
C.To show the interest in taking photos.D.To make us think of similar experience.
2. Why does photography “outsource” memories?
A.People depend more on photos to remember than their brains.
B.Many sources influence people’s memories during photo-taking.
C.Photos are more detailed than memories.
D.Taking photos is helpful for us to memorize.
3. What may likely be discussed next?
A.Situations when taking photos is better.
B.How to use photo-taking to memorize better.
C.When distraction is most likely to happen.
D.How to stay focused while taking photos.
4. Which of the following could be the best title for the text?
A.The Fewer Photos We Take, the Better We Will Remember.
B.Too Many Photos Taken Results in Poor Memories.
C.Photography Does Help to Memories.
D.Remember the Moment and Take Photos Properly.
2023-11-21更新 | 114次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般