How’s this for a coincidence (巧合)? Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born in the same year, on the same day: Feb. 12, 1809. Although people hardly think of them together, yet we want to say that they belong together. It’s not just because they were both great men, and not because they happen to live at the same time. Rather, it’s because the scientist and the politician each started a revolution that changed the world.
They were both revolutionaries in the sense that both men changed the realities when they were born. They seem and sound modern to us, because the world they left behind them is more or less the one we still live in. So, considering the joint greatness of their contributions and the coincidence of their birthdays ---- it is hard to wonder: who was the greatest man? It’s an apples and oranges--- or Superman vs. Santa---comparison. But if you limit the question to influence, very quickly the balance tips in Lincoln’s favor.
As great as his book on evolution is, it does no harm to remember that Darwin hurried to publish The Origin of Species because he thought he was about to be scooped (抢先) by his fellow naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace. Lincoln, however, is unique. True, his election as the president did cause the recession (衰退) and the war, but that war seems certain to happen---not a question of if but when. Certainly we know what happened after he was murdered: Reconstruction was organized and then abandoned, leaving the issue of racial (种族的) equality unsolved for another century.
Surely we should not deny Darwin’s accomplishment. But their same birthdays gave us a great opportunity to observe these men of their time.
1. Why does the author say Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln belong together?A.They were born on the same day. |
B.They lived in the same period of time. |
C.They started revolutions changing the world. |
D.They were both great men in the history. |
A.It is hard to tell which one is greater as they are both outstanding. |
B.The comparison between Darwin and Lincoln is easy and obvious. |
C.It is difficult to compare them as they are as famous as Superman and Santa. |
D.There is no point comparing them because they were born on the same day. |
A.narrow. | B.aggressive. |
C.independent. | D.ground-breaking. |
A.Lincoln’s success in election caused reconstruction. |
B.Lincoln had tried to solve the racial problem. |
C.Darwin was unique compared with Lincoln. |
D.Darwin’s theory is similar to Lincoln’s belief. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】“Does my smile look big in this?” Future fitting-room mirrors in clothing stores could subtly adjust your reflection to make you look—and hence feel—happier, encouraging you to like what you see.
That’s the idea behind the Emotion Evoking System developed by Shigeo Yoshida and colleagues at the University of Tokyo in Japan. The system can manipulate, or in other words, control your emotions and personal preferences by presenting you with an image of your own smiling or frowning face.
The principle that physiological changes can drive emotional ones—that laughter comes before happiness, rather than the other way around—is a well-established idea.
The researchers wanted to see if this idea could be used to build a computer system that manipulates how you feel. The system works by presenting the user with a web-camera image of his or her face—as if they were looking in a mirror. The image is then subtly altered with software, turning the corners of the mouth up or down and changing the area around the eyes, so that the person appears to smile or frown.
Without telling them the aim of the study, the team recruited 21 volunteers and asked them to sit in front of the screen while performing an unrelated task. When the task was complete, the participants rated how they felt. When the faces on screen appeared to smile, people reported that they felt happier. On the other hand, when the image was given a sad expression, they reported feeling less happy.
Yoshida and his colleagues tested whether manipulating the volunteers’ emotional state would influence their preferences. Each person was given a scarf to wear and again presented with the altered webcam image. The volunteers that saw themselves smiling while wearing the scarf were more likely to report that they liked it, and those that saw themselves not smiling were less likely.
The system could be used to manipulate consumers’ impressions of products, said the researchers. For example, mirrors in clothing-store fitting rooms could be replaced with screens showing altered reflections. They also suggest people may be more likely to find clothes attractive if they see themselves looking happy while trying them on.
“It’s certainly an interesting area,” says Chris Creed at the University of Birmingham, UK. But he notes that using such technology in a shop would be harder than in the lab, because people will use a wide range of expressions. “Attempting to make slight differences to these and ensuring that the reflected image looks believable would be much more challenging,” he says.
Of course, there are also important moral questions surrounding such subtly manipulative technology. “You could argue that if it makes people happy, what harm is it doing?” says Creed. “But I can imagine that many people may feel manipulated, uncomfortable and cheated if they found out.”
1. What’s the main purpose of the Emotion Evoking System?A.To see whether laughter comes before happiness. |
B.To see whether one’s facial expressions can be altered. |
C.To see whether one’s feeling can be unconsciously affected. |
D.To replace the mirrors in future clothing-store fitting rooms. |
A.It gave the volunteers a false image. |
B.It attempted to make the volunteers feel happier. |
C.It recorded the volunteers’ performance in the task. |
D.It beautified the volunteers’ appearance in the mirror. |
A.It only works in clothing stores. |
B.It only makes subtle changes to people’s expressions. |
C.It only changes the areas around the mouth and the eyes. |
D.It only deals with a limited number of facial expressions. |
A.Nothing is more important than happiness. |
B.Technology is unable to manipulate people. |
C.People should neglect the harm of the technology. |
D.People should have the right to make decisions independently. |
【推荐2】What if your next job is just a weak tie away? A recent study, conducted by a team from Stanford University and LinkedIn, revealed that weaker social connections have a greater beneficial effect on job mobility (流动性) than stronger ties. Stanford Professor Erik Bryson suggests a practical outcome of this study is to encourage job seekers to expand their reach beyond immediate friends and colleagues. Weak ties, he explains, often provide more unique, beneficial information and connections.
The advantage of weak ties theory is based on the idea that weak ties allow distant group of people to access novel information that can lead to new opportunities and innovation. Weak ties are more likely to introduce new job information to a wider social network.
The research team conducted a five-year experimental study with LinkedIn, involving 20 million global participants and 600,000 new jobs created. Using LinkedIn’s “People You May Know” (PYMK) algorithm (算法), the researchers tested the weak tie theory’s impact on the job market. The team randomly assigned LinkedIn users to receive either more weak or strong tie recommendations from the PYMK algorithm, then tracked the labor mobility of these groups over five years.
Their findings confirm that weaker ties enhance job mobility. Besides, the researchers looked at differences across industries and found that adding weak ties creates significantly more job opportunities in digital and high-tech industries. “This may reflect the fact that there is more rapid change and need for novel information and connections in those industries,” Bryson said.
He points out that the traditional methods used by policymakers to analyze labor markets are quickly becoming outdated. “They need to recognize that the labor market, like all aspects of the economy, is being digitized,” Bryson said. “It is important that we understand how the algorithms used by digital platforms like LinkedIn impact the labor market.”
1. According to paragraph 1, what should job seekers do?A.Expand network to include weak ties. | B.Limit the search to their current industry. |
C.Strengthen connections with close friends. | D.Rely on strong connections for opportunities. |
A.By carrying out on line surveys. | B.By interviewing LinkedIn employers. |
C.By tracking user data and job mobility. | D.By conducting a large-scale job fair. |
A.They are fast-paced and value novelty. | B.They cause weak ties among employees. |
C.Strong ties are the main source of mobility. | D.Weak ties do not contribute to job mobility. |
A.Prioritize traditional methods only. | B.Ignore the impact of digital platforms. |
C.Recognize the influence of digitization. | D.Understand the rules on digital platforms. |
【推荐3】The sun is setting, brightening your kids’ faces as they play in the waves. You reach for your phone for this perfect moment. But before you do, here’s a bit of surprising science: Taking photos is not the perfect way to keep memory as you think.
Taking too many pictures could actually harm the brain’s ability to keep memories, says Elizabeth Loftus, a psychology professor at the University of California, Irvine. So we get the photo but kind of lose the memory.
Photography “outsources” memories. It works in two ways: We either shake off the responsibility of remembering moments when taking pictures, or we’re so distracted (分散注意力的) by the process that we miss the moment altogether.
The first explanation is the loss of memory. People know that their camera is recording that moment, so they don’t try to remember. Similarly, if you write down someone’s phone number, you’re less likely to remember it offhand because your brain tells you there’s just no need. That’s all well and good — until that piece of paper goes missing.
The other is distraction. We’re distracted by the process of taking a photo—how we hold our phone, composing the photo, such as smiling faces, the background to our liking and clear image, all of which uses up our attention that could otherwise help us memorize.
However, taking photos can benefit memory — when done mindfully. While taking a photo may be distracting, the act of preparation by focusing on visual details around has some upsides. When people take the time to zoom in (拉近镜头) on specific things, memories become strengthened.
Another benefit is that we recall moments more accurately with the photos. Memory has been reshaped with the help of new information and new experiences. Thus, photos or videos help us recall moments as if they really happened.
Memories die away without a visual record backing them up. Therefore, a photo is an excellent tool to help remember when done purposefully, which is worth exploring further.
1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To call on readers not to take photos. | B.To introduce the topic. |
C.To show the interest in taking photos. | D.To make us think of similar experience. |
A.People depend more on photos to remember than their brains. |
B.Many sources influence people’s memories during photo-taking. |
C.Photos are more detailed than memories. |
D.Taking photos is helpful for us to memorize. |
A.Situations when taking photos is better. |
B.How to use photo-taking to memorize better. |
C.When distraction is most likely to happen. |
D.How to stay focused while taking photos. |
A.The Fewer Photos We Take, the Better We Will Remember. |
B.Too Many Photos Taken Results in Poor Memories. |
C.Photography Does Help to Memories. |
D.Remember the Moment and Take Photos Properly. |
【推荐1】Though most people know Benjamin Franklin for his political contributions, he was well-known in his time as a scientist and an inventor. As for his kite-and-key experiment, most people are aware of the version in which the metal key acted as a lightning rod (避雷针), and Franklin “discovered” electricity when lightning struck his kite.
“Franklin published a statement about the experiment in The Pennsylvania Gazette, the newspaper he published, on October 19, 1752,” Page Talbott, author and editor of Benjamin Franklin: In Search of a Better World, said. “Franklin referred to the experiment in his autobiography, and others in Europe wrote about it as well.” Obviously, the experiment appeared in the 1767 book The History and Present Status of Electricity by Joseph Priestley, an English chemist. Priestley heard about the kite-and-key experiment from Franklin himself around 15 years after the experiment, and in his book, he wrote that it occurred during June 1752. However, exactly when Franklin carried out the experiment is a matter of debate.
Some historians doubt whether Franklin actually did the experiment himself, or only outlined its possibility. In his book Bolt of Fate: Benjamin Franklin and His Electric Kite Hoax, author Tom Tucker stated that Franklin wanted to thwart (阻碍) William Watson, an outstanding electrical experimenter. Watson had spoiled (破坏) the publication of some of Franklin’s previous reports and had laughed at his experiments in the Royal Society, Tucker wrote. Could Franklin have felt pressured to invent the kite story to get back at (报复) Watson?
Tucker also noted that Franklin’s description of his experiment in The Pennsylvania Gazette used the future and conditional tense: “As soon as any of the Thunder Clouds come over the Kite, the pointed Wire will draw the Electric Fire from them...” Franklin could have simply been saying that the experiment could, in theory, be performed. Considering that his statement has a few missing details like the date, time, or location, he probably did not perform the experiment himself.
However, some historians believed that the experiment was carried out, pointing to Franklin’s great respect for scientific pursuits (追求). Some experts also point to the fact that Priestley specified the month when Franklin performed his experiment, suggesting Franklin must have given him exact details directly.
1. What can we learn about the book by Joseph Priestley?A.It mentioned the exact date of Franklin’s experiment. |
B.It caused heated debate over Franklin’s experiment. |
C.It gave a first-hand account of Franklin’s experiment. |
D.It included Talbott’s comments on Franklin’s experiment. |
A.William Watson might think poorly of Franklin’s work. |
B.William Watson might be impressed by Franklin’s kite story. |
C.William Watson contributed to Franklin’s previous reports. |
D.William Watson pressured Franklin to make his experiment public. |
A.To show the popularity of Franklin’s experiment. |
B.To expose the truth that Franklin tried to cover up. |
C.To give evidence that Franklin didn’t do the experiment. |
D.To explain the theoretical foundation of Franklin’s experiment. |
A.His autobiography. | B.His scientific spirit. |
C.His detailed description. | D.His relationship with Priestley. |
【推荐2】Compared with solar and wind energy, which are booming, tidal (潮汐的) power is a loser in the clean-energy competition. But if you did want to build a tidal power station, there are few better sites than the mouth of the River Severn, in Britain. Its tidal range, the difference in depth between high and low tides, of around 15 metres is among the largest in the world.
Engineers and governments have been toying with the idea since at least 1925. But none of the suggested projects has materialised. Price is one objection. A study thought that tidal energy might cost between £216 and £368 ($306-521) per MWh of electricity by 2025, compared with £58-75 for seagoing wind turbines (轮机) and £55-76 for solar panels. Environmentalists also worry that any plant would change the tides, making life harder for wildlife.
An engineer called Rod Rainey thinks he has a way around both problems. He plans to replace the conventional turbines of previous plans with a much older technology. Specifically, he plans to span (横跨) the river mouth with a line of water wheels. This is a design that dates back to the early days of the Industrial Revolution. Examples can be found fixed to the sides of old watermills (水磨).
But there would be nothing old-fashioned about Mr Rainey’s wheels. Thirty metres high and sixty wide, they would be made from ordinary steel. Two hundred and fifty of them, along with the supporting structures, would be floated into place and secured to the seabed, creating a line 15km long. Together, they could supply power at an avenge ate of 4GW. That is about as much as two biggish nuclear power stations would manage. Substituting one of the wheels with a set of locks would provide a shipping channel about twice the width of Panama Canal, permitting upstream ports such as Avonmouth and Cardiff to continue operating.
1. What is special about the mouth of the River Seven?A.The tidal range there is about 15 meters. |
B.It has the largest tidal range in the world. |
C.The tidal power station has been built there. |
D.Its power plant makes life harder for wildlife. |
A.Opposed. | B.Supportive. |
C.Controversial. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Support. | B.Transportation. |
C.Securing wheels. | D.Producing electricity. |
A.Rainey invented turbines. |
B.Rainey’s tidal power station. |
C.Tidal power in the River Seven. |
D.An old idea might be made practical. |
【推荐3】Two “stolen” notebooks, Notebooks B and C, written by Charles Darwin have been mysteriously returned to Cambridge University on March 9th, 22 years after they were last seen, but who returned them is a real whodunit. They were left anonymously(匿名地) in a bright pink gift bag containing the original blue box the notebooks were kept in and a plain brown envelope, on which was printed a short message: “Librarian, Happy Easter X.”
With an action plan to use advanced information technology to preserve important culture heritage, the notebooks were originally removed from the Special Collections Strong Rooms — where the rarest and most valuable items are kept — for photography to take place at the library in September 2000, with the photography request completed in November 2000. During a following routine check in January 2001, it was found that the small box containing the two notebooks had not been returned to its proper place.
For many years, previous university librarians believed that the notebooks had been misplaced in the vast storerooms and collections of Cambridge University Library. Despite a number of searches over the years, they remained undiscovered. At the start of 2020, a new search — the largest in the library’s history – was arranged by the librarian Dr Gardner involving specialist staff assigned to search specific zones of the library’s storage facilities. However, this failed to locate the notebooks, leading to the conclusion, with the help of national experts in cultural heritage theft and recovery, that they had likely been stolen.
In July 1837, Charles Darwin wrote at the top of the page of one of his notebooks, “I think”. Then he drew a sketch(草图)of a tree, attempting to pose to himself the question about what is the origin of species. More than 20 years later, Darwin published On the Origin of Species. Notebooks B and C provide an extraordinary insight into Darwin’s search for the solution to what public in those days had called “that mystery of mysteries”, the origin of new species.
1. What can we learn from the passage?A.Notebooks B and C used to be kept in a plain brown envelope. |
B.It took over 3 months to complete the photography in the library. |
C.At first the librarians believed the notebooks hadn’t been stolen. |
D.Charles Darwin searched the origin of trees in his notebooks. |
A.They were no longer regarded as the rarest and most valuable items. |
B.They had to make room for the photography of special collections. |
C.They would be presented for a photography exhibition in the library. |
D.They needed to be recorded by taking photos for better preservation. |
A.After completing the photography. |
B.After routine check in January 2001. |
C.After the largest search in history. |
D.After discovering the returned notebooks. |
A.A textbook. | B.A newspaper. |
C.A science report. | D.An introduction to a book. |
【推荐1】Napoleon, as a character in Tolstoy's War and Peace, is more than once described as having "fat little hands". Nor does he "sit well or firmly on the horse". He is said to be " undersized", with "short legs" and a "round stomach". The issue here is not the accuracy of Tolstoy's description — it seems not that far off from historical accounts — but his choice of facts: other things that could be said of the man are not said. We are meant to understand the difference of a warring commander in the body of a fat little Frenchman. Tolstoy's Napoleon could be any man wandering in the streets and putting a little of powdered tobacco up his nose — and that is the point.
It is a way the novelist uses to show the moral nature of a character. And it turns out that, as Tolstoy has it, Napoleon is a crazy man. In a scene in Book Three of War and Peace, the wars having reached the critical year of 1812, Napoleon receives a representative from the Tsar (沙皇), who has come with peace terms. Napoleon is very angry: doesn't he have more army? He, not the Tsar, is the one to make the terms. He will destroy all of Europe if his army is stopped. "That is what you will have gained by engaging me in the war!" he shouts. And then,Tolstoy writes, Napoleon "walked silently several times up and down the room, his fat shoulders moving quickly."
Still later, after reviewing his army amid cheering crowds, Napoleon invites the shaken Russian to dinner. "He raised his hand to the Russian's... face," Tolstoy writes, and "taking him by the ear, pulled it gently... " To have one's ear pulled by the Emperor was considered the greatest honor and mark of favor at the French court. "Well, well, why don't you say anything?" said he, as if it was ridiculous in his presence to respect any one but himself, Napoleon.
Tolstoy did his research, but the composition is his own.
1. How is Tolstoy's description of Napoleon in War and Peace?A.It's far from the historical facts. |
B.It's based on the Russian history. |
C.It's based on his selection of facts. |
D.It's not related to historical details. |
A.Because he thinks he should be the one to make the peace terms |
B.Because the Tsar's peace terms are hard to accept. |
C.Because the Russians stop his military movement |
D.Because he doesn't have any more army to fight with. |
A.ill-mannered in dealing with foreign guests |
B.fond of showing off his iron will |
C.determined in destroying all of Europe |
D.crazy for power and respect |
A.A writer doesn't have to be faithful to his findings. |
B.A writer may write about a hero in his own way. |
C.A writer may not be responsible for what he writes. |
D.A writer has hardly any freedom to show his feelings. |
【推荐2】It's extremely rare to find characters that excited such enthusiasm in the British population as Margaret Thatcher once did. There was no middle ground, no sitting on the fence and that was just the way she like it.
Back in the 70s—thanks to a combination of incapable Conservative and Labour prime ministers (all male) and the unelected and militant union leaders who didn't always have their members' best interests at heart—the country was on its knees, virtually bankrupt and covered in uncollected rubbish due to a massive public sector strike.
It was no wonder the people saw hope in Margaret Thatcher and accordingly voted her into power when, depending on where you were standing at the time, she either saved Great Britain or ruined people's lives.
Personally, for me it was the former and I could see how she improved the prospects and desires of the working classes to better themselves. I was one of them. At the same time I can also understand why people in the North of England who suffered after the close of the last remaining pits, factories and manufacturing industries didn’t see it that way.
But what I don't understand is how some folk think it’s OK to be so openly disrespectful in her death just because it's her.
The so-called ''death parties'' are sickening, attended as they mostly are by people who probably don't quite know who she is let alone who lived under her rule.
The Brighton teacher Romany Blythe, who organized one of the parties, actually compared her to Hitler. But Margaret didn't devote herself to genocide—murder of a whole race, neither did she attempt to take over Europe and control its people. She only went to war once in order to protect a British outpost in the South Atlantic after it was threatened and invaded by the Argentineans. And there lies the real reason I think she inspires such unreasonable hatred—because she was a woman. She clearly had no choice but to get the country back on its feet. Not one of them has half the courage to get us out of the current mess we’re in. They're all too bothered about being popular, so they spend all their time trying to please all of the people all of the time. It's just not possible—as the lady herself proved.
1. What kind of person can we see Margaret Thatcher as in the passage?A.Consistent(一致的) | B.Conservative(保守的) |
C.Controversial(有争议的) | D.Considerate(体贴周到的) |
A.Most Argentineans | B.Some of working classes |
C.Former prime ministers | D.Death party members |
A.she launched the war against Argentina |
B.she started a massive public sector strike |
C.they believe she devoted herself to genocide |
D.they think she brought them a miserable life |
A.Margaret Thatcher was popular among workers throughout the country. |
B.Margaret Thatcher did not succeed in getting the country back on its feet |
C.none of those who hate Margaret Thatcher can rule Britain as well as she did |
D.it is understandable why disrespect is shown to Margaret Thatcher on her death |
A.Incapable politicians. | B.Death party organizers. |
C.Women of courage. | D.Followers of Hitler. |
A.defend Margaret Thatcher against blames on her |
B.honour Margaret Thatcher and her achievements |
C.call on people to mourn for Margaret Thatcher |
D.show different opinions about Margaret Thatcher |
The historians chose Abraham Lincoln as American’s greatest president.He had also been named best president in a similar study in 2000.Abraham Lincoln was the president who led the nation through the Civil War in the 1860s, and was able to unite it in the end.He also took the first steps to abolish slavery in America.
Edna Medford, a professor of history at Howard University in Washington, D.C., was an adviser on this study and the earlier one.She says Abraham Lincoln is seen to represent the values the nation most honors, such as truthfulness, moderation, and respect for human rights.
The historians put American’s first president, George Washington, second on the list, while Franklin D.Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, and Harry Truman follow in that order.John F.Kennedy, the country’s first Roman Catholic president, is sixth on the list.Like Lincoln, Kennedy was murdered while in office.
Among recent presidents, Ronald Reagan was named the tenth best and Bill Clinton rated fifteenth, while the historians put former president George W.Bush at number thirty-six.His father, George H.W.Bush, did much better, being placed at number eighteen.
1. We learn from the text that ___________.
A.this is the second time that Abraham Lincoln has been chosen as America’s greatest president |
B.Edna Medford didn’t take part in the study conducted in 2000. |
C.George H.W.Bush was thought to have done worse in office than George W.Bush |
D.Harry Truman was rated the fourth-best president by the study |
a.Being able to persuade the public
b.Taking effective measures during a financial crisis.
c.Balancing home life and career.
d.Pursuing equal justice for all.
A.a,b,c | B.b,c,d | C.a,b,d | D.a,c,d |
A.John F.Kennedy | B.George Washington |
C.Bill Clinton | D.George W.Bush |
A.the ten qualities a great president needs |
B.a study of American presidents |
C.the values the American nation honors most |
D.how Abraham Lincoln improved the country |