1 . Have you ever come out of a steamy hot shower and tried to look at your reflection in the mirror when it’s completely steamed and fogged up? I often think that is how we tend to view our beauty—through fogged up mirrors. We are seeing ourselves but the picture isn’t exactly clear! The mirrors have been fogged up through different life experiences and memories as we have grown up, and now blend together to form our own definition of our beauty.
The first mirror is formed as a young child and is often based on what was said about us from our parents and those around us. I remember being told that I was a cute child, so that when I got a little older and was around six or seven and another child tried to tell me I was ugly- everything within me rose up against the statement because my self-belief in what my parents had said stood strong.
The second mirror is the mirror of adolescence, those formative years when we are pushed into the big wild world and out of the protection of home. As a teenager I went to a boarding school, and I was one of the only two black people in the entire school. Children being naturally curious, I felt like I was asked a million and one different questions about both my hair and skin tone- -and I don’t think there has ever been a time when I have been more acutely aware of my appearance, which in turn opened up the door for me to question how I looked and to thankfully embrace my differences.
The final mirror comes from socially constructed ideas of beauty. We are often faced with numerous images in the media, popular culture, society, peers and social media, which can create a false ideal of beauty in our eyes. We tend to compare ourselves to those ideals and use it as some sort of margin (差值) of measurement.
However, real beauty comes from within. It is acceptance of yourself, perceived flaws and all. You are a masterpiece, a unique blend of genes and life experiences. It’s essential to appreciate yourself like any other work of art or natural wonder, without judgement. Maybe it’s time to create a fourth mirror, a new mirror that is wiped clean and is minus the fog of comparisons, accusations, judgments and expectations.
1. What do the fogged-up mirrors represent according to the first paragraph?A.The difficulties of seeing oneself in the mirror. |
B.The various sources of beauty standards. |
C.The unclear perceptions of one’s beauty. |
D.The life experiences and memories. |
A.She felt embarrassed. |
B.She completely denied it. |
C.She sought comfort from her parents. |
D.She questioned what her parents had said. |
A.They push teens out of home protection. |
B.They arouse acute awareness of one’s appearance. |
C.They may mislead people’s idea of beauty. |
D.They are the exact measurement of beauty. |
A.A mirror not affected by external factors. |
B.A mirror going against society’s expectations. |
C.A mirror reflecting one’s childhood experiences. |
D.A mirror showing the beauty ideals from social media. |
A.bring happiness to those around us |
B.keep our resolve despite obstacles |
C.change ourselves to achieve an ideal |
D.embrace our real inner beauty |
2 . Pre-school children who spend time together take on one another's personalities, a new research has found. The study shows that environment plays a key role in shaping people's personalities. While genetics still forms the central part of the human psyche (心理), the research finds that personality traits (特征) are "contagious" (传染的) among children. "Our finding flies in the face of common assumptions that personality can't be changed," said Dr. Jennifer Neal, co-author of the study.
The researchers studied the personalities and social networks of two pre-school classes for a full school year. One of the classes was a set of three-year-olds, and the other a set of four-year-olds. Children whose friends were hard-working or outgoing gradually took on these personality traits over time. Psychology expert Dr. Emily Dublin said kids are having a far bigger effect on each other than people may realize.
The new study is not the first to explore the contagious effects of personality traits. A 2015 psychology study found that rudeness at work can be contagious as it travels from person to person "like a disease". The study found that seeing a boss being rude to an employee was enough to cause people to be rude to those around them.
The researchers questioned 6,000 people on the social "climate" in their workplaces, which included offices, hotels and restaurants. They found 75 percent of those who took part said they had been treated rudely at least once in the past year. And the study also suggests that merely seeing other people being subjected to rudeness made it more likely that a person would treat their colleagues in the same way. Rudeness could include leaving someone off an invite to a company event, sending unkind emails, finding fault with others or failing to give praise.
Dr. Torkelson believes companies need to be more aware of the harm that rudeness in the workplace can do as it can damage the working environment. She said better training could help to fight against the problem.
1. What does the underlined part "flies in the face of" in Paragraph1mean?A.Leads to. | B.Results from. |
C.Goes against. | D.Agrees with. |
A.Their parents. | B.Their friends. |
C.The researchers. | D.The psychologists. |
A.Ignoring the faults of co-workers. |
B.Not sending emails to workmates. |
C.Seeking praise from colleagues and bosses. |
D.Not inviting a colleague to a company party. |
A.One's personality is hard to change. |
B.One's personality is shaped by genes. |
C.One's personality traits can spread to others. |
D.One's personality traits can change overnight. |
A.a science report | B.a study guide |
C.a school textbook | D.a technical journal |
3 . If you were bringing friends home to visit, you could show them the way. You know the landmarks—a big red house or a bus-stop sign. But what if you were swimming in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean? Could you still find your way home? A loggerhead turtle(海 龟)could.
According to Dr. Ken Lohmann, loggerheads have a magnetic(磁力的)sense based on Earth’s magnetic field. It helps them locate the best spots for finding food and their home beaches.
Scientists already know that several other animals, such as whales and honeybees, can detect(探测到)magnetic fields. The difference between them and loggerheads, however, is the way they learn to use their magnetic sense. Young whales and honeybees can learn from adults. Loggerheads are abandoned as eggs.
As newborn loggerheads have no adults to learn from, what helps them figure out how to use their magnetic sense? Lohmann thinks one of the cues was light on the sea.
Baby loggerheads hatch only at night. However, a small amount of light reflects off the ocean. The light makes that region brighter. Heading toward the light helps them get quickly out to sea, where they can find food. Lohmann tested whether newborn loggerheads use this light source to set their magnetic “compasses”(罗盘). He and his team put some newborns in a water tank and recorded which way they swam. Around the tank, the scientists created a magnetic field that matched the Earth’s. They set a weak light to the east of the magnetic field. Then they let the newborns go.
At first, the newborns swam toward the light. After the scientists turned off the light, the turtles that had seen the light in the east always swam toward east. When the researchers reversed(颠倒)the magnetic field, these turtles turned around and swam toward the new “east”.
This and the follow-up experiments all showed that loggerheads use light from the outside world to set their magnetic “compasses” and then remember the “correct” direction. If a turtle hatches on a brightly-lit beach, that would damage its magnetic sense forever and make survival hard for the turtle.
Lohmann’s work has led others to protect the habitat of this endangered species. Yet many questions about these creatures remain unanswered, and researchers have a lot to study.
1. Loggerheads and whales differ in the way they______.A.bring up their young |
B.recognize landmarks |
C.detect magnetic fields |
D.learn to find directions |
A.Weak light reflected off the ocean. | B.Help from adult loggerheads. |
C.Bright sunlight from the sky. | D.Food in warmer waters. |
A.the light |
B.the magnetic field |
C.other unknown factors |
D.the light and the magnetic field |
A.It enables researchers to keep track of turtles. |
B.It contributes to the studies of the magnetic field. |
C.It offers a new solution to environmental pollution. |
D.It helps protect the loggerheads’ living environment. |
A.Experiments on Loggerheads |
B.The Survival of the Sea Turtle |
C.The Loggerhead’s Built-in “Compass” |
D.Comparison of Loggerheads and Other Animals |
4 . Beep! Beep! Beep! I rolled over and turned off my alarm clock. It was still
I
I shivered (打寒颤) and
Our lives here are full of sweet
A.rainy | B.dark | C.cold | D.snowy |
A.curious | B.afraid | C.eager | D.able |
A.coat | B.bite | C.leash | D.flashlight |
A.temperature | B.condition | C.environment | D.weather |
A.method | B.path | C.plan | D.calendar |
A.check | B.forecast | C.test | D.provide |
A.removed | B.needed | C.packed | D.washed |
A.tried on | B.decided on | C.relied on | D.focused on |
A.difficult | B.ideal | C.wrong | D.safe |
A.water | B.mud | C.dust | D.frost |
A.patience | B.balance | C.distance | D.promise |
A.complained | B.smiled | C.suffered | D.doubted |
A.pre-dusk | B.mid-night | C.pre-dawn | D.post-dawn |
A.Actually | B.Suddenly | C.Effortlessly | D.Generally |
A.avoided | B.regretted | C.stopped | D.continued |
A.wonder | B.reality | C.signal | D.challenge |
A.offered | B.refused | C.intended | D.failed |
A.found | B.admired | C.reflected | D.lighted |
A.discoveries | B.dreams | C.seasons | D.memories |
A.Enjoy | B.Examine | C.Admit | D.Remember |
5 . Biking is an amazing family activity, but finding a route that can accommodate a wide-range of ages can be a challenge.
Lee McNeil and his family are crazy about biking. They have seven children, from 4 to 24 years old. When looking for a route, they look for enough protection from traffic, good surface condition, easy access and interesting views.
With that in mind, here are some great routes for biking with your whole family, as are suggested by McNeil.
Iron Horse Trail
This is the McNeil family’s favourite ride. The route is 26 miles and goes through the 2.1mile Snoqualmie Tunnel.
“Beautiful views, the thrill the tunnel, and places to stop and watch the rock climbers make it special,” McNeil said. “All our kids have taken their turn at braving the black tunnel bravely for the first time, which we celebrate it at the end of the ride.”
How to get there: If you prefer, check http://bit.ly/Mlt9y4 for more information.
Centennial Trail
The Centennial Trail runs for 23 miles from Snohomish to Bryant. The trail is wide and smooth, and is safe for kids as it is off the roads. A nice stop is Lake Cassidy east of Marysville. A dock on the lake is fun to explore. It also has picnic tables and washrooms for a convenient lunch time stop.
How to get there: The trail can be accessed from a number of trailheads. For a map, go to http://bit.ly/L5qCeY.
Cascade Trail
The Cascade Trail follows an abandoned Burlington Northern railroad grade for 23 miles between Sedro-Woolley and Concrete. Because it’s on a railroad grade, the slope is gentle and it makes for an easy family ride.
McNeil said it is a “beautiful ride up the Skagit Valley, with lots of places to watch wildlife along the river.”
How to get there: Go to http://bit.ly/PR4wOW to see a map showing the trail, parking areas and bus stops .
Other good choices
Snoqualmie Valley Trail: http://l.usa.gov/nWGWO
Guemes Island: http://bit.ly/LJ3RxL
Burke-Gilman Trail: http://l.usa.gov/s33li
1. We can learn from the passage that Lee McNeil ________.A.has a large family |
B.often travels with his family |
C.teaches his children how to bike |
D.spends lots of money on bike rides |
A.Cascade Trail | B.Iron Horse Trail |
C.Centennial Trail | D.Burke-Gilman Trail |
A.see a small valley | B.go through a tunnel |
C.have a picnic for lunch | D.watch the rock climbers |
A.http://bit.ly/Mlt9y4 | B.http://bit.ly/LJ3RxL |
C.http://bit.ly/L5qCeY | D.http://bit.ly/PR4wOW |
A.ask people to learn from Lee McNeil |
B.tell people how to make a family ride |
C.introduce some routes for family rides |
D.encourage more people to ride bikes |
6 . With a satisfied smile, Keisha finished the last sentence of her English essay about one of her heroes, Rosa Parks, an important figure in the Civil Rights Movement.
“Keisha,” her mother shouted from downstairs. “It’s almost 4:15.”
“Don’t worry. I won’t be late. ” Keisha pulled down a storybook from her bookshelf, as she always read to the nursing home’s residents. And on an impulse(一时心血来潮), she added her English notebook as well.
As Keisha came running in the door, the manager told her, “We have a new resident this week, Mrs. Ruby Watson. She’s still adjusting to her new surroundings. You’ll find her in Room 28. And by the way, Keisha, good luck.”
Keisha walked down the hallway at a quick pace. As she entered Room 28, she met two sharp brown eyes staring at her doubtfully.
“I’m Keisha Jackson, a volunteer,” Keisha explained. “I come here to help pass the time with residents, or read to them, or, . . .” Keisha started stammering(结巴)as Mrs.
Watson continued to stare at her.
“I didn’t request anyone to keep me company,” Mrs. Watson interrupted. “I’m alone most of the time, and that’s how I prefer it.”
“I brought along some funny stories,” Keisha said hesitantly.
“I’m not in the mood for funny stories,” Mrs. Watson replied angrily. “What else do you have?”
Nervously, Keisha opened her notebook to her essay. She read the title aloud, “Rosa
Parks: A Woman of Courage and Conviction(信念).” She glanced at Mrs. Watson to see how she might react, but to her surprise, Mrs. Watson’s face relaxed and her eyes shone.
“Read to me about Rosa,” Mrs. Watson said.
Keisha read how Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat to a white passenger on a bus in 1955 inspired the protest that became a turning point in the struggle for civil rights.
“I walked with Rosa Parks and Dr. Martin Luther King,” Mrs. Watson said with pride. “That was the greatest moment of my life because…” She paused.
“Because… you were a woman of courage and conviction too.”
Sitting up straighter, Mrs. Watson said, “Yes, I was and I still am. Thank you for reminding me, Keisha. Next Thursday, I will tell you my story.”
1. Why did Keisha take her English notebook along?A.Her mother asked her to take it. | B.She would hand it in on her way. |
C.She might read her essay to someone. | D.The manager wanted to read her essay. |
A.Mrs. Watson could be difficult. | B.Mrs. Watson was in poor health. |
C.Keisha was feeling nervous. | D.Keisha was a shy person. |
A.amused | B.puzzled |
C.annoyed | D.interested |
A.It aroused her curiosity in volunteer work. |
B.It built up her expectation for more visitors. |
C.It awoke her pride in her struggle for civil rights. |
D.It changed her attitude to the Civil Rights Movement. |
A.a girl enjoys learning about her heroes | B.a girl helps someone feel appreciated |
C.a woman overcomes hardship by herself | D.a woman gathers the courage for life |
7 . In a recent series of experiments at the University of California, researchers studied toddlers’ thinking about winners and losers, bullies (欺凌) and victims.
In the first experiment, toddlers (学步儿童) watched a scene in which two puppets (木偶) had conflicting goals: One was crossing a stage from right to left, and the other from left to right. The puppets met in the middle and stopped. Eventually one puppet bowed down and moved aside, letting the other one pass by. Then researchers asked the toddlers which puppet they liked. The result: 20 out of 23 toddlers picked the higher-status puppet — the one that did not bow or move aside. It seems that individuals can gain status for being dominant (占优势的) and toddlers like winners better than losers.
But then researchers had another question: Do toddlers like winners no matter how they win? So, researchers did another experiment very similar to the one described above. But this time, the conflict ended because one puppet knocked the other down and out of the way. Now when the toddlers were asked who they liked, the results were different: Only 4 out of 23 children liked the winner.
These data suggest that children already love a winner by the age of 21-31 months. This does not necessarily mean that the preference is inborn: 21 months is enough time to learn a lot of things. But if a preference for winners is something we learn, we appear to learn it quite early.
Even more interesting, the preference for winners is not absolute. Children in our study did not like a winner who knocked a competitor down. This suggests that already by the age of 21-31 months, children’s liking for winners is balanced with other social concerns, including perhaps a general preference for nice or helpful people over aggressive ones.
In a time when the news is full of stories of public figures who celebrate winning at all costs, these results give us much confidence. Humans understand dominance, but we also expect strong individuals to guide, protect and help others. This feels like good news.
1. One of the purposes of the experiments is to ________.A.teach toddlers how to gain higher status |
B.offer toddlers a chance to watch a scene |
C.observe the process of toddlers’ solving a conflict |
D.find out toddlers’ attitude toward winners and losers |
A.obeying rules |
B.gaining status |
C.giving in to the other |
D.showing good manners |
A.They are excellent learners. |
B.They are always changeable. |
C.They show mercy to the loser. |
D.They value kindness over winning. |
A.Disappointing. | B.Encouraging. |
C.Unexpected. | D.Controversial. |
8 . Last spring, I was fortunate to be chosen to participate in an exchange study program. In my application letter, I was careful to
The moment I arrived in Paris, I was
I left France with many
A.discuss | B.express | C.announce | D.argue |
A.approved | B.knew | C.warned | D.denied |
A.stubborn | B.anxious | C.universal | D.interesting |
A.boring | B.upsetting | C.thrilling | D.promising |
A.expected | B.liked | C.doubted | D.feared |
A.greeted | B.witnessed | C.sponsored | D.supported |
A.since | B.until | C.when | D.while |
A.move | B.travel | C.walk | D.rush |
A.housekeeper | B.leader | C.colleague | D.roommate |
A.learn | B.appreciate | C.speak | D.master |
A.contrasted | B.evolved | C.placed | D.fitted |
A.added | B.introduced | C.devoted | D.adapted |
A.term | B.week | C.month | D.vacation |
A.dreams | B.suitcases | C.presents | D.stories |
A.concerned | B.disturbed | C.embarrassed | D.surprised |
A.exploring | B.analyzing | C.describing | D.investigating |
A.need | B.shall | C.must | D.can |
A.generous | B.independent | C.similar | D.distant |
A.but | B.or | C.and | D.so |
A.instructions | B.friendships | C.facts | D.data |
9 . To learn to think is to learn to question. Those who don't question never truly think for themselves. These are simple rules that have governed the advancement of science and human thought since the beginning of time. Advancements are made when thinkers question theories and introduce new ones. Unfortunately, it is often the great and respected thinkers who end up slowing the progress of human thought. Aristotle was a brilliant philosopher whose theories explained much of the natural world, often incorrectly. He was so esteemed by the scientific community that even 1,200 years after his death, scientists were still trying to build upon his mistakes rather than correct them!
Brilliant minds can intimidate upandcoming thinkers who are not confident of their abilities. They often believe they are inferior to the minds of giants such as Aristotle, leading many to accept current paradigms instead of questioning them.
I, like many thinkers of the past, once believed in my mental inferiority. I was certain that my parents, my teachers-adults in general-were always right. They were like a textbook to me; I didn't question what was written on those pages. I respected them, and accepted whatever they told me. But that attitude soon changed. My mind's independence was first stimulated in the classroom.
A stern, 65yearold elementaryschool science teacher once told me that light is a type of wave. I confidently went through years of school believing that light is a wave. One day,however I heard the German exchange student mention that light could be made up of particles. As the others laughed at his statement, I started to question my beliefs.
Maybe the teachers and textbooks hadn't given me the whole story. I went to the library, did some research and learned of the lightasawave versus lightasaparticle debate. I read about Einstein's discovery of the dual nature of light and learned the facts of a paradox(悖论) that puzzles the world's greatest thinkers to this day. Light behaves as both a particle and a wave, it is both at once. I realized I had gone through life accepting only half of the story as the whole truth.
Each new year brought more new facts, and I formulated even more questions. I found myself in the library after school, trying to find my own answers to gain a more complete understanding of what I thought I already knew. I discovered that my parents and teachers are incredible tools in my quest for knowledge, but they are never the final word. Even textbooks can be challenged. I learned to question my sources, I learned to be a thinker. I once believed that everything I learned at home and at school was certain, but I have now discovered to reexamine when necessary.
Questions are said to be the path to knowledge and truth, and I plan to continue questioning. How many things do we know for sure today that we will question in the future? At this moment, I know that our sun will burn for another five billion years, and I know nothing can escape the gravity of a black hole. This knowledge, however, may change in the next 20 years-maybe even in the next two. The one thing we can control now is our openness to discovery. Questions are the tools of open minds, and open minds are the key to intellectual advancement.
1. In the first paragraph, Aristotle is taken as an example to show that ______.A.he is the greatest and respected philosopher of all time |
B.huge influence of great thinkers may block human thought |
C.advancements are made when thinkers question theories |
D.great thinkers often make mistakes and then correct them |
A.Frighten. | B.Encourage. | C.Strength. | D.Persuade. |
A.what he learned from textbooks before turned out to be wrong |
B.he was inspired by the different ideas from an exchange student |
C.he was laughed at by other students for his unacceptable statement |
D.he was not satisfied with his life and desperate to achieve success |
A.looks down upon great thinkers all the time |
B.never doubts what he has learned in the textbook |
C.always throws himself into the laboratory |
D.determines to be a thinker and questioner |
A.the author is not quite sure about his future |
B.we human beings don't dare to predict future |
C.theory of black holes will change in two years |
D.questioning is necessary to promote advancement |
A.Following rules. | B.Challenging yourself. |
C.Questioning giants. | D.Predicting future. |
10 . National Music Theater Competition
The 2024 National Music Theater Competition (NMTC) will be held. It was launched in 2011 as the first national competition for the emerging professional music theater soloist (独唱者). NMTC has provided industry connections for past competitors and winners that have led to their success on Broadway and other venues.
Prizes (each prize only for a person)
The champion: $5,000 plus a concert at the next national conference of National Association of Teachers of Singing (NATS), a $1,000 Gift Certificate from Hal Leonard, a Career Management Services package from Stage Door Connections.
The runner-up: $2,500 plus a $500 Gift Certificate from Hal Leonard.
The third place: Louise Lerch Prize; $1,000 cash prize.
The fourth place: Bill Hayes Prize; $750 cash prize.
Qualification
Singers aged from 20 to 28 as of September 15, 2023.
Entrance Procedure
Application requires a fee of $900, but for these students of NATS members the fee is $75. Application fees due to cancellation by the applicant won’t be returned. All application materials must be submitted by September 15, 2023. If you are planning to submit your application for the online round, you must complete the submission by September 15, 2023, but you’ll have 30 days after the deadline to upload your audition (试唱) videos. Late or incomplete applications will not be considered.
Where to Audition
The preliminary (预选的) round
Live auditions: November 1 to 10, 2023 in New York City.
Online auditions: Video submission deadline is October 15, 2023.
Semifinal and final rounds
Live auditions: The semifinal round: January 3 to 9, 2024; the final round: January 15 to 20, 2024.
The semifinal and final rounds will be held in New York City as part of the 2024 NATS Winter Workshop.
1. Why was the National Music Theater Competition launched?A.To make people like music. |
B.To promote the leisure industry. |
C.To popularize Broadway musicals. |
D.To seek promising talents. |
A.A $500 Gift Certificate and Louise Lerch Prize. |
B.$2,500 in prize money and a Gift Certificate. |
C.A Career Management Services package. |
D.A chance to perform at a concert. |
A.Being at least 28 years old. |
B.Applying for membership of NATS. |
C.Submitting application materials on time. |
D.Uploading audition videos by September 15. |
A.Competitors can enter the semifinal round on January 18, 2024. |
B.Both online and live auditions are available in any round. |
C.There are three rounds in the competition in total. |
D.Application submission deadline is October 15, 2023. |
A.To call on people to explore their potential in music. |
B.To attract young singers to apply for the competition. |
C.To appeal to young singers to become NATS members. |
D.To encourage people to enter the musical industry. |