组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 时代变迁
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 31 道试题
语法填空-短文语填(约310词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。1818年,Mary Shelley出版了小说《弗兰肯斯坦》 ,讲述了一个科学家试图创造一个优秀的人体,结果却创造了一个怪物的故事。乍看,这个故事似乎在警告我们,如果我们试图扮演上帝和工程师话,我们将受到严厉的惩罚。但是这个小说有个更深刻的意义。作者认为,我们人类一直认为自己是最优秀的,所以很难接受这样一个事实:科学家可以改造人的精神和身体,因此未来人们可以创造出真正优于我们的东西。
1 . 阅读下面短文, 在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。

In 1818 Mary Shelley published Frankenstein, the story of a scientist who tries to create a superior, being and instead creates a monster. In the last two centuries, this story     1     (tell) over and over again in countless variations. At first sight, the Frankenstein story appears to warn us that if we try to play God and engineer life we will be punished severely. Yet the story has a     2     (deep) meaning.

The Frankenstein myth confronts. Homo sapiens (智人) with the fact that the last days are fast approaching.     3     some nuclear or ecological disaster strikes, the pace of technological development will soon lead to the replacement of Homo sapiens by completely different beings who possess not only different physiques, but also very different cognitive and emotional worlds. This is something most Sapiens find extremely worrying. We like to believe that in the future people just     4     us will travel from planet to planet in fast spaceships. We don’t like to think about the     5     (possible) that in the future, beings with emotions and identities like ours will no longer exist, and our place will be taken by alien life forms     6     abilities beat our own.

We seek comfort in the fantasy that Dr. Frankenstein can create only terrible monsters, whom we would have to destroy in order to save the world. We like to tell the story that way because it implies that we are     7     best of all beings, that there never was and never will be anything better than us. Any attempt     8     (improve) us will inevitably fail, because even if our bodies might be improved, you cannot touch the human spirit.

We would have a hard time     9     (accept) the fact that scientists could engineer spirits as well as bodies, and that future Dr. Frankenstein could therefore create something     10     (true) superior to us, something that will look at us as condescendingly (居高临下地) as we look at the Neanderthals (穴居人).

2023-08-11更新 | 508次组卷 | 2卷引用:江苏省南京师范大学附属中学2022-2023学年高一下学期期末考试英语试卷
完形填空(约340词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文,文章主要提到了关于未来世界的三个想象,飞行汽车,3D打印和钢铁侠套装,它们都有各自的优点,但还有很多问题需要解决。

2 . When people talk about the future, we like to think that we will be able to drive out of our garages and take to the ________ in our own personal flying car. The advantages are obvious. Some people ________ this technology will allow complete three-dimensional freedom of movement. We could fly at 489 kilometres per hour, ________ traffic lights, busy roads and speeding tickets. However, some people point to the disadvantages of flying cars. They claim that there are certain to be problems with traffic ________. Another big problem is mechanical ________. What will happen if they break down? ________, if they become popular, there is likely to be another big problem: air traffic congestion. So it looks like flying cars face more than a few problems if they are to get off the ground!

Most of us have printed out an electronic document on paper, but think about the ________ of printing out a three-dimensional object in plastic. 3D printers build an object using layers line-by-line like a(n) ________ printer until the object is complete. Vehicle companies like BMW and Volkswagen already use 3D printers to make life-size models of car parts. At the moment the process is slow and quality is ________, but before long it might be possible to see a product on a website and then ________ it to your printer at home. In the future we could make our own furniture, jewellery, cups, plates, shoes and toys from designs on our computers, and reduce the amount of ________ we have to do.

Imagine having your own Ironman suit. There are several companies trying to build a practical robot ‘exoskeleton’. This is a suit of robot arms and legs which follows your ________. It will allow the wearer to lift heavy objects, walk long distances and even punch through walls! There are ________ military advantages for this technology and might help people to walk again after disease or injury. However, besides cost and battery life, another problem is that a badly ________ robot suit could injure the wearer because you wouldn’t want your robot leg or arm bending the ________ way.

1.
A.parking lotB.valleysC.skiesD.dimension
2.
A.confirmB.predictC.proveD.approve
3.
A.neglectingB.avoidingC.changingD.controlling
4.
A.flowsB.crashesC.organizationD.control
5.
A.accidentsB.industryC.failureD.analysis
6.
A.AlsoB.HenceC.HoweverD.Therefore
7.
A.accessB.improvementC.possibilityD.compliment
8.
A.normalB.home-madeC.specialD.imported
9.
A.highB.advancedC.variousD.low
10.
A.clickB.checkC.removeD.download
11.
A.shoppingB.bargainingC.shippingD.delivery
12.
A.intentionsB.movementsC.instructionsD.advice
13.
A.forcefulB.possibleC.obviousD.doubtful
14.
A.criticizedB.programmedC.developedD.commented
15.
A.wavyB.directC.wrongD.straight
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。主要介绍了生活在2157年的Margie讨厌学校。学校里的老师也是电子的,她觉得很无聊。当她听到以前的孩子怎么在学校上课时,她觉得很有趣。

3 . “May 17, 2157

Dear diary,

Today, Tommy found a real book!...”

“What’s it about?” Margie asked.

“School.” replied Tommy, turning the yellow pages.

“Why would anyone write about school? I hope they can take my geography teacher away.”

“It’s not our school. This is the old sort that they had centuries ago.”

“Anyway, they had a teacher.” Margie said, reading the book over his shoulder.

“Sure, they had a teacher, but it wasn’t a regular teacher. It was a man.”

“A man? How could a man be a teacher?”

“Well, he just told the boys and girls things and gave them assignments and asked them questions.”

“A man isn’t smart enough.”

“Sure, he is. My father knows as much as my teacher.”

Margie wasn’t prepared to argue about that. She said, “I wouldn’t want a strange man in my house to teach me.”

Tommy laughed. “The teachers didn’t live in the house. They had a special building and all the kids went there.”

“And all the kids learned the same thing?”

“Sure, if they were the same age.”

“But my mother says a teacher has to be adjusted to fit the mind of each boy and girl it teaches and that each kid has to be taught differently.”

“If you don’t like it, you don’t have to read the book.”

“I didn’t say I didn’t like it,” Margie said quickly.

They weren’t even half-finished when Margie’s mother called, “Margie! School!”

“Not yet, Mamma.”

“Now!” said Mrs. Jones.

Margie said to Tommy, “Can I read the book some more with you after school?”

“Maybe,” Tommy said.

Margie went into the schoolroom, right next to her bedroom, and the mechanical teacher was on waiting for her.

The screen was lit up, and it said, “Please insert yesterday’s assignments in the proper slot.”

Margie was still thinking about the old schools they had when her grandfather’s grandfather was a little boy. All the kids from the whole neighborhood came, laughing and shouting in the schoolyard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things, so they could help one another on the assignments and discussed them.

And the teachers were people…

1. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A.Margie doesn’t like her school.
B.It’s common to read paper books in 2157.
C.Online learning is what Margie wants.
D.Tommy feels his father is smarter than his teacher.
2. Which of the following is TRUE about a school in 2157?
A.There are only female teachers at school.
B.Teachers give no assignments to students.
C.A special building is constructed for teachers.
D.Students learn different things at their own pace.
3. What does the underlined word “slot” probably mean?
A.Envelope.B.Opening.
C.Screen.D.Schoolroom.
4. What can we learn about Margie’s feelings about old schools?
A.Longing.B.Objection.
C.Suspicion.D.Tolerance.
阅读理解-七选五(约290词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校

4 . Farms of the Future

Skyscrapers(摩天大楼) are the ultimate symbol of urban life. By 2050, almost 80 percent of the earth’s population could live in cities. The human population could increase to 9.1 billion people yet the amount of land available for farming will be the same.     1    

Vertical farms, where farmers could grow crops in environmentally friendly skyscrapers, could be the solution. In spite of concerns over high costs, experts want to make these urban farms a reality and use these skyscrapers to grow crops.     2    

Vertical farms would have many advantages, experts say. The food would be grown with minimal effects on the environment. Unlike traditional farming, vertical farming would not force animals out of their habitats by taking over large areas of land, nor would it pollute the air with the use of heavy farming equipment.     3     These have been well recognized.

Growing prosperity has led to many people demanding that all foods are available all year round. Indoor farming could produce crops constantly and crops would not suffer from weather-related problems like drought or flooding. In addition, the use of agricultural chemicals for controlling insects would be minimal.

    4     They point out that although crops growing in a tall glass building would get natural sunlight during the day, it wouldn’t be enough. The plants closest to the windows would grow much more quickly than the plants further inside. The plants growing away from the windows may not produce as many or as high quality vegetables.     5     They would need additional light sources.

Experts agree that the new farming practices are needed to support the planet’s need for more and more food at affordable costs, both to the farmer and to the consumer. Vertical farms may be a small-scale answer, but the best ideas could be yet to come.

A.Still, there are some people who are critical of vertical farms.
B.That is where vertical farms are often needed for year-round crops.
C.So how to meet the increasing food needs of our planet could be a big problem.
D.For these reasons, natural light cannot be a workable solution for vertical farms.
E.Vertically grown food is grown in environmentally controlled conditions in big cities.
F.Those farms would also reduce the cost and negative effects of transporting food over distances.
G.They believe that we can increase the food production by changing our thinking from out to up.
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章从娱乐,环境,交通,科技和医学5个方面预测了未来的生活将会是什么样子的,直到2050年,我们的生活将会发生很大的变化,将会完全不同于现在。

5 . What picture do you have of the future? Will life in the future be better, worse or the same as now? What do you hope about the future?

Futurologists(未来学家) predict that life will probably be very different in 2050 in all the fields of activity, from entertainment to technology. First of all, it seems that TV channels will have disappeared by 2050. Instead, people will choose a program from a “menu” and a computer will send the program directly to the television. By 2050, music, films, programs, newspapers and books will come to us by computer.

In what concerns the environment, water will have become one of our most serious problems. Demand for water will increase ten times between now and 2050 and there could be serious shortages. Some futurologists predict that water could be the cause of war if we don’t act now.

In transport, cars will run on new, clean fuels and they will go very fast. Cars will have computers to control the speed of the car and there won’t be any accidents. Today, many cars have computers that tell drivers exactly where they are. By 2050, the computer will control the car and drive it to your destination.

In the domain(领域)of technology,robots will have replaced people in factories. Many factories already use robots. Big companies prefer robots-they do not ask for pay rises or go on strike, and they work 24 hours a day. By 2050, we will see robots everywhere-in factories, schools, offices, hospitals, shops and homes.

Last but not least, medicine technology will have conquered many diseases. Today scientists have discovered how to control genes. They have already produced clones of animals. By 2050, scientists will be able to produce clones of people and decide how they look, how they behave and how much intelligence they have. Scientists will be able to do these things, but should they?

1. What’s the purpose of the first paragraph?
A.To arouse the interest of the reader.
B.To tell the background of the passage.
C.To show the author’s doubts about the future.
D.To describe the pictures of the future.
2. What can we infer from the passage?
A.Computer will finally take the place of the media nowadays.
B.Robots will completely have replaced people in factories.
C.Not all diseases will be conquered by scientists.
D.The clones of animals have a long way to go.
3. What’s the author’s attitude towards the life by 2050?
A.Excited but pessimistic.
B.Optimistic but worried.
C.Eager but afraid.
D.Enthusiastic but cautious.
4. Where can we find the passage on the web?
A.Travel.
B.Sports.
C.Education.
D.Life.
语法填空-短文语填(约360词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,介绍了汽车产业的未来——各大车企纷纷向数字化转型。
6 . Directions: After reading the passage below, fill in the blanks to make the passage coherent and grammatically correct. For the blanks with a given word, fill in each blank with the proper form of the given word; for the other blanks, use one word that best fits each blank.

Cars of tomorrow

Since 2008, when General Motors’ then boss delivered a keynote speech at the Consumer Electronics Show, Las Vegas     1     (offer) a glimpse of car making’s digital future. This year nearly 200 automotive firms signed up     2     the online event, which got cracking on January 5th. GM’s current chief, Mary Barra, addressed a speech that day.     3     other big carmakers, GM did not show up in person. But GM’s virtual show signaled how rapidly cars are evolving from oil—filled lumps of metal into devices stuffed with silicon.

Ms. Barra talked about GM’s transformation from automaker to platform innovator, celebrated its advances in commercial electric vehicles and autonomous driving, and     4     (release) a battery-powered version of the Chevrolet Silverado pickup. Rival firms raced to appear even more innovative. BMW demonstrated a system that changes a car’s paint colour at the press of a button. Mercedes-Benz went so far as     5     (claim) that its Vision eqxx concept, with interior materials fashioned from bamboo, cactus and mushroom, and a battery—powered range of 1,000km, was “reinventing the car”. Not     6     (overtake), consumer-electronics giants showed off their automotive stuff. Sony, a Japanese one, surprised many attendees     7     it announced a possible raid into car-making.

Other announcements were     8     (fancy) but more telling when it comes to the digitization of car-making. Mobil eye, the self-driving arm of Intel, which supplies chips to many big car firms, announced expanded deals with Ford, Geely and Volkswagen. Qualcomm, another chip-maker, inked new     9     with Volvo, Honda and Renault.

The courtship between carmakers and chip firms will only intensify. The worldwide chip shortage that knocked nearly 8m units off global car output is thankfully easing and annualized global car production could return to pre-pandemic levels by the second half of 2022, according to an investment bank. Still, car bosses are desperate to avoid a repeat. Many look enviously at Tesla,     10     own intimate rapport with semiconductor suppliers celebrated its full-year output for 2021 to a total of 930,000 vehicles.

阅读理解-阅读单选(约450词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章主要讲述在人类发展的长河里,没有什么是一成不变的。要保障人类的未来,借鉴我们过去的经验很重要。

7 . Up until a few decades ago, our visions of the future were largely—though by no means uniformly—glowingly positive. Science and technology would cure all the ills of humanity, leading to lives of fulfillment and opportunity for all.

Now utopia has grown unfashionable, as we have gained a deeper appreciation of the range of threats facing us, from asteroid strike to epidemic flu and to climate change. You might even be tempted to assume that humanity has little future to look forward to.

But such gloominess is misplaced. The fossil record shows that many species have endured for millions of years—so why shouldn’t we? Take a broader look at our species’ place in the universe, and it becomes clear that we have an excellent chance of surviving for tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of years. Look up homo sapiens (智人) in the “Red List” of threatened species of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and you will read: “Listed as Least Concern as the species is very widely distributed, currently increasing, and there are no major threats resulting in an overall population decline.”

So what does our deep future hold? A growing number of researchers and institutions are now thinking seriously about that question. For example, the Long Now Foundation has its flagship project a mechanical clock that is designed to still be marking time thousands of years hence.

Perhaps willfully, it may be easier to think about such lengthy timescales than about the more immediate future. The potential evolution of today’s technology, and its social consequences, is dazzlingly complicated, and it’s perhaps best left to science fiction writers and futurologists to explore the many possibilities we can conceive (构想). That’s one reason why we have launched Arc, a new publication dedicated to the near future.

But take a longer view and there is a surprising amount that we can say with considerable assurance. As so often, the past holds the key to the future: we have now identified enough of the long-term patterns shaping the history of the planet, and our species, to make evidence-based forecasts about the situations in which our descendants (后代) will find themselves.

This long perspective makes the pessimistic view of our prospects seem more likely to be a passing fad (狂热). To be sure, the future is not all rosy. But we are now knowledgeable enough to reduce many of the risks that threatened the existence of earlier humans, and to improve the lot of those to come.

1. Our vision of the future used to be influenced by ________.
A.our desire for lives of fulfillmentB.our faith in science and technology
C.our awareness of potential risksD.our belief in equal opportunity
2. The IUCN’s “Red List” suggests that human beings are ________.
A.a sustained speciesB.a misplaced race
C.a threat to the environmentD.the world’s dominant power
3. What can we learn from Paragraph 5?
A.Arc helps limit the scope of futurological studies.
B.Technology offers solutions to social problem.
C.The interest in science fiction is on the rise.
D.Our immediate future is hard to imagine.
4. To ensure the future of mankind, it is crucial to ________.
A.explore our planet’s abundant resourcesB.adopt an optimistic view of the world
C.draw on our experience from the pastD.control our ambition to reshape history
2022-11-10更新 | 237次组卷 | 1卷引用:北京市一零一中学2022-2023学年高一上学期期中考试英语试卷
书面表达-开放性作文 | 较难(0.4) |
名校
8 . 假定你是李华,某英文报社正在举行题为“科技改变我们的未来生活”的征文活动,要求同学们想象科技将如何改变我们的生活环境、工作和休闲方式,请根据你的畅想用英语写一篇短文。
注意:1.可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯;
2.词数120左右。
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

9 . SHOULD WE FIGHT NEW TECHNOLOGY?

This morning, I saw the shocking headline: “Passenger Dies When Car Crashes in Driverless Mode”.In the article, a lot of people said that the public should oppose the idea of developing driverless cars.They said that some advances in technology were unnecessary and could even be dangerous.Hence, we should cease accepting technology just because it is new.The newspaper reported that the car company had already apologized for the accident, but the families of the deceased said it was not enough.Nevertheless, the company still claimed that most people would be travelling in driverless cars one day soon.

On the one hand, there are many different groups of people around the world who live happily in the absence of new technology.Probably the most well known are the Amish, a group of Christians living in rural America.They do not own or drive cars, watch TV, or use the Internet.They have lived mainly as farmers since the 18th century, and they will probably be living the same way in the distant future.They advocate a simple life with an emphasis on hard work, family, and community.They think that is better than caring about luxuries or following the lives of the rich and famous.It could even be argued that the Amish’s quality of life is better since they live in and appreciate the natural environment rather than living in large, polluted cities.

On the other hand, new technology has provided people everywhere with many benefits over the years.For example, the latest weather-tracking computer programs give people lots of warnings about potential natural disasters, which saves many lives.Moreover, the Internet has made it possible for friends and family to keep in touch easily even if they are on opposite sides of the world.It has also made finding opportunities in life much easier, as it allows people to make larger networks of friends through using social media.

Personally, I have benefited quite a lot from technological advances.I found my career as an AI designer through a social media network.My health monitor, which I wear all the time, has also helped me get into the best shape of my life.Of course, when new technology changes the way we live, it can be a scary prospect.Nevertheless, I will always look on the positive side of change and accept it rather than resist it.

1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?
A.A person died in an accident while driving his brand-new car.
B.The relatives of the victim would never accept the apology.
C.Many people took a negative attitude to this new technology.
D.The company was very concerned about the future of this new technology.
2. What is the author’s purpose in mentioning the Amish in the second paragraph?
A.To persuade us to follow their natural living style.
B.To tell us the Amish prefer a harmonious and peaceful life.
C.To prove people can still live better without new technology.
D.To advocate a simple life with family and community by hard work.
3. According to the third paragraph, which of the following benefits is not talked about?
A.Monitoring people’s physical health.
B.Providing chances in life more easily.
C.Predicting the earthquake and tsunami.
D.Helping people contact each other easily.
4. The underlined word “prospect” in the last paragraph probably means __________.
A.resistanceB.futureC.advanceD.positivity
5. Why did the author decide to write about the passage?
A.The author wanted to praise the advantages of new technology.
B.The author wanted to show his supportive idea of new technology.
C.The author wanted to criticize the disadvantages of new technology.
D.The author wanted to arouse people’s concern about new technology.
2020-12-14更新 | 434次组卷 | 2卷引用:广东省深圳实验学校2020-2021学年高一上学期第二阶段考试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校

10 . Each of Apple’s products such as the iPhone and the iPad sounds cool and has become a fashion. Apple has cleverly taken advantage of the power of the letter “i”, and many other brands are following suit. The BBC iPlayer, which allows Web users to watch TV programs on the Internet, used the title in 2008. A lovely bear — popular in the US and the UK — that plays music and video is called iTeddy. A simplified version of The Independent was launched in 2010 under the name i.

In general, single-letter prefixes(前缀) have been popular since the 1990s, when terms such as e-mail and e-commerce first came into use.

Most “i” products are aimed at young people and considering the major readers of The Independent’s sister paper I, it’s no surprise that they’ve selected this fashionable name.

But it’s hard to see what’s so special about the letter “i”. Why not use “a” , “b”, or “c” instead? According to Tony Thorne, former Director of the Language Centre at King’s College London, “i” works because its meaning has become unclear. “When Apple uses ‘I’, no one knows whether it means the Internet, information, individual or interactive,” Thorne told BBC Magazines. “Even when Apple created the iPad, it seems it didn’t have one clear definition,” he said.

“However, thanks to Apple, the term is now connected with portability (轻便),” added Thorne.

Clearly the letter “i” also agrees with the idea that the Western world is centered on the individual. Each person believes they have their own needs, and they love personalized products for this reason.

Along with “Google” and “blog”, readers of BBC Magazines voted “i” as one of the top 20 words that have come to define the last decade.

But as history shows, people grow tired of fashion. From the 1900s to the 1990s, products with “2000” in their names became fashionable as the year was connected with all things advanced and modern.

However, as we entered the new century, the trend unavoidably disappeared.

1. Why do people use iPlayer?
A.To listen to music.
B.To make a call.
C.To watch TV programs online.
D.To read newspapers.
2. What is The Independent’s sister paper i aimed at?
A.Engineers.
B.Young readers.
C.Fashionable women.
D.Old readers.
3. Nowadays, the term “i” often makes people think of the products which are ________.
A.easy to carry
B.environmentally friendly
C.advanced
D.personalized
4. What is implied in the last paragraph?
A.“i” products are often of high quality.
B.Actually nobody likes products with “2000”.
C.Fashion is closely connected with time.
D.The popularity of “i” products may not last long.
共计 平均难度:一般