1 . Mauna Loa, the world’s largest active volcano, started erupting late Sunday in the U.S. island state of Hawaii in the Pacific Ocean. The volcano last erupted 38 years ago. But it is not expected to put people in danger.
At this point, melted(熔化的) rock, called lava, is predicted not to come near populated areas, but officials warned people to be ready to move away. The path of lava flows can change quickly.
Island officials warned people to stay away from the areas where lava is coming out because it can shoot 30 to 60 meters in the air. The gas coming from the eruption is also harmful. At the moment, however, the state said air quality on the island is good.
The eruption is a new experience for many people on the island. There are more than twice as many people living there compared to the last time Mauna Loa erupted. State officials are most concerned about an area about 50 kilometers to the south of the volcano where about 5,000 people live.
There is some concern about a weak area on the southwestern part of the mountain. If lava escapes from that area, it could threaten places where people live in just hours or days. The lava has never come up through that area during past eruptions.
The lava could flow toward the city of Hilo, which has about 45,000 people. That could take about a week. Scientists say they hope the lava flows like it did in 1984, when it moved slowly.
Hawaii mayor is Mitch Roth. He said the eruption “will be remarkable”, but he does not think it will cause problems for people visiting Hawaii. He said many people come to Hawaii to see volcanoes, but they have to travel a long way to a national park. Now, they can see an eruption much more easily. “You can just look out your window at night and you’ll be able to see Mauna Loa erupting,” he said.
1. Why did officials give people a warning?A.The way lava flows is uncertain. | B.Air quality on the island isn’t good. |
C.The lava can shoot 60 meters at least. | D.The lava will reach where people live. |
A.It is near populated places. | B.No lava has come up through it. |
C.Many people live there. | D.It can stop eruptions. |
A.People had better leave Hawaii soon. |
B.The eruption is a possible danger to visitors. |
C.It is convenient to watch an eruption in Hawaii. |
D.The eruption is a once-in-a-century natural wonder. |
A.People in Hawaii Are Ready to Escape |
B.Volcanoes in Hawaii Always Attract Visitors |
C.Damage of Volcano in Hawaii Is Not Clear |
D.World’s Largest Active Volcano Erupts in Hawaii |
2 . With greater climate disasters lying ahead, it is natural for us to make every effort to stop a series of floods, unusual snowstorms, and alarming reports from scientists. For many of us, part of that means running out to buy reusable drinking tubes, organic cleaners, and packaging-free products.
However, before you are joyful of your “green” purchases, take a second to consider a principle that should be obvious: simply consuming less is better for the planet. After all, every new item a factory pumps out requires some resources to produce. But in the confusing stream of environmental news, this simple truth can get lost. Take plastic bag bans for instance. If your city is getting rid of single-use shopping bags, it can be tempting to pay for that fashionable organic cotton bag hanging in the check-outline of supermarkets. However, experts who have analyzed the data on environmental impact insist that growing cotton is actually no better for the Earth than producing the conventional plastic bag. Any bag you already own is your best bet for carrying your groceries if you care about sustainability.
It is not just the Earth that will be happier if you buy less. You will feel more contented too. There is a common view that green buying patterns mean people are going green. However, it doesn’t seem to be that way. Reduced consumption has positive effects on increased well-being, but you don’t see that with “green” consumption.
Many studies have shown that materialism in general makes us unhappy and lonely. It is perfectly possible to be a materialist and an environmentalist at the same time. Lusting (欲望) for every new “green” product on the market might make you feel good about yourself but it presents the same emotional traps as lusting for whatever the Joneses next door are buying. If you relieve yourself of that burden of ownership, most people report feeling a lot better and freer.
1. What is the function of Paragraph 1?A.To introduce the topic. |
B.To send a warning. |
C.To offer practical advice. |
D.To advocate green purchases. |
A.To promote cotton bags. |
B.To call for less consumption. |
C.To ban the using of plastic bags. |
D.To reveal the harm of using plastic bags. |
A.Buying less does benefit to the Earth. |
B.Green consumption increases well-being. |
C.Buying green indicates a green awareness. |
D.Being green gives rise to more consumption. |
A.Green Products Win Popularity |
B.Don’t Be Lost in Environmental Passion |
C.Buying Green Is Never a Final Solution |
D.Buying Less Beats Buying Green |
3 . Reducing the use of plastic is a balance between what you can afford and what you can get. I’ve
I’ve found that living plastic free is a great way to
Besides, I’ve slowly
Of course, there are certain situations where plastic is the most
Life without plastic doesn’t take place overnight. Devote yourself to making a few
A.heard | B.benefited | C.received | D.suffered |
A.record | B.rebuild | C.reduce | D.recall |
A.promote | B.consider | C.prevent | D.experience |
A.hardly | B.disappointedly | C.unfortunately | D.carefully |
A.purchase | B.print | C.repeat | D.power |
A.repurpose | B.abandon | C.reward | D.remember |
A.abroad | B.indoors | C.online | D.locally |
A.sold | B.offered | C.developed | D.donated |
A.eager | B.embarrassed | C.annoyed | D.sad |
A.smaller-sized | B.faster-moving | C.better-shaped | D.longer-lasting |
A.strange | B.suitable | C.dangerous | D.difficult |
A.discovered | B.designed | C.ruined | D.needed |
A.solutions | B.visits | C.roads | D.exceptions |
A.fit | B.pay | C.cut | D.sent |
A.comments | B.notes | C.changes | D.stops |
4 . Plants don’t have ears or a central nervous system, but new research out of the University of Missouri has demonstrated that they might still have the ability to “hear”. More specifically, plants have been shown to exhibit an immune (免疫) response to the mere sound of a hungry insect.
For the study, researchers played the sound of a caterpillar chewing to a group of plants, which caused slight vibrations (振动) on the plants’ leaves. The plants were able to recognize these vibration patterns as danger, and responded by mounting the appropriate immune response. In other words, it appears that plants can “hear” themselves being chewed on.
Researchers assume that plants achieve this remarkable ability thanks to proteins that respond to pressure found within their cell membranes. Vibrations cause pressure changes within the cell, which can change the behavior of the proteins; however, additional study will be required to confirm or deny this theory.
Once researchers identify the exact mechanisms at play in this process, it could lead to advances in crop protection. Farmers could potentially learn to use sound to cause a plant’s natural chemical defenses against insect threats, rather than turning to poisonous chemicals.
“We can imagine applications of this where plants could be treated with sound or genetically engineered to respond to certain sounds that would be useful for agriculture,” said study author Heidi Appel.
The study adds to the growing list of ways that plants have been shown to sense their environments. They are not the boring organisms that many people assume they are. For instance, some plants are able to communicate with each other and signal upcoming danger to their neighbors by releasing chemicals into the air. Plants can respond to light (think about sunflowers) and temperature. Some can even respond to touch, such as the Venus flytrap (捕蝇草), which snaps shut when an insect stimulates its hairs.
1. Why did researchers carry out the study?A.To find out if plants can react to sounds. |
B.To learn how plants recognize dangers. |
C.To discover if plants can shake their leaves. |
D.To see how plants improve immune systems. |
A.To remove insects. | B.To protect crops. |
C.To treat plant diseases. | D.To produce chemicals. |
A.There are more plants than we know. |
B.Plants are more active than we think. |
C.Plants fit in well with their environments. |
D.Lots of secrets about plants remain unclear. |
A.Can plants “talk” with each other? |
B.How do plants make use of sounds? |
C.Can plants “hear” themselves being eaten? |
D.How do plants defend themselves against attacks? |