1 . Humans can make do with scarves, coats and gloves in cold weather. Some animals can hibernate (冬眠) for the winter. A new study finds that reptiles (爬行动物) and birds do something that is similar to hibernation, but a little different. In very cold weather, their body temperatures greatly drop into an energy-saving state in order to survive. The ability to thermoregulation (体温调节) for reptiles and birds is possible.
In Texas, where the city of Beaumont reached a low of 18 degrees Fahrenheit last month, it looked as if alligators (短吻鳄) had died of cold — yet alive in iced-over water. By ensuring their long noses stayed above the water line, the cold-blooded creatures were able to lower their body temperatures to survive the sudden short period of very cold weather. The process, in the case of cold-blooded animals like reptiles, is called brumation — it’s like a short state of hibernating. While in this state, reptiles become sleepy and they can go for a long time without eating or drinking. For example, alligators can be in brumation from just a few hours to months.
Like reptiles and mammals, birds can go into a state called torpor in order to save energy under very cold conditions. “Torpor is somewhere between a short sleep and hibernation,” said Justin Baldwin, a PhD candidate in biology at Washington University in St. Louis. Baldwin studied 29 species of hummingbirds living in Colombia. Researchers found that hummingbirds can enter into deep or shallow torpor, depending on several factors, including their size and weather conditions. In deep torpor, the birds are much more likely to be affected by disease. And what’s more, they would be easily harmed by their enemies.
Some bird lovers want to help the birds when they are in torpor. For example, the Bird Alliance of Oregon offers a few tips on how to keep the birds from danger.
1. What does the new study show?A.Body temperature is important for animals. |
B.Thermoregulation exists in reptiles and birds. |
C.Reptiles and birds’ thermoregulation is unusual. |
D.Body temperature drops greatly during reptiles and birds’ sleep. |
A.They are active in brumation. | B.They are dead in cold weather. |
C.They face extinction in cold weather. | D.They eat and drink nothing in brumation. |
A.They can get enough sleep. | B.They may harm other birds. |
C.They may waste plenty of energy. | D.They may be under threat. |
A.Risks of animal hibernation. |
B.His opinions of the study about birds. |
C.Some detailed measures to protect the birds in torpor. |
D.Other problems raised by cold weather. |
2 . One Saturday in June, I got off the train from Vienna at Altenberg station, in the midst of a gathering of bathers, such as often flock to our village at fine weekends.
I had gone only a few steps along the street and the crowd had not yet scattered when, high above me in the air, I saw a bird whose species I could not at first determine. It flew with slow, measured wing-beats, varied at set intervals by longer periods of gliding. It seemed too heavy to be a hawk; for a stork (鹳), it was not big enough and, even at that height, neck and feet should have been visible. Then the bird made a sudden turn so that the setting sun shone for a second full on the underside of the great wings which lit up like stars in the blue of the skies. The bird was white. By Heaven, it was my cockatoo (凤头鹦鹉)! The steady movements of his wings clearly indicated that he was setting out on a long-distance flight.
“What should I do? Should I call to the bird?” Well, have you ever heard the flight-call of the greater cockatoo? No? But you have probably heard pig-killing in the traditional method. Imagine the loudest long cry a pig could make, picked up by a microphone and amplified many times over by a powerful speaker. A man can imitate it quite successfully, though somewhat weak, by shouting at the top of his voice “O-ah”. I had already proved that the cockatoo understood this imitation and promptly “came to heel”. But would it work at such a height? A bird always has great difficulty in making the decision to fly downwards at a steep angle. To yell, or not to yell, that was the question. If I yelled and the bird came down, all would be well, but what if it sailed calmly on through the clouds? How would I then explain my song to the crowd of people?
Finally, I did yell. The people around me stood still, rooted to the spot. The bird hesitated for a moment on outstretched wings, and then, folding them, it descended in one dive and landed upon my outstretched arm. Once again I was master of the situation.
1. What was the author’s cockatoo like?A.It looked like a hawk. | B.It was blue and shiny. |
C.Its neck and feet were long. | D.It was white with great wings. |
A.By waving at it quickly. | B.By singing a song loudly. |
C.By screaming his head off. | D.By using a powerful loudspeaker. |
A.Flew about. | B.Came back. | C.Came around. | D.Landed on the ground. |
A.He knew birds very well. | B.He could speak with his bird. |
C.He liked showing off in public. | D.He often surprised people around him. |
3 . A British company has proposed releasing a GM(genetically modified) strain of the diamondback moth (菱形斑纹蛾), which has been developed to help reduce the population of these vegetable-eating insects.
Male diamondback moths carrying a deadly gene would be released which would cause their off springs (后代) to die almost immediately. Then the fall in their numbers could help to increase crop yields for farmers.
Oxitec, the company which came up with the idea, hopes to begin trials next year but faces opposition from groups who say the untested technology could threaten wildlife and human health.
“Mass releases of GM insects into the British countryside would be impossible to recall if anything went wrong. Changing one part of an ecosystem can have knock-on effects on others in ways that are poorly understood. This could include an increase in different types of pests. Wildlife that feeds on insects could be harmed if there are changes to their food supply” said Dr Helen Wallace, the director of Gene-Watch UK, who has sat on government advisory bodies.
Hadyn Parry, Oxitec’s chief executive, said there was demand from farmers for the technology and that using GM insects to kill the pests that feed on food crops is better for the environment than chemical sprays. The firm, which is supported by grants from the taxpayer, is developing a number of GM insects that would be used in Britain and around the world to protect crops and combat disease in humans.
Oxitec has contacted the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to ask what controls, if any, should be put in place around GM moth trials. A spokesman said that while its officials and advisers have discussed Oxitec’s plans, there is yet to be a formal application for a trial. Consequently the department has not reached a view on whether it should go ahead.
1. People strongly object to the idea mainly because they think _______.A.the technology won’t be as effective as chemical sprays |
B.the technology may bring about knock-on effects on insects |
C.the technology won’t be well controlled |
D.the technology may not be good for wildlife and human health |
A.Disapproving. | B.Positive. | C.Doubtful. | D.Not mentioned. |
A.struggle | B.avoid | C.fight | D.contract |
A.Oxitec still hasn’t formed any plans to control the trials. |
B.Oxitec has decided to begin the trial this year. |
C.Taxpayers will not continue to support Oxitec’s research. |
D.Farmers prefer GM insects to chemical sprays. |
Jiangsu, known for its unique blend of innovation and preservation, is a true treasure. I was
My first stop was Suzhou.
Actually, the mindset of modernization with deep respect for the past isn’t only unique to Suzhou
5 . The California sea otter (海獭), once hunted to the edge of extinction, has staged a thrilling comeback in the last century. Now, scientists have discovered that the otters’ success story has led to something just as remarkable: the restoration of their declining coastal marsh (沼泽) habitat.
Elkhorn Slough, a coastal marsh within Monterey Bay, had been experiencing severe damage. The root cause was a growing population of shore crabs, which fed heavily on the marsh plants, weakening the structural integrity of the habitat. Coastal marshes like these are not only natural defenses against storm waves but also serve as important carbon storage areas and water-cleaning systems.
The conservation-driven comeback of the sea otter has been crucial. California’s coastlines were once alive with sea otters. Sadly, they were nearly wiped out at the hands of fur traders. In the 1980s, conservation efforts aided these otters in re-occupying large areas of their former range. Now, Elkhorn Slough has the highest concentration of sea otters in California, with a population of about 100. By naturally feasting on crabs, the otters have helped a significant regrowth of plant life. Brent Hughes, a scientist working alongside Angelini, led a three-year study. Their findings were clear: in areas with sea otters, crab numbers fell markedly. This led to a resurgence in plant growth, which in turn stabilized the soil and lowered the rate of soil washing away.
As the sea otter population continues to restore, their positive impact on coastal ecosystems is likely to increase. It not only showcases the sea otter as a central species—a species that has a significant effect on its natural environment—but also highlights the essential nature of top predators (捕食者) in preserving ecological harmony. “My honest reaction was—this could become a classic in the literature,” says scientist Lekelia Jenkins. She reveals marsh restoration also helps people by reducing flooding. “Suddenly, sea otters go from just cute things we like to something that can protect our livelihoods and our properties.”
1. What change did the disappearance of sea otters bring about?A.Fewer predatory crabs. | B.More coastal plant life. |
C.Better water-cleaning effect. | D.Worse coastal ecological balance. |
A.Barrier. | B.Advancement. | C.Expansion. | D.Revival. |
A.To highlight the importance of coastal marshes. |
B.To introduce a new research study on sea otters. |
C.To demonstrate the practical benefits of sea otters. |
D.To emphasize the need for increased conservation efforts. |
A.The necessity for controlled hunting. |
B.The interconnectedness of the ecosystem. |
C.The drawbacks of wildlife reintroduction. |
D.The need for human intervention in nature. |
1. What is the woman doing?
A.Hosting a program. | B.Chairing a meeting. | C.Conducting a job interview. |
A.In 2016. | B.In 2018. | C.In 2019. |
A.Satisfied. | B.Uncaring. | C.Disapproving. |
A.To earn adequate money. |
B.To expand the adoption center. |
C.To make sure adopters treat cats well. |
A.Sunny. | B.Windy. | C.Rainy. |
8 . To the human ears a field of flowers is silent, save the noise of birds and insects. To certain animal ears, however, a field of flowers is full of conversation.
It has long been known that plants communicate when stressed. You need only observe a houseplant to realize that a plant wilts (枯萎) when it needs water, or turns yellow at the edges when it has been watered too much. Some plants may also emit a bitter taste to deter insects from capitalizing on their stressed state; while others may emit organic compounds to alarm other plants in the area.
Now, a new study, conducted by researchers at Tel Aviv University. shows that not only do plants express themselves in the above ways when stressed, they also emit sounds.
According to the study, plants emit sounds at frequencies between 40 to 80 kilohertz- beyond the range of human ears—but within the range of some animals. “While imperceptible to the human ears, the sounds emitted by plants can probably be heard by such animals as bats, mice, and insects, "explained Dr. Lilach Hadany, a Professor at Tel Aviv University and a co-author of the study.
One of the primary breakthroughs of Hadany's study is that the researchers have managed to understand and classify the sounds that plants generate for the first time. Plants that are not stressed produce about one noise per hour, but plants that are stressed, dehydrated, or injured many hundreds of sounds per hour, and each of these sounds seems to be specific to the type of stress the plant is under.
This type of information could be vital for agriculture. Knowing what sounds their plants are making could help farmers determine whether their crops are in danger or drought or disease and allow them to make the necessary changes to let their plants to thrive.
Amazingly enough, the researchers are not actually sure how the plants make sounds, though it may have something to do with cavitation (空穴现象), which is when the water tension in the plants becomes too high and the water turns to gas, making an ultrasonic popping noise.
Whatever the case, this is still a game-changer for plant science, and potentially for the future of agriculture. One day soon your plants may be-able to tell you if they are hungry, thirsty, or just feeling lonely.
1. What does the underlined word “deter” mean in paragraph 2?A.Identify. | B.Ignore. | C.Prevent. | D.Preserve. |
A.The sounds emitted by plants always remain the same. |
B.All animals are not able to hear the sounds produced by plants. |
C.Previous experiments suggested similar findings to the new study. |
D.Researchers have made sense of how plants exactly make sounds. |
A.The new study’s benefits to farmers. |
B.The new study’s limitations in agriculture. |
C.The new study’s impact on further studies. |
D.The new study’s insight into relevant research. |
A.Indifferent. | B.Skeptical. | C.Ambiguous. | D.Favorable. |
9 . A team of researchers from the University College London (UCL) has recently found that humans transmit viruses to domestic and wild animals more frequently than they contract them from these animals. This major analysis of viral genomes offers new insights into the dynamics of disease transmission across species.
Through an exhaustive examination of all publicly available viral genome sequences, the experts aimed to trace the cross-species transmission—or host jumps—of viruses.
The team sought to challenge the prevailing view that humans are primarily at the receiving end of zoonotic diseases, which are infections that jump from animals to humans. These diseases have been responsible for outbreaks such as Ebola, flu, and COVID-19.
The research team developed and applied methodological tools to analyze the nearly 12 million viral genomes that have been published on public databases to date, outlining the scale of their investigation into the evolutionary paths and mutations of viruses as they adapt to new hosts.
Contrary to the common perception of humans as mere recipients of animal viruses, the study’s findings suggest a more bidirectional exchange of pathogens (病原体). “We should consider humans just as one node in a vast network of hosts endlessly exchanging pathogens, rather than a sink for zoonotic bugs,” said co-author Francois Balloux, a professor at the UCL Genetics Institute.
“By surveying and monitoring transmission of viruses between animals and humans, in either direction, we can better understand viral evolution and hopefully be more prepared for future outbreaks and epidemics of novel illnesses, while also aiding conservation efforts. ” Study lead author Cedric Tan, a PhD student at the UCL Genetics Institute and Francis Crick Institute, pointed out the broader implications of their findings, especially concerning conservation and food security. “When animals catch viruses from humans, this can not only harm the animal and potentially pose a conservation threat to the species, but it may also cause new problems for humans by impacting food security if large numbers of livestock need to be killed to prevent an epidemic, as has been happening over recent years with the H5N1 bird flu strain.”
1. What is the prevailing view mentioned in paragraph 3?A.Humans are passive recipients of zoonotic diseases. |
B.Zoonotic diseases are preventable with proper measures. |
C.Animals are the sole source of all infectious diseases. |
D.Ebola, flu, and COVID-19 are the most severe zoonotic diseases. |
A.The study involved a deep analysis of over ten million virus genomes. |
B.The analysis revealed evolutionary patterns of viruses as they adapt to new hosts. |
C.The study found that all virus genomes exhibit similar mutation patterns. |
D.The analysis results contribute to our understanding of virus transmission and mutation mechanisms. |
A.New discoveries about the mechanisms of virus transmission. |
B.Improvements in the treatment of zoonotic diseases. |
C.Reflections on the impact of human lifestyles and the environment. |
D.Potential effects on global public health policies. |
A.Humans transmit more viruses to animals than we catch from them |
B.Zoonotic Diseases: The Leading Cause of Human Ailments |
C.Revolutionary Breakthroughs in Viral Genomics |
D.Cross-Species Viral Transmission: A Complex Web of Relationships |
10 . Five years ago, I was a trail ride leader at a holiday farm in Victoria. My favourite horse was a warmblood, called Holly. Aged seven, she was
One day, as we headed back from a ride on the beach, Holly and I were
At the bottom of the hill as we rounded a corner, Holly
I have heard that horses have a better sense of
Holly then
A.negative | B.gentle | C.pitiful | D.aggressive |
A.solution | B.reaction | C.problem | D.difficulty |
A.frightened | B.delighted | C.touched | D.attracted |
A.chasing | B.following | C.pushing | D.leading |
A.stopped | B.preferred | C.hesitated | D.refused |
A.signals | B.truth | C.evidence | D.symbols |
A.sped | B.rushed | C.escaped | D.slowed |
A.rabbit | B.horse | C.monster | D.snake |
A.frozen | B.stuck | C.planted | D.fastened |
A.vision | B.smell | C.direction | D.hearing |
A.approved | B.denied | C.displayed | D.ignored |
A.Unfortunately | B.Thankfully | C.Undoubtedly | D.Instantly |
A.fell off | B.went back | C.came out | D.stepped forward |
A.responsible | B.regretful | C.grateful | D.available |
A.emerged | B.lifted | C.recovered | D.missed |