1 . Goldfish may seem like simple creatures swimming in a glass tank, but they possess a rather complicated navigation system, as discovered by researchers at the University of Oxford Led by Dr. Adelaide Sibeaux, the study aims to shed light on our understanding of how fish, and potentially humans, estimate distances using what could be described as an internal GPS.
Writing in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Sibeaux and colleagues report how they created a tank in their experiment with 2cm-wide black and white vertical stripes (条纹) on the walls, connected by similar stripes across the floor. The team trained nine goldfish to swim a set distance of 70cm and then return to their starting point when waved at. The experiment aimed to investigate how the fish would estimate this distance without any gestures, under different patterns.
Over multiple trials, the goldfish averaged a swim distance of 74cm, give or take 17cm, when presented with the vertical 2cm-wide stripes. However, when the stripe pattern was altered to either narrower vertical stripes, checked patterns, or horizontal stripes, the fish’s behavior changed significantly. Narrower vertical stripes led them to overestimating the distance by 36%, while horizontal stripes resulted in highly inconsistent estimations.
According to the researchers, the goldfish appeared to be using an “optic (光学的) flow mechanism” based on the visual density of their environment. They kept track of how frequently the vertical pattern switched between black and white to estimate how far they had traveled. The study suggests that different optic flow mechanisms are used by mammals, including humans, based on angular (有角度的) motion of visual features. The study implies that the use of visually based distance information could have emerged early in the evolutionary timeline.
“This study is novel because, despite knowing that fish respond to geometric information regarding direction and distance, we don’t know how they estimate distances,” Professor Colin Lever, although not involved in the study, said, “it’s exciting to explore fish spatial mapping because fish navigation evolved earlier and better than most mammals.”
1. Why did Dr. Adelaide Sibeaux conduct the study on goldfish?A.To test the accuracy of goldfish’s internal GPS. |
B.To create an advanced navigation system for humans |
C.To uncover how an inbuilt GPS helps calculate distances. |
D.To explore the relationships between goldfish and humans |
A.People gestured the goldfish throughout the experiment |
B.The tank was decorated with colorful background patterns |
C.Goldfish tended to underestimate distances with horizontal stripes. |
D.The change in the tank setting led to the goldfish's incorrect judgment. |
A.optic flow mechanism is unique to humans |
B.mammals developed flow mechanism long before goldfish |
C.goldfish evaluated the distance with multidimensional visual information |
D.visual density of the environment strengthened the locating ability of goldfish |
A.Neutral. | B.Ambiguous. | C.Disapproving. | D.Favorable. |
2 . An environmental group in Colombia is leading a project to save wild areas in the San Lucas Mountains with the help of coffee growers.
Since 2016, San Lucas areas have been threatened by mining and coca (古柯) planting Gold miners and coca growers make more money than coffee farms. Now the group WebConserva helps link coffee farmers with coffee processors from around the country in order that they can earn more. At the same time coffee farms can serve as boarders around the forests to protect the biodiversity within.
To date, the project includes 10 families who farm 400 hectares of coffee plants. WebConserva said it hopes, in time, 200 families will be included. At that level. 20,000 hectares of untouched forest could be protected. The families promise not to cut down trees to expand their crops or to hunt wild animals. In return, they receive $300 for 125 kilograms of coffee.
Arcadio Barajas is among those taking part. His coffee farm sets up a barrier between cattle farms and forests where wild animals live, thus reducing the possibility of conflict between cattle farmers and wild animals. “Cutting down the forest to plant coca and killing wildlife were against my faith, and now I feel that growing coffee lets me be a good guard of the land,” he said.
Amnobis Romero is a former coca grower and miner. “Many families depended on illegal activities to support their children years ago. Now, we feel it a duty to look after this biodiversity and leave it for future generations,” he said. Activists want San Lucas to be protected as a national park, but the process has been slow. Carlos Valderrama, director of Webconserva, hopes the project can build production system that will last far into the future. “It protects forests, biodiversity and ecosystems at the same time as improving coffee growers’ quality of life,” he said.
1. What does the underlined word “they” in Paragraph 2 refer to?A.Coffee farmers. |
B.WebConserva members. |
C.Gold miners. |
D.Coca growers. |
A.By increasing cattle farms. |
B.By setting up a barrier. |
C.Ry developing gold mining. |
D.By encouraging coffee farming. |
A.Families have enough money for their kids. |
B.Coffee planting will last for several generations. |
C.Coffee farming changed the former coca growers’ lives. |
D.The project benefit the forests more than the local farmers. |
A.Families protecting wildlife will get very rich. |
B.WebConserva benefits ecosystems and local people’s life. |
C.Gold mining and coca farming have been replaced rapidly. |
D.San Lucas will develop into a national park in the near future. |
It’s really nice to see a lot of Tibetan antelopes (藏羚羊) on the green grass. However,
In order to save this species from extinction, the Chinese government placed it under
Gradually, the antelope population has recovered and
In a word, if we want
4 . The earth has many mysteries for people to explore and we live on the earth for protection. Do you know that the earth has two North Poles? There’s the geographic North Pole, which never changes. And there’s the magnetic (有磁性的) North Pole, which is always on the move. Over the past 150 years, the magnetic North Pole has casually wandered 685 miles across northern Canada. But right now it’s racing 25 miles a year to the northwest. This could be a sign that we’re about to experience something humans have never seen before: a magnetic polar flip (翻转). And when this happens, it could affect much more than just your compass.
Right now on the surface of the planet, it looks like it’s just a bar magnet. Our compasses are just pointing to one pole at a time because there’s mainly a two-pole system. But sometimes, the earth doesn’t just have a single magnetic North and South Pole. Evidence suggests that, for hundreds to thousands of years at a time, our planet has had four, six, and even eight poles. This is what has happened when the magnetic poles flipped in the past. And when it happens again, it won’t be good news for humans.
Now you might think, eight poles must be better than two. But the reality is that multiple magnetic fields would fight each other. This could weaken the earth’s protective magnetic field by up to 90% during a polar flip.
The earth’s magnetic field is what protects us from harmful space radiation which can damage cells and cause cancer. With a weaker field in place, some scientists think this could expose planes to higher levels of radiation, making flights less safe.
This could also interrupt the internal sense of direction in many animals that use the magnetic field for navigation (导航). Even worse, it could make certain places on the planet too dangerous to live in. But what exactly will take place on the surface is less clear than what will undoubtedly happen in space.
Satellites and space missions will need extra shelter that we’ll have to provide ourselves. Without it, intense universal and solar radiation will fry circuit boards and increase the risk of cancer in astronauts.
1. Which of the following can best describe the earth’s magnetic field?A.The focus of scientific research. | B.The navigation of satellites. |
C.The center of the universe. | D.The protective umbrella of humans. |
A.Losing the ability to hunt for food. |
B.Bearing very loud noise day and night. |
C.Being unable to find directions exactly. |
D.Being unable to protect themselves from danger. |
A.Astronauts are more likely to suffer from cancer. |
B.The magnetic North Pole is moving faster than before. |
C.Flights aren’t allowed to travel as usual when the magnetic poles flip. |
D.There are always more than two magnetic poles on the earth at a time. |
A.What will happen when the poles flip? | B.The ways that scientists research poles |
C.How and when will the poles flip? | D.The reasons why scientists research poles |
A.Nancy. | B.Jason. | C.Mark. |
A.She dislikes the animals’ smell. |
B.She hates the long way there. |
C.She’s busy with her business. |
My aim in life is
There is no
8 . One day last summer, my 9-year-old son Ben and I were riding the waves at a popular ocean beach on outer Cape Cod. As we were playing happily with our surfboard, I suddenly noticed an astonishing
We stared and pointed in
Ben’s words took my breath away, more than the dramatic waves and the amazing sight of the
He was absolutely
We each have a part to play in
How we
A.show | B.change | C.sight | D.sign |
A.stood | B.left | C.started | D.lay |
A.fear | B.amazement | C.silence | D.confusion |
A.seldom | B.never | C.always | D.again |
A.beach | B.ships | C.swimmers | D.whales |
A.confident | B.crazy | C.smart | D.right |
A.home | B.family | C.performance | D.stage |
A.secret | B.public | C.natural | D.native |
A.ignore | B.remember | C.prove | D.imagine |
A.forever | B.only | C.once | D.almost |
A.sharing | B.creating | C.improving | D.finding |
A.required | B.judged | C.expected | D.did |
A.true | B.easy | C.funny | D.powerful |
A.researches | B.dreams | C.communities | D.activities |
A.compete with | B.connect with | C.hear from | D.separate from |
The Chinatown in San Francisco is the biggest in America, and also
10 . Last summer, I was sent to take photos that could communicate the urgency of climate change in northern Canada. When I arrived at an abandoned village on Resolute Bay, I scanned the shore with my camera. Suddenly, I spotted a bear lying on the ground. It didn’t move for almost an hour. But when it finally stood up, I had to catch my breath. The bear’s once strong body was just skin and bones; every step that it took was painfully slow.
When I posted the photos on social media, I wrote, “This is what starvation may look like. I wonder whether the global population of 25, 000 polar bears would die the way this bear is dying.”
I did not say that this particular bear was killed by climate change. But news organizations around the world focused on it. The first line of the story published in National Geographic read, “This is what climate change looks like” — with “climate change” highlighted in yellow. Other news agencies even adopted more dramatic headlines.
It was estimated that my photos had been read by about 2.5 billion people around the world. But there was a problem: Most people and the news agencies didn’t recognize or misunderstood the real message I tried to send with them. Many people expressed gratitude that I’d provided shocking evidence on climate change, while others who are still trying to deny the existence of climate change charged me with spreading false information.
Perhaps I had made a mistake in not telling the full story — that I was looking for pictures that might foretell the future and that I didn’t know what had happened to this particular polar bear.
I can’t say that this bear was starving because of climate change, but I am happy that my photos have moved the conversation about climate change to the forefront, where it must remain until this problem is solved.
Until then, when I come across a scene like this one, I will again share with the world — and take pains to be sure that my intention is clear.
1. How did the author feel when the bear stood up?A.Shocked. | B.Scared. | C.Excited. | D.Relieved. |
A.The story. | B.The photo. | C.A starving bear. | D.Climate change. |
A.Provide more direct evidence on climate change. |
B.Show the link between the bear and climate change. |
C.Warn the possible results of climate change. |
D.Expose the false information about climate change. |
A.To admit his mistake. | B.To clarify his true intention. |
C.To please his readers. | D.To show off his amazing trip. |