Today, giant pandas are one of the world's most well-known animals. And they are
The idea of the WWF's logo(标志)
Aware of the need for a recognisable symbol that would break through all language barriers(障碍), WWF's founders agreed that the big, furry bear with her special black and white coat would make a great logo. The first sketches(草图) were done by the British environmentalist and
Based on these, Sir Peter Scott, one of WWF's founders, drew
The panda has since become a symbol not just for WWF,
2 . Last year, wildfire spread through Boulder, Colorado. It wasn’t a hot summer day. It wasn’t a forested neighborhood. It was winter in the suburbs (郊区) . More than 1,000 homes and buildings burned.
Large parts of the country that don’t have wildfires are now at risk. They include nearly 80 million homes and buildings. That is what new data shows. Over the next 30 years, the risk will only grow. The group First Street Foundation created a program called Fire Factor. People can go to a website to learn what their wildfire risk is in 2022 and in 2052. Right now, about 16% of Americans live in risky places. By 2052, that will go up to 21%.
California will likely suffer a lot from wildfire. That’s partly because it is so big and partly because of its weather. So California will be on the top of the at-risk list. But nearly half of all at-risk Americans in 2052 will live in the southern half of the U.S. The South will be home to the largest number of people at high risk: 32 million. States like Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, and North and South Carolina will be “in the line of fire,” so to speak, and so will southwestern states like Arizona and New Mexico.
People are doing many things to make fire risk worse. They are moving to places where wildfire is a natural yearly event. They are building homes right next to plants and trees that can burn. Climate (气候) change has increased heat and dryness. That means any spark (火花) at any time can cause a big fire.
As with many climate threats, wildfires put minorities at the greatest risk. By 2052, about 44% of all Native Americans will live in places at majors risk from wildfire. Nearly 1 in 4 Hispanics will. People who don’t speak English or own cars will have a harder time learning about and getting away from a fast-moving fire.
1. What problem did Boulder have last year?A.Strange weather. | B.Widespread wildfires. |
C.Huge loss of forests. | D.A rapid drop in populations. |
A.About 16% of Americans are safe now. |
B.The risky areas of wildfire are increasing. |
C.The risk of wildfire will be lowered in 2052. |
D.Nearly 80 million homes are burnt down by wildfire. |
A.groups with foreign population. | B.groups with native population. |
C.groups with large population | D.groups with small population |
A.Reasons why wildfire risk is worse. | B.Dangers humans may face in the future. |
C.Actions taken by humans to prevent fire. | D.Suggestions for self-protection in wildfire. |
3 . Researchers in Australia have identified enzymes (酶) in the body of certain beetle larvae (甲虫幼虫) that can degrade or break down plastic. In a study published in Microbial Genomics, they write that these “superworms” could help reduce plastic waste in the future.
“Superworms are like mini recycling plants, cutting up the polysyrene (聚苯乙烯) with their mouths and then feeding it to the bacteria in their stomach,” said Chris Rinke from the University of Queensland in Australia. “The breakdown products from this reaction can then be used by other microbes to create high-value chemicals.”
In the study, scientists divided beetle larvae into three groups, feeding one group wheat bran, one polystyrene and one nothing. Over three weeks, they monitored their growth. “We found that superworms fed a diet of just polystyrene not only survived, but even had marginal weight gains,” said Rinke. “This suggests the worms can get energy from the polystyrene, most likely with the help of their stomach bacteria.”
On the other hand, the plastic-fed worms gained much less weight and were overall much less healthy than the bran-fed ones, though better off than the starvation group. After three weeks, some larvae were also set aside to grow into beetles, according to the study. About 93% of the bran-fed larvae formed adult worms, while about 67% of the plastic-fed larvae and 10% of the starved larvae formed adult worms.
The researchers investigated the superworm’s stomach bacteria to find the specific enzymes linked to plastic degradation, writes Fionna M. D. Samuels for Scientific American. The enzyme that degrades the polystyrene appears to live with the stomach bacteria, not the worm itself.
Polystyrene is one of the most common plastics used today. But it’s not very chemically reactive, and breaking it down with industrial recycling methods takes high heat. So, researchers have been looking for plastic-degrading enzymes and bacteria for years.
Further research will still need to be done to figure out how to employ these worms, bacteria and enzymes in recycling facilities.
1. What does Chris Rinke compare superworms to?A.Small plants. | B.Beetle larvae. | C.Stomach bacteria. | D.High-value chemicals. |
A.Few. | B.Tiny. | C.Obvious. | D.Normal. |
A.The damage of plastic to life. |
B.Possible causes of plastic pollution. |
C.Researchers’ efforts over the years to recycle plastic. |
D.The necessity of finding out a way to degrade plastic. |
A.To report a new way to recycle plastic. | B.To call on people to reduce plastic waste. |
C.To explain how larvae can degrade plastic. | D.To introduce the findings of a new research. |
4 . France has changed the rules in its grocery stores and marketplaces. Starting on January 1, 2022, most fresh fruits and vegetables can no longer be packaged for salern plastic.
Under the new law, more than 30 types of fruits and vegetables must now be sold in materials that can be recycled. Potatoes, tomatoes, apples and carrots are some of the items included in the list. Plastic will still be allowed for packs that are over 1.5 kilograms. Smaller items such as raspberries and cherry tomatoes can still be sold in plastic for now, but the country plans to ban (禁止) all single-use plastic packaging for whole fruits and vegetables by 2026.
This ban on plastic packaging is part of a broader effort by France to control plastic waste across a range of sectors. Other efforts include preventing restaurants from including plastic toys in children’s meals, newspapers and magazines from being delivered in plastic, and tea bags being sold in plastic packages. Furthermore, public locations must provide water refill stations to disincentivize the use of single-use water bottles.
It’s believed that 37% of fresh fruits and vegetables are wrapped in plastic in France. The government says the new ban will stop one billion pieces of plastic from being used each year.
Not everyone is happy with the change. François Roch, president of the French fruit sellers’ federation, told Reuters, “Selling loose produce is complicated (复杂的) as many customers touch the fruit and people do not want their fruit to be touched by other customers.”
The ban will likely require a change in habits Shoppers will probably have to take their own reusable bags to fill and weigh. It will be interesting to see how France deals with the complications that come with selling loose produce, and whether other countries follow suit, once a precedent (先例) has been set.
1. What’s the purpose of the new ban?A.To reduce plastic waste. | B.To control overspending. |
C.To recycle plastic products. | D.To fight over-packaging. |
A.Ignore. | B.Measure. | C.Increase. | D.Discourage. |
A.Relaxed. | B.Dissatisfied. | C.Surprised. | D.Interested. |
A.More attention to a healthy lifestyle. | B.A change in customers’ shopping habits. |
C.Fewer tips to stores and supermarkets. | D.A drop in the sale of fruits and vegetables. |
5 . As awareness of climate change grows, so does the desire to do something about it. One way to gain a quantifiable (可量化的) understanding of the impacts of our actions, for good and bad, is through what is known as a carbon footprint. While the concept is gaining traction, it is not always fully understood.
According to Mike Berners-Lee, a professor at Lancaster University in the UK and author of The Carbon Footprint of Everything, a carbon footprint is “the sum total of all the greenhouse gas emissions that had to take place in order for a product to be produced or for an activity to take place.”
What steps a person can take to reduce their personal footprint depends on the kind of lifestyle they presently live, and the same actions are not equally effective for everyone. Berners-Lee notes that, “for some people, flying may be 10 percent of their footprint, for some people it’s zero, and for some it’s such a huge number that it should be the only thing they should be thinking about.”
It isn’t easy to calculate a carbon footprint. The earliest such calculator is thought to have appeared in 2004 as part of the “Beyond Petroleum” campaign of oil giant BP, which makes observers criticize the pressure to reduce personal carbon footprints as an indication that climate change is not the fault of an oil giant, but that of individuals.
“I would say personal carbon footprint calculators are a useful tool to assess the impact of your immediate actions.” Berners-Lee says. “But what’s much more important than your personal carbon footprint is your climate shadow, which aims to paint a picture of the full sum of one’s choices and the impact they have on the planet. For example, how you vote, where you work, how you invest your money, and how much you talk about climate change.”
1. What does the underlined word “traction” in paragraph 1 probably mean?A.Control. | B.Insight. | C.Attention. | D.Power. |
A.By presenting a fact. | B.By giving suggestions. |
C.By clarifying a concept. | D.By making a comparison. |
A.Unclear. | B.Favorable. | C.Tolerant. | D.Disapproving. |
A.Tools are more important than choices. |
B.Climate shadow covers a broad range of actions. |
C.Calculating carbon footprint is the most effective. |
D.Only individuals are responsible for climate change. |
6 . The National Hurricane Centre, lying in Miami, Florida, gives watches and warnings before hurricanes come near the coastline. They use computers with satellite images (卫星影像) to find out where and when a hurricane will hit the coast. Sometimes, if a hurricane is strong enough, officials may require people to leave their homes, and travel to a safer place.
Can you imagine flying a plane through a hurricane? If you’re a hurricane hunter, it’s your job! Hurricane hunters fly airplanes to help the National Hurricane Centre make predictions (预测) about hurricanes, and give them the information needed to give warnings. Pilots find out how fast the winds are blowing, how big the hurricane is, and which direction it’s moving in. This helps people to be better prepared for hurricanes as they come near the coastline.
Categories (类别) of Hurricanes
There are five categories of hurricanes. The categories help to make people know how much damage a hurricane may cause because the greater the wind speed, the more dangerous the storm.
Category 1 - Winds 74-95 mph
Winds break branches, pull trees out of the ground and overturn mobile homes.
Category 2 - Winds 96-110 mph
Winds are strong enough to destroy weak doors and windows, and create 8-foot ocean waves.
Category 3 - Winds 111-130 mph
Strong winds cause major flooding near the coast which can destroy homes and businesses.
Category 4-Winds 131-155 mph
Winds are strong enough to destroy some buildings and cause heavy damage to building roofs .
Category 5 - Winds greater than 155 mph
Buildings along the coastlines are washed away. Buildings can be completely destroyed.
1. What is the first paragraph mainly about?A.Hurricane predictions. | B.The job of National Hurricane Centre. |
C.Hurricane safety guides. | D.The advice of National Hurricane Centre. |
A.They help people out in a hurricane. | B.They predict the paths of hurricanes. |
C.They collect information about hurricanes. | D.They warn of possible hurricane dangers. |
A.They can bring about great flooding. | B.They can blow roofs off buildings. |
C.They can break weak doors. | D.They can destroy the buildings completely. |
World Olive Tree Day takes place on 26 November every year. It
The olive tree, especially the olive branch, holds an important place
Protecting and growing the olive tree is
World Olive Tree Day is set up
There is much to learn, share and celebrate on World Olive Tree Day, and UNESCO encourages everyone to participate in
8 . Plastic, once seen as a revolutionary material for its wide application and convenience, has become a global environmental crisis because it is non-biodegradable. The ubiquity (无处不在) of plastic in our daily lives has led to an increasing amount of plastic waste, causing great harm.
One of the most alarming examples of this crisis is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a floating mass of plastic waste in the North Pacific Ocean. It is estimated to be twice the size of Texas and consists of everything from microplastics to abandoned fishing nets. Marine life often mistakes plastic particles for food, leading to ingestion and death. Additionally, the chemicals used in plastic production can pollute water and soil, and finally threaten marine ecosystems.
Plastic waste is not limited to the oceans; it also impacts the land. Landfills overflow with plastic waste, emitting (排放) harmful greenhouse gases as plastics break down slowly over time. The production of plastics is highly energy-intensive and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change. Furthermore, plastic litter is evident in urban and rural landscapes, destroying the natural beauty of our planet.
Beyond its environmental impact, plastic poses serious health risks to humans. Many plastics contain harmful chemicals, which can be found in food and drinks when plastic containers are used for storage and heating. These chemicals have been linked to a range of health problems, including developmental issues and cancer.
In conclusion, the problem of plastic pollution demands urgent action. A comprehensive strategy for cutting down on plastic is essential to tackle these challenges and safeguard the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.
While reducing the consumption of plastic may seem challenging, it is achievable through a combination of policy measures, technological innovations and changes in consumer behavior. Governments must issue laws to ban or heavily regulate single-use plastics and promote alternatives. Businesses should adopt sustainable packaging practices, and individuals can reduce plastic consumption by making conscious choices.
1. What does the example of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch show?A.Animals rely on plastic waste to survive. |
B.Plastic is too widespread to remove. |
C.Plastic waste is harming the oceans. |
D.Plastic poses health risks to humans. |
A.Worsening. | B.Controlling. | C.Recording. | D.Evaluating. |
A.Ways to cut plastic consumption. |
B.Problems of handling plastic. |
C.Alternatives for plastic products. |
D.Some benefits of banning plastic. |
A.Plastic Packaging Is Everywhere |
B.Plastic Consumption Should Be Reduced |
C.How Should Plastic Be Used |
D.How Plastic Products Affect People |
9 . In the rich countries of the West, the electric vehicle revolution is well occurring. Climate-conscious consumers drive Teslas or Polestars for reasons of morality (道德) and fashion. Poorer countries are also experiencing a wave of electrified trend. In Bangladesh, electric three-wheeler taxis, known as tuk-tuks, are rapidly replacing gas-powered ones on the streets. Such electric vehicles are climate friendly, cost effective, and help reduce air pollution.
Yet a glance under the hood (引擎盖) of these vehicles shows a poisonous secret: each tuk-tuk runs on five massive lead-acid batteries (铅酸电池), containing almost 300 pounds of lead (铅) in total. Every year and a half or so, when those batteries need to be replaced and recycled, about 60 pounds of lead leaks into the environment. Battery recycling, often at small-scale unregulated factories, is a highly profitable (高利润的) but deadly business.
Lead is dangerous, and any exposure to it is harmful to human health. Lead that has entered the environment hurts people on an unexpected scale. The numerous ways lead enters air, water, soil, and homes across the developing world and the enormous damage it does to human health, wealth, and welfare cause one of the biggest environmental problems in the world yet receives little attention.
The World Bank estimates that lead kills 5.5 million people per year, making it a bigger global killer than AIDS, malaria, diabetes, and road traffic deaths combined. On top of the shocking deaths, the social burden of lead poisoning is heavy, as is its contribution to global inequality — our research on the cognitive (认知的) effects of lead poisoning suggests that it may explain about one-fifth of the educational achievement gap between rich and poor countries.
But unlike many challenges faced by developing countries, lead poisoning is a problem that can be resolved through financial investment (财政投入). Better monitoring, research, and rules can help protect children all over the world from the unpleasant effects of lead poisoning and reduce the massive global costs it brings.
1. How does the author describe the lead problem in paragraph 2?A.By listing some numbers. | B.By analyzing hidden causes. |
C.By making an interesting comparison. | D.By explaining its working principle. |
A.Lead enters poor countries in one way. |
B.Lead leaking has been avoided in all the countries. |
C.Lead will definitely not harm anymore. |
D.Lead poisoning may make poor societies poorer. |
A.Fixing these used batteries. | B.Reducing the cost of recycling lead. |
C.Ignoring the illegal use of lead. | D.Putting certain effort and money. |
A.The Impacts of Lead Poisoning on Man. |
B.The Global Lead Poisoning Problem. |
C.The Ways to Solve Lead Problem. |
D.The Benefits of Using Electric Vehicles. |
10 . Washing machines are one of the greatest inventions of the last few centuries.They have made life easier. Unfortunately, washing machines also contribute to the environmental issues of energy use and micro-plastics flowing into the oceans. That is why the washing machine manufacturer (制造商), Samsung, and the outdoor-wear company, Patagonia, are working together to make a change.
For Patagonia, the issue of micro-plastics has been on its mind for years — its woolen jackets release many microfibers. As for Samsung, new requirements throughout the world have forced many producers to start thinking about ways to help reduce the number of micro-plastics. There are currently more than 14 million tons of micro-plastics floating in the oceans. Though people previously think of things such as plastic bottles and fishing lines when it comes to plastics in the ocean, thousands of micro-plastics are released into seas with every wash.
The issue is a sort of catch-22. In order to reduce energy costs, manufacturers try to make their machines more efficient. These machines use hotter water and are designed to create more friction (摩擦) between the clothing in the machine. However, both of these things lead to the release of more micro-plastics. So, using Patagonia clothes as test cases, Samsung came up with a two-fold solution: One is a technology called Eco-bubbles, which creates more bubbles to make the detergent (洗涤剂) more powerful, and the other is a water purifier that can filter (过滤) out more micro-plastics.
The cooperation between the two companies is proof of how complicated protecting the environment can be. On the one hand, clothing that is well-constructed and durable is a weapon in the fight against fast fashion. On the other hand, the material used to make those clothes and the way they are washed can also add pollutants to the environment.The same goes for washing machines. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. The fight against climate change requires creative thinking and learning how to attack a problem from many angles. This will certainly lead to even more strange and fruitful cooperation between the environmentally conscious companies.
1. What is Samsung’s purpose in partnering the outdoor clothing company?A.To limit the use of micro-plastics. |
B.To solve the issue of energy waste. |
C.To find a solution to micro-plastic pollution. |
D.To produce high-efficiency washing machines. |
A.A tricky situation. | B.A questionable fact. |
C.A possible dream. | D.A practical method. |
A.Using hotter water. |
B.Creating more friction. |
C.Using powerful detergents. |
D.Adding a water purifier to washing machines. |
A.The difficulty in fighting against fast fashion. |
B.The complexity of environment conservation. |
C.The influence of humans’ active action. |
D.The importance of creative thinking. |