1 . Once upon a time, a daughter complained to her father that her life was unhappy and that she was tired of struggling all the time.
Her father, a chef, took her to the kitchen. He filled three pots with water and placed each on a high fire. Once the three pots began to boil, he placed potatoes, eggs and coffee beans in them. After 20 minutes, he took them out, putting the potatoes and eggs in a bowl and the coffee in a cup.
Turning to his daughter, he said, “Look closer, and touch the potatoes.” She did and noted that they were soft. He then asked her to take an egg and break it. After pulling off the shell, she observed the hard-boiled egg. Finally, he asked her to taste the coffee. Its good smell brought a smile to her face.
“Father, what does this mean?” she asked. He then explained that the potatoes, the eggs and the coffee beans were in the same adversity (逆境) — the boiling water. However, each one reacted differently.
The strong and hard potato became soft and weak in boiling water. The egg was fragile, with the thin outer shell protecting its liquid until it was put in the boiling water. Then the inside of the egg became hard. However, the coffee beans were unique. After they were exposed to the boiling water, they changed the water and created something new. “Which one do you want to be like,” he asked. “When adversity knocks on your door, how will you respond?”
In life, challenges happen to us all, but the only thing that truly matters is what happens within us.
1. What can we infer from this story?A.The girl liked the coffee best. |
B.The father was good at cooking. |
C.The girl didn’t like the potatoes and eggs. |
D.Different people have different reactions to adversity. |
A.thick | B.hard | C.strong | D.easily-broken |
A.Challenges and responses. | B.Adversities and a chef. |
C.A chef and coffee beans. | D.Father and daughter. |
2 . Climate change, not human hunting, may have destroyed the thylacine(袋狼) , according to a new study based on DNA from thylacine bones.
The meat-eating marsupials (有袋动物) died out on mainland Australia a few thousand years ago, but survived in Tasmania, an island of southeast Australia separated from the mainland, until the 1930s. Until now, scientists have believed the cause of this mainland extinction was increased activity from native Australians and dingoes (Australian wild dogs).
Scientists behind the University of Adelaide study, which was published in the Journal of Biogeography on Thursday, collected 51 new thylacine DNA samples from fossil bones and museum skins. The paper concluded that climate change starting about 4,000 years ago was likely the main cause of the mainland extinction.
The ancient DNA showed that the mainland extinction of thylacines was rapid, and not the result of loss of genetic diversity. There was also evidence of a population crash in thylacines in Tasmania at the same period of time, reducing their numbers and genetic diversity.
Professor Jeremy Austin said Tasmania would have been protected from mainland Australia’s warmer, drier climate due to its higher rainfall. He argued that climate change was “the only thing that could have caused, or at least started, an extinction on the mainland and caused a population crash in Tasmania.”
“They both occurred at about the same time, and the other two things that have been talked about in the past that may have driven thylacines to extinction on the mainland were dingoes and humans. So the only explanation that’s left is climate change. And because that population collapse happened at the same time that the species went extinct on the mainland, our argument is there’s a common theme there and the only common theme is that there is this change in climate.”
1. What did scientists believe in the past according to the passage?A.Marsupials were all meat-eating animals. |
B.Dingoes should be removed from Australia. |
C.Thylacines had no enemies on mainland Australia. |
D.Human activities may cause the extinction of thylacines. |
A.Tasmania has more dingoes. |
B.Tasmania has more native activities. |
C.Tasmania has a higher temperature. |
D.Tasmania has more rainy days. |
A.change | B.aging | C.decline | D.increase |
A.The result of warmer climate in Australia |
B.The ways of protecting meat-eating animals |
C.The cause of disappearance of thylacines |
D.The effect of climate change on wildlife |
A.ticked all the right boxes. | B.was on the edge of my seat. |
C.had a frog in my throat. | D.was in my own right. |
A.force | B.energy | C.strength | D.power |
A.give away | B.give in | C.give off | D.give up |
1. Where does the speaker work most of the time?
A.In libraries. | B.At a college. | C.At home. |
A.Teach courses at colleges. |
B.Work part-time in a library. |
C.Type letters for other people. |
A.Keep up writing books. |
B.Travel around the world. |
C.Start a new job working with lots of people. |
1.讲座的时间和地点;
2.讲座的具体内容。
注意:1.写作词数应为80字左右;
2.请按以下格式作答。
Notice
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________10 . One of the most famous literary challenges in history was when Dr. Seuss received a challenge from his publisher that he could only use 50 words to write an entire book. That’s all well and good, but it’s a tough challenge, to be sure. However, Ernest Vincent Wright would no doubt turn up his nose, as he challenged himself to pen an entire 50,000-word novel without once using the letter “e”.
Wright managed to pull it off. The final product was Gadsby, which is about a man named, well, Gadsby, who tries to save his city with the help of a youth group. It took Wright nearly six months to complete the work, and in his introduction pages he mentioned the challenges along the way.
One of the biggest challenges was replacing pronouns, since it’s tough to write a sentence, let alone a novel, without words like “he” or “she” or “her” and so forth. Additionally, he was forced to find ways to work around using past tense words that typically end in “-ed”, which, as you might imagine, is more than a little tricky.
Still, Wright did manage to come up with 50,110 words and a full story without any cheats, making it one of the most successful lipograms (避讳某字之文) in the history of writing. Wright self-published the book in 1939 and it was read primarily by people who tried to find any cheats, so convinced were they that Wright simply must have used the letter.
The entire novel is available online to read for free, as it entered the public domain in 1968. It’s a good thing, too, as the storehouse that contained the majority of the copies burned down, destroying enough of the books that it has since become a rare book collector’s prize, with copies being valued at thousands of dollars.
At the end of the day, of course, it remains a truly great achievement. After all, “e” is the most commonly used letter in English, with more than 11 percent of all words in the Oxford dictionary containing at least one “e”.
1. What did Wright challenge himself to write?A.An entire book with 50 words. |
B.A 50,000-word book in six months. |
C.A 50,000-word book without the letter “e”. |
D.An entire book including “e” 50,000 times. |
A.The difficulties Wright faced. |
B.The plot of Wright’s final product. |
C.The popularity of Wright’s final product. |
D.The smart ways Wright used to replace pronouns. |
A.They considered the book a great success. |
B.They expected the book to be available online. |
C.They wondered what lipograms mean. |
D.They doubted if Wright really made it. |
A.Due to their rarity. |
B.Because Wright won a big prize. |
C.Because they had a really long history. |
D.Due to book collectors’ recommendation. |