组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 历史
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 1 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了令人惊讶的足迹将人类抵达美洲的时间推迟了数千年。
1 .

The tracks found at New Mexico’s White Sands National Park are turning upside down past assumptions on when humans first came into North and South America. They look like they were left behind just moments ago by a barefoot teen visitor to New Mexico’s White Sands National Park, each footprint freshly defined (描出外形) by sand. But this is no tourist track. These footprints are among the oldest evidence of humans in the Americas, marking the latest addition to a growing body of evidence that challenges when and how people first got into this unexplored land.

According to the research team, the footprints were pressed into the mua near an ancient lake at White Sands between 21, 000 and 23, 000 years ago, a time when many scientists think that huge ice sheets walled off human passage into North America.

Exactly when humans populated the Americas has been heatedly debated for nearly a century, and until recently, many scientists insisted that this first occurred no earlier than 13, 000 years ago. A growing number of discoveries suggest people were in North and South America thousands of years before. These include the Monte Verde site in Chile that is as old as 18, 500 years and the Gault site in Texas that is up to 20,000 years old. But each find kicks up a firestorm of controversy among scientists.

While the White Sands discovery doesn’t close the book on these debates, it is stirring excitement. “A discovery like this is very close to finding the Holy Grail (圣杯),” says Ciprian Ardelean, an archacologist at the Chiquihuite Cave in Mexico, where researchers believe they have evidence for human activity in the Americas as early as 30,000 years ago.

If confirmed, the discovery of people in the Americas during the last glacial maximum (末次盛冰期)would require a major change in scientifie thinking about how people arrived in the New Werld.

1. What is the previous conclusion on the first arrivals of Americas?
A.Humans came into Americas about 23, 000 years ago.
B.Humans first appeared in Americas to explore the land.
C.Humans didn’t arrive in Americas until 13, 000 years ago.
D.Humans couldn’t enter Americas because of White Sands.
2. Why are the Monte Verde site in Chile and the Gault site in Texas mentioned?
A.To add evidence.B.To introduce the background.
C.To give data.D.To end the debate.
3. What does the underlined word “controversy” mean?
A.Excitement.B.Argument.C.Disagreement.D.Interest.
4. What does Ciprian Ardelean think of the discovery in Paragraph 4?
A.Trustworthy.B.Questionable.C.Inspiring.D.Disappointing.
5. What is the main idea of the text?
A.Humans populated the Americas for nearly one hundred years.
B.The tracks were found at New Mexico’s White Sands National Park.
C.The footprints are among the oldest evidence of humans in the Americas.
D.Surprising footprints push back human arrival in Americas by thousands of years.
2022-04-22更新 | 96次组卷 | 1卷引用:福建省福州市2021-2022学年高一下学期期中质量抽测英语试卷
共计 平均难度:一般