组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 社会
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 2 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍了一项重要的技能“批判性忽视”,在互联网时代帮助我们有意识地控制自己的信息环境,以减少接触到虚假和垃圾信息。

1 . In the days before the Internet, critical thinking is the most important skill that we could have. To think critically, we need to read carefully, consider the credibility (可信度) of sources, and reason out conclusions on our own. But in the digital age, according to Anastasia Kozyreva, a psychologist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development, a more important skill is “critical ignoring”.

“With so much information, we need to first sort the wheat from the chaff, deciding what’s worth our attention and time, and what’s not. Now, we live in an ‘attention economy’ in which we are no longer consumers. Rather, we’re the products whose attention is being sold on the advertising marketplace. That means each link we click on is a sale of our time and attention, often with little or no benefit to ourselves. To protect ourselves, we need to develop new ways of interacting with information,” she said.

Kozyreva advocates learning the skill of critical ignoring, in which readers intentionally control their information environment to reduce their exposure to false and trash information.

By developing our critical ignoring skills, she thinks we can enjoy the benefits of the Internet while avoiding falling victim to those who try to control our attention, our time, and our minds. Here are three of the strategies recommended by her to avoid the traps of attention economy.

The first strategy is self-control. Of course, we need to stay informed of world events and be in touch with others, so we can’t just ignore the Internet altogether. When we do go into social media, Kozyreva recommends setting time limits. Limiting ourselves in this way prevents us from losing track of time as we click on one attractive link after another.

The next strategy is in-depth reading. For example, headlines are often designed to attract attention, not provide information. The contents of the articles may be completely contrary to what the headlines show.

1. What does the underlined phrase “sort the wheat from the chaff” in paragraph 2 mean?
A.Decide which produce is more useful.B.Balance potential harms with benefits.
C.Select the valuable from the valueless.D.Think about how to divide the profits.
2. What does critical ignoring help us do?
A.Read every attractive link carefully.B.Reason out conclusions on our own.
C.Avoid using the Internet altogether.D.Stay away from low-quality information.
3. What might the author continue talking about?
A.Another recommended strategy.B.The importance of self-control.
C.The traps of attention economy.D.The value of our time and attention.
4. What is the author’s purpose in writing the text?
A.To compare two important concepts.B.To introduce a useful idea to readers.
C.To show the limits of critical thinking.D.To prove critical ignoring is less important.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较易(0.85) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇夹叙夹议文。本文通过85岁的妈妈开车发生事故,作者拿走了妈妈的车钥匙的故事展开讨论,到底老年人能不能开车。

2 . My mother at 85 was quick, with good vision and sharp reaction for her age, but one day she knocked into three parked cars on a supermarket parking lot. We never found out exactly how it happened, but the investigators figured Mom hit the accelerator instead of the brake.

Mom was lucky, even though she spent two weeks in the hospital. But we unwillingly concluded that it was time to take away Mom’s car keys. Tears ran down her cheeks. I think she never felt old until that moment, when I took away the independence provided by the car.

In the days that followed, we suggested she take taxis to shop, but she wouldn’t do it. Fortunately, she lived in the city and quickly slipped into the habit of taking the bus. She began to enjoy her new life. But most old people have no convenient public transportation or shops within walking distance.

We seemed to have made a right decision. But is tragedy like that a reason to take away the car keys of the elderly? I think not. Age doesn’t necessarily prove anything. Slower reactions or not, senior citizens are much better than teenagers. They usually drive more slowly. They get honked at a lot, but their slower speed reduces the risk of death and destruction. The worst risk-takers on the highway are young men between the ages of 18 to 25, but no one suggests taking away their keys or raising the driving age to 26.

The death rate in the past year for motorists between 16 and 20, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, was more than double that for drivers over 70. The older citizen who tries to avoid danger is likely to take personal responsibility more seriously than a younger person who causes danger through partying and risk.

So, let Granny drive. Road age is a lot less dangerous than road rage.

1. Why was Mom sad when her car keys were taken away according to the author?
A.She was misunderstood.
B.She had to walk to shop.
C.She realized she was old.
D.She was seriously injured.
2. What did the author think of taking away Mom’s car keys finally?
A.Influential.
B.Unreasonable.
C.Meaningful.
D.Unimportant.
3. Which of the following opinions does the author support?
A.It’s necessary to raise the driving age to 20.
B.People under 26 should be forbidden to drive.
C.Both senior and young drivers like taking risks while driving.
D.Seniors shouldn’t be banned from driving because of their age.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.The legal age for driving.
B.Why young drivers take risks.
C.The accident caused by Mom.
D.Whether the elderly can drive.
2023-01-20更新 | 102次组卷 | 1卷引用:2023届陕西省山阳中学高三上学期一模英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般