1 . At the time of writing this, it's been eight days since I moved into my dorm room at Montclair State University. Commuting (通勤) or going online completely is not an option for me. I can't drive a car. And I am studying journalism, which is difficult to practice with online-only classes.
Few people are on campus. The school is doing phased move-ins. For the safety of students and staff,you have to fill out charts and forms telling the school exactly where you go and when you will move in.
Housing was not a big concern because the on-campus population has been halved. I moved in at the earliest time I could: Aug. 10. During that time, the only people I saw were joggers wheezing up the many hills around my school. To get my double room, I had to fill out an abundance of paperwork. I agreed that in the event that I get COVID-19, I'll move to a single room completely lacking in human contact, besides food delivery and online classes.
And then there was the food situation. It's unknown whether dining options will be open in time for our classes next week, and if they are, how they will be handled. The tables I spent many hours sitting at with friends have all but disappeared. There are plenty of floor signs at the canteen for all students to follow. Instead of sitting down to eat, it was grab-and-go. Pick whatever you want, and an employee will pack it for you in a box and a plastic bag.
But here on campus, it's the calm before the storm. Somehow, society hasn't collapsed. Cats and dogs are not raining from the sky. Pigs aren't flying. Right now, it's like a nature reserve. I've seen more birds, deer and squirrels than humans here.
My bizarre (怪异的) college situation leaves me with sleepless nights. Much like this whole pandemic (疫情),everything is just one day at a time.
1. What are students from Montclair State University required to do?A.Report their whereabouts. | B.Fill out application forms. |
C.Take online courses at dorms. | D.Move in as soon as possible. |
A.He was infected with COVID-19. |
B.There were not so many applicants. |
C.He came earlier than any other students. |
D.He submitted all the necessary paperwork. |
A.Food will be delivered by an employee. |
B.Students will have more choices next week. |
C.Students are not allowed to eat at the canteen. |
D.The canteen provides more tables and floor signs. |
A.Optimistic. | B.Concerned. |
C.Relaxed. | D.Indifferent. |
2 . Growing up, we are constantly reminded that young people are heavily affected by technology. We are the “antisocial club”, those who prefer to text our friends in the same room rather than make eye contact with them. And even though never-ending studies reveal to us the extent of our social media addiction, we should at least consider that it’s not only our young people’s problem any more.
There’s the rise of the Instagram mums, who like to post an abundance of cute baby pictures, share their mom feelings along the way and show their wonderful lifestyles. They are the so-called “Facebook mum generation”, a growing group of parents that like to overshare.
While all of this might be fine, and even a little humorous, new research suggests that parents’ technology addiction is negatively affecting their children’s behavior. According to the study, 40% of mothers and 32% of fathers have admitted having some sort of phone addiction. This has led to a significant fall in verbal interactions within families and even a decline in mothers’ encouraging their children.
There is no denying that I get annoyed when receiving the words “I’ll be with you soon” from a parent, when all I want to do is ask one question. But, at the same time, every day leaving the room to wait until my father is finished with his “serious business” (Farmville), has now become the norm. Whether you want to escape your disturbing children for a bit, or want to stay up late flicking through Twitter, know that wanting to do all of these is normal. We, your children, know how addictive it can be and how difficult it is to switch off. But before telling us to put our phones away at the table or even worse, listing statistics of how damaging social media can be for us, maybe lead by example, considering how much time you spend on the phone and how this is impacting your children and your relationship with us. Maybe in this way we can work on our addiction together.
1. From Paragraph 1, we can know that teenagers nowadays ________.A.enjoy socializing with their friends | B.send messages to their friends every day |
C.hate to make eye contact with their friends | D.are heavily addicted to their mobile phones |
A.Boring. | B.Selfish. | C.Funny. | D.Meaningful. |
A.security | B.standard | C.routine | D.custom |
A.To share the author’s own experience with the readers. |
B.To call on parents to get rid of their own media addiction. |
C.To reveal that parents are always addicted to mobile phones. |
D.To show the author’s dissatisfaction with parents’ phone use. |
3 . It’s possible to admire Oprah Winfrey and still wish Harvard hadn’t awarded her an honorary doctor of law degree and the commencement speaker spot at yesterday’s graduation. There’s no question Oprah’s achievements place her in the temple of American success stories. Talent, charm, and an exceptional work ethic have rarely hurled anyone as far as they have this former abused teenage mother from rural Mississippi who became one of the world’s most successful entertainment icons and the first African-American female billionaire.
Honorary degrees are often conferred on non-academic leaders in the arts, business, and politics. Harvard’s list in recent years has included Kofi fi Annan, Bill Gates, Meryl Streep, and David Souter. But Oprah’s particular brand of celebrity is not a good fit for the values of a university whose motto, Veritas, means truth. Oprah’s passionate advocacy extends, unfortunately, to a hearty embrace of fake science. Most notoriously, Oprah’s validation of Jenny McCarthy’s claim that vaccines cause autism has no doubt contributed to much harm through the foolish avoidance of vaccines.
Famous people are entitled to a few failings, like the rest of us. And the choice of commencement speakers often reflects a balance of institutional priorities and aspirations. Judging from our conversations with many students, Oprah was a widely popular choice.
But this vote of confidence in Oprah sends a troubling message at precisely the time when American universities need to do more to advance the cause of reason. As former Dean of Harvard College, Harry Lewis, noted in a blog post about his objections. “It seems very odd for Harvard to honor such a high profile popularizer of the irrational… at a time when political and religious nonsense so jeopardize the rule of reason in this allegedly enlightened democracy and around the world.”
As America’s oldest and most visible university, Harvard has a special opportunity to convey its respect for science not only through its research and teaching programs but also in its public affirmation of evidence-based inquiry.
Unfortunately, many American universities seem awfully busy protecting their brand name and not nearly busy enough protecting the pursuit of knowledge. A recent article in The Harvard Crimson noted the shocking growth of Harvard’s public relations arm in the last five years and it questioned whether a focus on risk management and avoiding controversy was really the best outward-looking face of this great institution.
As American research universities begin to resemble profit centers and entertainment complexes, it’s easy to lose sight of their primary mission: to produce and spread knowledge. This mission depends on traditions of rational discourse and vigorous defense of the scientific method. Oprah Winfrey’s honorary doctorate was a step in the wrong direction.
1. What do we learn about Oprah Winfrey from the passage?A.She was a distinguished graduate of Harvard School of Law. |
B.She worked her way to success in the entertainment industry. |
C.She used to abuse her children when she was a young mother. |
D.She achieved her fame through persistent advocacy of fake science. |
A.She did not specialize in the study of law. | B.She was known as a supporter of fake science. |
C.She was an icon of the entertainment industry | D.She had not distinguished herself academically. |
A.They show inadequate respect for evidence-based inquiry. |
B.They fall short of expectations in teaching and research. |
C.They all attach too much importance to public relations. |
D.They are tolerant of political and religious nonsense. |
A.Cultivation of student creativity. | B.Defense of the scientific method. |
C.Liberation of the human mind. | D.Pursuit of knowledge and truth. |
4 . Speed-reading is a crucial skill in the Internet age. We skim over articles, e-mails and tweets to try to
But a new trend calls on people to
A recent story from The Wall Street Journal reported on a book club in Wellington, New Zealand, where members meet in a cafe and turn off their smartphones. They
Unlike traditional book clubs, the
Slow readers, such as The Atlantic’s Maura Kelly, say a regular reading habit sharpens the mind, improves concentration,
Some of these benefits have been backed up by science.
Another study published last year in Science showed that reading novels helps people understand others’ mental states and beliefs, a crucial skill in building
Slow reading means a(n)
A.highlight | B.grasp | C.determine | D.underline |
A.Flooded | B.Armed | C.Obsessed | D.Impressed |
A.unlock | B.uncover | C.unplug | D.unpack |
A.straighten in | B.rise from | C.shift in | D.sink into |
A.point | B.cause | C.impact | D.duty |
A.protected | B.interactive | C.relaxed | D.addictive |
A.defined | B.urged | C.initiated | D.performed |
A.increases | B.maintains | C.evaluates | D.reduces |
A.In brief | B.For example | C.Above all | D.By contrast |
A.recreational | B.professional | C.intellectual | D.educational |
A.confidence | B.endurance | C.awareness | D.relationship |
A.return | B.answer | C.end | D.barrier |
A.misunderstandings | B.sufferings | C.obstacles | D.distractions |
A.purposely | B.automatically | C.occasionally | D.leisurely |
A.Cope with | B.Reach for | C.Believe in | D.Stick to |
A man in Jinan was sentenced
The incident has drawn a lot of attention with people
The problem is
The harm that can be done by throwing objects out of windows has not received its deserved attention yet.
6 . The proportion of teenage and young adults smokers in China has been increasing rapidly in recent years, which is an alarming trend, the president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Wang Chen said on Thursday.
Last year, 18.6 percent of people aged 15 to 24 in China were smokers, compared with 12. 5 percent in 2013 and 8.3 percent in 2003, Wang Chen said at a news conference on tobacco control. In contrast, tobacco prevalence among adults as a whole has been declining steadily in recent years-the percentage of smokers aged 15 and older last year in China was 26.6 percent, down from 27.7 percent in 2015, according to a report released by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention in May. Despite a general decline, the smoking rate in China is still higher than in most other countries, Wang said.
“What is most worrisome is the rising prevalence of tobacco among young people, which represents a country’s future,” he said. “Young smokers are very likely to keep the habit for their entire lives, which can cause huge health and economic consequences.”
Smoking has been regarded as a major culprit in many chronic diseases, and tobacco control has played a significant role in health promotion efforts made in recent years by the Chinese government, which aims to reduce the smoking rate for people aged 15 and older to 20 percent by 2030.
Wang said a lot of young people are still not aware of the harmful effects caused by smoking, and more education is needed to reduce the rising smoking rate. In addition, tobacco advertisements and rampant smoking footage in films and television series can also encourage smoking among teenagers and young adults, and they should be banned. “Key groups, such as medical staff, schoolteachers, government officials and parents, should take the lead in quitting smoking to help create a nonsmoking environment for teenagers and young adults,” he said.
1. What can we know from the numbers listed in para. 2?A.Adult smokers has been increasing steadily. |
B.People aged 15 and older are more likely to smoke. |
C.The numbers of young smokers has been rising rapidly. |
D.Smoking rate in China is higher than any other country. |
A.reminder | B.issue |
C.cause | D.crisis |
A.objective | B.concerned |
C.indifferent | D.relieved |
A.Smoking rate among youth is rising. | B.Smoking accounts for many chronic diseases. |
C.Smoking is harmful to our environment. | D.Smoking footage in films should be banned. |
7 . Despite being used by 1.34 billion people each year, traveling on the Tube in London can actually be quite lonely. An unwritten rule encouraging silence, mixed with classic British reserve, means that even though you’re packed into enclosed space wit hundreds of other people, the morning trip can leave you feeling somewhat lonely.
One London resident, however, is trying to change this. “You get on the Tube here and it’s completely silent and it’s strange,” says Jonathan Dunne, an American living in London, who has started a campaign of giving out badges (徽章) with the slogan “Tube Chat?” last month, encouraging travelers in London to get talking to one another.
Although Dunne says he’s received mostly positive responses, there are always exceptions.
Londoner Brian Wilson responded with a campaign of his own, handing out 500 badges with the words “Don’t even think about it” on them. “ I can’t stand the idea of having to talk to strangers on the Tube on my way to work,” he said.
Michael Robinson, a student from London, agrees. “Being on the Tube is the only peace and quiet some people get on their journeys to and from work. It doesn’t need to be spoiled by people coming up and chatting to you,” he says.
“People assume that I just walk up and talk to strangers, which I don’t, but it’s been a great way to meet people you would never have normally spoken to,” Dunne says.So if you ever end up using public transport in London, why not say hello to the person next to you? Just make sure to check for a badge first.
1. Which partly leads to the silence on the Tube in London?A.The government’s rule. | B.People’s desire for quiet. |
C.British people’s personality. | D.Awareness of personal privacy. |
A.A request for keeping silent. | B.A special way of greeting someone. |
C.A signal of avoiding being disturbed. | D.An encouragement to start a conversation. |
A.To stress the importance of communication. |
B.To show not everyone agrees with Dunne’s idea. |
C.To prove Londoners are speechless on the Tube. |
D.To state the disadvantages of chatting with strangers. |
A.Silence on the Tube! |
B.Tube Chat or Not |
C.Lonely Travel in the London Tube |
D.Tube Passengers Wearing Badges |
8 . It was the morning before I was presenting a paper at an academic conference in Paris. Unexpectedly, the babysitter I’d
“
So, with uncertainty and anxiety, I did. While I presented my
Unfortunately, my experience is not the
A.arranged | B.looked | C.care | D.provided |
A.change | B.like | C.make | D.plan |
A.conference | B.presentation | C.announcement | D.conversation |
A.Accompany | B.Support | C.Comfort | D.Bring |
A.dream | B.life | C.work | D.choice |
A.just | B.even | C.yet | D.still |
A.sheltered | B.fed | C.freed | D.amused |
A.forgive | B.thank | C.praise | D.blame |
A.memories | B.requirements | C.challenge | D.preparations |
A.unique | B.rare | C.random | D.common |
A.schedule | B.gathering | C.body | D.entertainment |
A.decision | B.idea | C.attitude | D.risk |
A.invent | B.request | C.ignore | D.understand |
A.policies | B.predictions | C.explanations | D.assumptions |
A.grow up | B.wake up | C.show up | D.cheer up |
A.Lastly | B.Instead | C.Thus | D.However |
A.Eventually | B.Personally | C.Differently | D.Gradually |
A.balance | B.competition | C.outcome | D.interest |
A.conclude | B.expect | C.remember | D.question |
A.In other words | B.On the other hand | C.In a similar way | D.As a result |
9 . “Alexa, what’s 5 minus 3?” A 6-year-old boy recently asked that question in a video, which was popular on Twitter. Alexa, Amazon’s voice-started assistant, delivered a quick answer: 2.
It’s cute, but it raises a question that’s been on the minds of many parents and educators lately: How do virtual assistants like Alexa affect children’s learning experiences?
Clint Hill, an English teacher, says in his classrooms he often sees “children quietly talking into their phones and asking Google or other services to spell some complicated words that they don’t know.” But Hill says he doesn’t mind. “I struggle with spelling, and spellcheck on my word processing has been a lifesaver for me.” he says. “I think being able to use those technological aids is not hurting anybody,” Hill adds.
But some experts say it’s not just about learning basic math or spelling. “One of the best gifts we can give our children is doing that kind of problem-solving together,” says Diane Levin, a professor of applied human development. Levin says it’s important for children to learn to struggle—even just a little—with challenges. “They will use those skills that they’re learning for all kinds of things that come along,” Levin says.
How much concern should parents have over Alexa and their children? Every new wave of technology, from calculators to TV sets, causes a panic about its effect on children, and nostalgia (怀旧) for the past, says Dimitri Christakis, an expert in child health, behavior and development.
But he says that a child watching television is having a completely passive experience. Because new technology is interactive, “it helps understand how the world works,” Christakis says. “But while watching television, you play no role in the content,” Christakis says.
Still, he agrees that this debate is about much more than knowing what 5 minus 3 is. It’s also about developing the patience to solve problems. “That ability to stay focused,” he says, “is one of the most important developmental skills that children acquire.”
1. What can be inferred from Hill’s words?A.Technological aids are helpful. |
B.His students don’t use their brains. |
C.His students aren’t focused in class. |
D.Spelling is really difficult for small children. |
A.They fail to solve problems. |
B.They give children challenges. |
C.They present a threat to teachers at school. |
D.They are harmful to children’s development. |
A.New technology affects children most. | B.New technology tends to cause worries. |
C.Television has been a thing of the past. | D.Today’s parents are too concerned. |
A.Their ability to interact with others. | B.Their ability to learn from the past. |
C.Their ability to study technology. | D.Their ability to pay attention. |
10 . It's an attractive habit for young people to glance at their smartphone rather than make eye contact with someone and make conversation. There is so much to look at photographs, social media feeds, messages and emails.
First, there have been many claims about the damage looking at screens does to our eyesight. Some people feared staring at a small bright box could make us short-sighted or lead to headaches.
But a new study says time in front of computers and phones might not be as bad for young people as many think. Research by the Oxford Internet Institute examined data from more than 17,000 teenagers in the UK, Ireland and the United States. Their study concluded that most links between life satisfaction and social media use were of little importance.
So, does this mean young people can spend longer time looking at social media? Dr Max Davie, officer for health improvement, calls the study a "small first step". But he said there were other things to consider. For example, your sleep, exercise and time with the family or friends may be affected by screen time.
A.But is it really good for them? |
B.It's no wonder they are glued to their screens. |
C.This is a real problem for children and young people. |
D.Self﹣harm could prove damaging to their mental health. |
E.Only less than 1% of the teenagers' life was seriously affected. |
F.The researchers are confident that the bad effects are very small. |
G.Perhaps, deciding what is the right amount of screen time is up to a personal judgment? |