组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:572 题号:11852575

Growing up, we are constantly reminded that young people are heavily affected by technology. We are the “antisocial club”, those who prefer to text our friends in the same room rather than make eye contact with them. And even though never-ending studies reveal to us the extent of our social media addiction, we should at least consider that it’s not only our young people’s problem any more.

There’s the rise of the Instagram mums, who like to post an abundance of cute baby pictures, share their mom feelings along the way and show their wonderful lifestyles. They are the so-called “Facebook mum generation”, a growing group of parents that like to overshare.

While all of this might be fine, and even a little humorous, new research suggests that parents’ technology addiction is negatively affecting their children’s behavior. According to the study, 40% of mothers and 32% of fathers have admitted having some sort of phone addiction. This has led to a significant fall in verbal interactions within families and even a decline in mothers’ encouraging their children.

There is no denying that I get annoyed when receiving the words “I’ll be with you soon” from a parent, when all I want to do is ask one question. But, at the same time, every day leaving the room to wait until my father is finished with his “serious business” (Farmville), has now become the norm. Whether you want to escape your disturbing children for a bit, or want to stay up late flicking through Twitter, know that wanting to do all of these is normal. We, your children, know how addictive it can be and how difficult it is to switch off. But before telling us to put our phones away at the table or even worse, listing statistics of how damaging social media can be for us, maybe lead by example, considering how much time you spend on the phone and how this is impacting your children and your relationship with us. Maybe in this way we can work on our addiction together.

1. From Paragraph 1, we can know that teenagers nowadays ________.
A.enjoy socializing with their friendsB.send messages to their friends every day
C.hate to make eye contact with their friendsD.are heavily addicted to their mobile phones
2. What does the author think of mums’ oversharing?
A.Boring.B.Selfish.C.Funny.D.Meaningful.
3. The underlined word “norm” in Paragraph 4 probably means ________.
A.securityB.standardC.routineD.custom
4. What’s the main purpose of the article?
A.To share the author’s own experience with the readers.
B.To call on parents to get rid of their own media addiction.
C.To reveal that parents are always addicted to mobile phones.
D.To show the author’s dissatisfaction with parents’ phone use.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】Leaders in the aviation (航空)industry plan to launch a campaign that they hope will work against what they call a " flight shaming(使蒙羞)” movement. They say flight shaming has weakened peopled demand for air travel in Europe . Some travelers there are increasingly concerned about the effects of flying on the environment. Activists have been calling for greater action against climate change. That includes avoiding air travel.

Flight shaming has affected air travel demand in many European countries, including Britain, France and Germany. The campaign will try to explain to the public how the industry is reducing its effect on the environment. Juniac, head of IATA, said the flight shaming movement gave off "misleading information"..

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) is organizing the plan through the Air Transport Action Group, a group of aviation industry organizations and companies. Juniac didn't say when the campaign would start, but noted that details would be available to airports and airlines.

Commercial flying is estimated to cause about 2.5% of worldwide carbon emissions(释放). However, that number could rise as worldwide air travel increases.

The aviation industry says it has already cut carbon emissions by one-half since 1990. The improvements are mainly the result of aircraft that use fuel more effectively. The industry plans to cut emissions further by 2050. It has a goal of stopping the growth of carbon emissions by 2020.

Airlines also have warned of the harmful effects of the flight shaming movement. Some have criticized the industry for failing to explain itself Tim Clark,president of the airline Emirates,said that improvements in technology have reduced the environmental effects of passenger airplanes.

1. What is flight shaming movement about?
A.Weakening peopled demand to travel abroad.
B.Calling on all to fight against global warming.
C.Announcing the environmental harm of flying.
D.Scaring people from approaching the airport.
2. How does Juniac comment on flight shaming movement?
A.It ignores the efforts of airlines to reduce pollution.
B.Airlines will charge the movement for their loss.
C.Airlines are to blame for the cause of the movement.
D.It has positive effects in urging airlines to be green.
3. What conclusion can we draw from the fifth paragraph?
A.The effective use of fuel has made air travel greener.
B.Flight shaming movement has caused great loss for airlines.
C.With more passengers? carbon emissions by planes may rise.
D.The aviation industry aims to stop carbon emission by 2020.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.Improvement of air quality since flight shaming. movement.
B.Opposition of aviation industry against flight shaming movement,
C.Travelers' inconvenience caused by flight shaming movement,
D.Measures by aviation industry to reduce environmental pollution.
2020-02-13更新 | 64次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了艺术品盗窃是全球范围内的一个严重问题,每年有多达1万件珍贵物品被盗。尤其对于小型博物馆来说,解决这个问题可能是他们无法承担的。此外,文章还提到了警方在调查案件时,对于提供相关信息的人支付费用是合法的,但信息费与赎金之间的界限往往模糊不清。

【推荐2】Willie Sutton, a once celebrated American criminal, was partly famous for saying he robbed banks because “that’s where the money is.” Actually, museums are where the money is. In a single gallery there can be paintings worth more, taken together, than a whole fleet of jets. And while banks can hide their money in basements, museums have to put their valuables in plain sight.

Nothing could be worse than the thought of a painting as important as The Scream, Edvard Munch’s impressive image of a man screaming against the backdrop of a blood-red sky, disappearing into a criminal underworld that doesn’t care much about careful treatment of art works. Art theft is a vast problem around the world. As many as 10,000 precious items of all kinds disappear each year. And for smaller museums in particular, it may not be a problem they can afford to solve. The money for insurance on very famous pictures would be budget destroyers even for the largest museums.

Although large museums have had their share of embarrassing robberies, the greatest problem is small institutions. Neither can afford heavy security. Large museums attach alarms to their most valuable paintings, but a modest alarm system can cost $500,000 or more. Some museums are looking into tracking equipment that would allow them to follow stolen items once they leave the museums. But conservators are concerned that if they have to insert something, it might damage the object. Meanwhile, smaller museums can barely afford enough guards, relying instead on elderly staff.

Thieves sometimes try using artworks as money for other underworld deals. The planners of the 2006 robbery of Russborough House near Dublin, who stole 18 paintings, tried in vain to trade them for Irish Republican Army members held in British prison. Others demand a ransom (赎金) from the museum that owns the pictures. Once thieves in Frankfurt, Germany, made off with two major works by J.M.W. Turner from the Tate Gallery in London. The paintings, worth more than $80 million, were recovered in 2012 after the Tate paid more than $5 million to people having “information” about the paintings. Though ransom is illegal in Britain, money for looking into a case is not, provided that police agree the source of the information is unconnected to the crime. All the same, where information money end s and ransom begins is often a gray area.

1. Why do smaller museums face a greater challenge in preventing art theft?
A.They lack experienced staff.
B.They cannot afford high-tech security systems.
C.They do not have valuable artworks.
D.They lack interest in art conservation.
2. What is the concern of conservators regarding the use of tracking equipment to prevent art theft?
A.It might damage the artwork.
B.It is too expensive for smaller museums.
C.It is difficult to insert into the paintings.
D.It is ineffective for valuable paintings.
3. From Paragraph 4, we can learn that ________.
A.the thieves demanded a ransom from the Tate Gallery
B.the Tate Gallery regained the lost paintings illegally
C.the money paid was considered an information fee, not a ransom
D.the police requested the Tate Gallery to pay the money
4. The purpose of this passage is ________.
A.to remind criminals to protect and preserve the painting
B.to give suggestions on how to avoid the crimes of art theft
C.to urge museums to set up more advanced security systems
D.to make people aware of art theft and the necessity of good security systems
2024-01-16更新 | 130次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Life for almost anyone is increasingly influenced by screens. Not only are screens themselves cheap to make, but they also make things cheaper. Any place that can fit a screen in can cut costs. And any activity that can happen on a screen becomes cheaper. The physical experience of learning, living and dying is becoming smooth glass. All of this has led to a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming a luxury good (奢侈品).

“What we are seeing now is the luxury of human engagement,” Milton Pedraza, the chief of the Luxury Institute, said. Expected spending on experiences such as enjoyable travel and dining is outpacing spending on goods, according to his company’s research, and he sees it as a direct response to the rapid increase of screens.

Screens exposure starts young. And children who spent more than two hours a day looking at a screen got lower scores on thinking and language tests, according to early results of a landmark study supported by the National Institutes of Health. The study focuses on brain development of more than 11,000 children. Most disturbingly, the study is finding that the brains of children who spend much time on screens are different. For some kids, their cerebral cortex (大脑皮层) would become thinner before expected time. In adults, one study found an association between screen time and depression.

There is also the reality that in our culture of increasing separation, in which so many of the traditional gathering places and social structures have disappeared, screens are filling a vital gap.

For normal people, running away from the screen becomes impossible. It’s not a luxury, and it’s easy to get. It is normal for more people to need the network constantly. In addition, it has become an important part of social interaction.

1. What can we infer from Paragraph 1?
A.Screens make everything in life cheaper.
B.People’s life is totally controlled by screens.
C.It is difficult for people to contact each other.
D.Face-to-face communication is decreasing nowadays.
2. According to the text, which of the following WON’T be caused by long screen time?
A.More social interaction.B.Depressive state of mind.C.Different brain structures.D.Poorer academic performance.
3. What is the author’s attitude towards the popularization of screen?
A.Favorable.B.Skeptical.C.Concerned.D.Opposed .
2020-03-22更新 | 207次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般