1 . When Stanford University student Ellen Xu, now 18, was a five-year-old in San Diego, Califormia, she clearly remembers that her parents rushed her little sister to the hospital. Three-year-old Kate had fallen seriously ill; she had a fever, reddened eyes, and some swelling (肿胀) in her hands and tongue.
At first, the puzzled doctors thought she had flu, but when her condition didn’t improve, the Xus returned to the clinic room, where a doctor by chance had a similar earlier experience with such symptoms (症状) in the blood known as Kawasaki disease. Though rare (罕见的), it’s the leading cause of the heart disease in babies and young children, and its causes remain unknown.
The doctor knew how to treat it: He ordered some medicine for Kate, and finally she shook off the illness without suffering damage to her heart.
Xu remembers being curious about her sister’s illness condition and was amazed that the grown-ups couldn’t answer her questions about why it was so hard to check. “In my mind, it was this puzzle I wanted to solve,” she says.
Ten years later, wanting to enter a high school science fair, she had an idea. What if we had a doctor in our pocket? So she created just that: Using AI, Xu designed a program that uses visual facts to check the disease based on five physical symptoms.
The technology works the same way as apps that can identify birds and plants with photos you’ve taken on your cellphone. Worried parents can upload a photo that they have taken of their child, and the technology will scan the picture for symptoms of the disease, which often have a strong visual factors, such as a swollen tongue.
Xu’s invention has been applied as a web app on the website. “The technology could also be developed for recognizing some other diseases,” she says, “It means a lot to me. I want to use AI to help people live happier and healthier lives.”
Xu says that her sister Kate, now in her third year of high school with dreams of becoming an environmental engineer, is strong and healthy.
1. Why did the author mention Kate’s illness?A.To explain who treated Kate’s illness. |
B.To prove how serious Kate’s illness was. |
C.To show how much Ellen loved her sister. |
D.To tell why Ellen solved the puzzle in her mind. |
A.To save her sister. | B.To earn a prize. |
C.To check a rare disease. | D.To identify birds and plants. |
A.Determined and careful. | B.Creative and helpful. |
C.Diligent and selfless. | D.Active and easygoing. |
A.A Girl’s Road to Invention. | B.An Invention Helping Doctors. |
C.A Girl Recovering from a Disease. | D.A New Method to Treat a Disease. |
The Sanfu days, also known as the “Chinese dog days of summer”, mark summer’s hottest period of the year. During these days, many Chinese are keen on
The treatment
These patches
3 . Healthcare professionals in four Canadian provinces can now prescribe (开处方) their patients passes to National Parks thanks to a new program, PaRX, which stresses the health benefits of spending time in nature in helping to manage physical and mental health.
PaRx was founded by the B. C. Parks Foundation in November 2020 and was officially supported by Parks Canada last month. Health professionals who register (注册) with the program can offer their patients a Parks Canada Discovery Pass, making it the country’s “first national nature prescription program”. The Parks Discovery Pass typically costs about $57 per adult per year.
“We’re really asking doctors to prioritize patients who live close to Parks Canada sites so they’ll have more access and can make it part of their everyday lives, and also those for whom the cost of a pass might be a barrier to nature access,” said Melissa Lem, president-elect of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.
Studies have shown that spending time in nature has a range of health benefits—from lowering blood pressure and improving heart health to reducing stress and anxiety. PaRx recommends that patients spend at least two hours per week in the great outdoors, and at least 20 minutes each time, to get the most benefit.
The program is currently available in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. It will eventually spread to every province.
PaRx also has benefits outside of the national parks, with many gardens offering free admission to visitors who show their prescriptions.
“There’s almost no medical condition that nature doesn’t make better. Rediscovering nature and then realizing how important it is to us has really shown that nature-health connection,” Lem said.
1. What do we know about the Parks Discovery Pass?A.It is low priced. | B.It is designed for poor families. |
C.It is well received. | D.It is owned by registered doctors. |
A.Improve its service quality. | B.Carry it out all over the country. |
C.Do further research on its effect. | D.Make it available free of charge. |
A.Nature matters a great deal to our health. |
B.Not all patients can get treated by doctors. |
C.People should learn to change their lifestyle. |
D.People should place health above everything. |
A.Canadians Are Living in Harmony with Nature |
B.Canadians Are Trying to Get Away from Hospitals |
C.Canadian Doctors Are Prescribing National Park Visits |
D.Canadian Doctors Are Leading the Way in Medical Research |
4 . Recently, my mother experienced a surgery. It was conducted to
I told him it would be great if we could think of a(n)
When finally I arrived at the hospital, I had the
When my mom recovered well and was
Nurses really are the true
A.repair | B.add | C.remove | D.shut |
A.met with | B.operated on | C.looked into | D.tended to |
A.active | B.pleased | C.comfortable | D.strong |
A.efficient | B.extra | C.special | D.exact |
A.appointing | B.performing | C.organizing | D.approving |
A.ignored | B.exhausted | C.recognized | D.prepared |
A.doubt | B.decision | C.agreement | D.idea |
A.attempt | B.chance | C.courage | D.luck |
A.considerately | B.frequently | C.occasionally | D.individually |
A.make | B.enjoy | C.need | D.deserve |
A.ordered | B.permitted | C.convinced | D.delayed |
A.witness | B.share | C.appreciate | D.understand |
A.monitors | B.heroes | C.providers | D.experts |
A.result | B.reality | C.difficulty | D.situation |
A.service | B.sacrifice | C.guidance | D.promise |
5 . The good news about Britain's National Health Service (NHS) is that it gives free medical help to everyone who needs it. Sick people don't have to pay to see the doctor, or to stay in hospital, and they only pay part of the cost of their medicines. The NHS has been enjoyed by British people since 1946 when it started. The idea then was to look after people of all ages.
Slowly, problems have grown up. Governments are finding that the bills are getting bigger and bigger. In 1982, £14,000 million was spent on health. One reason for this is that there are many more old people now than there were in 1946. Forty percent of NHS money goes to looking after the old. Some people say that the NHS is a luxury (奢侈品)Britain can not afford. Free medicine should be given only to the poor. Other people, including many doctors, disagree. Everyone, they say, has the right to the same medical help. In a two-part system, the rich would always get the best. This would not be fair. People also disagree about how NHS money should be spent. Should £15,000 be spent on each heart transplant operation, when there are not enough beds for thousands of old people in pain? Should abortions (流产) be paid for by the NHS? Should more money be spent on the mentally ill? Shouldn't doctors and nurses be better paid?
The questions go on and on — but so does the NHS. And millions of British people are thankful that it's there.
1. What do sick people have to pay in Britain?A.Seeing a doctor. | B.Staying in a hospital. | C.Getting some medicine. | D.Having an operation. |
A.More young people get ill. | B.There are many more old people. |
C.Medicines become more expensive. | D.Doctors and nurses are better paid. |
A.Shortage of money. | B.Disagreement from people. |
C.Arguments about its function. | D.Pressure from the government. |
A.Whether it's necessary to provide beds for old people in pain. |
B.Whether there should be free medical care for the physically ill. |
C.Whether people should ever be cared for from birth to death. |
D.Whether money should be spent on some serious diseases. |
A.How to use the health care service. |
B.How to make an online appointment. |
C.How to reach a doctor in health center. |
7 . People have different ways of dealing with a common cold. Some take over the counter medicines such as aspirin while others try popular home remedies(治疗) like herbal tea or chicken soup. Yet here is the tough truth about the common cold: nothing really cures it.
So why do people sometimes believe that their remedies work? According to James Taylor, professor at the University of Washington, colds usually go away on their own in about a week, improving a little each day after symptoms peak, so it's easy to believe it's medicine rather than time that deserves the credit, USA Today reported.
It still seems hard to believe that we can deal with more serious diseases yet are powerless against something so common as a cold. Recently, scientists came closer to figure out why. To understand it, you first need to know how antiviral drugs work. They attack the virus by attaching to and changing the surface structures of the virus. To do that, the drug must fit and lock into the virus like the right piece of a jigsaw(拼图), which means scientists have to identify the virus and build a 3D model to study its surface before they can design an antiviral drug that is effective enough.
The two cold viruses that scientists had long known about were rhinovirus(鼻病毒) A and B. But they didn't find out about the existence of a third virus, rhinovirus C, until 2006. All three of them contribute to the common cold, but drugs that work well against rhinovirus A and B have little effect when used against rhinovirus C.
''This explains most of the previous failures of drug trials against rhinoviruses,'' study leader Professor Ann C. Palmenberg at the University of Wiscons in Madison, US, told Science Daily.
Now, more than 10 years after the discovery of rhinovirus C, scientists have finally built a highly detailed 3D model of the virus, showing that the surface of the virus is, as expected, different from that of other cold viruses.
With the model in hand, hopefully a real cure for a common cold is on its way. Soon, we may no longer have to waste our money on medicines that don't really work.
1. What does the author think of popular remedies for a common cold?A.They are quite effective. | B.They are slightly helpful. |
C.They actually have no effect. | D.They still need to be improved. |
A.By breaking up cold viruses directly. |
B.By changing the surface structures of the cold viruses. |
C.By preventing colds from developing into serious diseases. |
D.By absorbing different kinds of cold viruses at the same time. |
A.The surface of cold viruses looks quite similar. |
B.Scientists have already found a cure for the common cold. |
C.Scientists were not aware of the existence of rhinovirus C until recently. |
D.Knowing the structure of cold viruses is the key to developing an effective cure. |
A.Drugs against cold viruses | B.Helpful home remedies |
C.No current cure for common cold | D.Research on cold viruses |
8 . Researchers in China and the United States have developed a new cataract(白内障)treatment with cells that has restored vision in babies in a trial and may eventually be used in adults.
The treatment- by doctors and staff members at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and Sichuan and Sun Yat-sen universities in China-was published in March 9 edition of the scientific journal Nature.
A cataract is a clouding of the normally clear lens(晶体)of an eye. Typical cataract operation involves the removal of the cloudy lens and the insertion of an artificial one. The new operation has been tested in animals and during a small, human trial. It resulted in fewer complications(并发症)than the current harmful operation, and in regrown lenses with superior visual function in all 12 of the baby cataract patients who received the procedure.
A congenital cataract- lens clouding that occurs at birth or shortly after- is important cause of blindness in children. In the new research, Kand Zhang, head of ophthalmic genetics at US San Diego’s Shiley Eye Institute, and his colleagues relied on the regrown potential of endogenous(同源的)stem cells.
According to Zhang, endogenous stem cells are different from other stem cells that are typically grown in a laboratory, transplanted into a patient, and can have risks of immune(免疫的)rejection, infection or cancers. Zhang told CBS News, “We invented a new operation to make a very small opening at the side of a cataractous lens bag, remove the cataract inside, allow the opening to heal, and promote potential lens stem cells to regrow an entirely new lens with vision.”
The human trial involved 12 babies under the age of 2 who were treated with the new method, while 25 babies received the standard operation care.. The latter group experienced a higher incidence of pos- operation danger, early- onset eye high blood pressure and increased lens clouding. The scientists reported fewer complications and faster healing among the 12 babies who has the new procedure.
1. What is the text mainly about?A.The concept of the cataract |
B.A new cataract treatment with stem cells |
C.Bad effects of post-operation in the cataract |
D.The reasons why the cataract comes into being |
A.Convenient | B.Comfortable |
C.Cheap | D.Safe |
A.It has more risks |
B.It may be used widely |
C.It has been put into practice widely |
D.It can only restore vision in babies |
A.Born | B.Strange |
C.Serious | D.Dangerous. |