1 . Months ago, researchers at UCLA published a study that showed using a specific type of yoga to engage in a brief, simple daily meditation reduced the stress levels of people who care for those stricken by Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia. Now they know why.
As previously reported, practicing a certain form of chanting yogic meditation for just 12 minutes daily for eight weeks led to a reduction in the biological mechanisms responsible for an increase in the immune system’s inflammation response. Inflammation, if constantly activated, can contribute to a multitude of chronic health problems.
Reporting in the current online edition of the journal Psychoneuroendocrinology, Dr. Helen Lavretsky, senior author and a professor of psychiatry at the UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, and colleagues found in their work with 45 family dementia caregivers that 68 of their genes responded differently after Kirtan Kriya Meditation (KKM), resulting in reduced inflammation.
Caregivers are the unsung heroes for their yeoman’s work in taking care of loved ones that have been stricken with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia, said Lavretsky, who also directs UCLA’s Late-Life Depression, Stress and Wellness Research Program. But caring for a frail or demented family member can be a significant life stressor. Older adult caregivers report higher levels of stress and depression and lower levels of satisfaction, vigor and life in general. Moreover, caregivers show higher levels of the biological markers of inflammation. Family members in particular are often considered to be at risk of stress-related disease and general health decline.
“We know that chronic stress places caregivers at a higher risk for developing depression,” she said “On average, the incidence and prevalence of clinical depression in family dementia care givers approaches 50 percent. Caregivers are also twice as likely to report high levels of emotional distress.” What s more, many caregivers tend to be older themselves, leading to what Lavretsky calls an “impaired resilience” to stress and an increased rate of cardiovascular disease and mortality.
Research has suggested for some time that psychosocial interventions like meditation reduce the adverse effects of caregiver stress on physical and mental health. However, the pathways by which such psychosocial interventions impact biological processes are poorly understood.
“The goal of the study was to determine if meditation might alter the activity of inflammatory and antiviral proteins that shape immune cell gene expression,” said Lavretsky. “Our analysis showed a reduced activity of those proteins linked directly to increased inflammation.”
“This is encouraging news. Caregivers often don’t have the time, energy, or contacts that could bring them a little relief from the stress of taking care of a loved one with dementia, so practicing a brief form of yogic meditation, which is easy to learn, is a useful tool.”
1. According to researchers at UCLA, whose pressure can be decreased by doing a particular kind of yoga meditation?A.People suffered from Alzheimer’s and dementia. |
B.People who care for those suffered from Alzheimer’s and dementia. |
C.All family members of those who suffered from Alzheimer’s and dementia. |
D.Alzheimer and dementia’s research experts. |
A.are heroes who have the highest honor | B.are at risk of being infected by their patients |
C.are heroes unknown to the public | D.should be rewarded with a lot of money |
A.lower the caregivers’ risk of stress-related diseases |
B.reduce the older people’s rate of cardiovascular disease and mortality |
C.eliminate caregivers’ physical and mental stress |
D.weaken the unfavorable influences of caregiver pressure on physical and mental health |
A.whether meditation can change the action of inflammatory and antiviral proteins |
B.whether meditation can activate the inflammatory and antiviral proteins |
C.whether the activity of those proteins relates to the inflammation |
D.whether the antiviral proteins can form immune cell gene expression |
2 . This website is designed to explore how the experience, diagnosis and treatment of illness has changed over time, and to show some of the many ways illness has been understood by humans. It is our hope that you will leave the site with a broader appreciation of the relationship of medicine to culture, and an understanding that our own medical practices look different when seen in a historical context.
In exploring this site, we ask you to think of this fundamental idea: that illness, the feeling and experience of being sick, is itself a historical object. Illness and medicine are not static(静止的) phenomena. Different people in different time periods can experience, understand and treat similar groups of symptoms very differently. Cycles of fevers and chills may be identified as being a particular disease, part of a general pattern of seasonal health or an internal struggle of opposing yet complementary forces. These are more than just descriptions; they influence the actual experience of having illness, and strongly influence the treatment. A body that is out of balance feels pain in manner that is subjectively different from a body fighting a battle against an external attacker. We believe that illness changes over time. Thus, to fully understand illness, we need not just biological explanation, but also historical explanation. We need both medicine and the history of illness.
Related to this idea is a second. This is the concept that illness, and the medical responses to illness, are related to cultural worldviews. How we see the world structures how we experience and shape the world we live in. What makes particular responses seem reasonable emerges from specific cultural values. The judgements about what medical practices are effective and sensible are value judgements made in the context of broader cultural beliefs about how the world works, our place in that world, and what is morally good and bad. Our aim is to help you understand why blood-letting for instance, now considered unacceptable, was a sensible healing activity in the early 19th century.
Finally, it is easy to read the history of medicine as one of constant progression leading from barbaric (野蛮的) roots to a scientific approaches embodied in current medical practice. We believe that this understanding is problematic. First, a lack of knowledge that we have today did not mean that medicine in other time periods and cultures was wrong. Based on cultural values and contemporary knowledge, other cultures developed advanced treatments that were effective and sensible for their people, although they may be considered barbaric nowadays. Similarly in a century or two, our own medical practices may seem backward and nonsensical, it is not the case that former practices have led simplistically to our own superior knowledge.
1. According to the first paragraph, the website is intended to show that ________.A.many illnesses were wrongly diagnosed in the past |
B.we have unrealistic expectations of medical practice |
C.medicine should be examined in connection with culture |
D.changes in living conditions have led to the development of new illnesses |
A.we need more accurate biological explanations of illnesses |
B.illnesses are influenced by climate and environment |
C.our bodies are constantly under attack from illnesses |
D.how an illness is interpreted affects how it is experienced |
A.In certain cultures, the factual basis of illnesses is not recognized |
B.Medical practices have improved over time. |
C.Illness can influence our perception of the world. |
D.We judge past medical practices by inappropriate principles. |
A.There are considerable differences between cultures. |
B.Illnesses are better understood today than in the past. |
C.Current medical practices will be seen differently in the future. |
D.Little research is being carried out into the treatment of some diseases. |
3 . Crowdfunding (众筹) campaigns to help people with cancer pay for ineffective alternative treatments are becoming more common. They often come with six-figure targets to meet the cost of debatable therapies.
The BMJ (British Medical Journal) reports
Although the treatments, such as extreme diets, aren’t backed by scientific evidence, people who are desperate and vulnerable are often
However, journalists must review the role they play in promoting the
Most concerning of all were the frequent cases where someone had died—sometimes just months after eye-catching
This leaves the public with a
If journalists wish to avoid promoting ineffective treatments, they would do well to view such stories not just as human-interest ones, but as
I’m certain no journalist would want their work to be used as a recruitment tool for therapists whose treatments offer nothing but heartbreak and false hope, yet until reports of miraculous cancer cures in questionable clinics are approached with an appropriate level of skepticism(怀疑), I fear such places will continue to
A.On the other hand | B.In addition | C.By contrast | D.As a result |
A.attitudes | B.stands | C.concerns | D.prospects |
A.private | B.foreign | C.local | D.illegal |
A.tempted | B.questioned | C.awakened | D.frightened |
A.prohibit | B.protect | C.discourage | D.distract |
A.Launching | B.Issuing | C.Questioning | D.Considering |
A.reference | B.interference | C.hope | D.implication |
A.appeals | B.awareness | C.resources | D.sales |
A.persuaded | B.alarmed | C.moved | D.encouraged |
A.coverage | B.details | C.timing | D.course |
A.newsworthy | B.time-worthy | C.effort-worthy | D.praise-worthy |
A.general | B.moderate | C.extreme | D.twisted |
A.survival | B.nutrition | C.science | D.emotion |
A.classifying | B.examining | C.revising | D.enriching |
A.contract | B.decay | C.bother | D.flourish |
4 . Delivering life-saving drugs directly to the brain in a safe and effective way is a challenge for medical providers. One key reason: the blood-brain barrier, which protects the brain from tissue-specific drug delivery. Methods such as an injection or a pill aren't as precise or immediate as doctors might prefer, and ensuring delivery right to the brain often requires invasive, risky techniques.
A team of engineers from Washington University in St. Louis has developed a new nano-particle generation-delivery method that could someday vastly improve drug delivery to the brain, making it as simple as a sniff.
“This would be a nano-particle nasal spray, and the delivery system could allow medicine to reach the brain within 30 minutes to one hour,” said Ramesh Raliya, research scientist at the School of Engineering & Applied Science.
“The blood-brain barrier protects the brain from foreign substances in the blood that may injure the brain,” Raliya said. “But when we need to deliver something there, getting through that barrier is difficult and invasive. Our non-invasive technique can deliver drugs via nano-particles, so there's less risk and better response times.”
The novel approach is based on aerosol science and engineering principles that allow the generation of mono-disperse nano-particles, which can deposit on upper regions of the nasal cavity via spread. The nano-particles were tagged with markers, allowing the researchers to track their movement.
Next, researchers exposed locusts' antenna to the aerosol, and observed the nano-particles travel from the antennas up through the olfactory nerve, which is used to sense the smell. Due to their tiny size, the nano-particles passed through the brain-blood barrier, reaching the brain and spreading all over it in a matter of minutes.
The team tested the concept in locusts because the blood-brain barriers in the insects and humans have similarities. “The shortest and possibly the easiest path to the brain is through your nose,” said Barani Raman, associate professor of biomedical engineering. “Your nose, the olfactory bulb and then olfactory cortex: two steps and you've reached the cortex.”
To determine whether or not the foreign nano-particles disrupted normal brain function, Saha examined the physiology response of olfactory neurons in the locusts before and after the nano-particle delivery and found no noticeable change in the electro-physiological responses was detected.
This is only a beginning of a set of studies that can be performed to make nano-particle-based drug delivery approaches more principled, Raman said. The next phase of research involves fusing the gold nano-particles with various medicines, and using ultrasound to target a more precise dose to specific areas of the brain, which would be especially beneficial in brain-tumor cases.
1. This passage is mainly about ________.A.a novel method of drug delivery | B.a challenge facing medical staff |
C.a new medicine treating brain disease | D.a technique to improve doctor's ability |
A.Doctors prefer using methods like an injection to treat diseases. |
B.Locusts were tagged with markers to track their movement. |
C.The blood-brain barrier lowers the effectiveness of a pill. |
D.The medicine could reach the brain within half an hour. |
A.human and locusts have similar structures that protect brain from foreign substances |
B.the delivery process consists of the olfactory bulb and the olfactory cortex |
C.locusts have changeable electrophysiological responses to nanoparticles |
D.The shortest and possibly the safest path to the brain is through human's noses |
A.A lung cancer patient who needs operation immediately |
B.A college student who majors in medical technology |
C.A senior doctor who is about to retire |
D.A high school teacher who is teaching biology |
5 . Dr. De Momi, of the Politecnico di Milano (Italy), led an international team that trained a robot to imitate natural human actions.
“As a roboticist, I firmly believe that robotic (co)workers, or say, collaborators will definitely change the work market, but they won’t steal job opportunities.
To conduct their experiment De Momi’s team photographed a human being doing numerous reaching motions, in a way similar to handing instruments (手术工具) to a surgeon. These camera captures were input into the neural (神经) network of the robotic arm, which is essential to controlling movements. Next, a human operator guided the robotic arm in imitating the reaching motions that the human subject had initially performed. Although there was not a perfect match between the robotic and human actions, they were generally similar.
These results are promising, although further research is necessary to confirm or refine De Momi’s conclusions. If robotic arms can indeed imitate human behavior, it would be necessary to build conditions in which humans and robots can cooperate effectively in high stress environments like operating rooms.
A.This future may not be as far away as we think. |
B.Robots can’t successfully imitate doctors’ motions in the operating room. |
C.Finally, several humans observed as the robotic arm made numerous motions. |
D.De Momi’s robots have been widely used in many fields and are sure to change the market. |
E.They will just help us decrease workload and achieve better performances in several tasks. |
F.His work suggests that humans and robots can effectively cooperate during high-risk events. |
6 .
WHO IS LIPITOR FOR?
Who can take LIPITOR:
• People who cannot lower their cholesterol (胆固醇) enough with diet and exercise
• Adults and children over 10
Who should NOT take LIPITOR:
• Women who are pregnant, may be pregnant, or may become pregnant. LIPITOR may harm your unborn baby. If you become pregnant, stop LIPITOR and call your doctor right away
• Women who are breast-feeding. LIPITOR can pass into your breast milk and may harm your baby
• People with liver problems or allergic (过敏的) to anything in LIPITOR
HOW TO TAKE LIPITOR
Do:
• Take LIPITOR at any time of day, with or without food
• If you miss a dose, take it as soon as you remember. But if it has been more than 12 hours since your missed dose, wait. Take the next dose at your regular time
Don’t:
• Do not change or stop your dose before talking to your doctor
• Do not give your LIPITOR to other people. It may harm them even if your problems are the same
POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS OF LIPITOR
Serious side effects in a small number of people:
• Muscle problems that can lead to kidney problems, including kidney failure. Your chance for muscle problem is higher if you take certain other medicines with LIPITOR
• Liver problems. Your doctor may do blood tests to check your liver before you start LIPITOR and while you are taking it
Call your doctor right away if you have:
• Unexplained muscle weakness or pain, especially if you have a fever or feel very tired
• Allergic reactions including swelling (肿胀) of the face, lips, tongue, and/or throat that may cause difficulty in breathing or swallowing which may require treatment right away
• Nausea, vomiting (呕吐) or stomach pain
• Feeling more tired than usual
• Your skin and whites of your eyes turn yellow
• Allergic skin reactions
Common side effects of LIPITOR are:
• Diarrhea (腹泻)
• Muscle and joint pain
• Upset stomach
• Changes in some blood tests
NEED MORE INFORMATION?
• Ask your doctor or health care provider
• Go to www.lipitor.com
1. LIPITOR is a medicine ________.
A.specially designed for young kids | B.to cure serious liver problems |
C.that can lower the risk for heart attack | D.for mothers-to-be to lower cholesterol |
A.Drinking alcohol twice a day. | B.Changes in medical tests. |
C.Discomfort and ache in muscles. | D.Feeling tired after a day’s work. |
A.LIPITOR should never be taken with other food at the same time. |
B.Skipping is the best choice for those who have missed one dose. |
C.Recommendation is encouraged if one feels LIPITOR to be good. |
D.People can consult the professionals for details of the medicine. |
Mini-Biographies Help Clinicians Connect with Patients
Bog Hall was recovering from yet another surgery in March 2014 when a volunteer walked into his hospital room.
The volunteer wasn't there to check on his lungs or breathing. Instead, she asked Hall
The interview was part of a program
When the story is finished, it
Today more than 2,000 patients at the Madison VA
Project organizers say it could change the way providers interact with patients.
8 . Patient data: we need a better approach
Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) and Deep-Mind must start by acknowledging that both sides mean well. Deep-Mind is one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world. The potential of this work applied to healthcare is very great, but it could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants. It is against that background that the information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, has issued her judgment against the Royal Free hospital under the NHS, which handed over to Deep-Mind the records of 1.6 million patients in 2015. This is on the basis of a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patient’s rights and their expectations of privacy.
Deep-Mind has almost apologized. The NHS has modified its ways. Further arrangements and there maybe many between the NHS and Deep-Mind will be carefully inspected to ensure that all necessary permissions have been asked of patients and all unnecessary data has been cleaned. There are lessons to learn about the informed patient agreement. But privacy is not the only angle in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to concentrate the blame on the NHS, since under existing law it “controlled” the data and Deep-Mind merely “processed” it. But this difference misses the point that it is processing and collection, not the more possession of bis, that gives the data value.
The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all the data that our lives now generate. Privacy law builds on the concept of damage to an individual from identifiable knowledge about them. That misses the way the economy works. The data of an individual there gains its value only when it is compared with the data of countless millions more.
The use of privacy law to restrict the tech giants in this instance feels slightly improper. This practice does not address the real worry. It is not enough to say that the algorithms Deep-Mind develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that they will belong to a private monopoly (垄断) which developed then using public resources. If software promises to save lives as drugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big medical company has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution. A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future troublesome. Ms Denham’s report is a welcome start.
1. The agreement between the NHS and Deep-Mind________.A.put both sides into a dangerous situation |
B.judged the power of Royal Free hospital |
C.failed to pay attention to patient’s rights |
D.caused conflicts among tech giants |
A.careful assessment | B.sincere apologies |
C.necessary adjustments | D.empty promises |
A.All unnecessary date should be inspected. |
B.The value of data comes from the processing of it. |
C.It is more valuable to collect user’s data. |
D.Leaking patient’s data is worse than selling it. |
A.the violating behavior of big medical companies |
B.the ineffective enforcement of privacy law |
C.the centralization of big data by tech giants |
D.the revolution in the big data industry |
9 . What the scientists are saying…
The first primate (灵长目动物) clones
For the first time, scientists have used the technique that produced Dolly the sheep to clone monkeys. The Chinese researchers who produced the two macaques say that having access to genetically identical primates will be a huge
Herbal remedy danger
Herbal remedies such as St. John’s wort and ginseng may be
A.threat | B.damage | C.benefit | D.potential |
A.variations | B.diseases | C.structures | D.factors |
A.manufacturing | B.applying | C.testing | D.prescribing |
A.mess | B.differences | C.losses | D.recombination |
A.concerns | B.focuses | C.funds | D.suspicion |
A.translating | B.transferring | C.connecting | D.reversing |
A.magnificent | B.astonishing | C.limited | D.accurate |
A.theory | B.reality | C.advance | D.addition |
A.Attached | B.Related | C.Compared | D.Added |
A.access | B.key | C.barrier | D.contribution |
A.harmful | B.useful | C.helpful | D.purposeful |
A.methods | B.figures | C.problems | D.instances |
A.deal | B.interact | C.mix | D.identify |
A.put forward | B.moved up | C.held down | D.carried on |
A.claim | B.avoid | C.classify | D.mention |
In discussion of technological changes,the Internet gets most of the attention these days. But the change in medicine can be the real technological event of our times. How long can humans live? Human brains were known to decide the final death. Cells(细胞) are the basic units of all living things,and until recently,scientists were sure that the life of cells could not go much beyond 120 years because the basic materials of cells,such as those of brain cells,would not last forever. But the upper limits will be broken by new medicine. Sometime between 2050 and 2100,medicine will have advanced to the point at which every 10 years or so,people will be able to take medicine to repair their organs(器官). The medicine,made up of the basic building materials of life,will build new brain cells,heart cells,and so on-in much the same way our bodies make new skin cells to take the place of old ones.
It is exciting to imagine that the advance in technology may be changing the most basic condition of human existence,but many technical problems still must be cleared up on the way to this wonderful future.
1. According to the passage,human death is now mainly caused by ________.
A.diseases and aging | B.accidents and war |
C.accidents and aging | D.heart disease and war |
A.the Internet | B.medicine |
C.brain cells | D.human organs |
A.heart disease will be far away from us |
B.human brains can decide the final death |
C.the basic materials of cells will last forever |
D.human organs can be repaired by new medicine |
A.Over 100 years. |
B.More than 120 years. |
C.About 150 years. |
D.The passage doesn’t tell us. |