1 . Consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has increased over the past 20 years. UPFs (超加工食品) contain few or no whole foods, are industrially produced, are ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat, and include additives (添加剂). The ultra-processing of food reduces its nutritional value. It has been known that higher UPF consumption is associated with overweight and heart disease. Now, research has been extended to examine its impact on mental health.
In a new study, over 72,000 participants who were at least 55 years old and didn’t have dementia (痴呆) at the start of the study were followed for an average of 10 years, during which they filled out questionnaires regarding their diet. By the end of the study, 518 people were diagnosed (诊断) with dementia. After adjusting for other factors that could affect risk of dementia such as age, gender, and heart disease, researchers found every 10 percent increase in daily intake of UPFs was associated with a 25 percent higher risk of dementia. They also found replacing 10percent of UPFs with unprocessed or minimally processed foods was associated with a 19 percent lower risk of dementia.
In another study, researchers found individuals who consumed the most UPFs had significant increases in the symptoms (症状) of mild depression, “mentally unhealthy days”, and “anxious days”. Eric Hecht, Founder and Executive Director of the Institute of Etiological Research, said, “More than 70 percent of packaged foods in the US are classified as UPFs and represent about 60percent of all calories consumed by Americans. Considering the degree of exposure to and effects of UPF consumption, this study has great significance in clinical practice and public health. It might help improve future development of dietary guidelines.”
Facing such alarming data, maybe it’s time for Americans to reconsider their food choices. Researchers recommend taxes on UPFs and carrying out policies to reduce the consumption. They also support programs and policies to increase the availability and affordability of whole foods, especially among disadvantaged populations.
1. What do we know about UPFs?A.They have no nutritional value. | B.They are ready-made and instant foods. |
C.They are cheap and mass-produced. | D.They serve as additions to our daily diets. |
A.Positive. | B.Negative. | C.Ambiguous. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Collecting higher taxes on UPFs. | B.Decreasing UPFs’ consumption in diet. |
C.Focusing on the nutrient content of foods. | D.Increasing public awareness of whole foods. |
A.Public Health Response to UPFs | B.Physical Disorders Linked to UPFs |
C.Rising Consumption of UPFs in the US | D.Negative Effects of UPFs on Mental Health |
2 . Adding salt to already prepared meals is linked to dying prematurely, according to a new study. Researchers found always adding salt to food knocks 2.3 years off life expectancy for men and 1.5years for women.
The study did not rule out other factors, but researchers said the evidence was compelling enough that people should consider avoiding seasoning their meals. The findings were based on research involving over 500,000 participants, who were followed for an average of 9 years. Compared with those who never added salt, those who always seasoned their food had a 28% increased risk of dying earlier. “To my knowledge, our study is the first to assess the relation between adding salt to foods and earlier death,” said Prof Lu Qi, who led the work. “Even a modest reduction in sodium (钠) intake can result in remarkable health benefits.”
Salt intake is difficult to accurately track because many processed foods contain high levels of salt. Roughly 70% of sodium intake in western populations comes from processed foods, with 8-20% from salt added at the table. However, adding salt is a very good indicator of a person’s preference for salty tasting foods, so the team focused their analysis on this measurement.
Prof Annika Rosengren, a researcher who was not involved with the research, said that there is an ideal level for salt to different people. It’s hard to figure out the best level in terms of health for any given individual. “So far, what the evidence seems to indicate is that healthy people consuming normal levels of salt need not worry too much about their salt intake,” she said. However, those at high risk of heart disease should probably cut down. “Not adding extra salt to already prepared foods is one way of achieving this.”
1. What does the underlined word “compelling” probably mean?A.Interesting. | B.Convincing. | C.Fascinating. | D.Stimulating. |
A.Adding salt can suggest a person’s favor. |
B.Western populations prefer salty foods relatively. |
C.The study centered on tracking salt intake accurately. |
D.More than 70% of sodium intake comes from processed foods. |
A.There is an ideal level for salt to all people. |
B.It’s appropriate to add more salt while cooking. |
C.Occasional addition of salt has no effect on health. |
D.Patients with heart disease should control their salt intake. |
A.A biology textbook. | B.An official report. | C.A health magazine. | D.A science fiction. |
1. Why doesn’t the man eat at the university cafeteria?
A.It’s less fun. | B.It’s too expensive. | C.It’s not healthy. |
A.Textbooks. | B.A car. | C.Rent. |
A.A teacher. | B.A banker. | C.A doctor. |
4 . Beejhy Barhany, growing up in an Ethiopian-Jewish community in Israel, has been cooking for her family as long as she can remember. Now a chef and owner of Tsion Café in Harlem, New York, Barhany continues to pull from cooking traditions, including one that has become the source of much controversy in recent decades: washing raw meat before cooking.
For Barhany, submerging raw chicken in salt and lemon water is both functional and ceremonial, as soaking or rinsing raw meat in salt water and acid-such as lemon juice or vinegar-is a common form of “washing” required by Jewish Kosher rules. And a 2015 survey of over 1, 500 American consumers found that nearly 70 percent rinse or wash their poultry before cooking it, though the U. S. Department of Agriculture( USDA) started telling consumers not to wash raw poultry in the 1990s. Experts including those from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strongly warned that rather than reducing the risk of foodborne illness (食源性疾病), washing meat increases the likelihood of spreading unwanted pathogens (病原体), like salmonella and campylobacter, around the kitchen.
“Washing meat before cooking is not really helping,” says Betty Feng, associate professor of food science at Purdue University. “The only thing it does is splashing (飞溅) and could cross-contaminate a lot of your kitchen items-your sink, probably your clothes, whatever you have by the sink.” Moreover, Feng cautions against using saltwater, vinegar, or lemon juice, which simply isn’t strong enough to effectively kill foodborne pathogens. “If the acidity is high enough to kill bacteria, then it’s not really likely you can use your bare hand to wash,” she says.
And a 2022 study showed that submerging meat in a bowl of water reduced the splashing but not the spread of germs. “I would treat the entire sink just like the outside of the chicken——it’s a biological hazard,” says Benjamin Chapman, one of the study authors and associate professor in North Carolina State University’s agricultural and human sciences department. “The way that we make meat safe is through cooking, not through the removal of pathogens.”
1. What is the purpose of paragraph 1?A.To broaden the readers’ horizons. | B.To make a comparison. |
C.To introduce the topic. | D.To state the author’s opinion. |
A.Nearly 70 percent of American consumers follow the rules. |
B.The rules pay attention to functional and ceremonial aspects. |
C.Uncooked meat is submerged in water with salt and vinegar. |
D.It warns people of the risk of foodborne illness. |
A.It has sparked a lot of controversy in recent years. |
B.It has decreased the risk of foodborne illness. |
C.It can not be directly done/with your bare hands. |
D.It may do a favor/ to the transfer of pathogens. |
A.To emphasize that chickens pose a level/of threat to humans’ life. |
B.To show that sinks can be a way to increase splashing. |
C.To prove that cooking is a good way to kill pathogens. |
D.To stress that the practice people follow is not advisable. |
1.阐明观点;
2.表述理由。
注意:
1.写作词数应为80个左右;
2.请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。
参考词汇:预制菜 ready-made meals
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6 . Holiday Eating to Boost Immunity
People don’t generally use the words health and holiday eating in the same sentence, and when they do,
There’s more to holiday eating than avoiding too many calories. What we eat affects the health of the entire body, including the immune system. Most of the body’s immune system is concentrated in the gut (内脏) and the trillions of healthy bacteria living there called the microbiome, which might make you more possible to get sick. A lot of people don’t think about the effects of what they eat on immunity.
While an occasional indulgence probably won’t cause lasting damage, throwing caution to the wind from Thanksgiving to New Year’s Day is certainly unhealthy.
A.But scientists think it’s crucial |
B.you don’t have to stop celebrating |
C.your immune system is overburdened |
D.that may be especially true at holiday time |
E.it’s usually to express a worry about weight gain |
F.So it will potentially weaken the functioning of the immune system |
G.What we eat has a direct impact on how the immune system functions |
7 . “In high school, I decided to stop eating meat. I love animals. I couldn’t see them suffering.” Babulski says, who is a biologist at Monroe Community College in New York. Teenage Babulski initially lived on starches (淀粉食物) and salads. Eventually she learned to eat a more balanced vegetarian (素食者的) diet. But, Babulski remembers, her mom still wished she’d give up the madness. Mom thought she was going to straight up die.
The decision by Babulski and others to go vegetarian can be threatening to those who view eating animals as typically American. Eating meat is the norm in the United States, even though medical experts have long encouraged people to eat less processed and red meat for health reasons. What is becoming clear is that a meat-heavy diet is also terrible for the planet.
Shifting demand from meat to beans, whole grains, fruits, vegetables and nuts could have many benefits for the climate. A more recent April report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, suggests that the world’s wealthiest individuals could greatly decrease emissions (排放) through lifestyle changes. That’s because households with incomes in the top 10 percent produce roughly 36 to 45 percent of global emissions, while households with incomes in the bottom 50 percent contribute just 13 to 15 percent. Therefore, wealthier individuals, who adopt a low-carbon lifestyle, can help establish new, more sustainable social norms.
Babulski learned about the environmental impacts of meat production. She now shares her personal journey with students in her environmental science course. Many of her students come to realize the power of their individual choices. The little things they do actually do add up and make a difference.
1. Why did Babulski’s mother object to her becoming a vegetarian?A.She felt threatened. | B.She was a meat lover. |
C.She misunderstood her. | D.She was worried about her health. |
A.It is a personal lifestyle. | B.It can cause health problems. |
C.It is harmful to the environment. | D.It is an essential part of their life. |
A.The factories. | B.The government. |
C.The low-income families. | D.The wealthy people. |
A.Neutral. | B.Supportive. | C.Critical. | D.Uninterested. |
8 . Bred to be sweeter, today’s cherries, bananas and apples taste different than they used to but not necessarily better. Among fruit farmers, the word “quality” is now routinely used as a standard for “high in sugar”, though firmness, color and size are also considerations. In a recent study about ways to enhance the sweetness of fruit using “molecular (分子的) approaches”, a group of plant scientists wrote that, in general, the sugar content of many fruits are now higher than before owing to continuous selection and breeding. Modern apple varieties, the scientists stressed, were on average sweeter than older ones.
The sweetness of fruit depends not just on how it is bred but also on growing conditions, yield and harvest. The lead researcher, Sugiura, said, “If you could taste an apple harvested 30 years ago, you would feel the difference.” He believed that modern apples are picked so early that even if they are bred for sweetness, they often don’t develop their full character. The fragrance never develops in fruit that is harvested too early.
Jim Cooper, an apple farmer in England, is regretful to admit the fact that many people will never taste the “strawberry hint” in a really ripe Pearmain, a type of heritage apple. In a way, the rise of consistently sweeter fruit in our lifetimes has been a victory of plant breeding. After all, it’s a rare person who would seek out bitter grapes if they could have sweet ones instead.
But the sweetness of modern fruit is not without its problems, especially for people with diabetes (糖尿病), who have to reduce their intake of higher-sugar fruits. Fruit that is bred sweeter also tends to be lower in the chemicals that make it healthy. Considering health, maybe the real problem with modern fruit is that it has become yet another sweet thing in a world with sugar. Even grapefruits, which used to be quite bitter, are sometimes now as sweet as oranges. If you’ve never tasted a sour cherry, how can you fully appreciate a sweet one?
1. In what aspect is many fruits different from before?A.Bright color. | B.Soft skin. | C.Sugar content. | D.High yield. |
A.They are bred too early. | B.They are losing a good flavor. |
C.They taste so sweet. | D.They need a higher yield. |
A.Critical. | B.Ambiguous. | C.Favorable. | D.Uncaring. |
A.The sweetness of fruits will cause health issues. |
B.It’s a wise choice to breed fruits for sweetness. |
C.Breeding sweet fruits improves the quality of fruits. |
D.Some fruits like grapes and cherries taste the same. |
Why would someone decide not to eat? We know that the body needs food
Some people fast for political reasons. Mohandas Gandhi, the famous Indian leader, fasted 17 times during his life. For Gandhi, fasting was a powerful political tool. Fasting is also a
Of course not everyone fasts for political or religious reasons. Some people
10 . The idea that we need to eat meat to get enough protein and iron is a common misconception. It ignores the abundance of protein and iron in many plant-based foods. Likewise, while we typically associate omega-3 fatty acids with fish, fish themselves absorb these into their tissue by eating seaweed, which we can consume directly without the concerns of exposure to microplastics in fish flesh.
Indeed, a whole-food, plant-based diet can provide all essential nutrients except for vitamin B12. While modern sanitation (卫生) allows humans to consume clean produce unpolluted by dirt, we can easily and cheaply obtain oral B12 supplements (补充).
Obviously, significantly reducing our consumption of meat would carry vast benefits. Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death around the world. Eating highly processed foods and red meat has been repeatedly demonstrated to promote underlying mechanisms of cancer and cardiovascular disease, such as inflammation(炎症)and damage to the lining of blood vessels (血管).
Mounting evidence points to the benefits of a whole-food, plant-based diet. Studies from 2017found that a vegetarian diet is associated with a 25 percent relative risk reduction for coronary heart disease and an 8 percent relative risk reduction for cancer, with a vegan diet related to a 15 percent relative risk reduction for cancer.
Besides harming ourselves, eating meat harms others. Factory farming practices often entail unspeakable cruelty to animals, and working conditions for workers are also unsafe. Overcrowding of livestock and workers promotes the spread of disease among both people and animals, putting us all at risk for future pandemics. The overuse of antibiotics (抗生素) to accelerate animal growth and precautiously treat the infections anticipated as a result of living in unclean and overcrowded conditions can promote antibiotic resistance.
While national and international action is undoubtedly needed to fight immoral factory farming practices, educators and policy makers should consider the importance of acting as role models for healthy behaviors themselves as well as advocating for policies that ensure better nutritional access and education for others. All of these should not be excuses for individuals to resist changes in their own lives and communities. Societies change only when enough individuals within them alter their behavior.
1. The author writes the first two paragraphs mainly to ______.A.introduce a false belief in nutrition source |
B.compare the differences between two diets |
C.highlight the importance of nutrition intake |
D.show the concerns of healthy diet advocates |
A. |
B. |
C. |
D. |
A.escape. | B.involve. | C.balance. | D.overcome. |
A.A Meatless Diet Is Better for You |
B.Food Problems Call for Joint Efforts |
C.Say No to Processed Meat Consumption |
D.Eatable Greens or Not? That Is a Question |