A.He is sick. |
B.He wants to raise a dog. |
C.He is allergic to long-haired animals. |
2 . In mainland Britain, people who has ever attempted to grow berries or nuts — or indeed feed the bird — will know, doing so is identical to an opening move in a game of chess with local grey squirrels, a game the squirrels tend to win. Grey squirrels are also fond of the occasional bird’s eggs or the young birds, and enjoy tearing and eating the bark of young broadleaf trees, which can either kill the trees or leave them open to infection. This, apart from affecting biodiversity and the landscape, harms the wood industry. The loss — in damaged timber, lost carbon revenue and tree replacements — is not insignificant: £37 a year in England and Wales.
Grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), introduced from North America in 1876, have nearly replaced the native red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in Britain by outcompeting them for food and habitat. They are larger, and stronger, and resistant to squirrel pox virus, while reds are not. About 3 million now live in the UK; the International Union for Conservation of Nature lists the grey squirrel among the top 100 most harmful invasive species in the world.
In Britain, significant efforts have been made to stop grey squirrels’ progress, including trapping, shooting, and releasing pine martens into their habitats. The latest move, a workable system for which was thought to be a decade away, is forbidding the breeding of grey squirrels. However, legal challenges brought so many delays that the invasive grey squirrels. population expanded to an unmanageable level and wiping out was abandoned. The main issue in Britain was thought to be more technological than legal — designing a drug that targets only grey squirrels to prevent them breeding. Another possibility in the years ahead is to use DNA editing to ensure grey females are born unable to give birth.
Obviously, there is a hint of xenophobia (仇外) in some discussions about the introduction of grey squirrels to Britain nearly 150 years ago which has had an impact on the local ecosystem, posing a threat to native species. It’s also worth noting that reds — which also tear bark and take eggs — were seen as pests until the early 1930s, and extensively killed. There is, too, a strong argument that ecosystems evolve naturally, and it may be impractical and unrealistic to intervenes or even resist it. The attraction of controlling the breeding of the grey squirrels is that it is less inhumane, and aims for balance rather than uprooting.
1. What does the author focus on in paragraph one?A.The harm of grey squirrels. |
B.The cutting habits of grey squirrels. |
C.The effect of grey squirrels on the wood industry. |
D.The game between the British and grey squirrels. |
A.Their huge number. | B.Their unique origins. |
C.Their breeding ability. | D.Their physical qualities. |
A.To offer more labour. | B.To invest more money. |
C.To perfect the law. | D.To take advantage of technology. |
A.Unclear. | B.Indifferent. | C.Favorable. | D.Doubtful. |
With full preparation from both China and the US, the giant panda family Mei Xiang, Tian Tian, and their 3-year-old son Xiao Qiji arrived safely in China on Thursday due to the ending of the agreement between the two
Giant pandas are rare and endangered wild animals,
1. Why was Kaavan sent to Pakistan?
A.He was given as a gift. |
B.A zoo there wanted to train him. |
C.A female elephant there needed a companion. |
A.He was homeless. | B.He lost his friend. | C.He was kept in chains. |
A.2016. | B.2020. | C.2021. |
5 . With their beautiful feathers, roosters might be forgiven for secretly taking quick looks in the mirror—especially as research now suggests the birds may be able to recognise themselves.
The ability to recognise oneself in the mirror has so far been found in a handful of animals, including elephants, dolphins, and certain fish and birds. Sonja Hillemacher, one of the authors of the study at the University of Bonn, said animals that can recognise themselves in a mirror often seemed to have more advanced cognitive abilities, and that there was a link to social and emotional wisdom, as well as self-awareness. “This ability is a basic aspect of cognition. It is also important for us,” she said.
Writing in the journal Plos One, Hillemacher and her colleagues note that roosters tend to call out to their fellow chickens if they see a threat. If a rooster is alone, however, it does not usually raise the alarm as it could draw the enemy’s attention.
In the experiment, the team placed a rooster in an indoor space and then placed a mirror, or another rooster, or nothing. The team then showed the image of a flying hawk (鹰) onto the ceiling in the space.
The results from 58 roosters found that the birds made far more alarm calls when they could see another rooster nearby, with 1.33 alarm calls per bird on average over three tests, than when alone (0.29 calls on average) or faced with the mirror (0.43 calls on average). In the follow-up experiment, the team found a similar reduction in calls when they placed a second rooster out of sight behind the mirror. The team said the findings suggest the birds did not regard their reflection as another rooster, even when there was also the presence of smell and sound of a second bird, which proves that roosters may recognise themselves in a mirror.
1. What does the new study led by Sonjn Hillemacher show?A.Only a few animals can recognise themselves in a mirror. |
B.Some animals have cognitive abilities similar to humans. |
C.Roosters will enjoy their own beauty when looking in a mirror. |
D.Roosters may have the ability to recognise themselves in a mirror. |
A.To stress the importance of the research. | B.To provide the scientific basis for the research. |
C.To explain reasons for carrying out the research. | D.To offer details of the preparation for the research. |
A.A flying hawk was put in an indoor space. | B.A second rooster was placed near a mirror. |
C.Different conditions were set to test the roosters. | D.Separate areas were needed to group the roosters. |
A.They made only a bit more alarm calls with a second rooster in sight. |
B.They made fewer alarm calls when faced with a mirror than when alone. |
C.They made more than one alarm call in each test with another rooster in sight. |
D.They made similarly fewer alarm calls when another rooster was hidden nearby. |
6 . Each year, the discovery of new shark species underlines how little we know about ocean biodiversity. In a recent report conducted by Sibert and Rubin, they reported an unexpected finding: a large-scale extinction of sharks in the pelagic ocean, the largest ecosystem on Earth, about 19 million years ago. Their discovery suggests that some extinctions in the open sea of the past may have been mysterious.
The study of Sibert and Rubin takes advantage of a system by using tiny, hard bits of shark skin and bony fish teeth that naturally fall from their bodies to the seafloor. These extremely small fossils provide a rich record of ancient oceanic sharks and their abundance for thousands of years. By studying fossils from many regions, the diversity patterns can give major insights into evolution (进化) of the open sea that would be otherwise unknown.
Sibert and Rubin quantified(量化)a past extinction of sharks, reporting a 90% decline in number and >70% drop in diversity. They found that nearer-shore sharks appear to survive, but migratory ones go extinct. The finding of this study is that sharks had undergone a widespread extinction that reorganized their communities from 16 million to 20 million years ago.
Sibert and Rubin narrowed the disappearance of sharks to a window of time under 100,000 years around 19 million years ago, but the causes of this event remain unclear. Because this time period does not stand out as a period of major climatic change, the authors do not attribute(归因于) environmental factors as an extinction driver. As for other causes, the loss of shark diversity is directly linked to overfishing.
The loss of sharks from the oceans has profound, complex, and unavoidable ecological consequences because their presence reflects the stability of marine ecosystems. Yet, one-quarter of the global diversity of sharks is currently threatened with extinction. Despite recent improvements in conservation actions, shark communities never recovered from a mysterious extinction event 19 million years ago; the ecological fate of what remains is now in our hands.
1. What did Sibert and Rubin find?A.The negative impact of the extinction of sharks. |
B.The mysterious reasons behind the disappearance of sharks. |
C.The most recent advances in the study of the largest ecosystem. |
D.The large-scale decline in the number of sharks about 19 million years ago. |
A.By collecting and analyzing shark fossils worldwide. |
B.By quantifying the movement of near-shore sharks. |
C.By using a system to study the naturally fallen bits from sharks. |
D.By keeping track of ancient oceanic sharks and their activities. |
A.Overfishing is partly to blame for the loss of shark diversity. |
B.The number of sharks has recovered to its previous level. |
C.Scientist have figured out the exact causes of sharks’ extinction. |
D.Sharks had undergone a widespread extinction due to the climate change. |
A.Sharks: The Stories behind Them | B.Sharks: The Marine Masters |
C.Sharks: Killers or Misunderstood? | D.Sharks: The Mysterious Extinction |
7 . The most powerful hurricane in the year was crashing into coastlines in Virginia. Lucky Dog Animal Rescue planned to take the 21 dogs, affected by the disaster, to a
Mirah Horowitz is the head of Lucky Dog in Arlington, Virginia. “It’s a double
The group tried to
Lucky Dog was also talking to an animal shelter on the island of Grand Bahama in the Bahamas. That was where the hurricane had caused the most
Horowitz said, “I really
A.sight | B.shelter | C.cave | D.reserve |
A.challenge | B.demand | C.destination | D.measure |
A.instead of | B.other than | C.because of | D.rather than |
A.give up | B.make out | C.search for | D.take in |
A.attract | B.rescue | C.quit | D.transport |
A.supporters | B.survivals | C.experts | D.workers |
A.Obviously | B.Immediately | C.Luckily | D.Actually |
A.curious | B.calm | C.awkward | D.anxious |
A.attack | B.damage | C.pressure | D.emergency |
A.Moreover | B.Therefore | C.However | D.Otherwise |
A.destroyed | B.removed | C.established | D.changed |
A.exchange | B.explore | C.recommend | D.deliver |
A.request | B.appreciate | C.promote | D.supply |
A.affected | B.controlled | C.prevented | D.reduced |
A.confident | B.responsible | C.worthwhile | D.unusual |
8 . Sleep is so important that it has long interested scientists. Scientists have studied everything from mice to fruit flies in the lab to get a better understanding of what happens when animals sleep and why they do it. However, gathering data (数据) on how animals sleep in their natural habitat has always been hard to do.
But scientists did just that with wild chinstrap penguins in Antarctica. In doing so, researchers found the birds took over ten thousand microsleeps throughout the day — adding up to a 11-hour-long sleep.
To study the penguins, scientists put devices (设备) into a small group of penguins’ brain and neck muscles, which provided the brain wave and location data. The devices had never been used before, so this data collection was only supposed to be a test. However, the process went so well and the data was published in this study.
Researchers found that the microsleeps last only seconds. Researchers think that being able to sleep for such a short time might help the animals avoid predators (捕食者) that might more likely attack if the penguins were asleep for longer — especially when one parent goes out feeding in the ocean for days, leaving the other parent to protect the eggs from predatory birds.
The study is an early insight into a relatively large missing scientific knowledge about sleep.
“Almost every study on sleeping birds discovers something new, something we didn’t know about before,” says study co-author Paul-Antoine Libourel.
Vladyslav Vyazovskiy, a sleep neuroscientist at the University of Oxford who didn’t join in the study, is excited about this new data because “most of what we know about the animal sleep was gained in laboratory conditions, which are totally different from conditions where sleep developed”.
1. What is paragraph 3 mainly about?A.The study method. | B.The device introduction. |
C.The research purpose. | D.The background information. |
A.Feeding baby birds. | B.Getting longer sleep. |
C.Avoiding being hunted. | D.Attacking other birds. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Positive. | C.Confused. | D.Objective. |
A.Animal Sleep Is Researched in the Lab |
B.Penguins Gain a Different Way of Sleep |
C.Sleep Is of Great Importance to Penguins |
D.Penguins Take Thousands of Microsleeps a Day |
9 . If there was to be a praise to the frog, it would have to contain one new piece of information: its ability to predict earthquakes. A scientific study has suggested that they escape an area just before such disaster strikes.
The evidence, published yesterday in the Journal of Zoology, centers on a population of breeding (繁殖) frogs in Italy. It seems that, a few years ago, these creatures had suddenly escaped from their home five days before an earthquake struck their breeding ground.
The frogs’ ability to sense the earthquake is not fully understood, but 96 percent of male frogs escaped and returned a day after the danger had passed. This discovery baffled Dr. Rachel Grant, who hadn’t set out to learn about frogs’ reactions to earthquakes, but to study the effect of the lunar cycle on them. She now believes that frogs may be able to sense some signs and use them as an early-warning system for earthquakes.
Frogs are not the only creatures born with an unusual power to predict natural disasters. In 2004, elephants in Thailand made loud noises before the tsunami hit, while bats in Sri Lanka flew around in anxiety before the disaster.
While most of these animal warnings have been ignored, there are times when they have been noticed. In 1975, scientists in Haicheng, China, noticed unusual behavior in the city’s dogs and cats. They demanded the evacuation of the city, expecting a major disaster. Their warning came five-and-a-half hours before an earthquake struck, resulting in 2,000 deaths. Without the evacuation, another 150,000 people could have been killed.
“There are things we can’t see and sounds we can’t hear. But many animals can. There is a sense called electro-perception that fish and sharks use to form a picture around them, while dolphins and bats use sonar to find their way around,” says Professor Daniel Mills, an expert in animal behavior at Lincoln University.
1. According to paragraph 3, Dr Rachel Grant was ______ about the frogs’ unusual behaviorA.worried | B.confused | C.disappointed | D.anxious |
A.By giving examples. | B.By listing numbers. |
C.By explaining causes. | D.By presenting contrasts. |
A.To stress the seriousness of the disaster. | B.To praise the government’s timely action. |
C.To describe a successful evacuation in history. | D.To show the benefit of noticing animal warnings. |
A.Why animals can sense disasters. | B.What his study will focus on next. |
C.How humans learn about the world. | D.How animals behave before disasters. |
10 . Cows produce much methane (甲烷) the world’s second worst greenhouse gas, as they break down the grass. They are a large source of the greenhouse gases that are driving climate change. Now scientists have shown the pollution from cows can be reduced by adding a little seaweed (海藻) to their food.
Recently, the researchers from the University of California studied 21 cows on a farm for about five months. They taught the cows to get their food from inside a special hood, which allowed the scientists to know the amount of the methane the cows were giving off. They added a small amount of seaweed to the cows’ food.
The consequences were surprisingly good. In some cases, the cows produced 82% less methane. The improvement depended on the kind of food the cows were given. Even the worst-polluting cows produced 33% less methane. Over the five months, the scientists didn’t see any signs that the cows’ stomachs were getting used to the seaweed and starting to produce more methane again. What’s more, the cows that were fed seaweed gained just as much weight as the other cows.
But there are still some big problems with the idea of feeding cows seaweed. For one thing, there’s not enough seaweed to feed all of the cows in the world. So farmers would have to figure out a way to grow lots of seaweed. A bigger problem is that for most of their lives, cows live in the fields, where they eat grass. That means there’s no chance to feed them seaweed every day.
Still, as the study shows, something as simple as feeding cows seaweed can help reduce some of the pollution causing the climate crisis.
1. Why did the researchers carry out the study?A.To test the effects of the seaweed. |
B.To discover healthier grass for cows. |
C.To improve the cows’ living conditions. |
D.To measure the amount of methane in the world. |
A.The background of the subject. | B.The results of the study. |
C.The content of the experiment. | D.The process of the research. |
A.Seaweed is not as tasty as grass. |
B.Seaweed is dying out in the world. |
C.Cows fed with seaweed gained weight easily. |
D.Cows can hardly have daily access to seaweed. |
A.Positive. | B.Doubtful. | C.Unclear. | D.Negative. |