组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:49 题号:21822394

With their beautiful feathers, roosters might be forgiven for secretly taking quick looks in the mirror—especially as research now suggests the birds may be able to recognise themselves.

The ability to recognise oneself in the mirror has so far been found in a handful of animals, including elephants, dolphins, and certain fish and birds. Sonja Hillemacher, one of the authors of the study at the University of Bonn, said animals that can recognise themselves in a mirror often seemed to have more advanced cognitive abilities, and that there was a link to social and emotional wisdom, as well as self-awareness. “This ability is a basic aspect of cognition. It is also important for us,” she said.

Writing in the journal Plos One, Hillemacher and her colleagues note that roosters tend to call out to their fellow chickens if they see a threat. If a rooster is alone, however, it does not usually raise the alarm as it could draw the enemy’s attention.

In the experiment, the team placed a rooster in an indoor space and then placed a mirror, or another rooster, or nothing. The team then showed the image of a flying hawk (鹰) onto the ceiling in the space.

The results from 58 roosters found that the birds made far more alarm calls when they could see another rooster nearby, with 1.33 alarm calls per bird on average over three tests, than when alone (0.29 calls on average) or faced with the mirror (0.43 calls on average). In the follow-up experiment, the team found a similar reduction in calls when they placed a second rooster out of sight behind the mirror. The team said the findings suggest the birds did not regard their reflection as another rooster, even when there was also the presence of smell and sound of a second bird, which proves that roosters may recognise themselves in a mirror.

1. What does the new study led by Sonjn Hillemacher show?
A.Only a few animals can recognise themselves in a mirror.
B.Some animals have cognitive abilities similar to humans.
C.Roosters will enjoy their own beauty when looking in a mirror.
D.Roosters may have the ability to recognise themselves in a mirror.
2. What is the purpose of paragraph 3?
A.To stress the importance of the research.B.To provide the scientific basis for the research.
C.To explain reasons for carrying out the research.D.To offer details of the preparation for the research.
3. What do we know about how the experiments were conducted?
A.A flying hawk was put in an indoor space.B.A second rooster was placed near a mirror.
C.Different conditions were set to test the roosters.D.Separate areas were needed to group the roosters.
4. How did the roosters react in the experiments?
A.They made only a bit more alarm calls with a second rooster in sight.
B.They made fewer alarm calls when faced with a mirror than when alone.
C.They made more than one alarm call in each test with another rooster in sight.
D.They made similarly fewer alarm calls when another rooster was hidden nearby.
【知识点】 动物 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】Thanks to Ventana Wildlife Society’s feeding program in central California, the condors (秃鹫) were finally returning to their natural habitat (栖息地)in Big Sur. However, the Do-lan Fire in Big Sur which has so far burned through 129 km² has destroyed the society’s efforts.

In the last week of August, the house built for condors burned down and although there were no people or condors when the house caught fire, at least four of the birds were missing. “We made sure that two of the chicks in the four houses were in the burned area, and the other two we have not been able to check,” Kelly Sorenson, executive director of Ventana Wildlife Society, told Discovery.

“We still have nine free flying condors that are missing. We are actively searching, but it's also a lot of waiting. We're not giving up hope yet. ” Condors once lived from Baja California all the way to British Columbia. But, in 1987, the last wild California condor was taken into cage after many years of shooting, catching, and habitat destruction led to the birds' fall. As part of a 10-year-long feeding program, the condors had been gradually returned to their natural habitat.

On September 3, the society announced it had found one of its chicks, Iniko, after fire department gave the green light to go into the Dolan Fire burned area and view the chick's Redwood nesting tree. Iniko's father Kingpin remains missing, but the chick’s mother Redwood Queen, was found caring for her chick.

The fire burned just 10 feet below the nest, yet Ventana Wildlife Society biologists, Joe Burnett and Darren Gross were overjoyed to find the chick and its mother alive and well. “We were not expecting the best as we hiked through the fire's ruins. To find Iniko alive and well is simply a marvel,” said Burnett.

1. How many condors are missing in the fire?
A.2.B.4.C.9.D.13.
2. What happened to wild California condors in 1987?
A.They disappeared in the wild.B.They returned to the wild.
C.They once ranged widely.D.They died out.
3. Who is Kingpin according to paragraph 4?
A.A baby condor.B.A missing chick.
C.A missing male condor.D.A surviving female condor
4. What does the underlined word “marvel” in paragraph 5 probably mean?
A.Wonder.B.Truth.C.Puzzle.D.Fear.
2021-06-29更新 | 38次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Crown shyness(树冠羞避) is a mysterious natural phenomenon in which the crowns of some tree species do not touch each other, but get separated by a gap clearly visible from ground level. The effect usually occurs between trees of the same species, but has also been observed between trees of different species.

There are many theories going around, most of which make sense, but no one has been able to prove without the shadow of a doubt why some trees avoid touching each other.

In his 1955 book Growth Habits of the Eucalypts, Australian forester M.R. Jacobs writes that the growing tips of the trees are sensitive to abrasion(擦伤), which results in crown shyness phenomenon. This theory was also supported by Dr. Miguel Franco. Some experiments have shown that if trees displaying crown shyness are artificially prevented from swinging in the wind and touching each other, they gradually fill up the gaps between them.

But while the above theory is arguably the most widespread, it’s certainly not the only one. Some scientists have suggested that crown shyness is a mechanism to stop the spreading of leaf-eating insects. These pests have been known to work together and create structures that extend up to 10 cm off of tree branches in order to reach other plants, so the gaps are the trees’ natural defense method.

One Malaysian scholar studied many trees, but found no traces of abrasions, despite their clear crown shyness. Instead, he suggests that the growing tips of the trees were sensitive to light levels and stopped growing when they got too close to other trees. Plants are able to sense how close they are to other plants and in order to get more light, they give off some chemical element to stop other trees from growing too close.

Whatever the reason, one thing is for sure: plants are more intelligent than people used to think.

1. What can we know about crown shyness?
A.It can cause abrasion between trees.
B.It only happens between the same species.
C.It has been discovered for only half a century.
D.No agreement has been reached about its real cause.
2. What will happen if trees showing crown shyness are stopped from swinging?
A.The trees will stop growing and even die.
B.The gaps between the trees will grow wider.
C.The crown shyness phenomenon will disappear.
D.The gaps between the trees will remain the same.
3. What’s tree’s reaction when attacked by pests according to the text?
A.Swinging less in the wind
B.Leaving space between their crowns
C.Spreading their branches and leaves
D.Stopping growing for a period of time
4. Which statement might the Malaysian scholar agree with?
A.Trees have special ways to attack others.
B.Some insects stop trees growing too close.
C.Trees compete with their neighbors for light.
D.Trees won’t touch each other to avoid diseases.
2018-12-20更新 | 76次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍了通过不断的观察,人们发现了黑猩猩的亲社会行为。

【推荐3】Back in November 2019, Alessandra Mascaro, a volunteer working at the Ozouga Chimpanzee Project in Loango National Park, Gabon, West Africa, saw something she couldn’t quite believe — one of the apes named Suzee noticed her son Sia had hurt his foot. After seemingly thinking about the best course of action, she then plucked an insect out of the air, licked it and applied it to the wound.

Mascaro captured the whole touching moment on film and showed her tutor, Dr. Tobias Deschner, a zoologist working for Ozouga. The Ozouga team then set about monitoring the chimpanzees in the park and looking for other examples of the behaviour. Over the following 15 months they captured 76 incidences of the apes applying insects to wounds on themselves or other group members. The researchers are uncertain why the chimps use the insects, or even which insects they are, but suspect they might have lenitive properties that could provide pain relief.

However, the finding really proves that the act of applying an insect to treat other’s wounds is a clear example of prosocial behaviour (亲社会行为) that echoes the acts of empathy displayed by human beings. “This is, for me, especially breathtaking because so many people doubt prosocial abilities in other animals. Suddenly we have a species where we really see individuals caring for others,” Deschner said.

The team now aims to identify the insects being used by the chimpanzees and investigate who is applying insects to whom to establish whether the behaviour is based on a social rank. “We need to still put much more effort into studying great apes because it is crucial to shed light on our own cognitive evolution,” said Deschner.

1. How did Suzee treat her son’s wound?
A.By licking the injury.B.By adopting an easy way.
C.By using a certain insect.D.By preventing the infection.
2. Which of the following can best replace the word “lenitive” in Paragraph 2?
A.Original.B.Relieving.C.Refreshing.D.Resistant.
3. What can be inferred from the Ozouga team’s study?
A.Apes are capable of caring for others.
B.Chimps can distinguish useful insects.
C.Prosocial abilities come from imitation.
D.Social ranks decide the power of empathy.
4. What does Deschner think of the finding?
A.It remains a mystery.B.It facilitates evolution.
C.It highlights apes’ intelligence.D.It clarifies people’s doubt.
2022-08-30更新 | 111次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般