1 . On March 31, 2007, the World Wildlife Fund(WWF)urged the citizens and businesses in Sydney to switch off all lights for one hour.
As news of the impact spread, more people became inspired to join the Earth Hour movement. In 2008, over 50 million people in over 5,000 cities worldwide observed the event.
Besides making an immediate difference, the WWF says the worldwide participation demonstrates people’s desire to do their share to reverse climate change. In the past decade, the Earth Hour movement has inspired several global initiatives to protect the environment.
Not sure what to do without your gadgets and television for a whole hour?
A.The numbers have grown since then. |
B.A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. |
C.Earth Hour is the brainchild of the World Wildlife Fund. |
D.More than 2 million households responded to the request. |
E.This includes the establishment of a 2.7 million square meters Earth Hour forest in Uganda. |
F.The WWF suggests organizing a candlelight dinner for your family or a picnic under the stars. |
G.While the big changes certainly help, minor lifestyle changes can make a big difference as well. |
2 . There you are in your favorite clothing store. You don’t really need to buy anything, but everything is so cheap and stylish! Before you know it, you leave the store with bags and bags of new clothes.
On the surface, this doesn’t seem so bad. However, there are a lot of hidden costs behind the cheap price tags (标牌). To put it plainly, the fashion industry is terrible for the planet. Not only does it use up a lot of resources, but it also heavily pollutes the environment with chemicals, microplastics and unwanted waste.
Fashion is one of the least sustainable industries on the planet, commented Michael Stanley-Jones. “We’ve all become our own waste managers, hoarding fashion waste in our houses,” he noted.
It doesn’t just take up space in our cupboards, though. It also ends up in landfills (垃圾场), too. But, thankfully, the fashion trend tides are changing. People are increasingly examining their own consumption and what changes they can make to become sustainable, Jane Fellner, founder and CEO of sustainable fashion seller Loopster, told the Guardian.
In particular, with its typically lower prices and rare fashion finds, shopping secondhand has become an increasingly popular and eco-friendly option. According to online reseller ThredUp, the secondhand market is predicted to reach $80 billion by 2029. And, although fast fashion will continue to grow 20 percent over the next 10 years, secondhand fashion is expected to grow an unbelievable 185 percent in that same amount of time. Fellner continued: “Secondhand has become more socially acceptable. Thrifting (节约) is now massive on TikTok.”
The only true sustainable way to shop is to not shop at all, unless you’re buying clothes that already exist.
1. What does the fashion industry bring about?A.People’s love for fast fashion. | B.Damage to the earth. |
C.Cheap price tags. | D.Sufficient resources. |
A.Sorting. | B.Avoiding. |
C.Storing. | D.Recycling. |
A.It is gaining popularity. |
B.It has defeated fast fashion. |
C.It makes people attractive. |
D.It is huge among young people. |
A.Young Consumers’ Habits |
B.A Stylish Fashion Manager |
C.The Fashion Industry |
D.Sustainable Fashion Trend |
1. 活动认识;
2. 创意介绍。
注意:
1. 词数80左右;
2. 可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4 . We’re often reminded of the importance of preserving the planet as we see it for future generations—and children at St Oswald’s Primary School in Chester certainly agree.
Nine-year-old Isobel Kelleher from the school’s Hummingbirds class thinks adults need to take note.“Sometimes they can be busy and I don’t think they think they can make a difference,but if everyone does a little bit it all adds up,”she tells HuffPost UK.“We started looking at plastic pollution in our oceans and the things like plastic bags and broken down pieces of plastic that are polluting them.”she says.“Fish can eat the plastic and they can die,or we might even eat the fish ourselves.”
Mr Timms,Isobel’s teacher,has been spearheading a new project at the school which lets children loose creatively to raise awareness of the need to be more environmentally friendly.The entire Hummingbirds class,which is made up of 9 and 10-year-old pupils,has been busy writing poems and creating online video adverts to warn adults about the serious situation of our oceans and wildlife.
Mr Timms thinks children have an important role to play in teaching us how to take care of the things around us.“We sometimes overlook how much we can really learn from children.”he says.“It has been really hard to believe having parents come in saying that their children have been asking them to stop using plastic,and to recycle more,and even stopping them using plastic straws.”
Mr Timms is proud of his Hummingbirds class.“The message that they would like to send to the world is simple:stopping this isn’t someone else’s job,and it won’t be OK if we just leave it.”
1. What can we infer about adults according to Isobel Kelleher?A.They just pretend to be busy. |
B.They haven’t done their part well. |
C.They can do nothing to stop pollution. |
D.They have started to care about oceans. |
A.To help adults to learn more about their kids. |
B.To remind adults to be friendly to environment. |
C.To persuade students to stop using plastic bags. |
D.To teach students how to write poems creatively. |
A.To prove kids are creative in teaching. |
B.To attract people to support his work. |
C.To have adults care about education. |
D.To show the effects of the project. |
A.An inspiring school project. |
B.An appeal to stop plastic bags. |
C.Serious situations of our planet. |
D.Adults’ignorance of environment. |
5 . When we talk about protecting the environment and sustainability, we focus on factories and industries that produce cars, household objects, and materials used in production. However, the carbon footprint of the fast fashion industry is sizeable and should not be overlooked.
Fast fashion has seen quite the rise recently, with stores spreading far and wide all over the world. They mass-produce one collection after the other, always on trend, and always encouraging consumers to follow the said trend. However, what about the impact this kind of business model has on the environment?
The clothing industry is the second-highest polluter of water. Factories of fast fashion poured poisonous chemicals into clean water supplies because clothing production is a land-and water-intensive industry, responsible for 10% of all carbon release globally. Even after the clothes are produced in factories, they can still affect the environment. For example, polyester (涤纶) can release plastic microfibres into the water system, which contributes to the already existing plastic problem.
The fashion industry is indeed causing great harm to the environment; moreover, the clothes being made are not meant to last. In most cases, the quality is not there, and the clothes are only used a few times before being discarded. Before the rise of fast fashion, clothes were made to last and were not meant to have the high turnover that clothes have.
There are many designers who are committed to mass-producing their clothes in sustainable ways. Some big brands are also trying to make improvements in the materials they use and the mass-producing process, but big efforts are needed if we are going to see a change. What we as consumers can do is shop consciously and consider how the clothes have been made and whether we truly need that piece or not.
1. What can be inferred about fast fashion from the first two paragraphs?A.It stresses offline sales. | B.It affects the environment seriously. |
C.It is a sustainable industry worldwide. | D.It is popular among young consumers. |
A.It makes clothing last long. | B.It reduces carbon footprint. |
C.It results in water pollution. | D.It lowers the production cost. |
A.Thrown away. | B.Picked up. | C.Passed down. | D.Turned in. |
A.Support big fashion brands. | B.Stop buying long-lasting clothes. |
C.Think twice before shopping for clothes. | D.Change dressing styles frequently. |
6 . Butterflies, a familiar sight around the world, are disappearing now.Over the past four decades, more than 450 butterfly species have been affected by threats from climate change. In the US alone, the monarch butterfly has seen a drop of 80%, from millions of them in the 1980s to only 29,000 in 2020; in 2017, scientists in Germany raised alarm bells after stressing that insects had decreased by more than 70% in 30 years.
As of now, there is no long-term data available to develop effective conservation strategies in those areas where the threat is particularly widespread. And long-term monitoring programs worldwide face a challenge—training locals as citizen biologists, which, although successful, requires significant and constant funding to cover wages.
In Ecuador, however, scientists have come up with a novel approach.In Yasuni National Park, they started a monitoring project where park rangers(护林员) were trained and then performed monitoring.The rangers were able to identify sampled butterflies with impressive accuracy-an 85% success rate-which is key to the success of these monitoring programs. The data gathered by the park rangers was so accurate that it did not significantly differ from data obtained by trained biologists in the area.
Other monitoring projects select individuals from the community to act as citizen biologists, so scientists may pull the plug on them when funding dries up. However, this study represents a long-term solution.Monitoring with an infrastructure (基础设施)already in place means that it can continue into the future regardless of funding.
"Our approach increases the possibility of constant monitoring in the long term by reducing costs such as lodging(住宿)and wages,"said lead author Maria Checa. "Furthermore, it also empowers(授权)local people, offers opportunities to public institutions to accomplish their environmental goals, and opens up possibilities for expansion into other highly threatened and important areas for biodiversity(生物多样性)conservation."
1. What do the figures in paragraph 1 show?A.The rich varieties of butterflies. |
B.The scientists' close attention to the butterfly. |
C.The growing concern about climate change. |
D.The sharp decline in the number of butterflies. |
A.The high cost of training staff. | B.The wide areas to be monitored. |
C.The lack of professional trainers. | D.The difficulty in dealing with the data. |
A.Improving the lives of park rangers. |
B.Producing many trained biologists. |
C.Providing habitat for endangered butterflies. |
D.Collecting reliable data for butterfly conservation. |
A.End. | B.Control. | C.Examine. | D.Continue. |
1.活动目的;
2.具体措施;
3.发出倡议。
注意:
1.词数80左右:
2.可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
8 . New international research reveals the far-reaching impacts of forest cover loss on global biodiversity. The study, led by the University of Edinburgh and the University of St Andrews, investigated the impacts of forest loss on species and biodiversity over time and around the world, revealing both losses and gains in species.
Focusing on biodiversity data spanning(跨越) 150 years and over 6,000 locations, the study, published in Science, reveals that as tree cover is lost, plants and animals are responding to the transformation of their natural habitats.
Bringing together over 5 million records of the numbers of different plants and animals with information on both historic and contemporary peaks in forest loss, the researchers discovered both immediate and delayed effects of forest loss on ecosystems.
The pace at which biodiversity responds to forest loss varies from a few years, as is the case for light-loving plants and insects, to decades for long-living trees and larger birds and mammals. Gergana Daskalova, a Ph.D. student in the School of GeoSciences at the University of Edinburgh and lead author of the study, said, “Changes in the biodiversity of the planet’s forests matter because they will reflect how these landscapes look, the types of species they support and the benefits that forests provide for society like clean air and water.”
Maria Dornelas, a co-senior author from the School of Biology at the University of St Andrews, continued, “Humans are undoubtedly changing the planet. Yet, global analyses of how biodiversity is changing over time are revealing biodiversity changes are nuanced(有细微差别的) and variable.”
She added, “With a better understanding of the different ways, both positive and negative, in which forest loss influences biodiversity, we can improve future conservation and restoration of global ecosystems.”
1. What did the international research find?A.Species suffer losses as tree cover is lost. |
B.Historic and contemporary peaks in forest loss vary. |
C.Forest loss cannot impact ecosystems immediately. |
D.Plant and animal species are reacting to forest cover loss. |
A.Effects of forest loss are difficult to notice. |
B.Insects adapt to forest loss quite slowly. |
C.Species respond to forest loss at different paces. |
D.There are different degrees of forest loss in history. |
A.They make no difference. |
B.They worsen the landscapes. |
C.They have a great effect on society. |
D.They cause damage to types of species. |
A.call on people to change nature |
B.find ways to make global analyses |
C.pay attention to the negative effects |
D.improve protection of global ecosystems |
9 . Plans to bring wild tigers back to their original home , their historical range(历史分布范围) in the IliBalkhash region, have been announced by Kazakhstan( 哈萨克斯坦 ) and an agreement with World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) to conduct a tiger reintroduction program has been signed . “It will not only bring wild tigers back to their original home, but also protect the unique ecosystem of the IliBalkhash region,” said Askar Myrzakhmetov, the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
If successful, Kazakhstan will be the first country in the world to bring wild tigers back to an entire region where they have died out for nearly half a century. Tiger reintroduction projects have only been achieved within national borders and in areas that are considered current tiger habitats . Kazakhstan's tiger reintroduction program is unique and it badly requires the restoration of a vast forest that is part of the wild tiger's historical range.
Since the beginning of the 20th century, wild tigers have lost over 90 per cent of their historical range. Wild tigers have completely disappeared from the region since the late 1940s, due to the loss of habitat. To prepare for the return of wild tigers, on 1st January 2018 Kazakhstan will set up a new nature reserve in the southwestern IliBalkhash, in order to restore the unique forest habitat. This will include the protection of existing wildlife, and reintroducing important prey ( 猎物 ), such as the endangered wild Bactrian deer(中亚红鹿).
Restoring tigers will also help protect Lake Balkhash and prevent it from repeating the fate of the Aral Sea, formerly the world's fourth largest lake and now 10 percent of its original size. “The hard work remains ahead of us. We have to spare no effort to make this region ready for tigers and involve all the relevant people to make this happen. That means dealing with illegal activities, having these people who govern parks be welltrained and equipped, increasing prey populations and involving local communities,” said Ekaterina Vorobyeva, Director of the WWF program.
1. What is Askar Myrzakhmetov's attitude toward the tiger reintroduction program?A.Doubtful. | B.Favorable. |
C.Concerned. | D.Disapproving. |
A.The increasing loss of prey. | B.The evolution of the species. |
C.The lack of natural living places. | D.The serious environmental pollution. |
A.Regulating human activities. | B.Limiting the number of prey. |
C.Building a reserve for tigers only. | D.Training tigers to be more adaptable. |
A.Efforts to restore forests in Kazakhstan |
B.Bringing tigers back home to Kazakhstan |
C.Attempts to handle illegal activities effectively |
D.Preventing tigers disappearing in Kazakhstan |
A.Health. | B.Education. | C.Environment. |