1 . Animal and plant species are disappearing at frightening rates. The problem has led to efforts to “rewild” places where such life existed before human development, pollution and climate change forced it out. The American city of Detroit is an example of how human actions can increase rewilding, which generally means helping natural systems in damaged locations, removing dams or building tunnels to reconnect animal pathways cut by roads.
Detroit’s population reached a high of 1. 8 million in the 1950s. Then the population began dropping. By 2000, there were fewer than one million people living in the city. Thousands of houses and other buildings were left empty over the years. Some structures were destroyed, leaving empty areas that plants and animals regained as habitats. Nonprofit groups have also planted trees and community gardens in these areas. Bald eagles found their way back as bans on DDT and some other insect poisons were put in place nationwide. Anti-pollution laws and government-supported cleanups made nearby rivers better for fish and native plants.
Now, Detroit is home to 300 bird species and is a busy visiting place for ducks and others during migration. Additionally, this city offers a special way to study plants and animals in urban settings. Unlike most big cities, its population is decreasing but its streets and buildings remain in place. And there are many kinds of habitats, including large lakes, rivers and human neighborhoods. Detroit’s parklands are so quiet that people don’t even know they’re in the city.
“It used to be that you had to go to some remote location to get exposure to nature,” said John Hartig, a professor of University of Windsor. “Now that’s not the case. Like it or not, rewilding will occur. The question is how we can prepare communities and environments to anticipate the presence of more and more wildlife. After all, many city people have lost their tolerance to live with wildlife. To really make a difference in dealing with the biodiversity crisis, you’re going to have to have people on board. ”
1. What might have happened in Detroit at the beginning of 21st centuryA.The city was overpopulated. | B.More community gardens were built. |
C.Many buildings were deserted. | D.The environment was badly damaged. |
A.It’s government-supported efforts that really matter. |
B.Humans’ efforts can make a difference in rewilding. |
C.Humans are to blame for the worsening environment. |
D.It’s hard to humans and wildlife to live in harmony. |
A.It is a big city crowded with tourists and bird species. |
B.Tourists don’t show any interest in the quiet surroundings. |
C.It’s turned into a place where people can get close to nature. |
D.It’s become a center for those who study animals and plants. |
A.Protect. | B.Expect. | C.Imagine. | D.Delay. |
2 . As environmental concerns continue to increase, many people are left wondering how they can balance the need to travel with the need to protect the planet. One particular dilemma that has received significant attention is air travel.
Air travel is known to be one of the most carbon-intensive forms of travel. According to a report by the European Environment Agency, aviation is responsible for around 3% of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions, and that number is expected to grow in the coming years. In addition, aircraft contribute to other types of air pollution, such as particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.
For environmentalists who advocate for reducing our carbon footprint, this brings up a difficult question: should we avoid flying altogether?
On one hand, it’s easy to see why environmentalists would want to keep away from air travel. By doing so, they could dramatically reduce their carbon footprint and set an example for others. Additionally, some argue that air travel perpetuates(使永久)a culture of overconsumption, which is contradictory to environmental values.
However, there are also arguments in favor of air travel: For one, air travel enables people to experience different cultures, build relationships, and expand their knowledge in ways that might not be possible otherwise. It can also facilitate business trades and contribute to economic growth. Moreover, some experts believe that technological advancements could make air travel more sustainable in the future. For example, some airlines are experimenting with biofuels and electric planes, which could dramatically reduce the emissions associated with air travel.
So what’s the answer? Ultimately, it’s up to each individual to decide whether the benefits of air travel outweigh the environmental costs. However, there are steps that everyone can take to reduce their impact. For example, travellers can choose to fly less frequently, opt for direct flights, and offset(抵消)their emissions through programs like carbon offsetting. In the end, the key is to remain aware of the environmental impact of our choices and to make informed decisions based on our own values and priorities.
1. What’s the function of paragraph 2?A.To make a comparison. |
B.To present an argument. |
C.To clarify the effect of air travel. |
D.To describe various greenhouse gases. |
A.It helps avoid economic problems. |
B.It promotes globalization in some sense. |
C.It will make biofuels popular in the near future. |
D.It will accelerate the development of electric planes. |
A.Approving. | B.Skeptical. | C.Objective. | D.Ambiguous. |
A.Whether we should travel by air or not. |
B.Environmental concerns about air travel. |
C.How to reduce the pollution air travel causes. |
D.The advantages and disadvantages of air travel. |
3 . Should We Create More National Parks to Save Endangered Animals?
Don’t you find it worrying that more and more species of animals are in real danger of becoming extinct?
In addition, national parks protect animals from the danger of being hunted. A major reason why many species are endangered is that these animals are killed by hunters. They hunt animals to make money.
On the other hand, some people fight against the creation of national parks because they consider it is wrong to interfere with nature. They believe that wild animals are happier living in their natural environment.
All in all, these disadvantages are far less important than the benefits of national parks.
A.To begin with, animals are important to humans. |
B.Some hunters even hunt animals simply for sport. |
C.I personally believe that we must save these animals. |
D.These parks allow animals to live in a safe environment. |
E.Firstly, national parks protect these animals’ natural environment. |
F.They say though the animals may face danger, they enjoy a free life. |
G.There is a heated discussion about whether to create more national parks. |
4 . Think about the different ways that people use the wind. You can use it to fly a kite or to sail a boat. Wind is one of our cleanest and richest power sources, as well as one of the oldest. Evidence shows that windmills (风车) began to be used in ancient Iran back in the 7th century BC. They were first introduced to Europe during the 1100s, when armies returned from the Middle East with knowledge of using wind power.
For many centuries, people used windmills to grind (磨碎) wheat into flour or pump water from deep underground. When electricity was discovered in the late 1800s, people living in remote (偏远的) areas began to use them to produce electricity. This allowed them to have electric lights and radio. However, by the 1940s when electricity was available (可利用的) to people in almost all areas of the United States, windmills were seldom used.
During the 1970s, people started becoming concerned about the pollution that is created when coal and gas are burned to produce electricity. People also realized that the supply of coal and gas would not last forever. Then, wind was rediscovered, though it means higher costs. Today, there is a global movement to supply more and more of our electricity through the use of wind.
1. From the text we know that windmills ________.A.were invented by European armies |
B.used to supply power to radio in remote areas |
C.have a history of more than 2,800 years |
D.have rarely been used since electricity was discovered |
A.Producing electricity. | B.Sailing a boat. |
C.Grinding wheat into flour. | D.Pumping water from ground. |
A.the supply of coal and gas failed to meet needs |
B.it is one of the oldest power sources |
C.it was cheaper to create energy from wind |
D.wind power is cleaner |
5 . Eco-friendly Vauban, located in the southwest of Germany, is a city where less than 20% residents(居民) own cars, since parking spots are a no-no on private property. Most of the residents get around Vauban by walking or biking, according to a report from ABC news. Can an eco-friendly city like Vauban be a model for Americans to stop their over-reliance on the cars?
Sometimes when I watch a news report what’s in the back of my mind is what isn’t being reported or stressed. While this eco-friendly city is inspiring in that it shows residents getting exercise and fresh air through the majority use of bicycles, as well as good old fashioned walking, common sense would tell you that even for a place like Vauban, Germany, it owes its existence to the cars.
Do you think that bicycles were able to transport all the construction materials that were needed to build and maintain the eco-friendly homes and businesses in Vauban? It took cars to help build this utopia. It is one of the paradoxes(矛盾) of life that sometimes in order to get away from relying on something like the car, you actually have to rely on that very thing at the beginning and into the foreseeable future to some degree.
I myself haven’t owned a car for more than 14 years, and mostly get around town running, walking, or using public transportation. There are times I wish I had one, since it would make many things easier, but overall I’m glad not to have to deal with the headaches of owning a car, which caused me to get rid of it in the first place. And all the walking and running has helped to keep me fit and healthy.
To get even close to being like eco-friendly Vauban, Americans will need to absolutely change the way they live. Commuting (乘车上下班) patterns will have to change, public transport will have to be invested in, etc. And though ending our love affair with the car will be impossible during my lifetime, we may at least start to see more Vauban-like areas in the USA.
We can hope that Americans will consider using their feet more to get around, cutting down on pollution, and giving themselves some more exercise.
1. Why don’t over 80% of the residents in Vauban own a car?A.The streets there are very narrow. | B.They don’t have private parking spots. |
C.The government limits the number of cars. | D.They are too poor to buy cars. |
A.Angry. | B.proud. |
C.Great. | D.Regretful. |
A.Throwing away the cars. | B.Forbidding using the cars. |
C.Producing more electric cars. | D.Improving public transportation. |
A.To warn Americans not to use cars any more. |
B.To introduce the eco-friendly Vauban to Americans. |
C.To call on Americans to build more eco-friendly cities in the USA. |
D.To compare the differences between Vauban and cities in the USA. |
6 . Sea turtles have been on Earth for millions of years, but they may soon die out. The main
But the latest news may
In the US, most people have
Davis said he also wants to send out a bigger
A.doubt | B.stream | C.danger | D.worry |
A.accelerate | B.slow | C.improve | D.change |
A.cause | B.expand | C.absorb | D.reduce |
A.beneficial | B.unhealthy | C.unfit | D.annoying |
A.animals | B.oceans | C.seas | D.humans |
A.accidental | B.occasional | C.unknown | D.serious |
A.die from | B.survive from | C.suffer from | D.free from |
A.often | B.seldom | C.never | D.rarely |
A.qualified | B.protected | C.restricted | D.produced |
A.impossible | B.difficult | C.illegal | D.abnormal |
A.goal | B.impression | C.difficulty | D.cost |
A.earth | B.ocean | C.people | D.animals |
A.advertisement | B.message | C.sign | D.problem |
A.turtles | B.depths | C.health | D.expansion |
A.concerned | B.disturbed | C.developed | D.connected |