8 . The green, natural forest absorbs carbon dioxide from the air through photo- synthesis (光合作用). There is another way of dealing with the climate crisis. That is setting up fields of dark-colored solar panels (太阳能电池板), also known as “solar forests”, which replace power stations that use fossil fuels such as coal and gas to make electricity, thus mitigating harmful emissions (排放) of greenhouse gases.
But since they are both relatively dark, they absorb a lot of solar radiation. Some of the energy is used for photosynthesis in natural forests or to produce electricity in “solar forests”, but most returns to the atmosphere, heating it up. Then what would be the more effective land use option in terms of the climate crisis: planting a forest, or building solar panels? This issue has long been debated by decision-makers around the world. Now, we may have an answer, thanks to a new study.
First, the researchers compared the impact of a forest on the climate crisis in a dry area to that of a solar farm in a similar environment. The researchers found that the albedo effect (反射效应) of both of these “forests” was similar, but that the absorption or prevention of carbon emissions was very different. It turns out that it takes 2.5 years for the heat emitted by solar farms to be balanced by the carbon emissions that are avoided, thanks to the energy they produce. In the case of a natural forest of similar size, it would take more than 100 years of photosynthesis to balance its heating effect.
The researchers also studied how the heating-cooling relationship changed in other climates and found that in more humid environments, the heating effect of planting large numbers of trees is smaller. And the break-even point is reached within 15 to 18 years.
“In dry places, building solar forests seems far more effective in addressing the climate crisis. Meanwhile, forests absorb about a third of annual carbon emissions and play a vital role in the global rain cycle, in maintaining biodiversity and in many other environmental and social contexts. Preventing them from being cut down and planting more trees in humid areas are of great significance,” explains one of the researchers in the study.
1. What does the underlined word “mitigating” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?
A.Releasing. | B.Decreasing. | C.Generating. | D.Stabilizing. |
2. What is the root cause of the long-running debate over the two types of forests?
A.They cause much damage to the land. |
B.They result in a serious loss of farmland. |
C.They contribute to the warming of the atmosphere. |
D.They lose energy during the absorption of solar radiation. |
3. What did the researchers find in the study conducted in the dry environment?
A.The natural forest exhibits a stronger albedo effect. |
B.The solar forest can generate more energy in dry areas. |
C.The solar forest is superior in balancing the heating effect. |
D.The natural forest is more effective in solving the climate crisis. |
4. What can be concluded from the last paragraph?
A.More trees should be planted in dry regions. |
B.More methods should be adopted to address the climate crisis. |
C.Fields of solar panels should be set up everywhere on the earth. |
D.Building solar panels and planting trees should be effectively combined. |