1 . Naturalist Enzo Suma, who is now 40, lives in Puglia, a region in southern Italy whose long coastline faces the Adriatic Sea. Floating waste accumulates in this relatively enclosed part of the Mediterranean, unlike the open ocean, where the waste tends to be spread over a vast area. Feeling concerned about that, Suma makes it a habit to pick up the washed-up waste along the shore, especially after big winter storms.
One day, Suma was walking along the beach near his home when he discovered a bottle of Coke. Suma noticed on the bottle that the price, clearly printed on the bottom, was in lire, a currency (货币) that hadn’t been used in Italy since it was replaced by the euro in 2002. Could a plastic container have well survived in the Mediterranean, he wondered, for about two decades?
That led him to founding the Archeoplastica museum. It has a collection of about 500 unique pieces recovered from Italian shores and the Coke bottle is the first one of them. All collection demonstrates the unsettling life force of plastic waste in the environment. “Seeing that a product people may have used 30, 40, or 50 years ago remains still unchanged, you’ll feel different. It’s a great shock,” Suma said to a reporter. So Suma often exhibits selected pieces from the Archeoplastica collection at local schools around his hometown of Ostuni.
“The playful side of the work allows you to arrive at the less beautiful side of things,” Suma acknowledged. “Plastic is a kind of useful substance. But it’s unthinkable that a water bottle, made from a material designed to last so long, can be used for just a few days—or even minutes—before becoming garbage. Clean the beaches. Clean the oceans. Recycle. But if we are still throwing out plastics, none of those are going to be long-term solutions.”
1. What’s Suma’s concern about his living place?A.Its long coastline is disappearing. | B.Big storms frequently hit the area. |
C.Floating waste spreads over a vast area. | D.The waste pollution on shore is worsening. |
A.They have a history of more than half a century. |
B.They were quite valuable before turning into waste. |
C.They’re more like educational exhibits than garbage. |
D.They have stronger life force than ordinary plastic products. |
A.Creative, devoted and socially responsible. | B.Enthusiastic, ambitious and adventurous. |
C.Generous, cautious and humorous. | D.Curious, efficient and playful. |
A.The birth of plastics has greatly served humans. |
B.The key to tackling the plastic pollution is to stop littering. |
C.The plastic problem can be solved by cleaning and recycling. |
D.People should be more aware of the powerful functions of plastics. |
2 . The world has a plastic problem—and it is increasing.
1.Replace plastic bags. People use a lot of plastic bags worldwide every year.About 10 percent are used in the United States alone. That’s almost one bag per American per day.
2.Skip the straw(吸管).Today, around 8.3 billion plastic straws pollute the world’s beaches.
3.Use limited plastic bottles. Buy a reusable bottle and fill it with any type of beverage(饮料)you like.
4.Avoid plastic packaging materials.Don’t buy fruit or vegetables in plastic packaging.In the United Kingdom, leaders are calling for supermarkets to have plasticfree areas.They also want to tax plastic takeout containers.
5.Recycle. We can’t recycle all plastic items, but it is possible to recycle most bottles and milk or juice cartons.Today, Norway recycles 97 percent of its plastic bottle.How?
A.Likewise, the average Dane(丹麦人) uses four plastic bags per day. |
B.In contrast, the average Dane uses four singleuse bags per year. |
C.So when you order a drink, say no to the straw, or bring your own reusable one. |
D.However, there are still loads of people ignoring the seriousness of it. |
E.Scientists are working to find a longterm solution by making plastic more biodegradable (可降解的). |
F.Some cities, like Bundanoon in Australia and San Francisco in the U.S., have completely or partially banned bottled water. |
G.Machines at most supermarkets take the bottles and give a refund (退款) of up to 2.5 kroner (32 cents) per bottle. |
Nowadays, our living conditions are becoming increasingly serious owing to the destruction of our environment. Many plants and
It is obvious that there are many reasons
Personally, I hold the view that effective measures must be taken
My aim in life is
There is no
A. restrict B. down C. nonrenewable D. energy-consuming E. taxing F. reusable G. elsewhere H. transport I. intaking J. purchase K. trash-can |
Standing in line at the grocery store last week, I watched the woman in front of me buy a tube of toothpaste. As the clerk placed her
People have come to rely on plastic bags as everything from shopping bags for groceries to
Plastic bags harm the environment in several ways. First, they break
People all over the world are starting to recognize the problems associated with plastic bags. Countries such as China, South Africa, Switzerland, and Uganda are taking action and banning the bags. Other nations, including Italy and Ireland, have been trying to
6 . Coca -Cola, PepsiCo and Nestle have been accused of “zero progress” on reducing plastic waste, after being named the world’s top plastic polluters for the third year in a row.
Coca -Cola was ranked the world’s No. 1 plastic polluter by Break Free From Plastic in its annual audit, after its beverage bottles were the most frequently found discarded on beaches, rivers, parks and other litter sites in 51 of 55 nations surveyed. Last year it was the most frequently littered bottle in 37 countries, out of 51 surveyed.
The annual audit, undertaken by 15,000 volunteers around the world, identifies the largest number of plastic products from global brands found in the highest number of countries.
Coca -Cola came under fire from environmental campaigners earlier this year when it announced it would not abandon plastic bottles, saying they were popular with customers. In March, Coca -Cola, PepsiCo, Nestle and Unilever were found to be responsible for half a million tonnes of plastic pollution in six developing countries each year in a survey.
“
A spokesperson for PepsiCo said the company was taking action to tackle packaging through “partnership, innovation and investments”. They said it has set plastic reduction goals “including decreasing virgin plastic in our beverage business by 35% by 2025“, and was also ”growing refill and reuse through businesses like SodaStream and SodaStream Professional, which we expect will avoid 67 billion single -use plastic bottles through 2025”.
A.The world’s top polluting corporations claim to be working hard to solve plastic pollution. |
B.Up to 91% of all the plastic waste ever generated has not been recycled and ended up being incinerated, in landfill or in the natural environment. |
C.A statement from Nestle said the company was making “meaningful progress” in sustainable packaging. |
D.Globally, we have a commitment to get every bottle back by 2030, so that none of it ends up as litter or in the oceans. |
E.This year they collected 346, 494 pieces of plastic waste, 63% of which was marked clearly with a consumer brand. |
F.Coca-Cola branding was found to be worse than PepsiCo and Nestle combined. |
Air pollution, global warming and overflowing landfills are the most serious environmental problems we are currently facing today.
The main cause of air pollution is the burning of fossil fuels.Other human activities,such as construction and the burning of waste,also contribute to air pollution.The effects on our health can be very serious.You can easily contribute to
Global warming
Landfills are used for waste disposal in many countries around the world.However,due
很多人认为目前我们正在面临“一次性文化”(throw-away culture)的冲击。我们习惯使用各种一次性用品,原因是它们方便、卫生,但是后果也是非常严重的——这些用品会破坏水源、污染土地和空气。假如你是李华,请写一封信给世界自然保护联盟,谈谈你对一次性用品的看法,包括以下内容:
●你是否有使用一次性用品的习惯以及理由;
●具体说明如何面对一次性用品造成的环境问题。
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9 . The national movement to get rid of plastic bags has been gaining steam — with over 240 cities and counties passing laws that ban (明令禁止) or tax them since 2007 in the US. But these bans may be hurting the environment more than helping it.
University of Sydney economist Rebecca Taylor and her colleagues compared cities with the bans with those without them about the use of bags. For six months, they spent weekends in grocery stores recording the types of bags people carried out.
Taylor found these bag bans did what they were supposed to: People in the cities with the bans used fewer plastic bags. But people who used to reuse their shopping bags for other purposes, like picking up dog waste, still needed bags. “What I found was that sales of garbage bags actually grew sharply after plastic grocery bags were banned,” she says.
Garbage bags are thick and use more plastic than typical shopping bags. “About 30 percent of the plastic that was reduced by the ban comes back in the form of thicker garbage bags,” Taylor says. On top of that, cities that banned plastic bags saw a surge in the use of paper bags, which she thinks resulted in about 80 million pounds of extra paper garbage per year.
A bunch of studies find that paper bags are actually worse for the environment. They require cutting down and processing trees, which needs lots of water, toxic chemicals and fuel. While paper is biodegradable and avoids some of the problems of plastic, Taylor says, the huge increase of paper means banning plastic shopping bags increases greenhouse gas emissions.
The Danish government recently did a study that took into consideration environmental impacts beyond simply greenhouse gas emissions, including the use of water, damage to ecosystems and air pollution. These factors make cloth bags even worse. They estimate you would have to use an organic cotton bag 20,000 times more than a plastic grocery bag to make using it better for the environment.
1. What is the result of banning plastic grocery bags?A.Plastic bags are no longer needed. |
B.People begin to reuse their plastic bags. |
C.The amount of garbage is even greater. |
D.Most of the reduced plastic returns in the form of garbage bags. |
A.Sharp increase. | B.Slow development. | C.Tight control. | D.Sharp decrease. |
A.They are much thicker than plastic bags. |
B.They are not as biodegradable as plastic bags. |
C.They can’t be reused as many times as plastic bags. |
D.They need more natural resources and hurt the environment more than plastic bags. |
A.Banning plastic may do more harm than good. |
B.Banning plastic has great influence on people’s life. |
C.Banning plastic increases the use of paper and cloth bags. |
D.Banning plastic bags is gaining popularity worldwide. |
Light pollution
By
Migratory birds (候鸟) are also