1 . Conifers (针叶树) are generally better than broad-leaved trees at purifying air from pollutants. But deciduous (落叶的) trees may be better at taking in particle-bound pollution. A new study led by the University of Gothenburg shows that the best trees for air purification depend on the type of pollutants involved.
Trees and other greener in cities provide many benefits that are important for the well-being of residents. Leaves and needled on trees filter air pollutants and reduce exposure to poisonous substance in the air. But which trees purify the air most effectively? Researchers from the University of Gothenburg have collected leaves and needle from eleven different trees growing in the same place in the Gothenburg Botanical Garden (GBG) to analyse which cub-stances they have absorbed.
“This tree collection provided a unique opportunity to test many different species of trees with similar environmental conditions and exposure to air pollutants,” said Jenny Klingberg, a researcher of the GBG
A total of 32 different pollutants were analysed, some of which are bound to articles of various sizes. Others are gaseous. This project has focused on paths (多环芳烃). In cities, traffic is the biggest source of these pollutants, which are released due to incomplete burning in engines.
“Our analysis show that different species of trees have different abilities to absorb air pollutants. Conifers generally absorb morn gaseous paths than broad-leaved trees. Another advantage of conifers is that they also act as air purifies in winter, when air pollution is usually at its highest,” said Jenny Klingberg.
“This study contributes to improving our understanding of the ability of trees to clean the air and which species are best at absorbing air pollutants,” said Jenny Klingberg. This known-edge is important for urban planning when designing sustainable cities. While trees and green-era can contribute to better air quality in cities, at the end of the day, the most important measure is to reduce emissions.
1. Which is the determining factor in choosing the most suitable tries to purify air?A.Air quality. | B.Geographical location. | C.The height of plants. | D.The kind of pollutants. |
A.To compare their shapes. | B.To create a tree collection. |
C.To figure out what they absorb. | D.To display them on exhibition. |
A.Fuel vehicle’s. | B.Electric engines. | C.Traffic accidents. | D.Complete burning. |
A.Decreasing emissions. | B.Planting more conifers. |
C.Raising public awareness. | D.Designing sustainable cities. |
Zou Yi, an environmentalist
The fact that China is the first major developing country to combat PM 2.5 may sound unfamiliar to many,
Days with good air quality accounted
3 . Electronic waste, also known as e-waste, consists of a discarded phones, printers, TVs, electric toothbrushes and many other electronic goods no longer in use.
A shocking 53. 6 million tons of electronic waste was generated worldwide in 2019 — less than a fifth of which was recycled, according to UN's Global E-waste Monitor 2020 report.
Of the total e-waste last year, Asia contributed the biggest amount — 46.4 per cent — followed by the Americas(24.4 percent), Europe (22.3 percent), Africa (5.4 percent) and Oceania (1.3 percent).
The combined heap of e-waste for 2019 averaged 7. 3 kg for every man, woman and child on Earth. The UK averaged the second-biggest in the world, at 23.9 kg, behind Norway, which averaged 26kg.
The report also reveals that just 17.4 percent of the e-waste was properly collected and recycled. E-waste is a health and environmental hazard (危害), containing hazardous substances such as mercury, which damages the human brain.
After a device is discarded and e-waste is warmed up, toxic chemicals are released into the air, damaging the atmosphere. E-waste in landfills can also seep (渗透) toxic materials into groundwater, affecting animals and plants.
Gold, silver, copper, and other high-value materials were collectively valued at $57 billion. However, they were mostly dumped or burned rather than being collected for treatment and reuse. In countries with developing markets, an increasing number of household electronics like refrigerators, air conditioners, and lamps are now being bought, leading to the rapid increase in e-waste. A global obsession with smart phones, which tend to be replaced by an updated model after a year, also helps build e-waste piles.
It's not that countries don't have policies to fight e-waste since 2014, the number of countries that have adopted a national e-waste policy has increased from 61 to 78, the report says. But advances are slow, enforcement (执行) is poor, and policies fail to encourage the collection and proper management of e-waste. The lack of effective policies around the world needs to be addressed (解决) as soon as possible.
1. According to official figures, how much e-waste was recycled in 2019?A.53.6 million tons. | B.10.8 million tons. |
C.9.3 million tons. | D.20.1 million tons. |
A.health condition | B.electronic products |
C.energy resources | D.environmental protection |
A.Tolerant. | B.Indifferent. | C.Ambiguous. | D.Critical. |
A.E-waste is increasing. | B.E-waste is being reduced. |
C.E-waste is harmful to people. | D.E-waste is being encouraged. |
4 . The tons of plastic we’re dumping in the oceans is finding a new home—the stomachs of our beautiful marine animals. Yet another reminder of this fact washed ashore in Eastern Indonesia this week. A large amount of waste, including drinking cups and flip-flops, was found in the stomach of a whale that died off the coast near Kapota Island.
The 9.5-metre sperm whale (抹香鲸) was found by rescuers from the Wakatobi National Park. The whale had swallowed 5.9 kilograms of plastic waste containing 115 plastic cups, four plastic bottles, 25 plastic bags, and more than 1,000 other kinds of pieces of plastic, park chief Heri Santoso told the reporter.
“Although we have not been able to deduce the cause of death, the facts that we see are truly awful,” said Dwi Suprapti, a marine species conservation co-ordinator at WWF Indonesia. She said it was not possible to determine if the plastic had caused the whale’s death because of the animal’s advanced state of decay (腐烂). But this is only the latest.
Four Asian nations—Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand—account for 50% of the plastic waste in the oceans, according to a report by environmental campaigner Ocean Conservancy and the McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. The Philippines is second to Indonesia when it comes to putting away plastic waste in the oceans, according to a study published in the journal Science in January. Of the 3.2 million mismanaged waste it produces every year, 1.29 million ends up in the ocean.
A report released earlier this year stated that the amount of plastic in the ocean is likely to increase.
1. What can we know about the sperm whale?A.Its stomach is the home of plastic waste. |
B.It died of swallowing lots of plastic waste. |
C.It was the first whale to eat plastic waste. |
D.It had eaten much plastic waste before its death. |
A.confirm | B.cause |
C.approve | D.contain |
A.Thailand | B.Indonesia |
C.Vietnam | D.Philippines |
A.Philippines puts away 1.29 million tons of plastic. |
B.A sperm whale was found dead near Kapota Island. |
C.Much dumped plastic waste was found in a dead whale. |
D.We should take measures to reduce the waste in whales. |
5 . Imagine an area 34 times the size of Manhattan. Now imagine it covered ankle-deep in plastic waste.That’s a total of about 19 billion pounds of
"We're being
Plastic has in many ways been a good help to humanity, used in all walks of
Ocean Conservancy says plastics are believed to
And it’s not
With this in mind,experts say that all of us have a
A.seaweed | B.seafood | C.garbage | D.money |
A.comes from | B.ends up | C.takes out | D.put away |
A.trapped | B.controlled | C.surrounded | D.destroyed |
A.medical | B.technical | C.agricultural | D.environmental |
A.figure | B.waste | C.price | D.cost |
A.swiftly | B.slowly | C.hurriedly | D.unexpectedly |
A.time | B.education | C.technology | D.life |
A.While | B.So | C.But | D.And |
A.changing | B.growing | C.moving | D.touching |
A.scientific | B.coastal | C.general | D.tiny |
A.picks up | B.takes up | C.makes up | D.brings up |
A.see | B.eat | C.hide | D.search |
A.influence | B.damage | C.increase | D.threaten |
A.plants | B.animals | C.protection | D.species |
A.mistake | B.look | C.regard | D.recognize |
A.vivid | B.deadly | C.dead | D.lively |
A.mouth | B.stomach | C.head | D.tail |
A.waste | B.rubbish | C.nothing | D.plastics |
A.just | B.always | C.really | D.constantly |
A.unique | B.critical | C.reasonable | D.natural |
6 . You've probably heard the phrase "go outside and get some fresh air" before. Breathing fresh air can make us feel more energetic.
According to a new study from the World Health Organization (WHO), nine out of every 10 people on the planet breathe polluted air every day.
Polluted air can get deep inside your lungs when you breathe, causing diseases like lung cancer and heart disease. Around 7 million people die every year from breathing polluted air.
Some of the biggest sources of air pollution include factories and vehicles. In some regions, sand and desert dust, as well as the burning of waste, also cause air pollution.
Maria Neira, the WHO's head of public health, said China has set a good example to the world in improving air quality. "
A.More than 90 percent of these deaths happen in low-income and middle-income countries |
B.Although this problem is serious, the good news is that countries are taking action to fight it |
C.Another large source of air pollution can be found in some people's homes |
D.However, not everyone in the world has the chance to enjoy it |
E.Air pollution is a serious problem around the world |
F.There is a big step at the government level in China declaring war on air pollution |
G.People who work outdoors are more directly harmed by air pollution |
In modern India, polluting sectors continue to be important pillars of the economy. Many argue that any attempt to get rid of coal would result
One of the
The government
8 . New mercury threat to oceans from climate change
Rising temperatures could boost mercury levels in fish by up to seven times the current rates, said Swedish researchers in an article published in Science Journal. They’ve discovered warming increases levels of the toxin in sea creatures. In experiments, they found that extra rainfall drives up the amount of organic material flowing into the seas. This alters the food chain, adding another layer of complex organisms which boosts the concentrations of mercury up the line.
Mercury is one of the world’s most toxic metals, and according to the World Health Organization, is one of the top ten threats to public health. The substance at high levels has been linked to damage to the nervous system, paralysis and mental impairment in children.
The most common form of exposure to mercury is by eating fish containing methylmercury, an organic form of the chemical which forms when bacteria react with mercury in water, soil or plants. Levels of mercury in the world’s ecosystems have increased by between 200% and 500%, since the industrial revolution, say experts, driven up by the use of fossil fuels such as coal.
In recent years there have been concentrated efforts to limit the amount of mercury entering the environment, with an international treaty, called the Minamata Convention, signed by 136 countries in place since 2013.
Researchers hope that the Minamata treaty will be successful and countries reduce the amount of mercury that is being produced. Otherwise this discovery of a previously unknown source could have impacts for human health.
Other researchers in the field say that the new study highlights important issues that have previously been little known.
“This work experimentally proves that climate change will have a significant effect of methylmercury budgets in coastal waters and its accumulation in fish,” said Milena Horvat from the Jozef Stefan Institute in Slovenia.
“This work will also help us understand the formation of mercury in fish and help reduce mercury from emission sources (primarily industrial).”
1. Where did Swedish researchers find warming increases levels of the toxin?A.In the Pacific Ocean. | B.On the Continent. |
C.In Red Sea. | D.In sea creatures. |
A.Exposure to mercury. | B.Mercury at high levels. |
C.Methylmercury. | D.The use of fossil fuels. |
A.By limiting the amount of mercury entering the environment. |
B.By reducing the amount of mercury. |
C.When bacteria react with mercury in water, soil or plants. |
D.When climate change returns to normal. |
A.Climate change will increase the levels of mercury in food. |
B.Levels of mercury in the world’s ecosystems have increased by between 200% and 500%. |
C.The Minamata Convention has been signed by 136 countries in place since 2013. |
D.Mercury reduction from emission sources can be beneficial to fish. |
9 . A decade-long study, also the first major research into air pollution and disease has shown that living near a main road increases the risk of dementia(痴呆). The study of 6.6 million people found that one in 10 dementia deaths in people living within 50 metres of a busy road was due to waste gas and noise.
Air pollution is already known to contribute to the deaths of around 40,000 people in Britain each year by worsening breathing and heart conditions, while previous research showed emissions (排放物) can cause brain shrinkage. But the new study by Canadian public health scientists is the first to find a link between living close to heavy traffic and the increasing of dementia, a discovery described as "believable" and "impressive" by British experts.
Dr Hong Chen said. "Our study suggests that busy roads could be a source of environmental stressors that could give rise to the onset of dementia. Population growth and urbanization has placed many people close to heavy traffic, and with widespread exposure to heavy traffic and growing rates of dementia, even a modest effect from near-road exposure could cause a large public health burden. More research to understanding this link is needed, particularly into the effects of different aspects of traffic, such as air pollutants and noise."
In the new study, the team tracked all adults aged between 20 and 85 living in Ontario for more than a decade from 2001 to 2012. They used postcodes to determine how close people lived to a main road and analyzed medical records to see if they went on to develop dementia, Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis(多发性硬化).
While there was no correlation between living near a road and Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis, dementia risk reduced as people lived further from a main road, with a 7 percent higher risk in developing dementia among those living within 50 metres; a 4 percent higher risk at 50-100 metres and a 2 percent higher risk at 101-200 metres. After 200 metres there was no increase. Researchers believe that noise of traffic may also play a role in the raised risk as well as other urban pollution, which is often present near busy roads.
1. What can we know about Canadian's new study?A.British experts think highly of it. |
B.It brings benefits to dementia patients. |
C.It shows that air production is very serious. |
D.It shows that air pollution can cause brain shrinkage. |
A.people are diagnosed with dementia mainly due to air pollution |
B.widespread exposure to traffic will reduce the risk of having dementia |
C.the link between living near roads and having dementia was not obvious |
D.busy roads could be a source of environmental stressors that caused dementia to increase |
A.Change. | B.Improvement. |
C.Association. | D.Secret |
A.Living near a main road adds to the risk of noise. |
B.Living beyond 300 metres of a main road is safe for people. |
C.Living within 200 metres of a main road has a lower risk of having dementia. |
D.The further people live away from heavy traffic, the smaller the risk of having dementia. |