组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 环境污染
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 5 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了海水中的塑料垃圾对海洋动物的影响,并呼吁人们应该阻止塑料进入海洋。

1 . The amount of plastic pollution in the oceans is rapidly increasing. This is problematic, as at least 700 species of sea animals may mistake it for a tasty snack. While we know that some species seem to eat plastic because it looks like jellyfish or some other food sources, less research has been carried out into what plastic smells like to marine animals.

But now, a study from the University of North Carolina has found that the coating of algae that naturally builds up on ocean plastics causes the rubbish to give off the scent of food.

The researchers took 15 loggerhead turtles, each around five months old, and placed them in a laboratory tank. They then piped in clean water, clean plastic, turtle food, and plastic that had been immersed in the marine environment for five weeks.

The turtles showed no reaction to the smell of clean water or clean plastic. But when they were exposed to the smell of ocean-soaked plastic or turtle food, they exhibited food-seeking behaviours like reaching their noses out of the water or showing increasing activities.

“This finding is the first demonstration that the smell of ocean plastics causes animals to eat them, ” said Dr Kenneth J. Lohmann, who took part in the study. “It’s common to find loggerhead turtles with their digestive systems fully or partially blocked because they’ve eaten plastic materials. There are also increasing reports of sea turtles that have become ill and stranded on the beach due to their ingestion (摄食) of plastic.”

According to the researchers, areas of the ocean with dense concentrations of plastic may trick turtles and other marine animals into thinking that there is an abundant food source. “Once these plastics are in the ocean, we don’t have a good way to remove them or prevent them from smelling like food,” said Lohmann.

1. Why is plastic pollution posing a threat to marine animals?
A.It may eat up all jellyfish.
B.It may mislead them as food.
C.It may kill them with its smell.
D.It may trap 700 species of sea animals.
2. What may attract the loggerhead turtles in the laboratory tank to search for food?
A.Sea water.B.Clear water.
C.Brand-new plastic.D.Sea-soaked plastic.
3. What can be inferred from Lohmann’s words in the last paragraph?
A.Turtles should be trained to be more intelligent.
B.Plastics should be kept from getting into the ocean.
C.An abundant food source should be offered to sea animals.
D.Researchers should come up with a solution to the current problem.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Ways Found to Remove Plastic
B.Loggerhead Turtles Faced with Food Shortage
C.Ocean Plastics Smell like Food to Turtles
D.Plastic Pollution — Compromise or Control?
2024-05-03更新 | 87次组卷 | 1卷引用:辽宁省铁岭市昌图县第一高级中学2023-2024学年高二下学期4月月考英语试卷
听力选择题-长对话 | 较易(0.85) |
2 . 听下面一段较长对话,回答以下小题。
1. What is the relationship between the speakers?
A.A couple.B.Classmates.C.Colleagues.
2. What do the speakers decide to do?
A.Stop using paper cups.
B.Prepare boxes for different waste.
C.Reduce the use of paper, plastic and cans.
2024-04-08更新 | 27次组卷 | 1卷引用:辽宁省沈阳市重点高中联合体2023-2024学年高二上学期期末考试英语试题(含听力)
23-24高三下·浙江·阶段练习
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。主要介绍了一项新的研究揭示微塑料和纳米塑料对人体健康的潜在影响。

3 . Plastic is everywhere, from the Arctic ice to vital organs in the human body. In fact, previous estimates suggest that the average person swallows a credit card-worth of microscopic plastic particles(颗粒) every week. But new research shows that this could actually be an understatement.

Microplastics are plastics smaller than 5 millimeters, found in industrial waste, beauty products, and formed during the degradation of larger plastic pieces. Over time, they break down into even smaller nanoplastics. These tiny particles can pass through our intestines and lungs into our bloodstreams, reaching vital organs like the heart and brain.

While the idea of eating plastic is unsettling in itself, the major concern here is that these plastic particles contain chemicals that can interrupt our body’s natural release of hormones, potentially increasing our risk of reproductive disorders and certain cancers. They can also carry toxins(毒素) on their surface like heavy metals.

In the past, researchers have shown bottled water can contain tens of thousands of identifiable plastic fragments in a single container. However, until recently, only the larger microplastics were detectable with available measuring tools, leaving the area of nanoplastics largely a mystery.

Using Raman microscopy (显微镜学), capable of detecting particles down to the size of a flu virus, the team measured an average of 240, 000 particles of plastic per liter of bottled water, 90 percent of which were nanoplastics, a revelation 10 to 100 times larger than previous estimates.

These plastics likely originate from the bottle material, filters used to “purify” the water, and the source water itself. “It is not totally unexpected to find so much of this stuff, ” the study’s lead author, Columbia graduate student Naixin Qian, said in a statement. His team hopes to expand their research into tap water and other water sources to better inform our exposure to these potentially dangerous particles. “The idea is that the smaller things get, the more of them I reveal, ” he added.

1. What is the primary focus of the new research?
A.The presence of plastic particles.B.The use of plastic in everyday products.
C.The detection methods for microplastics.D.The potential risks of nanoplastics to human.
2. What is the advantage of Raman microscopy?
A.Finding the source of plastic particles.B.Helping to cure the deadly flu virus.
C.Detecting the smaller plastic particles.D.Improving the quality of bottled water.
3. Why will the team expand their research into tap water?
A.To focus on areas with higher plastic pollution.
B.To be aware of the dangerous particles in daily life.
C.To further measure the types of particles in tap water.
D.To detect the smaller plastic particles in industrial areas.
4. What is Qian’s attitude towards his research?
A.Skeptical.B.Objective.C.Conservative.D.Positive.
2024-03-26更新 | 225次组卷 | 7卷引用:英语 (新高考II卷03) (含考试版+听力+答案+解析+答题卡) -2024年高考押题预测卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了用纸和竹子等植物材料制成的吸管,通常人们认为它们比塑料制成的吸管更可持续、更环保。然而,这些吸管中PFAS的存在意味着它们看似环保,但确是有害的。

4 . In the first test of its kind in Europe, and only the second in the world, Belgian researchers tested 39 brands of straws (吸管) for the group of synthetic (合成的) chemicals known as poly-and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The straws are made from five materials — paper, bamboo, glass, stainless steel and plastic. PFAS were found in the majority of the straws tested and were most common in those made from paper and bamboo. They were not found only in steel straws tested.

PFAS are used to make everyday products, from outdoor clothing to non-stick pans, resistant (抵抗to water, heat and stains. They are, however, potentially harmful to people, wildlife and the environment. They have been related to a number of health problems, including lower response to vaccines (疫苗), lower birth weight, thyroid disease, liver damage, kidney cancer and testicular cancer. They break down very slowly over time and can last thousands of years in the environment, a property that has led to them being known as “forever chemicals”.

A growing number of countries, including the UK and Belgium, have sopped the sale of single-use plastic products, including drinking straws, and plant-based versions have become popular. The PFAS concentrations (浓缩物) were low in them and, bear in mind that most people tend to only use straws occasionally, bringing a limited risk to human health. However, PFAS can remain in the body for many years and concentrations can build up over time.

It isn’t known whether the PFAS were added to the straws by the producer for waterproofing or the PFAS were the result of contamination. Potential sources of contamination include the soil the plant-based materials were grown in and the water used in the production process. However, the presence of the chemicals in almost every brand of paper straws means it is likely that it was, in some cases, being used as a water-resistant coating, say the researchers.

1. Why are PFAS called “forever chemicals”?
A.They are commonly seen in daily life.
B.They bring humans health problems.
C.They remain in the environment for long.
D.They can resist water, heat and stains.
2. How can PFAS harm people’s health?
A.By bringing people air pollution.
B.By polluting humans’ food.
C.By building up little by little in humans’ body.
D.By making people addicted to drinking easily.
3. What does the underlined word “contamination” in the last paragraph mean?
A.Pollution.B.Discovery.C.Experiment.D.Development.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.More and more countries give up single-use plastic products.
B.PFAS are widely used in the production of daily necessities.
C.Certain kinds of new synthetic chemicals were discovered.
D.Environment-friendly drinking straws are actually harmful.
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了野火的形成原因、所带来的危害以及解决野火的建议。

5 . From his uptown Manhattan home, Samir Kumar can usually see skyscrapers (摩天大楼) downtown. But this week, as smoke from wildfires raging in the western United States and Canada stretched all the way to the East Coast, the city skyline was invisible.

Currently, nearly 300 wildfires are burning in British Columbia and about 80 are blazing through states in the U. S. West The fires get worse due to heat waves and prolonged (持续的) drought in the west, two weather patterns made more extreme by climate change.

As the smoke spreads across the country and exposes millions of people, the health impact becomes more widespread among the most vulnerable (易受伤的). In addition to causing breath problems, the smoke can lead to poor heart health. What’s more, smoke from wildfires could make it harder for people to fight off COVID-19 infections and the emerging variants (出现的变体) because their immune (免疫的) systems are already battling pollution. Studies have shown that people exposed to air pollution are more likely to die from COVID-19.

For the first time in its history as a state, California’s population is decreasing Falling birth rates, high housing prices and high taxes have been factors for years, and COVID-19 has strengthened the trend, delaying planned moves into the slate. Many survivors of wildfires have also chosen to rebuild in different states. “If I was starting to raise children… I probably would leave this state.” says Hertz-Picciotto, a director of the university’s health science center. She plans to spend several weeks during the height of wildfire season in August away from her home in northern California, where wildfires have become common.

Reducing air pollution from wildfire smoke in California and the rest of the country will require reducing the number and size of wildfires themselves. Lawmakers have introduced laws aimed at better managing forests, training more firefighters and making infrastructure (基础设施) more fire resistant.

“Ultimately until we stop burning fossil fuels. I don’t see why it’s not going to get worse. It certainly can’t get better,” says Hertz-Picciotto.

1. What’s the function of Paragraph 1?
A.To explain the concern of wildfires.
B.To introduce the spread of wildfires.
C.To describe the situation of wildfires.
D.To demonstrate the threat of wildfires.
2. What worsens wildfires?
A.Climate types.B.Human activities.
C.Extreme weather.D.Climate models.
3. What does wildfire smoke cause according to the text?
A.Strong immune systems.
B.Common breath problems.
C.Emerging infectious discases.
D.California’s population growth.
4. What is advised to tackle wildfires?
A.Restricting fossil fuels use.
B.Moving away from home.
C.Avoiding exposure to fires.
D.Fighting fire with fire.
共计 平均难度:一般