1 . An old lady was walking with her basket down the middle of a street in Petrograd to the great confusion of the traffic and with no small danger to herself. It was pointed out to her that the pavement was the place for pedestrians, but she replied: “I’m going to walk where I like. We’ve got liberty now.” It did not occur to the dear old lady that if liberty entitled(授权)the pedestrian to walk down the middle of the road, then the end of such liberty would be universal chaos. Everybody would be getting in everybody else’s way and nobody would get anywhere. Individual liberty would have become social chaos.
There is a danger of the world getting liberty-drunk in these days like the old lady, and it is just as well to remind ourselves of what the rule of the road means .It means that in order that the liberties of all may be preserved, the liberties of everybody must be limited. When the policeman steps into the middle of the road and puts out his hand, he is the symbol not of tyranny(暴政), but of liberty.
Liberty is not a personal affair only, but a social contract(契约). In matters which do not touch anybody else’s liberty, of course, I may be as free as 1 like. If I go down the street dressed strangely, who shall say me no? We have a whole kingdom in which we rule alone and can do what we choose. But directly we step out of that kingdom, our personal liberty of action becomes qualified by other people’s liberty.
We all tend to forget this. A reasonable consideration for the rights or feelings of others is the base of social conduct.
1. What does the first paragraph serve as?A.A background. | B.An introduction. | C.A comment. | D.An explanation. |
A.Park anywhere you like. | B.Walk along the pavement. |
C.Wear whatever you like. | D.Make loud noises in the wild. |
A.Follow the orders of policemen. | B.Do what you like in private. |
C.Never walk in the middle of the road. | D.Do not behave inconsiderately in public. |
A.Limited. | B.Ruined. | C.Improved. | D.Educated. |
The expensive trip to church was a surprise for Richard Albert, who lives right on the Canadian border. Like the other half-dozen people of Township 15, crossing the border is a daily occurrence for Albert. The nearby Quebec village of St. Pamphile is where they shop, eat and go to church.
There are many such situations in these areas along the largely unguarded 5,530-mile border between Canada and the US-which in some cases actually runs down the middle of streets or through buildings.
As a result, Albert says he did not expect any problems three weeks ago when he returned home to the US after attending church in Canada, as usual. The US customs(海关)station in this are is closed on Sundays, so be just drove around the locked gate, as he had done every weekend since the gate appeared last May, following a tightening of border security. Two days later. Albert was told to go to the customs office, where an officer told him be had been caught on camera crossing the border illegally(非法).
Ottawa has given out special passes to some 300 US citizens in that area so they can enter the country when Canadian customs stations are closed, but the US stopped a similar program last May. That forces the people to a 200-miledetour along hilly roads to get home through another border checkpoint.
Albert has requested that the customs office change their decisions on the fine, but he has not attended a Sunday church since. “I feel like I’m living in a prison,” he said.
1. We learn from the text that Richard Albert is .
A.an American living in Township 15 |
B.a Canadian living in a Quebec village |
C.a Canadian working in a customs station |
D.an American working in a Canadian church |
A.failed to obey traffic rules | B.broke the American security rules |
C.worked in St. Pamphile without a pass | D.damaged the gate of the customs office |
A.a drive through the town | B.a race across the fields |
C.a roundabout way of travelling | D.a journey in the mountain area |
A.A Cross-country Trip | B.A Special Border Pass |
C.An Unguarded Border | D.An Expensive Church Visit |
Almost every bit of information can be cut and pasted (粘贴) with a few clicks of a mouse. Many art forms such as writings, films, and music need new protection to ensure that people do not simply transfer them for free. Online illegal copying has been blamed for a huge reduction in the sales of many records because it is hard to convince people to buy something that they can get for free. Even the ideas behind traditional games, such as Scrabble, have been used without the owners’ permission.
Old laws have been struggling to keep up. While music companies have been successful in persuading courts that action should be taken against people who illegally download music, the law is difficult to carry out. Furthermore, intellectual property rights vary widely from country to country, so it’s up for debate which laws apply. Finally, there is the fact that many people simply do not see the act as theft (盗窃), since once the work has been digitized there is no clear physical object to steal in the first place.
All of these issues mean that companies involved with intellectual property — ideas or easily digitized information — are fighting desperately to get people to pay for the information they use, rather than paying for an object like a CD that they use. While the companies have sometimes been successful, the practical barriers to full protection seem insurmountable.
Finally, all that concerned parties can do is hope that their few successes scare off others and try to find new ways of making money.
1. Why do writings, films, and music need protection?
A.They are very expensive. |
B.They are impossible to copy. |
C.It is easy to make CDs, books, and movies. |
D.They are easily able to be transferred when in digital form. |
A.Laws are not the same in all countries. |
B.People do not see copying information as theft. |
C.It is very hard to catch people who are breaking the law. |
D.Internet service providers do not want to cooperate with the police. |
A.extremely expensive | B.impossible to overcome |
C.against the law | D.hard to prove |
A.Music and films will be unnecessary in the future. |
B.New laws are necessary but difficult to put into practice. |
C.The Internet is likely to become more important in the future. |
D.Laws are just a way for greedy companies to control their products. |
4 . The U.S. government is facing an increasing bother. Wild pigs, at their worst, can damage crops, spread diseases, attack humans and kill farm animals. And things are getting worse: a study shows that they are likely to double in number over the next 3 years. Why is it so hard to control wild pigs?
Introduced to America in the 16th century, and related to the wild pigs found in Europe, wild pigs can be found in 75% of all states. No single law exists to control them and regulations differ between states: while in Missouri they can only be shot if met by chance, in Texas hunting is actively encouraged; a “pork chopper” law allows Texan hunters to shoot wild pigs from helicopters, and some people in Louisiana have even built their own pig—hunting drone(无人机). As well as being popular with hunters, wild pigs are cheaper for game raisers to breed(饲养) than deer. In Michigan and Pennsylvania suggested bans on the private breeding of pigs for hunting have caused quarrels between game raisers and wildlife officials.
Wild pigs’ double nature—considered pests by farmers, but valued by hunters—makes it hard to pass laws to control them. Two other factors also contribute. Nearly 70% of land in America is privately owned. And it is difficult for lawmakers to force breeding and hunting laws on private landowners. Secondly, it is hard to define a wild pig.
In some states, laws are being introduced to redefine the term “wild animal” to keep out wild pigs. This is good news for those raising pigs for hunting, but less are to those who consider them pests whose number should be limited. Meanwhile, discussions continue over how to deal with this problem.
1. People are not permitted to hunt wild pigs freely in ________.A.Texas | B.Michigan |
C.Missouri | D.Louisiana |
A.It’s difficult to raise deer. |
B.Wild pigs are in large numbers. |
C.Deer are not popular with hunters. |
D.They can benefit more from wild pigs. |
A.The difficulty of passing effective laws. |
B.The high percentage of land owned privately. |
C.The farmers’ unwillingness to shoot wild pigs. |
D.The popularity of raising wild pigs in many states. |
A.Why are wild pigs so hard to control? |
B.Are wild pigs pests or wild animals? |
C.Wild pigs—an increasing danger in the US. |
D.How to deal with the problem of wild pigs? |
A house keeper,
The house keeper told KFOR that the dog,
"He was carrying it just
The house keeper stressed that the body had no markings or signs of trauma(伤口), and that Luke
“I believe Luke found it, picked it
Experts have determined that the newborn was a girl.
"We don’t know
Medical experts are trying to determine if the baby was born alive or
According to KOCO, Luke typically wandered over a large area, which officials are now seeking
All 50 states have some form of "safe shelter" law
The details of such
A.carry | B.carrying | C.carried | D.to carry |
A.that | B.which | C.how | D.whose |
A.named | B.shouted | C.viewed | D.reminded |
A.belief | B.mouth | C.trick | D.award |
A.as | B.for | C.like | D.just |
A.would | B.must | C.should | D.need |
A.down | B.out | C.in | D.up |
A.why | B.where | C.when | D.how |
A.obvious | B.religious | C.dead | D.raw |
A.for | B.of | C.from | D.away |
A.strengths | B.papers | C.books | D.items |
A.benefits | B.permission | C.steak | D.cheatings |
A.dangerous | B.tall | C.safe | D.frustrated |
A.laws | B.people | C.diets | D.manners |
A.find | B.found | C.founded | D.be found |
6 . Good afternoon, and welcome to England. We hope that your visit here will be a pleasant one. Today, I would draw your attention to a few of our laws.
The first one is drinking. Now, you may not buy wine in this country if you are under 18 years of age, nor may your friends buy it for you.
Secondly, noise. Enjoy yourselves by all means, but please don’t make unnecessary noise, particularly, at night. We ask you to respect other people who may wish to be quiet.
Thirdly, crossing the road. Be careful, the traffic moves on the left side of the road in this country. Use pedestrian crossing and don’t take any chance when crossing the road.
My next point is about rubbish. It isn’t lawful to drop rubbish in the street. When you have something to throw away, please put it in your pocket and take it home, or put it in a dustbin.
Finally, as regards smoking, it is against law to buy cigarettes or tobacco if you are under 16 years of age.
I’d like to finish by saying that if you require any sort of help or assistance, you should contact the police, who will be pleased to help you. You can call, write or directly go to ask any policeman.
1. “take any chance” means .
A.冒险,碰运气 | B.趁机 | C.失去机会 | D.生气 |
A.A guide. |
B.A person who makes the law. |
C.A teacher. |
D.An English officer. |
A.Three. | B.Four. | C.Five. | D.Six. |
A.tell people those above 18 can smoke and drink there |
B.declare the different laws of England |
C.give advice to travelers to the country |
D.warn people against going to the country |
A.in the country, if you are 18 years of age, you may not buy wine, but your friends can buy it for you |
B.you may not buy cigarettes or tobacco unless you are above 16 years of age |
C.because the traffic moves on the left side of the road, you must use pedestrian when crossing the road |
D.you can’t make a noise except at night |
Some persons look on laws with fear, hatred, or annoyance. Laws seem to limit people’s freedom to do many things they would like to do. Though laws may prevent us from doing things we wish to do at the moment, laws make everyone’s life safer and more pleasant. Without laws we could not hold on to our property; we could not go to bed at night expecting to wake up in the morning and find that we had not been robbed; no stores in which we buy food, clothes, and other necessities could stay open and sell to us. Our banks would not be safe places to keep our money.
Social life would be impossible without laws to control the way people treat one another. It is not the laws that should be feared but the trouble that comes to everyone when laws are broken. Once this is understood, a citizen will not fear or hate the law. Understanding the need for good laws and the evil results of breaking laws is the first requirement of good citizenship and government.
Philosophers once believed that in prehistoric time people lived without laws in a “state of nature”. People were free to do as they pleased unless someone stronger stopped them by force. As a result, life became so dangerous and unsafe that leaders had to create laws to protect life and property.
This is no longer believed to be true. Scholars now think that as soon as people began living in small groups, they worked out rules for getting along with one another. In time everyone accepted and supported the rules. Manners, customs and beliefs controlled the living habits and behavior of the group. Such rules and habits of life are called folkways.
Folkways are probably the real meaning of human laws, as well as of religion, morals, and education. As life became more complex, folkways became more complete guides to living. After thousands of years, some of the important folkways were put into writing as the earlier laws. And as life grew more and more complicated with faster transportation and the rise of modern industry and big cities, more human acts and interests had to be ruled by law. This led to a great increase in the number of laws.
But we know that unless laws are enforced, they cannot protect us. Poorly enforced laws invite crime and violence. So we agree that the best protection against crime is planned social change and law reform -- to reduce the causes of crime and to encourage people to obey the laws. Such a solution would join a sound system of law enforcement with forces working to prevent crime. To attain this goal, all citizens must understand the need for good laws and for their enforcement.
1. Some persons look on laws with fear, hatred, or annoyance, because_____.
A.they can’t do whatever they want to |
B.they feel it unnecessary to have laws |
C.laws only protect those who worked out them |
D.laws and rules are too complicated to understand |
A.Without laws we may fail to hold on to our property |
B.In prehistoric time people lived happily without laws in a “state of nature”. |
C.Human laws, as well as of religion, morals, and education, are believed to originate from Folkways. |
D.Good citizens and government should be aware of the need for good laws and the evil results of breaking laws |
A.some citizens fear or hate the law. |
B.poorly enforced laws cause crime and violence. |
C.we need someone stronger to stop crime by force. |
D.the evil results of breaking laws are getting fewer and fewer . |
A.The Origin of Laws | B.Enforcement of Laws |
C.Leaders and Laws | D.Laws and rules. |
Enough "meaningless drivel". That’s the message from a group of members of the UK government who have been examining how social media firms like LinkedIn gather and use social media data.
The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee’s report, released last week, has blamed firms for making people sign up to long incomprehensible legal contracts and calls for an international standard or kitemark (认证标记) to identify sites that have clear terms and conditions.
"The term and conditions statement that we all carelessly agree to is meaningless drivel to anyone," says Andrew Miller, the chair of the committee. Instead, he says, firms should provide a plain-English version of their terms. The simplified version would be checked by a third party and awarded a kitemark if it is an accurate reflection of the original.
It is not yet clear who would administer the scheme, but the UK government is looking at introducing it on a voluntary basis. "we need to think through how we make that work in practice," says Miller.
Would we pay any more attention to a kitemark? "I think if you went and did the survey, people would like to think they would," says Nigel Shadbolt at the University of Southampton, UK, who studies open data. "We do know people worry a lot about the inappropriate use of their information." But what would happen in practice is another matter, he says.
Other organisations such as banks ask customers to sign long contracts they may not read or understand, but Miller believes social media requires special attention because it is so new. "We still don’t know how significant the long-term impact is going to be of unwise things that kids put on social media that come back and bite them in 20 years’ time," he says.
Shadbolt, who gave evidence to the committee, says the problem is that we don’t know how companies will use our data because their business models and uses of data are still evolving. Large collections of personal information have become valuable only recently, he says.
The shock and anger when a social media firm does something with data that people don’t expect, even if users have apparently permission, show that the current situation isn’t working. If properly administered, a kitemark on terms and conditions could help people know what exactly they are signing up to. Although they would still have to actually read them.
1. What does the phrase " meaningless drivel" in paragraphs 1 and 3 refer to?
A.Legal contracts that social media firms make people sign up to. |
B.Warnings from the UK government against unsafe websites. |
C.Guidelines on how to use social media websites properly. |
D.Insignificant data collected by social media firms. |
A.social media firms would conduct a survey on the kitemark scheme |
B.people would pay as much attention to a kitemark as they think |
C.a kitemark scheme would be workable on a nationwide scale |
D.the kitemark would help companies develop their business models |
A.their users consist largely of kids under 20 years old |
B.the language in their contracts is usually harder to understand |
C.the information they collected could become more valuable in future |
D.it remains unknown how users’ data will be taken advantage of |
A.think carefully before posting anything onto such websites |
B.read the terms and conditions even if there is a kitemark |
C.take no further action if they can find a kitemark |
D.avoid providing too much personal information |
A.Say no to social media? |
B.New security rules in operation? |
C.Accept without reading? |
D.Administration matters! |
Good afternoon, and welcome to England. We hope that your visit here will be a pleasant one. Today, I would draw your attention to a few of our laws.
The first one is drinking. Now, you may not buy wine in this country if you are under 18 years of age, nor may your friends buy it for you.
Secondly, noise. Enjoy yourselves by all means, but please don’t make unnecessary noise, particularly at night. We ask you to respect other people who may wish to be quiet.
Thirdly, crossing the road. Be careful, the traffic moves on the left side of the road in this country. Use pedestrian crossing and don’t take any chance when crossing the road.
My next point is about rubbish. It isn’t lawful to drop rubbish in the street. When you have something to throw away, please put it in your pocket and take it home, or put it in a dustbin.
Finally, as regards smoking, it is against law to buy cigarettes or tobacco if you are under 16 years of age.
Ilike to finish by saying that if you require any sort of help or assistance, you should contact the police, who will be pleased to help you. You can call, write or directly go to ask any policeman.
1. Who do you think is most likely to make the speech?
A.A teacher | B.A person who makes the law |
C.A guide | D.An English officer |
A.Three | B.Four | C.Five | D.Six |
A.tell people those above 18 can smoke and drink there |
B.give advice to travelers to the country |
C.declare the different laws of England |
D.warn people against going to the country |
A.in the country, if you are 18 years of age, you may not buy wine, but your friends can buy it for you |
B.you may not buy cigarettes or tobacco unless you are above 16 years of age |
C.because the traffic moves on the left side of the road, you must use pedestrian when crossing the road |
D.you can’t make a noise except at night |
Xia’s death is warning to other students. A new rule went into effect on January 1, 2006. Teens are not allowed to buy or drink alcohol. Shops are not allowed to sell it to them.
A 1999 Chinese law forbade (禁止) shops to sell alcohol to youths under 18. But it is not taken seriously by shopkeepers because it doesn’t have specific rules. People hope the new rule will work.
I tasted alcohol when having the dinner of the last New Years Eve, said Lian Yuqi, a 16-year-old girl in Xiamen. She believes that the new rule will stop teens from drinking and help them grow in a healthy way.
Although it may be a little disappointing not to have beer at parties, I think we can have soft drinks instead, she said.
1. Xia Min died from alcohol at the age of ______.
A.15 | B.16 | C.17 | D.18 |
A.a warning sing | B.a shopkeeper |
C.the new rule | D.a 1999 Chinese law |
A.it is against the new rule for youths under 18 to drink alcohol |
B.shops can sell alcohol to a 16 years old youth. |
C.without an ID card, young people cant buy alcohol |
D.it seems that the young girl, Liang Yuqi, likes to drink alcohol |
A.The new rule has worked very well. |
B.Shopkeepers can sell alcohol to teens above 18. |
C.Chinas legal drinking age is clearly under18. |
D.Many teens drink alcohol to show theyve grown up. |