组卷网 > 知识点选题 >
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 3 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍了10月初,在一起地球外环境执法案件中,首次对太空垃圾处以罚款,文章还讨论了太空垃圾的危害以及处理方式。

1 . The first-ever fine for space junk was issued in early October in a case of off-planet environmental enforcement (执法). The television company, Dish Network, was hit with a $125,000 fine by the United States government for failing to remove a satellite in orbit that would have risked a collision (撞击) with other space equipment, a safety concern that will only grow with time as off-planet activities increase.

According to NASA, debris (碎片) orbiting in space can travel up to 15 kilometres per second, which is nearly 10 times faster than the velocity (速度) of a bullet. A huge amount of damage can be caused by something just a few centimetres in size, meaning that every effort must be taken to keep space as clear as possible. Collisions that take place in space have an effect back on Earth. Damaged satellites impact our ability to use the Internet and navigation (导航), leaving increasingly global critical infrastructure in an unstable state.

One solution for this may be to send autonomous space vehicles into orbit, which can then catch and effectively de-orbit space junk. By utilizing tools such as robotic arms, or nets, this approach will require very precise track and fine cooperation in order to be successful. Such measures are yet to catch up with the increase in space activity and pollution currently occurring. Therefore, fines and regulatory enforcement may presently be the only realistic method to hold organizations accountable.

The Dish Network satellite, fined $125,000 by the Federal Communications Commission, failed to de-orbit as a lack of fuel stopped the satellite from fully decommissioning (退役) a safe distance from Earth, falling short by around 75 miles (120 kilometres). It is hoped that significant fines like these will serve as a warning for companies, forcing them to make sure the safe decommissioning of their space operations.

1. Why was Dish Network fined?
A.It left space junk in orbit.B.It increased off-planet activities.
C.It made collisions among space equipment.D.It sent too much space equipment to space.
2. Why is it necessary to keep space clean?
A.Space junk may turn into bullets.B.Debris fragments are too tiny to track.
C.Debris may cause great damage in space.D.A bad space environment will destroy the Earth.
3. What is the third paragraph mainly about?
A.The harm of space junk.B.Ways to remove space junk.
C.Types of autonomous space vehicles.D.Approaches to stopping satellites.
4. What’s the author’s attitude towards the fines?
A.Unconcerned.B.Doubtful.C.Negative.D.Approving.

2 . Smoking in your own home in Thailand may now be considered a crime, if the smoke is considered harmful to other people in the house.

The new law, Family Protection and Development Promotion Act, was initiated (启动) by the Ministry of Social Development and Human Security and was announced in the Royal Gazette on May 22, 2019. The law aims at limiting smoking at home which might be hazardous for others’ health living under the same roof. In that case, it will be considered as “domestic violence”. The new law came into force on August 20.

According to the center for research and knowledge management for tobacco control, at the Faculty of Medical Science of Mahidol University, there are about 4.9 million households where one or more family members smoke. An average of 10.3 million people have unconsciously become passive smokers because they’ve been breathing in smoke at home. Scientific studies show that passive smokers are at greater risk of being affected by cancer.

Of 75 child patients from houses where smoking is practiced, 76% of them were found to have nicotine traces in their urine (尿液), with 43% of them having nicotine content going beyond permitted levels. Smoking at home also may lead to physical or emotional violence because of aggressiveness (攻击性) when there is a lack of smoking, and might as well ruin relationships between smokers and non-smoker family members.

According to the new law, anyone who thinks they are affected by domestic smoking can report to officials concerned so that inspectors will be sent to investigate and take legal action against the smokers. Once confirmed, the court may order a person to receive treatment to quit smoking in an attempt to protect the person’s family. In February in 2019, Thailand had banned smoking at six of its airports along with a ban in public places.

1. What do we know about the new law in Thailand?
A.It came into effect on May 22.
B.It aimed at protecting the health of non-smokers.
C.It regarded smoking at home as a kind of domestic violence.
D.It clearly claimed that smoking at home is a crime.
2. What does the underlined word “hazardous” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.Anxious.B.Harmful.
C.Beneficial.D.Essential.
3. What is Paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.The purpose of initiating the law.
B.Responses to the new law.
C.Actions to quit smoking.
D.Bad consequences of smoking at home.
4. What can be inferred from the text?
A.Smoking is illegal anywhere in Thailand.
B.Passive smokers are not likely to suffer from cancer.
C.People tend to be more aggressive when they are smoking.
D.Thailand is making efforts to create a smoke-free environment.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校

3 . The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. Let’s meet some of the great women who have left their mark on our country’ s highest court.

Margaret Brent

In the early years of our nation, women were generally prevented from practicing law. However,there were some exceptions. One such exception was Margaret Brent, who settled in Maryland with her sisters in 1638 and became a wealthy landowner.Brent appeared before courts several times to file lawsuits against people who owed her money.

Lucy Terry Prince

Lucy was well-known for her skills as a public speaker, and in 1796 she became the first black woman in America to argue before a Supreme Court justice. The case arose from a land dispute, and Lucy argued against two leading lawyers.Chief justice Samuel Chase, who oversaw the case,said that Prince "made a better argument than he had ever heard from a lawyer in Vermont.”

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1933, Ginsburg attended Cornell University and Columbia Law school. Between 1972 and 1978, Ginsburg argued six cases before the Supreme Court concerning laws that kept women out of certain occupations. She won five of them. In the spring of 1993, Justice Byron White retired from the Supreme Court. President Bill Clinton then picked Ginsburg to be his replacement.

Myra Bradwell

In 1872, the Illinois Supreme Court denied Myra Bradwell’ s admission to the Illinois Bar despite the fact that she had passed the state bar exam. Bradwell then asked the U. S. Supreme Court to overturn the Illinois court’s decision.Unfortunately for Bradwell, the tables weren’t turned. The Supreme Court claimed that there was nothing unconstitutional about denying a woman the chance to practice as a lawyer.

1. Which of the following describes Margaret Brent?
A.Brave and determined
B.Generous and friendly
C.Considerate and optimistic
D.Traditional and scholarly
2. What was Samuel Chase’ s attitude to Lucy’s argument?
A.FavorableB.Uncaring
C.DoubtfulD.Grateful
3. What does the author mean by the underlined sentence in the text?
A.Bradwell failed the state bar exam
B.Bradwell' s request was unconstitutional
C.The Illinois Supreme Court broke the law
D.The Supreme Court ruled against Bradwell
共计 平均难度:一般