组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 教育
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:56 题号:10288239

Sit still. It's the rule of every classroom. But that is changing as evidence builds that taking brief activity breaks during the day helps children learn and be more attentive in class, and a   growing number of programs designed to promote movement are being adopted in schools. "We need to recognize that children are movement-based," said Brian Gatens, the superintendent of schools in Emerson, N.J." In schools, we sometimes are pushing against human nature in asking them to sit still and be quiet all the time.We fall into this trap that if kids are at their desks with their heads down and are silent and writing, we think they are learning," Mr. Gatens added. "But   what we have found is that the active time used to energize your brain makes all those still moments better, or more productive."

A 2013 report from the Institute of Medicine concluded that children who are more active show greater attention, have faster cognitive processing speed and perform better on standardized academic tests than children who are less active. And a study released in January by Lund University in Sweden shows that students, especially boys, who had daily physical education, did better in school.

"Daily physical activity is an opportunity for the average school to become a high-performing school," said Jesper Fritz, a doctoral student at Lund University and physician at the Skane University Hospital in Malmo who was the study's lead author.

"Activity helps the brain in so many ways," said James F.Sallis, a professor of family medicine and public health at the University of California, San Diego, who has done research on the association between activity breaks and classroom behavior."Activity stimulates more blood vessels in the brain to support more brain cells.And there is evidence that active kids do better on standardized tests and pay attention more in school." "Plus," he added," it makes kids want to come to school more-it's fun to do these activities."

But not all districts are embracing the trend of movement breaks. "The bottom line is that with only six and a half hours during the day, our priority is academics," said Tom Hernandez, the director of community relations for the Plainfield School District in Illinois, about 40 miles southwest of Chicago. He said that under state law, the schools provide daily physical education classes and that teachers in the district find ways to give students time during the day to refresh and recharge.

"Kids aren't meant to sit still all day and take in information," said Steve Boyle, one of the co-founders of the National Association of Physical Literacy, which aims to bring movement into schools." Adults aren't either."

1. Brain Gatens is likely to agree that
A.all of the students should sit still
B.sitting still often means studying well
C.being quite is actually human nature
D.always sitting doesn't have good effects
2. According to Jesper Fritz, we can infer that _____
A.activity helps the brain in only one way
B.activities can make children physically and mentally healthy
C.activities have nothing to do with children's academic performances
D.Daily activity is a chance for the average school to become a high one
3. According to James F. Sallis, the reasons why activities make students clever is that _____
A.they stimulate more blood vessels in the body
B.they activate all the brain cells but are tough on bodies
C.they give children fun and motivate all the brains to work
D.they give students time during the day to refresh and recharge
4. Which column are you likely to read the passage in the newspaper?
A.Discovery
B.Sports
C.Education
D.Science
19-20高二下·江苏南通·阶段练习 查看更多[2]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-任务型阅读(约590词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐1】A recent study points out a so-called “gender-equality paradox(性别平等悖论)”: there are more women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) in countries with lower gender equality. Why do women make up 40 percent of engineering majors in Jordan, but only 34 percent in Sweden and 19 percent in the U.S.? The researchers suggest that women are just less interested in STEM, and when liberal Western countries let them choose freely, they freely choose different fields.

We disagree.

From cradle to classroom, a wealth of research shows that the environment has a major influence on girls’ interest and ability in math and science. Early in school, teachers, unconscious prejudice push girls away from STEM. By their preteen years, girls outperform boys in science class and report equal interest in the subject, but parents think that science is harder and less interesting for their daughters than their sons, and these misunderstandings predict their children’s career choices.

Later in life, women get less credit than men for the same math performance. When female STEM majors write to potential PhD advisors, they are less likely to get a response. When STEM professors review applications for research positions, they are less likely to hire “Jennifer” than “John,” even when both applications are otherwise identical—and if they do hire “Jennifer,” they pay her $4,000 less.

These findings make it clear that women in Western countries are not freely expressing their lack of “interest” in STEM. In fact, cultural attitudes and discrimination are shaping women’s interests in a way that is anything but free, even in otherwise free countries.

“Gender-equality paradox” research misses those social factors because it relies on a broad measure of equality called the Gender Gap Index (GGI), which tracks indicators such as wage difference, government representation and health outcomes. These are important markers of progress, but if we want to explain something as complicated as gender representation in STEM, we have to look into people’s heads.

Fortunately, we have ways to do that. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a well-validated tool for measuring how tightly two concepts are tied together in people’s minds. The psychologist Brian Nosek and his colleagues analyzed over 500,000 responses to a version of the IAT that measures mental associations between men/women and science, and compared results from 34 countries. Across the world, people associated science more strongly with men than with women.

But surprisingly, these gendered associations were stronger in supposedly egalitarian (主张平等的) Sweden than they were in the U.S., and the most pro-female scores came from Jordan. We re-analyzed the study’s data and found that the GGI’s assessment of overall gender equality of a country has nothing to do with that country’s scores on the science IAT.

That means the GGI fails to account for cultural attitudes toward women in science and the complicated mix of history and culture that forms those attitudes.

Comparison

A recent study

The author’s idea

Opinions

“Gender-equality paradox”     1     from the personal reason that women are less interested in STEM.

The environment including cultural attitudes and discrimination is     2     women’s interests.

Facts

    3     with Jordan and Sweden, America had the least percentage of women majoring in engineering.

• Early in school: Girls perform     4     than boys in science.
• Later in life: Female STEM majors are more likely to be     5     by potential PhD advisors.

Tools

It is     6     on GGI.

IAT     7     how tightly two concepts are tied together in people’s minds.

Findings

Women in liberal Western countries tend to     8     STEM.

• The GGFs assessment of overall gender equality is not     9     to that country’s scores on the science IAT.
• The GGI can’t     10     people’s cultural attitudes towards women in science, which are formed by a mix of history and culture.

2018-07-09更新 | 88次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】Until recently, the University of Kent prided itself on its friendly image. Not any more. Over the past few months it has been working hard, with the help of media consultants, to downplay its cozy reputation in favor of something more academic and serious.

Kent is not alone in considering an image revamp (翻新). Changes to next year’s funding regime (制度) are both forcing universities to justify charging students up to 9,000 in fees.

Nowadays, universities putting much more of a focus on their brands and what their value propositions are. While in the past universities have often focused on students’ social life and attractions of the university town in recruitment campaigns, they are now concentrating on more tangible attractions, such as employment prospects, engagement with industry, and lecturer contact hours, making clear exactly what students are going to get for their money.

The problem for universities is that if those benefits fail to materialize, students notice. That worries Rob Behrens, chief executive of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA), which deals with student complaints. “Universities need to be extremely careful that... they describe the reality of what’s going to happen to students,” he says. “Because competition is going to get greater for attracting students, there is a danger that universities will go the extra mile.”

One university told prospective engineering students they would be able to design a car and race it at Brands Hatch, which never happened, he says. “If universities spent as much money on handling complaints and appeals appropriately as they spend on marketing, they would do better at keeping students, and in the National Student Survey returns,” he says.

Ongoing research by Heist tracking prospective 2012 students suggests that they are not only becoming more sophisticated in thinking about what they want from a university, but are also spending more time researching evidence to back up institutional claims.

Hence the growing importance of the student survey and league tables. From next September, all institutions will also be expected to publish on their websites key information sets, allowing easier comparison between institutions—and between promises and reality—of student satisfaction levels, course information, and the types of jobs and salaries graduates go on to.

As a result, it is hardly surprising that universities are beginning to change the way they market themselves. While the best form of marketing for institutions is to be good at what they do, they also need to be clear about how they are different from others.

And it is vital that once an institution claims to be particularly good at something, it must live up to it. The moment you position yourself, you become exposed because you have played your joker, and if you fail in that you are in trouble.

1. What are universities putting their focus on to attract students?
A.A friendly reputation.B.Student funding.
C.Students’ social life.D.Practical benefits.
2. According to Behrens, which of the following may NOT be the consequences if students’ complaints are not dealt well with?
A.Universities may not be able to attract prospective students.
B.Students will become more sophisticated.
C.It will do harm to the reputation of the universities.
D.Universities may not be able to keep students.
3. Rob Behrens suggests universities do in marketing themselves EXCEPT ________.
A.make high promises to attract studentsB.establish their own strengths
C.show graduates career perspectiveD.show their feature courses
4. What does the underlined word “joker” refer to?
A.A person who are good at communication.
B.A thing that cannot be predicted.
C.The best thing that people cannot afford to lose.
D.A card that can be matched to any card.
2019-11-19更新 | 132次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】Over the past five years, researchers in artificial intelligence have become the rock stars of the technology world. A branch of AI known as deep learning, has proven so useful that skilled operators can command six-figure salaries to build software for Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. The top names can earn over $1 million a year.

The traditional way to get these jobs has been a Doctor’s degree in computer science from one of America’s top universities. Earning one takes years and requires a person who can be devoted to study, which is rare among normal people. Moreover, graduate students are regularly attracted away from their studies by various high-paid jobs.

That is changing. Last month Fast.ai, an education non-profit based in San Francisco, kicked off the third year of its course in deep learning. Since its beginning it has attracted more than 100,000 students from India to Nigeria. The course comes with a simple idea: there is no need to spend years obtaining a Doctor’s degree in order to practise deep learning. Fast.ai’s course can be completed in just seven weeks.

For example, a graduate from Fast.ai’s first year, Sara Hooker, was hired into Google’s highly competitive AI residency programme after finishing the course, having never worked on deep learning before. She is now a founding member of Google’s new AI research office in Accra, Ghana, the firm’s first in Africa.

To make it accessible to anyone who wants to learn how to build AI software, Jeremy Howard, who founded Fast.ai with Rachel Thomas, a mathematician, says middle school mathematics is enough. Fast.ai is not the only A.I. programme. AI4ALL, another non-profit organization, founded by leading technologists including Dr. Fei-Fei Li, works to bring AI education to schoolchildren that would otherwise not have access to it.

Howard’s ambitions run deeper than just dealing with the shortage in the AI labour market. His aim is to spread deep learning into many hands, so that it may be applied in as many fields as possible. The ambition, says Mr Howard, is for AI training software to become as easy to use and common as sending an email on a smart phone.

1. What’s Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The way to get a Doctor’s degree.
B.The difficulties to get a Doctor’s degree.
C.The importance to get a Doctor’s degree.
D.The necessity to get a Doctor’s degree.
2. What can we learn about Fast.ai?
A.It aims to produce AI graduates in a fast way.
B.It aims to collect money for poor students.
C.It charges a high free for offering courses.
D.It becomes popular only in India and Nigeria.
3. Where does Sara Hooker work according to the passage?
A.India.B.Nigeria.
C.Ghana.D.America.
4. What do Fast.ai and AI4ALL have in common?
A.They are both meant for children.
B.They require advanced math.
C.They have the same founder.
D.They are both non-profit.
5. What’s Howard’s attitude to AI training software in the future?
A.Anxious.B.Disappointed.
C.Optimistic.D.Surprised.
2019-04-04更新 | 250次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般