组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:185 题号:10404614

Over the last 25 years, psychologists have found that personalities center on five basic traits(特性) — the Big Five: agreeableness, conscientiousness (责任心), neuroticism, extroversion and openness. Contrary to common belief, people just aren’t organized into certain personality types. Every trait is a continuous dimension and everyone can be described as having varying levels of each trait. A new research has also found animals from ants to apes all have the Big Five and that the universality of personality points to an evolutionary (进化) origin.

Animals and humans have common problems of survival, which are spelled out beautifully in the Big Five, and that’s why there’s so much continuity in human personality and animal personality. For example, conscientiousness involves behaviors like planning and consideration, which are important among animals for taking care of their young, selecting mates and living in groups. Being neat and orderly — aspects of conscientiousness-also has evolutionary superiority. Bees that like to keep clean and remove more dead group members reduce risk of disease, gain more weight and reproduce more Spiders that make tidy webs catch more insects. Birds that build neater and solider nests attract more mates.

These behaviors may seem primitive, but they’re nevertheless indications of personality. Personality is the expression of all of the behaviors that humans and animals exhibit that allow them to function adaptively in the world.

Evolution can also explain why personalities vary so much. Depending on the situation, each of the Big Five can be advantageous. For example, agreeableness is great for relationships. But if a lion were charging at you, you’d be better off with a less agreeable and more aggressive personality. Because the world is so unpredictable, every aspect of each personality trait could be useful at different times, so instead of evolving a single type of personality that’s best for every situation, we’re left with a wide variety.

1. What do people generally think about personality types?
A.Different personality types have respective strengths.
B.Everyone falls into a particular personality type.
C.People with common personality types gather,
D.Everyone has mixed personality types.
2. What’s the purpose of mentioning some animals in Paragraph 2?
A.To illustrate the advantages of being conscientious.
B.To analyze survival chances of cooperative animals.
C.To explain why they are tidy and orderly.
D.To throw new light on their behavior.
3. Why do we display a certain personality in a specific situation?
A.To be free of trouble.
B.To be adaptive to circumstances.
C.To compete for equal rights.
D.To gain advantages over others.
4. What does the text mainly focus on?
A.Personality and behavior.
B.Categories of Big Five.
C.Contradictory facts on personality.
D.Diversity and variability of personality.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是是一篇说明文。文章主要以人们常说的自己没有方向感为话题进行了讲述。根据专家提出的理论,方向感的缺失实际上就是神经系统功能出现了紊乱,这样的人无法在脑海中形成地图进行方向导航。由此,或许引导这个人通过一系列的短路线可以成为一个挽救方法。

【推荐1】It is not uncommon for people to say they have no sense of direction. The sense of direction represents the ability to find one’s way. In other words, it is about getting from point A to point B without a hitch. The journey begins with determining the initial position using landmarks in the environment. It’s really about choosing a route and following it. It is also a question of testing that this same route is the correct one, with the mental representation of space or the help of tools such as maps. Finally, the ability to identify the point of arrival is obviously very important.

In a study published in 2009, scientist Giuseppe Iaria, a scientist of the University of Calgary (Canada), who specializes cognitive neural (认知神经) networks indicated that people lacking a sense of direction have a special condition: Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD).

The sense of direction requires large neural networks for proper functioning, according to the expert. However, the fact is that a majority of people are unable to put a map in their head while on the move. In her book Mind in Motion (2019), Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Stanford University (USA) Barbara Tversky explains how most people do it.

She introduces a combination of methods. It’s a mix of turn-by-turn directions, bird’s-eye views and general information in the form of maps. However, it should be noted that most medium-complexity navigation (导航) directions depend in part on the ability of people to understand the perspective of a map. In other words, people without a sense of direction follow a route in pieces. Thus, they have no expanded understanding for space and navigate their environment without any mental map of their destinations.

However, there is a solution, namely to guide the person through a series of short routes.

1. What does the underlined phrase “without a hitch” in paragraph 1 mean?
A.With ease.B.By oneself.
C.In a short time.D.Without hesitation.
2. What is the cause of going short of a sense of direction?
A.Being unable to put a map at hand.
B.Expanded understanding for space.
C.Lack of guiding through short routes.
D.Neural networks’ improper functioning.
3. What could be a challenge for someone without a sense of direction?
A.Reading a map.
B.Forming a map in mind.
C.Following a route in pieces.
D.Finishing a series of short routes.
4. What can be inferred from the text?
A.Mental map contributes to the sense of direction.
B.Having no sense of direction is merely an excuse.
C.Most people have long routes in their mind.
D.People with a sense of direction don’t need a map.
2022-03-29更新 | 312次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约220词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐2】“Mind over matter” is an English saying meaning that we can control our bodies with our minds. Now scientists are finding increasing evidence that our mind can have a great effect on our physical health. Since our mind influences how we feel, it’s not true to say if someone is ill just because he feels ill.
The influence of the mind on how well we feel is the basis of what is known as the placebo effect. A placebo (which is Latin for “I shall please”) is a harmless, inactive substance. Patients are sometimes given placebo pills and begin to feel better because they believe that they have been given real drugs and expect to respond to them. The placebo effect is very strong: research on pain suggests that up to 30% of the effect of most painkillers is a placebo effect.
So if it is so powerful, why don’t doctors use it today?
According to Dr Persaud, they really do. “All these things like seeing a doctor, going to a hospital, and being scanned(扫描) have a very strong placebo effect,” he says.
1. According to the first paragraph, if you feel ill.
A.you don’t need to see a doctor
B.it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re physically ill
C.you are in good condition
D.it is obvious that you suffer from a serious disease
2. The English saying “mind over matter” means that .
A.a sound mind is less important than a good health
B.our mind has a strong effect on our body
C.our physical health has nothing to do with our mind
D.mental health mainly depends on our physical health
3. According to the passage, placebos .
A.may make patients feel worse
B.are not effective pills
C.are not real drugs
D.can relieve all kinds of pains
4. From the passage it can be seen that there will be no placebo effect if a patient .
A.is dressed in whiteB.has a physical exam
C.takes placebo pillsD.sees a doctor
2016-11-26更新 | 94次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍了科学家Robert Sapolsky在《决定:一门没有自由意志的生命科学》一书中的观点,认为人的行为方式有时与目标和意图相冲突,这实际上是由无法控制的因素决定的。

【推荐3】We all sometimes behave in ways that seem to conflict with our goals and intentions. One person might wish to spend more time with family but instead find themselves mindlessly browsing social media. Another may repeatedly ignore their alarm and miss their morning workout. If we only had more willpower, the conventional wisdom goes, we could eat healthier, exercise regularly, and spend more time with loved ones. However, in Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will, scientist Robert Sapolsky argues that such choices are actually determined by factors beyond our control.

Sapolsky demonstrates in his book how various factors influence our intentions and actions. He describes scientific evidence that those influences may occur minutes, hours, or days before our actions; some may even begin years earlier. For example, people raised in a collectivist culture tend to avoid obstacles (障碍) when walking whereas those raised in independent cultures will remove the obstacles.

In particular, Sapolsky argues against the claim that “luck” evens (均等) out over time, with fortune and misfortune striking most people in equal measure, an idea favored by others. Instead, he provides convincing examples that many who are born “unlucky” have little chance of getting ahead.

Although Sapolsky is careful not to confuse determinism with the inability to affect change in the world, his unclear attitude toward how determinism might coexist with free will is one of the book’s weak points. Nonetheless, this book is worth reading. Better yet, pair it with Kevin Mitchell’s book Free Agents: How Evolution Gave Us Free Will, which makes the opposite argument, and then, decide for yourself whether you had a choice to do so or it was all predetermined.

1. How is the topic introduced in the first paragraph?
A.By giving examples.B.By listing statistics.
C.By raising arguments.D.By drawing conclusions.
2. According to Sapolsky, what determine(s) our choices and actions?
A.Level of willpower.B.Random luck.
C.Uncontrollable elements.D.Conventional wisdom.
3. What does the underlined word “collectivist” mean?
A.Low-esteemed.B.Determined.C.Self-centered.D.Cooperative.
4. Which of the following can be a suitable title for the passage?
A.Exploration on Free WillB.Wisdom in Decision Making
C.Views on Determinism and Free WillD.Conflicts between Goals and Choices
2024-01-23更新 | 69次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般