组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 语言学习 > 语言与文化
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:60 题号:11022224

What do you do when you need to look something up? Go to the library? Open an encyclopedia(百科全书)? Click onto the Internet? These days, most people go straight to Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia. But how reliable is it?

There’s no denying the popularity and usefulness of Wikipedia. It attracts as many as 78 million visitors every month, and the site is available in more than 270 different languages. It’s one of the most comprehensive resources available which includes almost all details, facts and information that may be concerned. It’s got much more information than an ordinary encyclopedia. The site is updated on a daily basis by thousands of people around the world. Anyone with an Internet connection can log on and edit the contents or add a new page. And you don’t need any formal training.

Of course, there are some controls. Wikipedia has a team of more than 1,500 administrators who check for false information. And main targets for harmful comments(such as politicians)are off-limits to public editing. But with more than 16 million articles to keep an eye on, it isn’t easy. So, while Wikipedia benefits from being constantly updated with information from all over the world, it’s also open to “vandals”(恣意破坏公共财物者).

Some of the damage is easy to notice. One person drew devil horns and a moustache on Microsoft chairman Bill Gate’s photo, while another edited Greek philosopher Plato’s biography to say he was a “Hawaiian weather man who is widely believed to have been a student of ‘Barney the purple Dinosaur’”.

But other things are harder to spot. The most common form of vandalism(恣意破坏公共财物罪) involves adding tiny items of false information into the biography of a famous person. Unbelievably, some of this misinformation has appeared in newspapers, with The Daily Mail, The Guardian and The Independent all having fallen victim to the dirty tricks. For example, in an article about British comedian Sir Norman Wisdom, one newspaper claimed that he co-wrote Dame Vera Lynn’s wartime hit. There’ll be bluebirds over the White Cliffs of Dover. He did no such thing. And in other article, it was reported that TV Theme tune composer Ronnie Hazlehurst had written the S Club 7’s hit Reach again, not true. So, if you’re going to use any information from Wikipedia, make sure you double- check it first.

1. According to the passage, which of the following statements about Wikipedia is true?
A.The primary job of the administrators is to guarantee information conveyed is accurate.
B.Wikipedia is updated daily so it is the most comprehensive resources available.
C.Wikipedia is sure to be attacked because too many people are using it.
D.Whoever has access to the Internet can edit any contents of Wikipedia as they like.
2. The main idea of the last two paragraphs is that___________.
A.information about famous people is likely to be inaccurate.
B.all items of false information are not easy to get spotted.
C.however famous the papers are, they will be cheated.
D.you can never be careful enough while updating information online.
3. What’s the writer’s attitude to Wikipedia according to the text?
A.Objective.B.Critical.C.SatisfiedD.Supportive
4. Which is the best title for the passage?
A.The Most Reliable Online Encyclopedia
B.Why Is Wikipedia So Popular?
C.An Online Encyclopedia With Advantages And Disadvantages
D.How Dose Wikipedia Help You?

相似题推荐

阅读理解-七选五(约210词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。讲英语不仅要注意语法还要注意当地的文化,在美国讲英语时作者给了几点建议。

【推荐1】Speaking English is not only about using proper grammar. To use English effectively, you need to understand the culture in which it is spoken. Here are a number of important tips to remember when speaking English in the United States.

Conversation tips.

Talk about location.    1    When speaking to strangers, ask them where they are from and then make a connection with that place. For example: “Oh, I have a friend who studied in Los Angeles. He says it’s a beautiful place to live in.” Most Americans will then willingly talk about their experiences living or visiting that particular city or area.

Talk about work.    2    It’s not considered impolite and is a popular topic of discussion between strangers.

Talk about sports. Americans love sports!    3    When speaking about football, most Americans understand “American Football”, not soccer.

    4    

Many Americans prefer first names. Americans often prefer using first names, even when dealing with people in very different positions. Americans will generally say, “Call me Tom.” and then expect you to remain on a first name basis.

Public behavior.

Always shake hands.    5    This is true for both men and women. Other forms of greeting such as kissing on the cheeks is generally not appreciated.

Smoking is out! Smoking, even in public places, is strongly disapproved of by most Americans in the modern United States.

A.Addressing people.
B.Talking with people.
C.However, they love American sports.
D.Americans love to talk about location.
E.Americans commonly ask “What do you do?”.
F.Americans prefer to make friends with foreigners.
G.Americans shake hands when greeting each other.
2017-11-17更新 | 146次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了一项新的研究表明一个单词的发音方式可以暗示一个物体的其他特征,比如它的形状,而且同一个单词可以跨越多种语言。

【推荐2】Some words copy the sounds made by the things they describe, like “buzz” or “hiss”or “zip”. But what if the way a word sounds could suggest some other feature of an object like its shape?

A new study suggests not only that it can but that the same word can do so across many languages. Marcus Perlman,a lecturer at the University of Birmingham, says that, a century ago,linguists(语言学家)insisted the words used to refer to various objects and actions are arbitrary(随意的) and that words don't necessarily look or sound like the things they refer to. That makes sense because different languages have different words for the same thing. One person’s pup is another one’s perro. But there’s a lot of evidence now suggesting it is false.

To further explore this connection between words and their meanings, Perlman and his colleagues turned to something called the bouba/kiki effect. With the help of 22 volunteers, the researchers tested it in 25 different languages. Participants were told to look at two shapes-one looks like a cloud which is somewhat round, and the other one is more pointy, maybe looks more like a star-and then listen to the sound: either “bouba” or “kiki”,both of which are totally made up. Then they were asked,“Which one is bouba and which one is kiki?” Most participants said the rounder shape was bouba and the pointy one was kiki. This suggests there is some widely observed connection between the spoken words and the visual features of the shapes.

As to what that could mean about the evolution(演变)of language:imagine our ancestors when they started using spoken words to refer to things. “They couldn’t say ‘Listen, my friend, now we’re gonna call this new object a table.’” So to get the conversation off the ground, they probably tried to come up with sounds that somehow suggested the object at hand.

1. What does the author mean by saying “One person’s pup is another one’s perro”?
A.People have personal preferences for the words they use.
B.A word can mean the same thing across many languages.
C.Different languages have different words for the same thing.
D.The sound of a word reminds people of the shape of an object.
2. How did Perlman study the connection between words and their meanings?
A.By making up new words.B.By interviewing language learners..
C.By conducting an experiment.D.By comparing different languages.
3. What do we know about the bouba/kiki effect?
A.It helps people understand language evolution.
B.It is a language research method created a century ago.
C.It makes little sense when it comes to written language.
D.It shows the differences between round and pointy objects.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.What Is the Shape of a Word?B.How Does Language Develop?
C.Nonsense Words Connected to ShapesD.Language Features Little Known to Linguists
2022-06-25更新 | 157次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】Many people believe that there is one form of their language that is more correct than others.They may believe for example that British English is more correct than other varieties;or that written English is more correct than spoken English; or that standard spoken forms are more correct than dialect forms. Often this belief is supported by reference books to grammars ,usage guides or dictionaries:if something goes against a rule in a grammar,or if the word isn't in the dictionary ,it“must be wrong”. Since the reference books are most often based on observation of the standard written language, the argument is really circular: these books will naturally describe standard usage, because that is what they are for ;but this does not mean that there is anything wrong with other kinds of usage that are less often described.

A better way of looking at things is to say that usage is“correct in its place”. Standard American English is correct in America , British English is correct in Britain , spoken grammar is accepted in casual speech, and formal written grammar is employed in formal writing. So this means there is no answer to the question: “What kind of English should learners study?” It depends on their purposes. For many learners, the best model is one or other of the two main standard varieties :British or American English. Neither of these is “better”than the other ,and they are both used and understood worldwide.

People are also worried by language change. If younger people“break”the rules that older people have learnt, or use language in new ways, older people often feel disturbed: they are concerned that younger people no longer know their grammar, and that the language is going downhill. This is a needless worry :change is natural and inevitable,it cannot be stopped ,and it does not generally affect a language 's efficiency as a communicative tool. A great deal of modern English grammar would have been wrong three hundred years ago, and will perhaps be wrong again three hundred years from now.

1. What can you learn from the 1st paragraph ?
A.Learners are always confused by the reference books.
B.Usages not mentioned in the reference books are not necessarily wrong.
C.Nobody can challenge the authority of the reference books.
D.Some wrong usages can be found in the reference books.
2. What does the author imply in paragraph 2?
A.Big differences exist between British English and American English.
B.American English is better for learners than British English.
C.A learner should master all the distinctions of different English.
D.Standard English varies according to different situations.
3. Which word can replace the underlined word“inevitable" in paragraph 3?
A.avoidable.B.certain.
C.formal.D.temporary.
4. What is the author's attitude towards the changes of English?
A.Disturbed.B.Concerned.
C.Indifferent.D.Acceptable.
2020-12-21更新 | 116次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般