组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 法律法治
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:50 题号:12831624

The days of hearsay “he said, she said” reports on school bus incidents might be over, at least in Pennsylvania.

Recently, Governor Tom Corbett has signed legislation(法律)allowing the use of sound recording equipment on school buses, and many districts are taking advantage of the law. The recordings can be used for “disciplinary(纪律的)and safety purposes,” the law states.

A growing number of incidents on buses created a pressing need for monitoring(监控), said Dan Castagna, West Mifflin Area superintendent(who is in charge of all the schools in the area). “Lots of students are forced into a small space, so it seems like no matter what we do,we see busing issues arise,” Mr. Castagna said. “Often you get a lot of ‘he said, she said’ and have a hard time getting the whole story. Now we can see what you’re doing and hear what you’re saying.”

“There are no teachers or principals(校长)on the bus, just the driver,” said Woodland Hills School District superintendent Alan Johnson. “Sometimes they are working with 30 or more students, so that can become very problematic. It’s hard to know how incidents started and who was saying what without the sound recording.

State Senator Richard Alloway agreed. “We viewed it as a protection bill for the school bus drivers who are driving a machine weighing thousands of pounds, trying to focus on the road while carrying dozens of kids with their backs to them,” said Senator Alloway.

Some civil rights advocates, though, argue giving up privacy is too great a cost. Andy Hoover, legislative director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, said the legislation has violated students right to privacy.

“Our kids are going to be watched at all times,” Mr. Hoover said. “They discuss their home situation, their academic situation, and school officials could be picking up on those conversations if the technology is strong enough. I would hope that people are thoughtful enough to address challenging situations without having to put a microphone on every student.”

1. The purpose of sound recording equipment on school buses is ______.
A.to avoid busing issuesB.to discipline school bus drivers
C.to monitor the performance of busesD.to understand students’ educational needs
2. According to Richard Alloway, school bus drivers’ work is ______.
A.a bit boringB.really toughC.very rewardingD.rather simple
3. Mr. Hoover’s attitude toward the legislation was that _____.
A.he paid little attention to itB.he was curious about it
C.he disapproved of itD.he doubted it
4. The author wrote the text mainly to ______.
A.introduce new recording technologiesB.report some school bus incidents
C.describe the life of bus driversD.discuss a newly signed law

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】With the possible exception of equal rights, perhaps the most controversial issue across the United States today is the death penalty. Many argue that it is an effective deterrent (威慑) to murder, while others maintain there is no convincing evidence that the death penalty reduces the number of murders.

The principal argument advanced by those opposed to the death penalty, basically, is that it is cruel and inhuman punishment, which is the mark of a brutal society, and finally that it is of questionable effectiveness as a deterrent to crime anyway.

In our opinion, the death penalty is a necessary evil. Throughout recorded history there have always been those extreme individuals in every society who were capable of terribly violent crimes such as murder. But some are more extreme than others.

For example, it is one thing to take the life of another in a fit of blind rage, but quite another to coldly plot and carry out the murder of one or more people in the style of a butcher. Thus, murder, like all other crimes, is a matter of relative degree. While it could be argued with some conviction that the criminal in the first instance should be merely separated from society, such should not be the fate of the latter type murderer.

The value of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime may be open to debate. But the overwhelming majority of citizens believe that the death penalty protects them. Their belief is strengthened by evidence which shows that the death penalty deters murder. For example, from 1954 to 1963, when the death penalty was consistently imposed in California, the murder rate remained between three and four murders for each 100,000 population. Since 1964 the death penalty has been carried out only once, and the murder rate has risen to 10.4 murders for each 100,000 population. The sharp climb in the state’s murder rate, which began when executions stopped, is no coincidence. It is convincing evidence that the death penalty does deter many murderers. If the bill reestablishing the death penalty is banned, innocent people will be murdered—some whose lives may have been saved if the death penalty were in effect. This is literally a life or death matter. The lives of thousands of innocent people must be protected.

1. The principal purpose of this passage is to________.
A.speak for the majorityB.initiate a ban
C.criticize the governmentD.argue for the value of the death penalty
2. The author’s response to those who urge the death penalty for all is likely to be________.
A.negativeB.friendly
C.supportiveD.neutral
3. According to the Paragraph 4, it can be inferred that________.
A.the death penalty is the most controversial issue in the United States today
B.the ban of the bill reestablishing the death penalty is of little importance
C.the second type of murderers should be sentenced to death
D.the value of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime is not to be debated
4. The passage attempts to establish a relationship between________.
A.the effects of execution and the effects of isolation
B.the murder rate and the imposition of the death penalty
C.the importance of equal rights and that of the death penalty
D.executions and murders
5. The author’s attitude towards “death penalty” is________.
A.opposingB.supporting
C.neutralD.not clear
2020-01-13更新 | 84次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约250词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】The biggest soccer organization in the U.S. introduces new rules to make the sport safer.

The U.S. Soccer Federation announced that players in its teams who are 10 or younger are no longer allowed to head the ball. Players aged from 11 to 13 have limits on how often they can practice heading.

The new rules are set to stop kids from getting hurt because of a blow to the head that shakes the brain. Players may get headaches by heading the ball. Even worse, they may also get concussions, which will cause lasting brain damage.

Heading the ball can be one of the most dangerous parts of soccer. Sometimes the force of hitting the ball with their heads gives players concussions. But more often, players receive concussions when they jump to head the ball and by accident knock heads with other players or fall and hit their heads on the grass.

“More concussions happen during the act of heading than any other action in soccer,” says Dr. Robert Cantu, an expert on brain damage.

So far, the new rules are only used by teams that are part of the U.S. Soccer Federation. But the group says it hopes more soccer teams will soon follow its example.

Former U.S. soccer star Brandi Chastain is one of the leaders of the activity to ban heading among young soccer players. She welcomes the rule change but wants the rule to include all players under 14.

1. The new rules are made to________.
A.keep young players from being hurt
B.teach young players how to practice heading
C.make the U.S. Soccer Federation more famous
D.encourage young players to improve their skills
2. What is Brandi Chastain’s attitude towards the new rules?
A.She is against them.B.She supports them.
C.She is unsure about them.D.She doesn’t care about them.
3. What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.New rules in soccer.B.How to protect young players.
C.Brain damage becomes more common.D.The introduction of the U.S. Soccer Federation.
2020-10-28更新 | 95次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】France is fighting food waste with firm determination. A new law has been passed in the country that will ban grocery stores from throwing away unsold food. If it’s still safe to eat, the food must be donated to charity; if not, it goes to farmers for use as animal feed.

Supermarkets will no longer be allowed to destroy unsold food by intention in order to prevent people from eating it. There are many people who forage for food in dumpsters behind stores, wanting to take advantage of the perfectly safe food that gets thrown away on a daily basis. Food waste is a global problem. It is reported that the average French person throws out 20 to 30 kilograms of food a year — 7 kg of which is still in its wrapping.

Not everyone is happy about the new legislation.

A group of food foragers stated their concerns in an open letter: “Food waste is a deep problem.” They are worried that it creates the illusion of doing one’s part — a “false and dangerous idea of a magic solution” — while failing to address the deeper reasons for such waste.

“The fight against food waste is everyone’s business, but we can’t win it unless we completely change the structures within our food system that are responsible for this waste.”

The supermarkets aren’t pleased because their food waste represents only 5 to 10 percent of the 7.1 million tons of food wasted annually in France. By contrast, restaurants waste 15 percent and consumers 67 percent. “The law is wrong in both target and intent,” argues Jacques Creyssel, head of the distribution organization for big supermarkets. “Big stores are already the major food donors.”

Despite the naysayers, France’s new law is a move in the right direction. Wasting food absolutely needs to become a socially abhorrent thing to do. If legislation is what’s needed to get people thinking about conservation, then it’s not a bad thing.

1. What should we do about unsafe food that is unsold in grocery stores?
A.Sell it at a discount.B.Donate it to charity.
C.Use it as animal feed.D.Destroy it on purpose.
2. What do we know about the food foragers?
A.They are greatly concerned about the law.
B.They have addressed the main cause of such waste.
C.They want to change the structures of our food system.
D.They think fighting against food waste is their business.
3. How much food is wasted by restaurants every year in France?
A.About 1 million tons.B.About 4 million tons.
C.About 5 million tons.D.About 7.1 million tons.
4. What’s the author’s attitude towards the law on forbidding food waste?
A.Critical.B.Indifferent.C.Supportive.D.Disappointed.
2022-01-21更新 | 54次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般