Teenagers who talk on the cellphone a lot, and hold their phones up to their right ears, score worse on one type of memory test. That’s the finding of a new study. That memory impairment might be one side effect of the radiation(放射线) that phones use to keep us connected while we’re on the go.
Nearly 700 Swiss teens took part in a test of figural memory. This type helps us remember abstract symbols and shapes, explains Milena Foerster. The teens took memory tests twice, one year apart. Each time, they had one minute to remember 13 pairs of abstract shapes. Then they were shown one item from each pair and asked to match it with one of the five choices. The study volunteers also took a test of verbal memory. That’s the ability to remember words. The two memory tests are part of an intelligence test. The researchers also surveyed the teens on how they use cellphones. And they got call records from phone companies. The researchers used those records to figure out how long the teens were using their phones. This allowed the researchers to work out how big radiation exposure(接触) each person could have got while talking.
A phone user’s exposure to the radiation can differ widely. Some teens talk on their phones more than others. People also hold their phones differently. If the phone is close to the ear, more radiation may enter the body, Foerster notes. Even the type of network signal that a phone uses can matter. Much of Switzerland was using an older “second-generation” type of cellphone networks, the study reports. Many phone carriers(通信公司) have moved away from such networks. And more companies plan to update their networks within the next few years.
The teens’ scores in the figural memory tests were roughly the same from one year to the next. But those who normally held their phones near the right ears, and who were also exposed to higher levels of radiation, scored a little bit worse after a year. No group of teens showed big changes on the verbal memory test. Why might one type of memory be linked to cellphone use, but not another? Foerster thinks it could have to do with where different memory centres sit in the brain. The site that deals with the ability to remember shapes is near the right ear.
1. The underlined word “impairment” in Paragraph 1 most probably mean “ ”.A.application | B.satisfaction |
C.damage | D.improvement |
A.Researchers paid little attention to the teens’ habits of using phones. |
B.The teens needed to report the average time spent on their phones. |
C.The teens took two types of memory tests four times in total. |
D.The teens’ ability of remembering words is shown in the figural memory test. |
A.How people hold their phones has no effect on their bodies. |
B.Phone users can make more money with new networks. |
C.The cellphone network type has little to do with the cellphone use. |
D.Radiation levels are affected by the cellphone network types. |
A.Cellphone use and safety warnings |
B.Teens’ cellphone use linked to memory problems |
C.Dangerous levels of cellphone use among teens |
D.Facts about cellphone use at school |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Things you need to know about your STRESS right now
After 60 years of research, scientists have determined what provokes stress. There's even a handy acronym: NUTS.
N is for Novelty: This is something new you've not experienced before, like the first day of school or a new job.
U is for Unpredictability: When you don't know how something is going to take shape, as is the case during a trip to the dentist.
T is for Threat to the Ego: When your competence is threatened, such as in front of colleagues. We're very sensitive to this.
S is for Sense of Control: When you feel you have little or no control over the situation, like being stuck in traffic.
It's helpful to identify your sources of stress, because a problem well-defined is a problem almost solved. The opposite of stress is not relaxation---it's resilience. If you tell your brain that you can deal with this, it will stop producing the stress hormone and you will calm down
Get on your bike!
As various bits of research have shown, cycling will lower your stress levels, whether you're doing a quick errand or committing to a lifetime on two wheels.
15 MINUTES LATER
A 2013 study out of Japan showed a marked drop in people's stress levels after they pedalled for just 15 minutes on a stationary bike.
AN HOUR LATER
Researchers found in 2015 that, compared to their cycling colleagues, those who drove or took the subway breathed more shallowly an hour later---a sure sign of stress.
18 YEARS LATER
After following 17,985 adult commuters for 18 years, U.K. researchers discovered in 2014 that those who walked or biked reported being happier, more confident and better able to face their problems.
①____________
In a 2015 study, researchers subjected 66 teen girls to a stress test. Some of them held their mothers' hands during the test; others had to go it alone. The girls who had contact with their moms were able to manage stress more effectively. It's what psychologists refer to as emotional load sharing.
②____________
In a 2007 UCLA study, some patients hospitalized for heart failure spent 12 minutes with a therapy dog, while another group interacted with a volunteer. The dog crowd experienced greater decreases in their anxiety level compared to those patients whose visitors could actually talk back.
1. __________---may suffer the most stress relatively.A.Luna, 19--she has well prepared for her first internship with the help of her mother. |
B.Tom, 29-his first day of work starts at 9: 00 am, but he's in a traffic jam at 8: 50 am. |
C.Karol, 39-she finally had her decayed tooth pulled out last Thursday at the dentist's. |
D.Jenny, 49-her colleagues are planning to give her a farewell party and she's in the dark. |
A.![]() |
B.![]() |
C.![]() |
D.![]() |
A.①Raise your hand! ②Find a volunteer companion! |
B.①Raise your hand! ②Get a furry companion! |
C.① Hug your family! ② Get furry companion! |
D.①Hug your family! ②Find a volunteer companion! |
【推荐2】It's clear that hiking-and any other physical activity-can reduce stress and anxiety. But there's something about being in nature that may expand those effects. Scientists are beginning to find evidence that being in nature greatly influences our brains and our behavior, helping us to reduce anxiety and stress, and increasing our creativity and our ability to connect with other people.
In one recent experiment conducted in Japan, participants were asked to walk either in a forest or in an urban center(taking walks of equal length and difficulty) while having their heart rate variability(可变性), heart rate, and blood pressure measured. The participants also filled out questionnaires about their moods, stress levels, and other psychological measures.
Results showed that those who walked in forests had apparently lower heart rates and higher heart rate variability, indicating more relaxation and less stress, and reported better moods and less anxiety, than those who walked in urban settings. The researchers concluded, that there's something about being in nature that has a beneficial effect on stress reduction, above and beyond what exercise alone might have produced.
In another study, researchers in Finland found that urban people who walked for as little as 20 minutes through an urban park or woodland reported more stress relief than those who walked in a city center.
The reasons for this effect are unclear, but scientists believe that we evolve to be more relaxed in natural spaces. In a now-classic laboratory experiment by Roger Ulrich of Texas A&M University, participants who first viewed a stress-causing movie, and were then exposed to color/sound videotapes describing natural scenes, showed much quicker and more complete recovery from stress than those who’d been exposed to videos of urban settings.
These studies and others provide evidence that being in natural spaces-or even just looking out of a window onto a natural scene-somehow helps us become calm and relieves stress.
1. How did the researchers in Japan make their discovery?A.By referring to a former study. |
B.By conducting tests in the laboratory. |
C.By experimenting and making a comparison. |
D.By studying examples and analyzing causes. |
A.Doing exercise in the gym. | B.Walking in a city park. |
C.Wandering along city streets. | D.Watching a classic movie. |
A.To make them under pressure. |
B.To find reasons for nature's effect. |
C.To help them relax their minds. |
D.To lead to faster recovery from stress. |
A.Stress Comes from Urban Settings |
B.Being in Nature Decreases Stress |
C.Why Nature Can Relieve Our Stress |
D.How We Are Affected by Natural Scenes |
【推荐3】It is easy to be doubtful about announcements of drugs that claim to slow the progress of Alzheimers, the most common form of dementia (痴呆). A new drug called Lecanemab, however, may be the real deal. Results of a clinical trial, conducted by its makers, Eisai, of Tokyo, and Biogen, of Cambridge Massachusetts, have just been announced in the New England Journal of Medicine(November; 2022). After18 months, it had slowed the progress of symptoms by a quarter.
The trial involved 1795 participants who were in the early stages of the illness. Half received the drug. The others, a placebo(安慰剂). It showed two things. One was the modest but measurable slowing of progression. The other was that an explanation of Alzheimers called the Amyloid Hypothesis(淀粉样蛋白假说) seems correct.
Amyloid is a protein which accumulates in parts of the brains of those with Alzheimers, which is an established sign of the illness. Lecanemab, containing a special antibody, is found to be able to attach itself to amyloid and then attracts immune-system cells to clear the protein away (and measurably did so in those receiving the drug).That suggests amyloid does indeed directly create problems associated with dementia and that Lecanemab can slow down the development of the disease.
This is a small first step. Some experts question whether the test used to show an improvement in symptoms is clinically meaningful because amyloid can be detected only with the help of a piece of expensive equipment, which is not something that can easily be turned into a routine program. Moreover, Lecanemab also caused swelling and bleeding of the brain in a number of participants. Now that the new drug has been shown to work, it can be followed up with further tests. Hope for more good news soon.
1. What can be learned from the first two paragraphs?A.The public shows confidence in new drugs for Alzheimers. |
B.All participants didn’t receive the new drug. |
C.The new drug had an obvious effect on the participants. |
D.It took 18 months to make the new drug. |
A.illustrating how the drug interacts with amyloid in body |
B.describing how immune-system works in detail |
C.making comparisons between two groups of participants |
D.quoting the comments of other scientists |
A.It can’t be accessed easily in daily treatment. |
B.It can cause some side-effects. |
C.It costs too much for ordinary families. |
D.It needs to be further tested before its launch. |
A.Reliable. | B.Groundbreaking |
C.Promising | D.Risky. |
【推荐1】Teens and younger children are reading a lot less for fun, according to a Common Sense Media report published on Monday.
While the decline(下降) over the past decade is steep for teen readers, some data in the report shows that reading remains a big part of many children’s lives,and indicates how parents might help encourage more reading.
According to the report’s key findings, “the proportion(比例) who say they ‘hardly ever’ read for fun has gone from 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds in 1984 to 22 percent and 27 percent respectively(分别地) today.”
The report data shows that pleasure reading levels for younger children, ages 2-8, remain largely the same. But the amount of time spent in reading each passage has declined, from closer to an hour or more to closer to a half hour per passage.
When it comes to technology and reading, the report does little to suggest parents looking for data about the effect of e-readers and tablets on reading. It does point out that many parents still limit electronic reading, mainly due to concerns about increased screen time.
The most hopeful data shared in the report shows clear evidence of parents serving as examples and important guides for their kids when it comes to reading. Data shows that kids and teens who do read frequently, compared to infrequent readers, have more books in the home,more books purchased for them, parents who read more often,and parents who set aside time for them to read.
As the end of school approaches, and school vacation reading lists loom(逼近) ahead, parents might take this chance to step in and make their own summer reading lists and plan a family trip to the library or bookstore.
1. What’s the proportion of 17-year-olds who rarely read for fun today?A.8%. | B.9%. | C.22%. | D.27%. |
A.Buying e-books costs too much. | B.Children are addicted to e-books. |
C.It is a waste of time to read e-books. | D.It may be harmful to children’s health. |
A.Parents | B.teachers | C.interests | D.environment |
A.Health. | B.Education. | C.Science. | D.Entertainment. |
【推荐2】Text message acronyms (缩略词) caused plenty of confusion for the older generations when mobile phones became commonplace — now emojis are making the embarrassment become more serious.
Slack, a workplace messaging service, surveyed 9,400 office workers worldwide including 1,000 in the UK. It found the biggest emoji socially embarrassing action or mistake at work was pictures of lips. Most older workers did not realize the double meaning of the peach emoji, which for younger users means hips. Olivia Grace, a director at Slack, said, “The findings of our research are very clear — be careful when communicating with emojis across generations. Emojis offer a great way to communicate emotion, whether it’s a joke, support or something else, but it’s good to be aware that different meanings may exist to avoid any awkward interpretations.”
The simple smiling face was also a source of misunderstanding — 60 percent of over-40s used it to show happiness or pleasure but a significant number of younger workers used it to convey “deep anger”. An image of someone painting their nails was the most confusing — it meant nothing to the older generation, while the under-25s said they used it to say “there is gossip”, and the 25 to 40-year-olds used it to communicate making themselves more beautiful. However, all ages agreed on the meaning of some emojis, such as a face with tears of laughter and a crying emoji.
Speaking about its reasons for conducting the survey, Slack said, “Are there certain emojis that should restrict your boss from using them? Have your international colleagues ever misunderstood an emoji? And do you usually wait to build a relationship before sending emojis at work?” It added that with thousands of emojis at users’ treatment, “there’s a lot of potential” to communicate by mistake.
Emojis are not technically a form of language, as they lack grammar. The original user of a particular emoji has no copyright on how it is to be understood. The significance of emojis belongs to those who use them, and they have a truly valuable role in written communication.
1. What did Slack find about emojis?A.Acronyms cause more confusion than them. | B.People understand some of them differently. |
C.It’s popular for office workers to use them. | D.They can avoid many awkward situations. |
A.By analyzing causes. | B.By raising questions. |
C.By following time order. | D.By making comparisons. |
A.To help people use emojis properly. | B.To find original emojis. |
C.To prove the convenience of emojis. | D.To explain some special emojis. |
A.Unclear. | B.Dismissive. | C.Doubtful. | D.Approving. |
Well,maybe I don’t have to worry about my laptop and kitchen appliances yet.After I use them I can always pull the plug.But in the future,machines might find a way to prevent us from switching them off.There’s a scary thought!
Professor Stephen Hawking warned a few months ago about the possibility that artificial intelligence could evolve and end up beyond human control.He suggested that machines could“ spell the end of the human race”.
Maybe the problem with computers too clever for us is not that they are evil or rebellious.What could put us in danger is that they might be too efficient.That’s what philosopher Nick Bostrom from the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University believes.He says that machines are indifferent to humans and in pursuit of their own goals,the destruction of people might be just collateral(附带的)damage.A machine would not take pity on you.
I’m glad my machines at home are“dumb”.All my vacuum cleaner wants to take over is the carpet in my living room.Let’s hope they don’t create an appliance which wants to take over the world!
1. We can conclude from Gates’statements that ___________.
A.he is embarrassed that he is afraid of robots |
B.he doesn’t think machines are intelligent |
C.machines should be fully employed |
D.machines’super intelligence should be a concern |
A.record | B.cause | C.explain | D.develop |
A.They are too evil and rebellious. |
B.They are indifferent to humans. |
C.They show pity on humans. |
D.They are too clever and efficient. |
A.He doesn’t agree with Bill Gates. |
B.He is not content with the present kitchen appliances. |
C.He is scared about the super intelligence of machines. |
D.He expects that machines will take place of humans. |