组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:306 题号:13730391

No matter how exciting space exploration sounds, there’s a vital point about it that needs to be considered: food supplies. Right now, astronauts typically rely on dry food in airtight bags and cans, since there are strict weight limits on items taken into space. Foods that we take for granted, such as fresh fruits and vegetables, are out of the question for space explorers.

For those who’ve attempted to grow food during space missions, they’ve faced many difficulties, including the absence of gravity, and a lack of soil, air and humidity (湿度). However, as Shane Topham, an engineer with Space Dynamics Laboratory at Utah State University in the US, told NASA, “Growing food to supplement and minimize the food that must be carried to space will be increasingly important on long-duration missions.”

Great efforts have been made to explore the concept of space farming. Recently, a team led by Federico Maggi at the University of Sydney in Australia figured out how plants can absorb nutrients from human urine (尿), as reported by New Scientist on March 27.

After over 20 years of experiments, the results suggested that human urine could supply three to four out of the six nutrients that plants need. The researchers also found out that urine-fertilized plants produce no harmful by-products, such as carbon dioxide or ammonia (氨).

According to New Scientist, human urine is 95 percent water, with the other 5 percent composed of nutrients which are harmful to the human body but not to plants. The advantage of this urine-fueled life support system is obvious: By recycling liquid waste and producing food, an efficient cycle will be created.

And most importantly, said New Scientist, the duration of space missions will be greatly extended to “20 years of flight”, meaning we may be soon sending astronauts on missions to Mars, or even beyond.

1. Space farming is important mainly because ________.
A.food brought from Earth goes bad easily during space flights
B.it will keep astronauts busy when they are on long-term space missions
C.it could provide fresh food and reduce the need to bring food from Earth
D.it’s a way for astronauts to learn more about the environment in space
2. What can we learn from the University of Sydney research?
A.Human urine is harmless to plants.
B.Human urine provides six necessary nutrients for plants.
C.Urine fertilizer is safer and more productive than chemical fertilizer.
D.Urine-fertilized plants only release a small amount of carbon dioxide.
3. What is the biggest advantage of using human urine for space farming, according to New Scientist?
A.It could pave the way for long-term space flights.
B.It does little harm to the environment in space.
C.It will greatly reduce the cost of farming in space.
D.Urine-fertilized plants are healthier and taste better.
4. What’s the text mainly about?
A.The significance of space farming.
B.A possible new way to grow food in space.
C.How to use human urine to produce food in space.
D.Problems facing astronauts on long-term space flights.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。本文主要介绍了遗传论学说的主张以及作者对这一观点的看法。

【推荐1】Humans are fascinated by the source of their failings and virtues. This state of mind inevitably leads to an old debate: whether nature or nurture(养育)frames us more. A revolution in genetics has poised this as a modern political question about the character of our society: if personalities are hard—wired into our genes, what can governments do to help us? It feels morally questionable, yet claims of genetic selection by intelligence are making headlines.

This is down to “hereditarian”(遗传论的)science and a recent paper claimed “differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non—selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them”. With such an assumption, the work was predictably greeted by a lot of ridiculous claims about “genetics determining academic success”. What the research revealed was the rather less surprising result: the educational benefits of selective schools largely disappear once pupils’ inborn ability and socio—economic background were taken into account. It is a glimpse of the obvious—and there’s nothing to back strongly either a hereditary or environmental argument.

Yet the paper does say children are “unintentionally genetically selected” by the school system. Central to hereditarian science is a tall claim: that identifiable variations in genetic sequences can predict an individual’s capability to learn, reason and solve problems. This is problematic on many levels. Unlike—minded academics say the inheritability of human traits is scientifically unsound. At best there is a weak statistical association and not a causal link between DNA and intelligence. Yet sophisticated statistics are used to create a frightening atmosphere of scientific certainty.

While there’s an undoubted genetic basis to individual difference, it is wrong to think that socially defined groups can be genetically accounted for. The fixation on genes as destiny is surely false too. Medical predictability can rarely be based on DNA alone; the environment matters too. Something as complex as intellect is likely to be affected by many factors beyond genes. If hereditarians want to advance their cause, it will require more balanced interpretation and not just acts of backing.

Genetic selection is a way of exerting influence over others, “the ultimate collective control of human destinies,” as writer H.G. Wells put it. Knowledge becomes power and power requires a sense of responsibility. In understanding cognitive ability, we must not elevate discrimination(歧视)to a science: allowing people to climb the ladder of life only as far as their cells might suggest. This will need a more doubtful eye on the science. As technology progresses, we all have a duty to make sure that we shape a future that we would want to find ourselves in.

1. What did a recent research paper claim?
A.The type of school students attend makes a difference to their future.
B.Genetic differences between students are far greater than supposed.
C.The advantages of selective schools are too obvious to ignore.
D.Students’ academic performance is determined by their genes.
2. What does the author think of the recent research?
A.Its result was questionable.B.Its implication was positive.
C.Its analysis of the data was sound.D.Its conclusions were valid(有效的).
3. Which of the following statement is true according to the passage?
A.The relationship between DNA and intelligence is one of scientific certainty.
B.Many factors influence a person’s intelligence.
C.Whether intelligence is decided by genes is based on interpretation of statistics
D.The importance of DNA is not fully examined by gene scientists.
4. What does the author warn against in the passage?
A.Exaggerating the power of technology in shaping the world.
B.Losing sight of professional ethics in conducting research.
C.Misunderstanding the findings of human cognition research.
D.Promoting discrimination in the name of science.
2022-12-08更新 | 71次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Health experts have long known that vitamin D is important for healthy bones and teeth. It may also help to protect the body against diseases such as diabetes and cancer. And now, researchers say vitamin D might help fight brain diseases called dementia(痴呆).

Dementia is a brain disease that damages thinking and memory processes, which scientists call “ cognitive(认知)abilities.” Dementia is difficult to treat. Taking care of someone who has dementia is extremely demanding. And the disease is very frightening to sufferers. Chris Roberts suffers from dementia. He says the worst part of living with this disease was getting lost while driving. “The worst thing that I found was getting lost in the car, not just forgetting where I was going—I wouldn't know where I was.” More than 47 million people around the world suffer from dementia. The World Health Organization reports that 60percent of them live in low—and middle—income countries.

We get vitamin D from some foods like nuts, lentils(扁豆) and fatty fish. We also get vitamin D from the sun. But that is not dependable. In some parts of the world, there is not enough sunlight to provide enough vitamin D. Also, sunblock prevents the vitamin from entering the body. To add to the problem, the skin's ability to process vitamin D weakens as a person ages.

Researchers at Rutgers University in New Jersey are exploring the relationship between vitamin D and dementia. The team recently measured vitamin D levels and cognitive ability in older people. Nutritional sciences professor Joshua Miller led the team. He said cognitive abilities differed among the study subjects. He said tests showed that about 60 percent of the group was low in vitamin D.

1. What does Paragraph 2 mainly talk about?
A.Where people get vitamin D.
B.How dementia affects people's health.
C.Whether sunlight can produce vitamin D.
D.Why people's age influences the production of vitamin D.
2. What does the underlined word "demanding" mean in Paragraph 2?
A.Boring but rewarding.B.Disgusting and stressful.
C.Tough and tiresome.D.Disturbing and frightening.
3. Which of the following is true according to the text?
A.Vitamin D is mainly obtained from food and the sun.
B.Vitamin D makes no difference to fighting against cancer.
C.Dementia primarily damages the brain's thinking process.
D.Most of the people suffering from dementia live in developed countries.
4. Where can the text be most probably found?
A.In a travel magazine.B.In a literature magazine.
C.In a business magazine.D.In a science magazine.
2021-06-16更新 | 42次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了目前没有真正能治愈普通感冒的事实,解释了其科学原因,并且介绍了一种可能真正治愈普通感冒的模型。也许,人们很快就会有治愈感冒的方法。

【推荐3】People have different ways of dealing with a common cold. Some take over-the-counter(非处方的)medicines such as aspirin while others try popular home remedies(治疗)like herbal tea or chicken soup. Yet, here is the tough truth about the common cold: nothing really cures you of it.

So why do people sometimes believe that their remedies work? According to James Taylor, professor at the University of Washington, colds usually go away on their own in about a week, improving a little each day after symptoms peak, so it’s easy to believe it’s medicine rather than time that deserves the credit.

It still seems hard to believe that we can deal with more serious diseases yet we are powerless against something so common as a cold. Recently, scientists came closer to figuring out why. To understand it, you first need to know how antiviral(抗病毒的)drugs work. They attack the virus by attaching to and changing the surface structures of the virus. To do that, the drug must fit and lock into the virus like the right piece of a jigsaw(拼图), which means scientists have to identify the virus and build a 3D model to study its surface before they can design an antiviral drug that is effective enough.

The two cold viruses that scientists had long known about were rhinovirus(鼻病毒)A and B. But they didn’t find out about the existence of a third virus, rhinovirus C until 2006.All three of them contribute to the common cold, but drugs that work well against rhinovirus A and B have little effect when used against rhinovirus C.

“This explains most of the previous failures of drug trials against rhinoviruses,” study leader Professor Ann C. Palmenberg at the University of Wiscons in Madison, US, told Scienc Daily.

Now, more than 10 years after the discovery of rhinovirus C, scientists have finally built a highly detailed 3D model of the virus, showing that the surface of the virus is, as expected,different from that of other cold viruses.

With the model in hand, hopefully a real cure for a common cold is on its way. Soon, we may no longer have to waste our money on medicines that don’t really work.

1. Which of the following is NOT the way people usually deal with a common cold?
A.Eating chicken soup.B.Taking aspirin.
C.Taking exercise.D.Drinking herbal tea.
2. What are antiviral drugs supposed to do?
A.To fit and lock into the cold virus.
B.To exactly copy the cold viruses.
C.To prevent colds from developing into serious diseases.
D.To absorb different kinds of cold viruses at the same time.
3. What do scientists still need to find out?
A.Why drugs for treating a common cold sometimes fail.
B.Why the surfaces of different viruses are different.
C.How to build a detailed 3D model of rhinovirus C.
D.How we can effectively fight against rhinovirus C.
4. What does the author think of the usual remedies to treat a common cold?
A.Effective.B.Fruitless.C.Expensive.D.Worthwhile.
2022-11-17更新 | 174次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般