No matter how exciting space exploration sounds, there’s a vital point about it that needs to be considered: food supplies. Right now, astronauts typically rely on dry food in airtight bags and cans, since there are strict weight limits on items taken into space. Foods that we take for granted, such as fresh fruits and vegetables, are out of the question for space explorers.
For those who’ve attempted to grow food during space missions, they’ve faced many difficulties, including the absence of gravity, and a lack of soil, air and humidity (湿度). However, as Shane Topham, an engineer with Space Dynamics Laboratory at Utah State University in the US, told NASA, “Growing food to supplement and minimize the food that must be carried to space will be increasingly important on long-duration missions.”
Great efforts have been made to explore the concept of space farming. Recently, a team led by Federico Maggi at the University of Sydney in Australia figured out how plants can absorb nutrients from human urine (尿), as reported by New Scientist on March 27.
After over 20 years of experiments, the results suggested that human urine could supply three to four out of the six nutrients that plants need. The researchers also found out that urine-fertilized plants produce no harmful by-products, such as carbon dioxide or ammonia (氨).
According to New Scientist, human urine is 95 percent water, with the other 5 percent composed of nutrients which are harmful to the human body but not to plants. The advantage of this urine-fueled life support system is obvious: By recycling liquid waste and producing food, an efficient cycle will be created.
And most importantly, said New Scientist, the duration of space missions will be greatly extended to “20 years of flight”, meaning we may be soon sending astronauts on missions to Mars, or even beyond.
1. Space farming is important mainly because ________.A.food brought from Earth goes bad easily during space flights |
B.it will keep astronauts busy when they are on long-term space missions |
C.it could provide fresh food and reduce the need to bring food from Earth |
D.it’s a way for astronauts to learn more about the environment in space |
A.Human urine is harmless to plants. |
B.Human urine provides six necessary nutrients for plants. |
C.Urine fertilizer is safer and more productive than chemical fertilizer. |
D.Urine-fertilized plants only release a small amount of carbon dioxide. |
A.It could pave the way for long-term space flights. |
B.It does little harm to the environment in space. |
C.It will greatly reduce the cost of farming in space. |
D.Urine-fertilized plants are healthier and taste better. |
A.The significance of space farming. |
B.A possible new way to grow food in space. |
C.How to use human urine to produce food in space. |
D.Problems facing astronauts on long-term space flights. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Humans are fascinated by the source of their failings and virtues. This state of mind inevitably leads to an old debate: whether nature or nurture(养育)frames us more. A revolution in genetics has poised this as a modern political question about the character of our society: if personalities are hard—wired into our genes, what can governments do to help us? It feels morally questionable, yet claims of genetic selection by intelligence are making headlines.
This is down to “hereditarian”(遗传论的)science and a recent paper claimed “differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non—selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them”. With such an assumption, the work was predictably greeted by a lot of ridiculous claims about “genetics determining academic success”. What the research revealed was the rather less surprising result: the educational benefits of selective schools largely disappear once pupils’ inborn ability and socio—economic background were taken into account. It is a glimpse of the obvious—and there’s nothing to back strongly either a hereditary or environmental argument.
Yet the paper does say children are “unintentionally genetically selected” by the school system. Central to hereditarian science is a tall claim: that identifiable variations in genetic sequences can predict an individual’s capability to learn, reason and solve problems. This is problematic on many levels. Unlike—minded academics say the inheritability of human traits is scientifically unsound. At best there is a weak statistical association and not a causal link between DNA and intelligence. Yet sophisticated statistics are used to create a frightening atmosphere of scientific certainty.
While there’s an undoubted genetic basis to individual difference, it is wrong to think that socially defined groups can be genetically accounted for. The fixation on genes as destiny is surely false too. Medical predictability can rarely be based on DNA alone; the environment matters too. Something as complex as intellect is likely to be affected by many factors beyond genes. If hereditarians want to advance their cause, it will require more balanced interpretation and not just acts of backing.
Genetic selection is a way of exerting influence over others, “the ultimate collective control of human destinies,” as writer H.G. Wells put it. Knowledge becomes power and power requires a sense of responsibility. In understanding cognitive ability, we must not elevate discrimination(歧视)to a science: allowing people to climb the ladder of life only as far as their cells might suggest. This will need a more doubtful eye on the science. As technology progresses, we all have a duty to make sure that we shape a future that we would want to find ourselves in.
1. What did a recent research paper claim?A.The type of school students attend makes a difference to their future. |
B.Genetic differences between students are far greater than supposed. |
C.The advantages of selective schools are too obvious to ignore. |
D.Students’ academic performance is determined by their genes. |
A.Its result was questionable. | B.Its implication was positive. |
C.Its analysis of the data was sound. | D.Its conclusions were valid(有效的). |
A.The relationship between DNA and intelligence is one of scientific certainty. |
B.Many factors influence a person’s intelligence. |
C.Whether intelligence is decided by genes is based on interpretation of statistics |
D.The importance of DNA is not fully examined by gene scientists. |
A.Exaggerating the power of technology in shaping the world. |
B.Losing sight of professional ethics in conducting research. |
C.Misunderstanding the findings of human cognition research. |
D.Promoting discrimination in the name of science. |
【推荐2】Health experts have long known that vitamin D is important for healthy bones and teeth. It may also help to protect the body against diseases such as diabetes and cancer. And now, researchers say vitamin D might help fight brain diseases called dementia(痴呆).
Dementia is a brain disease that damages thinking and memory processes, which scientists call “ cognitive(认知)abilities.” Dementia is difficult to treat. Taking care of someone who has dementia is extremely demanding. And the disease is very frightening to sufferers. Chris Roberts suffers from dementia. He says the worst part of living with this disease was getting lost while driving. “The worst thing that I found was getting lost in the car, not just forgetting where I was going—I wouldn't know where I was.” More than 47 million people around the world suffer from dementia. The World Health Organization reports that 60percent of them live in low—and middle—income countries.
We get vitamin D from some foods like nuts, lentils(扁豆) and fatty fish. We also get vitamin D from the sun. But that is not dependable. In some parts of the world, there is not enough sunlight to provide enough vitamin D. Also, sunblock prevents the vitamin from entering the body. To add to the problem, the skin's ability to process vitamin D weakens as a person ages.
Researchers at Rutgers University in New Jersey are exploring the relationship between vitamin D and dementia. The team recently measured vitamin D levels and cognitive ability in older people. Nutritional sciences professor Joshua Miller led the team. He said cognitive abilities differed among the study subjects. He said tests showed that about 60 percent of the group was low in vitamin D.
1. What does Paragraph 2 mainly talk about?A.Where people get vitamin D. |
B.How dementia affects people's health. |
C.Whether sunlight can produce vitamin D. |
D.Why people's age influences the production of vitamin D. |
A.Boring but rewarding. | B.Disgusting and stressful. |
C.Tough and tiresome. | D.Disturbing and frightening. |
A.Vitamin D is mainly obtained from food and the sun. |
B.Vitamin D makes no difference to fighting against cancer. |
C.Dementia primarily damages the brain's thinking process. |
D.Most of the people suffering from dementia live in developed countries. |
A.In a travel magazine. | B.In a literature magazine. |
C.In a business magazine. | D.In a science magazine. |
【推荐3】People have different ways of dealing with a common cold. Some take over-the-counter(非处方的)medicines such as aspirin while others try popular home remedies(治疗)like herbal tea or chicken soup. Yet, here is the tough truth about the common cold: nothing really cures you of it.
So why do people sometimes believe that their remedies work? According to James Taylor, professor at the University of Washington, colds usually go away on their own in about a week, improving a little each day after symptoms peak, so it’s easy to believe it’s medicine rather than time that deserves the credit.
It still seems hard to believe that we can deal with more serious diseases yet we are powerless against something so common as a cold. Recently, scientists came closer to figuring out why. To understand it, you first need to know how antiviral(抗病毒的)drugs work. They attack the virus by attaching to and changing the surface structures of the virus. To do that, the drug must fit and lock into the virus like the right piece of a jigsaw(拼图), which means scientists have to identify the virus and build a 3D model to study its surface before they can design an antiviral drug that is effective enough.
The two cold viruses that scientists had long known about were rhinovirus(鼻病毒)A and B. But they didn’t find out about the existence of a third virus, rhinovirus C until 2006.All three of them contribute to the common cold, but drugs that work well against rhinovirus A and B have little effect when used against rhinovirus C.
“This explains most of the previous failures of drug trials against rhinoviruses,” study leader Professor Ann C. Palmenberg at the University of Wiscons in Madison, US, told Scienc Daily.
Now, more than 10 years after the discovery of rhinovirus C, scientists have finally built a highly detailed 3D model of the virus, showing that the surface of the virus is, as expected,different from that of other cold viruses.
With the model in hand, hopefully a real cure for a common cold is on its way. Soon, we may no longer have to waste our money on medicines that don’t really work.
1. Which of the following is NOT the way people usually deal with a common cold?A.Eating chicken soup. | B.Taking aspirin. |
C.Taking exercise. | D.Drinking herbal tea. |
A.To fit and lock into the cold virus. |
B.To exactly copy the cold viruses. |
C.To prevent colds from developing into serious diseases. |
D.To absorb different kinds of cold viruses at the same time. |
A.Why drugs for treating a common cold sometimes fail. |
B.Why the surfaces of different viruses are different. |
C.How to build a detailed 3D model of rhinovirus C. |
D.How we can effectively fight against rhinovirus C. |
A.Effective. | B.Fruitless. | C.Expensive. | D.Worthwhile. |
【推荐1】The biggest challenge faced by travelers, especially those who like to have a backpacking trip is how to ensure a steady supply of clean clothes. Now, thanks to a great invention called Scrubba Wash Pack, that worry may be a thing of the past.
The portable washing machine was invented by Ash Newland in 2010, while he was planning to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro. Struck by the limited packing space, he got inspiration from traditional washboards to create a bag that could be used to clean clothes. Then he quitted his career as a lawyer and focused on perfecting the bag’s design. By 2012, the bag was ready for the public. It weighed only 180 grams and required very little storage space, making it perfect for anyone wishing to travel light.
Not surprisingly, the bag which was worth 55 dollars was an instant hit with travelers, university students and even passengers. However, Newland was not satisfied. He still saw a disadvantage with his invention — dirty clothes had to be carried around in a separate bag! The recently introduced Scrubba Wash Pack solves that problem.
In order to make the pack active, dirty clothes are placed inside the bag along with two or three liters of water. The bag is then shut tightly to ensure all air is squeezed out and the colors are massaged for a few minutes. After a quick wash, they are clean and ready to be dried. According to Newland, the pack can clean anything from jeans to smelly socks! What’s even more amazing is that with a capacity to hold 13 liters of water, it can be used to wash more clothes at a time.
The best part is that the 99-dollar pack that will be available for sale later this year, only weighs 300 grams and is completely foldable, making it easy to store when it’s not in use. With the Scrubba Wash Pack, wandering through foreign cities searching for a washing shop, or paying for washing machines may soon be a thing of the past.
1. What led Ash Newland to create the Scrubba Wash Pack?A.His job requirement. | B.A traditional washboard. |
C.His interest in invention. | D.His personal experience. |
A.Clothes couldn’t be washed well. |
B.The invention was not so convenient. |
C.The bag couldn’t contain enough water. |
D.The cost of the invention was very high. |
A.turns to be much environmentally friendly |
B.will replace the traditional washing machines |
C.will be widely used by more travelers in the future |
D.can encourage more people to travel a long distance |
A.Introducing a great new invention. |
B.Explaining the development of backpack. |
C.Listing some common problems for travelers. |
D.Comparing two kinds of washing machines. |
【推荐2】According to Jessica Hagy, author of How to Be Interesting, it’s not difficult to make yourself interesting at a dinner party.
The first step is to go exploring, if you’re out of your comfort zone or if you’re wandering into somebody’s house for the first time. So the main thing is just to show up and be adventurous, trying different new foods and talking to strangers.
People love to talk about themselves. If you can start the conversation with a question other than “What do you do for a living?”, you’ll be able to get a lot more interesting conversation out of whomever it is you’re talking to. If you ask the question “How did you get here?”, it can bring in “I have this old, broken-down vehicle” or “I rode the bus with these crazy people who were laughing at silly jokes in the back.” It just opens up conversation.
What about that person who had too much to drink or won’t stop talking? If you can’t take their wine away, you should certainly try to take away their soapbox (讲台). If you’re the host, you can ask them to help you in the kitchen with something and just remove them from the situation. Or turn the conversation into a topic where they have little to say.
And what about that other dinner-party killer: awkward silence? If you’re faced with an awkward silence at a dinner party, the only thing that always gets everyone talking again is to give the host a compliment (赞扬). He or she is the person who is feeling the weight of that awkwardness the most. Just quickly turn around and say, “This cake is extremely delicious and you have to tell me all about it.”
So being interesting at a dinner party isn’t that hard.
1. What’s the purpose of being out of your comfort zone?A.To explore nature. | B.To try something new. |
C.To make friends . | D.To seek adventure. |
A.By answering questions. | B.By telling jokes. |
C.By making up stories. | D.By asking certain questions. |
A.Praising the host. | B.Talking loudly. |
C.Discussing the food. | D.Admiring the cook. |
A.Making Yourself Popular in Office | B.Being Successful is Easy to Gain |
C.Being Humourous is Worth Owning | D.Making Yourself Interesting at a Party |
【推荐3】Women in post-pregnancy tend to respond slower to the outside world than they did before. In the West, this phenomenon is called “pregnancy brain”. In China, people describe it as “women are slower and less sharp for three years after giving birth.” However, studies showed that they are not less sharp. Rather, their brains are becoming better wired for parenting at the cost of memory.
In their 2016 research, Elseline Hoekzema and her team from the Netherlands scanned 25 women’s brains before and during pregnancy. The MRI results showed that there was a decrease in the amount of expectant mothers’ grey matter in their brains, which is responsible for multiple functions, including muscle control, emotions, speech and memory.
The decrease in grey matter isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Hoekzema compared it with the drop in the grey matter of teenagers during puberty (青春期). According to a previous study, during puberty, teenagers’ hormones cause a reduction in unnecessary synapses (突触), the connections between nerve cells. This process makes the brain work more efficiently. Likewise, the reduction of grey matter in new mothers’ brains might lead to greater parenting abilities.
The changes in the region of grey matter affected by pregnancy are known to play a role in social cognition (认知). This change might help a new mother better understand and decode her baby’s facial expressions and needs. Based on the results, scientists believed that the female brain experiences changes to help them better prepare for motherhood.
In a recent study led by Jonny Kohl from London’s Francis Crick Institute, experiments on the brains of pregnant mice provide concrete evidence that specific hormones improved connections between neurons (神经元) associated with parenting behaviors. While conducted on mice, this brain remodeling agrees with previous human studies, suggesting shared mechanisms, Newsweek reported.
However, this improvement in parenting-related skills might come at a cost. A 2010 study showed pregnant women have poorer memory skills than non-pregnant women, particularly concerning spatial recognition memory. This explains why many pregnant women sometimes lose their way on familiar routes.
And according to Hoekzema, the changes in women’s brains are long-lasting. So, next time your mom gets lost in a familiar place, be patient and kind to her. After all, her brain changed to bring you into the world!
1. During pregnancy, what happens to women’s brains?A.They increase in amount. | B.They become more complex. |
C.They generate new neuro cells. | D.They lose some grey matter. |
A.By improving their work efficiency. | B.By boosting their muscle control. |
C.By strengthening their social cognition. | D.By adjusting their emotional state. |
A.It conflicted with Hoekzema’s team’s findings. |
B.It compared pregnant mice with non-pregnant ones. |
C.It explored the link between hormone changes and parenting behaviors. |
D.It confirmed the long-lasting effects of pregnancy on women’s brains. |
A.Poorer communication skills. | B.A weaker sense of direction. |
C.A shorter length of attention. | D.Decreased problem-solving abilities. |