组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:62 题号:13794634

With their silly smiles and big brown eyes, Australian sea lions are adorable. Photographer Louise Cooper should know: in late 2019 she visited Kangaroo Island with a team of scientists from University of Sydney to photograph the sea lion colony at the beautiful Seal Bay. Cooper spent hours sitting with her camera amid sand dunes watching sea lions go about their day-mothers taking care of their young, huge males lazily sunning themselves on the sand, others playing bitey-face in the surf. “These playful creatures are just like puppy dogs,” she says.

Sadly, hunted almost to dying out in the 1800s, these creatures’ slow recovery has been influenced by their very long breeding(繁殖) period-Australian sea lions breed every 18 months, compared to 12 months for fur seals. Over the last 40 years, sea lion numbers have fallen by more than half. Cooper was on the South Australian island to record the important work being done by scientist Dr Rachael Gray and her team, who are   trying to find out why.

“Hookworm(钩虫) disease is quite common in Australian sea lions,” Cooper explains.“So scientists like Dr Gray are treating them with an antibiotic(抗生素) to see if they can stamp it out(消灭,根除).”High levels of mercury and E coli have also been discovered in their system. Together, these human pollutants weaken the sea lions’ immune(免疫的) systems. There are hopes that stamping out hookworm in Australian sea lions will give them a better chance of survival.

The team’s visit to Kangaroo Island was on the eve of the deadly bushfires that swept through much of the island, destroying wildlife and animal habitats. Dr Gray raced from Sydney to check on the seals and, the sea lions mostly paid no attention to what had happened. Thankfully, the sea lion colony at Seal Bay survived unharmed.

“The fires were heartbreaking,” says Cooper, who hopes to return to the colony with Dr Gray and her team, who for now are keeping an eye on this at-risk group of sea animals.

1. What does the underlined word “adorable” in paragraph 1 probably mean?
A.Careful.B.Lovable.
C.Dangerous.D.Independent
2. What problem do Australian sea lions face now?
A.They are attacked by fur seals.
B.They have to leave their home.
C.They are endangered by hunters.
D.They have a very small population.
3. What did Dr Gray’s team find out about Australian sea lions?
A.They have little chance of survival.
B.They have a strong immune system.
C.They are doing poorly after treatment.
D.They are at risk from hookworm disease.
4. What happened to the sea lions in the bushfires?
A.They were uninjured.B.They got burnt badly.
C.They failed to survive.D.They were frightened away.
【知识点】 动物 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Ants keep traffic flowing by changing their behavior to meet changing conditions, according to new research.

For their experiment, researchers from the University of Toulouse and the University of Arizona focused on Argentine ants, which are only 2-3 millimeters long and frequently move from colony (栖息地) to colony depending on how far food is. Tapping into the ants' talent for fast commutes (通勤), the researchers constructed bridges between their colonies. The bridges varied in width from a fifth to three-quarters of an inch.

Then the researchers sat back and monitored the traffic. To their surprise, even when those narrower bridges were nearly overloaded, there were no 20-ant pile-ups. And traffic remained steady regardless of how crowed the bridges were because ants could adjust to the flow of road conditions.

"When crowding on the path increased, ants assessed it locally and adjusted their speed accordingly to avoid any interruption of traffic flow," the researchers said. "Moreover, ants avoided entering a crowded path and made sure the bridge was never overloaded."

The lesson for humans? The traffic problem mostly lies in our loss of the quality that the ants have. You've probably noticed it on your own commute to work. Driving is fun when there're few cars on the road-a lane-change (车道变换)here, a little acceleration there. Then traffic slows down. But some impatient drivers still constantly move between lanes.

"Traffic jams are common in human society where some people are focusing on their own personal objectives," the researchers said. "In contrast, ants share a common goal: the survival of the colony, thus they're expected to act cooperatively to get food."

The research also suggests that the ever-widening of highways may never free us from traffic jams. As long as we drive along with our own agendas, no matter how many other people are on the road, we'll always end up in a traffic jam. Indeed, less space may be a good thing. It leaves less room for personal choices and forces us to take a page from the driving handbook of ants.

1. What did the researchers do to the ants in the experiment?
A.They fed them with much delicious food.
B.They trained them to avoid heavy traffic.
C.They built bridges linking their colonies.
D.They improved their colonies constantly.
2. How did the ants behave during the experiment?
A.They worked together to remove the road blocks.
B.They sped up to get out of the traffic jam quickly. .
C.They made their way carefully in the given direction.
D.They adjusted themselves for the flow of the traffic.
3. What is the biggest cause of the traffic jam in human society?
A.Poor road const ruction.B.People's inability to adjust.
C.People's selfish driving.D.Too many vehicles on roads.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.What ants help us do for driving safety.
B.What ants can teach us about traffic jams.
C.Why ants drive much better than humans.
D.Why ants are best at handling traffic jams.
2020-04-16更新 | 328次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:文章为一篇记叙文,主要围绕我和邻居的误会展开,讲述了由一只小狗引起的信件乌龙事件。

【推荐2】Nowadays mail delivery is a little different. I still get my mail from my mailbox. Nothing, but my neighbors’ mail. I thought that was curious.

I proceeded to take my neighbors’ mail to them. I was about to put the mail in their mailbox when a tall man came running out shouting about messing with his friend's mail. He snatched (夺过) the mail from my hand, opened the mailbox and pointed to the mail inside.“You were after this.

I shook my head, “No, believe me. I got this mail by mistake in my box today. I was just bringing it to them.” He gave me a funny look and went back into his house.

I got the knock on the door the next morning by two very polite officers. The annoyed tall man had phoned the police and told them I was a crazy old woman going around mixing up everyone's mail. Before I could finish telling them about what was going on, the officers had watched a dog approach my mailbox with mail in his mouth. He took out the mail that was in my box and put letters in. He pushed the door closed with his nose, picked up the new pile of mail he had gotten from my box, and repeated this all the way down the next street. We all started laughing.

The dog had belonged to a mail carrier who had died. No one thought to check (the carrier lived alone) on the man’s dog. The dog had been trained to put mail in and take mail out of the boxes. When he got loose, he assumed his duties.

I went by to talk to the annoyed tall man to fill him in on what had happened. He was very pleased when he realized I was not a mail thief. He did, however, adopt the little guy.

1. Why did the tall man give the author a funny look?
A.To show his disbelief.B.To express his curiosity.
C.To contain his annoyance.D.To hide his embarrassment.
2. How did the police officers discover the truth?
A.By analyzing the case.B.By witnessing the mix-up.
C.By questioning the author.D.By consulting the tall man.
3. According to the story, the dog
A.was well-trained and devotedB.used to live a lonely and busy life
C.was assigned to replace the carrierD.guarded the mail in the neighborhood
4. What’s the best title for the story?
A.A mail serviceB.A dog’s tale
C.Special deliveryD.Noble duties
2022-03-26更新 | 506次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Western conservation groups are seeking stricter laws to deal with trade in endangered wildlife, but Dr. Paul Jepson warns that this isn’t the best solution. He specially mentions the case of the Bali starling (八哥). Bringing in tougher laws created unexpected outcomes, which contributed to the bird’s extinction in the wild in 2006.

He said that the traditional law enforcement (执行) approach that prohibited ownership of the Bali starling in the 1980s and 1990s increased rather than reduced the demand for wild-caught Bali starlings. The bird has become a popular gift among the rich of Indonesia, who can gain more status by owning one.

Instead, a case-by-case analysis might be needed. Last year, he said, a bird association set up a network of breeders (饲养者) among the owners of Bali starling on the island of Java. By introducing a “crowd-breeding” model, it transformed the bird into a species whose price and source of supply were publicly known. This lessened the status of keeping such birds and thereby reduced their profitability to black market suppliers.

Another case was on Nusa Penida, an island southeast of Bali. A Balinese conservation group planned to release starlings on the island. Some tried to block the plan, saying the island was outside the birds’ native zone. Eventually, the Governor of Bali came up with a plan. The starlings were given to a local temple as a ceremonial offering before they were released. This gave the Bali starling status as a “sacred bird”, giving them protection under customary laws. Now the released starlings established a breeding population on Nusa Penida.

Dr. Jepson commented, “I do not want to condemn the international approach seeking tighter law enforcement, but this case study shows we should not oversimplify how we respond to the problem of the wildlife trade. There is a growing body of evidence that shows more different approaches are sometimes needed to fit with the local social and political realities. We should tailor solutions on more of a case-by-case basis.”

1. What might have sped up the wild Bali starling’s extinction in 2006?
A.The bad natural environment.
B.The side effect of strict protection laws.
C.The debate over the wildlife trade.
D.The popularity of the bird in the world.
2. Why was the “crowd-breeding” model introduced?
A.To make the Bali starling less profitable.
B.To cut off the supply to the black market.
C.To increase the demand for the Bali starling.
D.To block the strict laws passed by the government.
3. What can we learn from the case on Nusa Penida?
A.The starlings were protected as a result of stricter laws.
B.It is unwise to release starlings outside their native zone.
C.The starlings were endangered due to their reduced status.
D.Attaching spiritual value to the starlings helps protect them.
4. Which of the following will Dr. Jepson probably agree with?
A.Stricter enforcement is needed to protect biodiversity.
B.Those who seek tighter law enforcement should be blamed.
C.There’s no one-size-fits-all approach to the wildlife trade problem.
D.The problem of wildlife trade should be treated with determination.
2019-12-18更新 | 147次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般