组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:65 题号:13804795

If you think of the jobs robots could never do, you would probably put doctors and teachers at the top of the list. It's easy to imagine robot cleaners and factory workers, but some jobs need human connection and creativity. But are we underestimating what robots can do? In some cases, they already perform better than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some patients might feel more comfortable sharing personal information with a machine than a person. Could there be a place for robots in education after all?

British education expert Anthony Seldon thinks so. And he even has a date for the robot takeover of the classroom: 2027. He predicts robots will do the main job of transferring information and teachers will be like assistants. Intelligent robots will read students' faces, movements and maybe even brain signals. Then they will adapt the information to each student. It's not a popular opinion and its unlikely robots will-ever have the ability to really connect with humans like another human can.

One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all. In some parts of the world, there aren't enough teachers and 9~16 percent of children under the age of 14 don't go to school. That problem could be partly solved by robots because they can teach anywhere and won't get stressed, or tired, or move somewhere for an easier, higher-paid job.

Those negative aspects of teaching are something everyone agrees on. Teachers all over the world are leaving because it is a difficult job and they feel overworked. Perhaps the question is not "Will robots replace teachers?" but "How can robots help teachers?" Office workers can use software to do things like organizing and answering emails, arranging meetings and updating calendars. Teachers waste a lot of time doing non-teaching work, including more than 11 hours a week marking homework. If robots could cut the time teachers spend marking homework and writing reports, teachers would have more time and energy for the parts of the job humans do best.

1. What does the underlined word "diagnosing" in the first paragraph mean?
A.Curing.B.Deciding.C.Preventing.D.Avoiding.
2. In Anthony Seldon's opinion, a robot teacher can ________.
A.transfer all information to the studentsB.make teachers be his assistants in class
C.offer the students special informationD.take the place of real teachers in class
3. What does the underlined sentence in the third paragraph mean?
A.A robot teacher is better than a human teacher.
B.A robot teacher can work continuously without any complaint.
C.A robot teacher doesn't necessarily be better than a human teacher.
D.A robot teacher can read students' ideas better than a human teacher.
4. How can robots help teaching in the future?
A.They can do all the teaching for the teachers.
B.They can transfer all the information to the students.
C.They can organize the teaching activities for teachers.
D.They can finish the boring and repeated work for the teachers.
【知识点】 科学技术 教育 议论文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。作者介绍了钢琴家、作曲家和技术专家Zubin Kanga如何利用先进技术改变音乐表演形式的。

【推荐1】For over a decade, Zubin Kanga, a pianist, composer and technologist, has changed the limits of the forms of musical performances. He has both organized and performed shows that have pushed barriers, with motion sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), live-generated 3D visuals and virtual reality among the technological advancements used to unlock new possibilities of music and performances.

Kanga’s approach to employing cutting-edge technology was first informed by the relative limitations of his chosen instrument. “The piano is a very accurate technology,” he says. “From the early 20th century till now it hasn’t really changed at all. It’s an amazing instrument, but it does have certain limitations in terms of the types of sound you can create.”

One of the early works is Steel on Bone, composed by Kanga himself. He performs the piece using MiMU multi-sensor gloves. “I can put up one finger, and that’ll produce a particular sound,” Kanga explains. “And then I can control that sound just by moving my wrist through the air — I can do that with lots of different gestures.”

“For Steel on Bone, I’m actually playing inside the piano with these steel knitting (编织) needles, and getting all these interesting effects on the strings. Then I’m using samples of them. Sometimes I’m using live delays and operating them. The sound can change depending on how my hands are moving. It allows me to make a very theatrical piece, and people can see this immediate connection between how I’m moving — these very big, almost conductor-like gestures through the air — and the way the sound is changing,” said Kanga.

This is just the start, and Kanga goes on to be enthused with the use of motion sensors to make music, the possibilities that AI offers composers as a tool, and how virtual reality could transform performances and more.

1. What do technological advancements do for music and performances?
A.Remove music barriers.
B.Bring new performance forms.
C.Popularize musical performances.
D.Make performances professional.
2. Why does Kanga talk about the piano in paragraph 2?
A.To indicate its stability.
B.To prove its rare accuracy.
C.To show it has a long history.
D.To clarify why he uses technology.
3. How does Kanga perform Steel on Bone?
A.By moving his hands in the air.B.By pressing the piano keys.
C.By beating the steel knitting needles.D.By making very small gestures.
4. Which can be the best title for the text?
A.Technology: When It Replaces Music
B.Virtual Reality: Future of Performances
C.Zubin Kanga: When Music Meets Technology
D.AI Music: From Composing to Performing
2023-09-06更新 | 330次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:文章是一篇说明文。文章通过对比前100年和这个世纪的可能改变世界的技术,发现这个世纪的技术创新和经济增长都变得很慢。

【推荐2】On June 22, 1927, Charles Lindbergh flew into Dayton, Ohio of the US, for dinner at Orville Wright’s house. It had been just a month since the young aviator (飞行家) completed the first ever solo nonstop crossing of the Atlantic, and he felt he ought to pay his respects to the celebrated pioneer of flight.

Forty-two years later, on July 16, 1969, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong was allowed to bring a personal guest to the Kennedy Space Center to witness the launch of NASA’s towering Saturn V rocket. Armstrong invited his hero, Charles Lindbergh.

One man, Lindbergh, could be the living link between the pilot of the first powered flight and the commander of the first mission to another world.

In our century, for better or worse, progress isn’t what it used to be. Northwestern University economist Robert Gordon argues that by 1970, all the key technologies of modern life were in place: electricity, mechanized agriculture, highways, air travel, telecommunications, and the like. After that, innovation and economic growth simply couldn’t keep going at the breakneck pace set over the previous 100 years—a period Gordon calls “the special century.”

Since 1970 the only notable creation has been the ever-growing increase in computing power in the form of the Internet and our mobile devices. But in most other ways, Gordon argues, the lives of people in developed nations look and feel the same in 2019 as they did in 1979 or 1989.

Consider consumer robotics. There’s enormous potential for robots to help us with housework, education, entertainment and medical care. But home robotics companies seem to keep folding. So far, the only commercially successful home robot, the Roomba vacuum cleaner, hit the market in 2002.

Or consider access to space. In 2007 the XPRIZE Foundation offered $30 million in prizes to commercial teams that would compete to land a robotic rover on the moon by 2018. Although five teams had built rovers, all had trouble raising enough money to buy launch contracts.

Meanwhile the list of potentially world-changing technologies that get lots of press ink but remain stubbornly in the prototype (雏形) phase is very long. Self-driving cars, flying cars, gene therapy, nuclear fusion. Need I continue?

Granted, these are all hard problems. But historically, solving the really big problems—rural electrification, for example—has required sustained, large-scale investments, often with private markets and taxpayers splitting the burden. In this century, we urgently need to undo some of the consequences of the last great boom by developing affordable zero-and negative-emissions technologies. That’s another hard problem—and to solve it, we’ll need to recapture some of what made the “special century” so special.

1. In the beginning of the passage, the author used the story Charles Lindberg to _____.
A.explain technology advanced fast in the past 100 years
B.infer most aviators are likely to know each other well
C.prove this man was a key historic figure of the past century
D.point out we should be grateful to such a pioneering inventor
2. Why does Robert Gordon call the past 100 years “the special century”?
A.Computing power keeps growing at a high speed.
B.New things keep coming up to make life easier.
C.Human life has become highly mechanized.
D.People have been trained to be more creative.
3. What can be inferred from the example of access to space in paragraph 7?
A.Big innovations can’t be achieved without constant financial support.
B.Technological development can’t be gained if it is not applied practically.
C.Scientific projects are not considered valuable unless commercially successful.
D.New creations are not worth making unless significantly improving people’s lives.
4. Which of the following best summarizes the passage?
A.Sustained and large-scale investments are harder to get now than before.
B.People are facing a time with more difficult problems than it used to be.
C.Major technological shifts are fewer and farther between than they were.
D.Solutions to the really big problems are fewer than we could expect.
2023-05-23更新 | 238次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍了电动汽车的发展趋势和面临的一些问题。

【推荐3】Nowadays, countries are eager to get more electric cars on the road because moving away from gas-powered vehicles is vital to fighting climate change. China says that most new vehicles sold by 2035 will be electric. The United Kingdom will ban new gas-powered cars in 2030. One of the world’s major automakers, General Motors (GM), announced that it would stop selling gas-powered cars by 2035.

The key to an electric future is batteries. Automakers are racing to pack the most energy into the smallest one. The lithium-ion battery is what powers our mobile devices, which can be recharged again and again. Making these batteries has an environmental cost. Lithium is taken from the earth, like the oil used to make gasoline. But the long-term cost is much smaller. “Once you burn gasoline, you can’t recycle it,” says Jessika Trancik, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “But when you use up a battery, you can still recycle the material.”

It’s up to governments to make electric cars accessible to everyone. National policies can help. In the United States, an electric Chevy Volt costs about $35, 000. Trancik says charging stations must also be made widely available. As part of an effort to fight climate change, America plans to build half a million of them in the US by 2030. She hopes enough charging stations will be built soon. “It’s important to put chargers where many different people can have access to them,” she says, “not just wealthier people.”

Last year, almost 5% of approximately 67 million new cars sold world widewere electric. For Venkat Viswanathan, a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, green electricity is part of the solution to climate change, and electric cars are just the beginning. He sees a future of solar powered homes and electric flying cars. “Soon, a plug in vehicle might be as cheap as a gas-powered car. It is now abundantly clear that electric is the future,” he says. “It will be a totally new world.”

1. Why are countries eager to promote electric cars?
A.To reduce the cost of vehicles.
B.To increase the availability of charging stations.
C.To promote solar-powered homes.
D.To deal with climate change.
2. What does Trancik indicate about charging stations in Paragraph 3?
A.They should come down in price.
B.They may be unfairly laid out.
C.Enough of them have been built.
D.They favor more ordinary people.
3. What can be inferred from Viswanathan’s words?
A.Gas-powered cars will be cheaper.
B.The price of batteries will drop sharply.
C.Electric vehicles will beat climate change.
D.Green electricity will be widely used.
4. Which word best describes Trancik’s attitude to the lithium-ion battery?
A.Positive.B.Skeptical.
C.Conservative.D.Disapproving.
2023-07-18更新 | 46次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般