组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:74 题号:14088085

All of us face a variety of risks to our health in our daily life. Driving cars and being exposed to environmental pollutants all pose certain degrees of risk. Some risks would restrict our ability to lead a good life. And some are risks we might decide to avoid if we had the opportunity to make informed choices. Indoor air pollution is one risk that you can do something about.

Scientific evidence has indicated that the air within homes can be more seriously polluted than the outdoor air in even the most industrialized cities. Other research indicates that people spend approximately 90 percent of their time indoors. Thus, for many people, the risks to health may be greater due to exposure to air pollution indoors than outdoors.

In addition, people exposed to indoor air pollutants for the longest periods of time are often those most susceptible to the effects of indoor air pollution. Such groups include kids, the elderly and the chronically ill, especially those suffering from respiratory disease.

While pollutant levels from individual sources may not pose a significant health risk by themselves, most homes have more than one source that contributes to indoor air pollution. There can be a serious risk from the cumulative effects of these sources. Fortunately, there are steps that most people can take both to reduce the risk from existing sources and to prevent new problems from occurring. This brochure was prepared by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U. S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to help you decide whether to take action that can reduce the level of indoor air pollution in your own home.

Because so many Americans spend a lot of time in offices with mechanical heating and cooling systems, there is also a short section on the causes of poor air quality in offices and what you can do if you suspect that your office may have a problem.

1. Who will be exposed to indoor air pollution more often according to the text?
A.A driver.B.A housewife.C.A farmer.D.A cyclist.
2. What does the underlined word “susceptible” in paragraph 3 mean?
A.Sensitive.B.Essential.C.Accustomed.D.Familiar.
3. What can the brochure of EPA and CPSC help people do?
A.Lead a healthier and richer life.B.Throw individual things away.
C.Get rid of the risk of air pollution.D.Reduce the risk of indoor air pollution.
4. What is the author’s main purpose in writing the text?
A.To show Americans’ unhealthy lifestyle.
B.To stress the negative influence of pollution.
C.To tell people to reduce the time spent at home.
D.To remind people to take note of indoor air pollution.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章认为虎鲨对于海洋生态系统的健康至关重要,解释了重要的原因,介绍了目前虎鲨数量急剧减少的现象,以及背后的原因和可能造成的危害,最后呼吁我们支持可持续的捕捞和减少温室气体排放。

【推荐1】Despite the bad reputation of sharks, they are crucial to the health of the marine ecosystem and can even help fight climate change.

In the shallows of Shark Bay, Western Australia, seagrass is food for the sea cows, which can weigh as much as 500 kg and eat roughly 40 kg of seagrass a day. Sea cows are a rich source of food for tiger sharks. By keeping the sea cow population controlled, tiger sharks here help the seagrass grow sustainably. A booming seagrass meadow stores twice as much CO2 per square mile as forests typically do on land.

But tiger shark numbers are declining. Off Australia’s northeast coast of Queensland, tiger sharks are estimated to have fallen by at least 71 percent, largely due to overfishing. A reduction in tiger sharks means more seagrass consumed by herbivores (食草动物) and less carbon stored in sea vegetation. This raised the question: What if they were absent from the Shark Bay — would the seagrass-dominated ecosystem survive?

To find out, researchers led by Rob Nowicki of Florida International University, spent time in Eastern Australia, where shark numbers were lower and sea cows ate seagrass largely undisturbed. “When uncontrolled, sea cows can rapidly destroy wide areas of seagrass,” said Nowicki.

Those findings emphasized that tiger sharks were playing an important role in preventing the reduction of seagrass in Shark Bay. If their populations continue to decline, the resilience of carbon-rich ocean ecosystems will likely decrease.

When it comes to stimulating shark numbers, there have been movements toward more sustainable fishing, but a large percentage of the industry have not changed their methods, which is a reason why the population of many marine top predators (捕食者) continues to decline.

Aside from supporting sustainable fishing, Nowicki said the only way to truly protect marine life is to reduce our global greenhouse gas emissions. “Ultimately, if we are going to protect our ecosystems in the centuries to come, we are going to need to solve climate change while undertaking species protection at the same time.”

1. Why are tiger sharks vital to the marine ecosystem?
A.They feed on various sea animals.
B.They can store large amounts of CO2.
C.They can prevent the loss of seagrass.
D.They influence marine species distribution.
2. What did Rob Nowicki’s team want to find out in Eastern Australia?
A.How sea cows destroy the seagrass community.
B.How shark population influences the ocean ecosystem.
C.What was contributing to the declining number of tiger sharks.
D.What to do to recover the seagrass-dominated ecosystem.
3. What is the main reason for the population reduction of many top predators in marine ecosystems?
A.Climate change.B.Water pollution.
C.Loss of seagrass.D.Unsustainable fishing approaches.
4. What’s the main idea of the text?
A.We should protect our environment.
B.The number of tiger sharks is decreasing.
C.Climate change causes the loss of seagrass.
D.Tiger sharks are vital to the health of the marine ecosystem.
2023-04-17更新 | 83次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。研究表明,抚摸宠物狗可改善人的身心健康。

【推荐2】I started considering the power of dogs during one of my daily walks around my neighborhood. Almost invariably, I’ll run into at least one person walking his dog. It’s a joyous moment to approach the dog and pet it. I always walk away from these exchanges feeling just a bit more relaxed and happy. And that got me wondering: Could these short interactions with other people’s dogs actually be good for me?

“Absolutely. I think it is safe to say that animals are beneficial to our mental and physical health,” says Nancy Gee, a professor of psychology at Virginia Commonwealth University. Gee says there’s some evidence that the act of actually touching a dog might be an important part of the calming effect. For instance, one study done in Canada found college students reported less stress and reduced feelings of homesickness after brief interactions with dogs, and that the effect was much bigger in those who actually got to pet the animals.

Now, the therapy (治疗) dogs used in research are screened for things like friendliness, good behavior and responsiveness to their handler’s cues (提示). And of course, not everyone is a dog person. “Pets are not a panacea (灵丹妙药),” Gee says. “They’re not necessarily going to be great for every single person. But for people who really connect with the animals, they can make a big difference.”

Research on the health benefits of human interactions with animals, especially with dogs, has exploded in recent years, thanks to the support of the National Institutes of Health and the Waltham PetCare Science Institute. Though the field is still young, Gee says the quality of the evidence is improving all the time, including more randomized controlled trials looking at short interactions. “We’re seeing really nice effects,” she says. “We actually saw those effects one month later. And there’s some evidence that they may exist six months later.”

1. Why does the author mention his interactions with dogs?
A.To praise his neighbor.B.To erase people’s doubts.
C.To introduce the topic.D.To voice his views on life.
2. What did the study done in Canada find about the students interacting with dogs?
A.They disliked raising pets.B.They enjoyed much respect.
C.They were very academic.D.They became less homesick.
3. What can be inferred about the research on human-animal relationships?
A.It has seen sound development.B.It cuts the cost of saving animals.
C.It ensures humans a bright future.D.It makes some medicine affordable.
4. Which is the most suitable title for the text?
A.Walking Improves the Quality of LifeB.Petting Dogs Can Boost Your Health
C.Animals Might Lift Patients’ SpiritsD.Happiness Lies in Helping Others
2023-12-24更新 | 106次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】The vast majority of us spend our entire lives pulled down by gravity. Then there are astronauts.

This small population of space travelers has given researchers a rare look at what happens to the human body when it’s able to spend large amounts of time outside the downward pull of the Earth. This week, a study on one of the largest groups of astronauts yet ---34 participants---was published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

In the new study, a team of international radiologists supported by NASA looked at MRIs of the brains of astronauts before and after their trips to space. The scientists found that upon returning to Earth, many of the astronauts’ brains had become repositioned inside their skulls, floating higher than before. In addition, the space between certain brain areas appeared to have shrunk. The changes were more common in astronauts who took longer trips into space.

The team characterized astronaut trips as short (an average of less than 14 days) or long (an average of about 165 days). Radiologists who didn't know each astronaut's duration(持续时间)in space compared MRIs from before and after their trips.

Of the 34 total astronauts involved in the study, 18 took long trips to space—spending most of that time on the International Space Station —and of those, 17 returned to Earth with smaller areas between the frontal lobe(脑前额叶)and parietal lobe(顶叶). The same area of the brain also shrank for three of the 16 astronauts who took shorter trips with the US Space Shuttle Program. The researchers also found that 12 of the ISS astronauts and six of the space-shuttle astronauts returned home with their brains sitting slightly higher in their skulls than before.

It’s not clear what, if anything, these brain changes mean for the health of space travelers. In general, it appears the human body tolerates space travel fairly well: the time astronauts have spent in zero-gravity environments so far doesn’t seem to have had any strong or long-lasting effects.

1. What is the finding of the study?
A.Astronauts have great brain power.
B.Astronauts’ duration in space is updated.
C.Astronauts’ skulls expand after space trips.
D.Astronauts return to Earth with raised brains.
2. How did the scientists draw the conclusion?
A.By analyzing astronauts’ symptoms.
B.By comparing each astronaut’s MRIs.
C.By monitoring astronauts’ brain activities.
D.By observing countless astronauts’ behaviors.
3. What does the author say about the changes inside astronauts’ skulls?
A.They are totally harmless.
B.Their effects are hard to assess.
C.Their occurrence is unavoidable.
D.They will heavily influence astronauts.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Effects of zero gravity
B.Valuable experiences of space travel
C.Space travel changes astronauts’ brains
D.Flying long house increases health risks
2018-06-27更新 | 103次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般