组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.85 引用次数:160 题号:14363567

Smart phones are greatly changing the way we walk down the street. Office workers and young people are walking like the old as they check emails and messages.

Scientists have found mobile phones make us walk more slowly, with modest steps, to avoid falling over. The leader of the study said the walk is just like someone in their eighties. Researchers found people writing a text message walk more than twice as slowly as those without a phone, finding it harder to stay in a straight line.

The scientists examined 252 people walking while reading a text message, writing one, speaking on their phones or without their phones at all. Writing a text is the hardest activity, causing people to look down at their phone 46 percent more, and 45 percent longer, than when reading a message. This led people to walk 118 per cent more slowly than when they were without their phones. People walked almost a third more slowly while reading a text and 19 per cent while talking on the phone.

Smart phones were found to stop people from walking in a straight line, putting them at greater risk of running into other people, cars or street lamps. This increased the need to slow down and take more careful steps.

John Timmis said the idea for this study came from following someone walking down the street in the afternoon, who was walking as if he had had several drinks. I thought it was a bit early for that, then walked up alongside him and saw that he was on his phone. Simply being on the phone changes the way people walk.

1. What does the underlined word “modest” mean in the second paragraph?
A.Young.B.Straight.
C.Low.D.Small.
2. Based on the text, who walk the most slowly?
A.Those not carrying phones.
B.Those writing a text message.
C.Those reading a text message.
D.Those speaking on their phones.
3. What made people with phones take more careful steps?
A.The need to walk straight.
B.The desire to use their phones.
C.The chance of possible accidents.
D.The traffic jams during rush hours.
4. What made John Timmis decide to do the research?
A.Seeing office workers walking like the elderly.
B.Seeing people walking in the street hurriedly.
C.Watching young people who were walking normally.
D.watching a person who was walking in the street in a strange way .

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校

【推荐1】By now it's almost common knowledge that spending time in nature is good for you. Areas with more trees tend to be less polluted, so spending time there allows you to breathe easier. Spending time outdoors has been linked with reduced blood pressure and stress and seems to motivate people to exercise more.

“So it'll come as surprise that there's research showing that spending time in nature is good. There are dozens of papers showing that,” University of Exeter Medical School researcher Mathew P.White said.“We get this idea-patients are coning to us and they are asking, ‘Doctor, how long should I spend? ’And the doctor is saying,‘I don't really know.’”

So White and his team decided to find out by using data collected from nearly 20,000 people in England through the Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey. And their answer? Two hours a week. People who spent at least that much time in nature either all at once or totaled over several shorter visits were more likely to report good health and psychological well-being than those with no nature exposure.

Remarkably, the two-hour standard applied to men and women, to older and younger folks, to people from different ethnic backgrounds, occupational groups, socioeconomic levels, and so on. Even people with long-term illnesses or disabilities benefited from time spent in nature- as long as it was at least 120 minutes per week.

While the findings are based on a vast number of people, White cautions that it's rally just a correlation. Nobody knows why of how nature has this benefit, or even if the findings will stand up to more strict investigation.

“I want to be rally clear about this. This is in very early stages.We're not saying everybody has to do 120. This is really to start the conversation, saying, what would athresholdlook like? What research do we need to take this to the next step before doctors can have the true confidence to work with their patients? But it's certainly a starting point.”

1. What does White want to figure out in the survey?
A.The benefits of being outside.
B.How long we should stay in nature.
C.The significance of outdoor activities.
D.Whether the British spend enough time in nature
2. What can we learn from the last two paragraphs?
A.The two-hour standard applies to everyone.
B.The reason why nature is beneficial is clear.
C.Further study is needed to confirm White's result.
D.The findings of White's survey have bee widely used.
3. What does underlined word“threshold”in the last paragraph mean?
A.Strict investigation.B.Following step.
C.Healthy lifestyle.D.Staring point.
4. What can be the best title for this text?
A.Nature and HealthB.Two-hour Staying in Nature
C.Tips to Improve HealthD.The Starting Point
2020-06-28更新 | 124次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 较易 (0.85)
真题
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。本文主要报道了一个研究人体节律的实验及其研究结果。Stefania Follini参与了这项研究,在山洞里呆了130天。
【推荐2】        On May 23,1989, Stefania Follini came out from a cave at Carlsbad, New Mexico. She hadn’t seen the sun for eighteen and a half weeks. Stefania was in a research program, and the scientists in the program were studying body rhythms (节奏). In this experiment Stefania had spent 130 days in a cave, 30 feet in depth.
        During her time in the cave, Stefania had been completely alone except for two white mice. Her living place had been very comfortable, but there had been nothing to tell her the time. She’d had no clocks or watches, no television or radio. There had been no natural light and the temperature had always been kept at 21℃.
        The results were very interesting. Stefania had been in the cave for over four months, but she thought she had been there for only two. Her body clock had changed. She hadn’t kept to a 24-hour day, she had stayed awake for 20-25 hours and then had slept for 10 hours. She had eaten fewer meals and had lost 171bs in weight as a results! She had also become rather depressed (抑郁).
       How had she spent her time in the cave? As part of the experiment she’d done some physical and mental tests. She’d recorded her daily activities and the results of the tests on a computer. This computer had been specially programmed for the project. Whenever she was free, she’d played cards, read books and listened to music. She’d also learned French from tapes.
        The experiment showed that our body clocks are affected by light and temperature. For example, the pattern of day and night makes us wake up and go to sleep. However, people are affected in different ways. Some people wake up naturally at 5:00 am, but others don’t start to wake up till 9:00 or 10:00 am. This affects the whole daily rhythm. As a result, the early risers, on the other hand, are tired during the day and only come to life in the afternoon or evening!
1. Stefania stayed in the cave for a long time because ______.
A.she was asked to do research on mice
B.she wanted to experience loneliness
C.she was the subject of a study
D.she needed to record her life
2. What is a cause for the change of Stefania’s body clock?
A.Eating fewer meals.
B.Having more hours of sleep.
C.Lacking physical exercise.
D.Getting no natural light.
3. Where does the text probably come from?
A.A novel.B.A news story.C.A pet magazine.D.A travel guide.
2016-11-26更新 | 109次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要讲述了科学家发现植物能够通过超声波进行“交流”,并且这种交流可能对农业有所帮助。

【推荐3】Scientists have known for years that plants respond to sounds around them. For example, flowers make sweeter nectar (花蜜) to the sound of buzzing bees. But now scientists in Israel have shown that plants also seem to be doing some “talking”.

Professor Lilach Hadany and her team at Tel Aviv University set up microphones to record tomato and tobacco plants under different conditions. Their recordings revealed that the plants made ultrasonic sounds (超声波) .

It’s not clear how the plants make the sounds. One idea is that air bubbles (气泡) form inside the plant’s stem, and that these popping bubbles make a clicking sound. It’s also not clear if the plants are making the sounds on purpose. Sometimes people’s knees creak, too, but they’re not doing it on purpose.

But the plants are definitely making noise, and creating much more noise when they’re stressed than when they’re not.

In fact, the researchers trained an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system to identify the different kinds of clicking sounds. The system was able to tell the difference between plants that needed water and plants with cuts about 70% of the time.

The result suggests that researchers may one day be able to use a plant’s sounds to figure out when it is having trouble, and what trouble it is having. They hope that could be very helpful to farmers.

The new discovery raises many more questions. One important question is: Do plants make sounds to communicate with each other?

Other research has shown that plants do seem to communicate in some ways. Plants being attacked by insects send chemicals into the air. Soon, nearby plants that haven’t been attacked yet start to make other chemicals that don’t taste good to insects. It’s possible that the ultrasonic sounds could work in a similar way.

Another big question is: Is anything listening to the plants? Dr. Hadany points out that mice and moths, for example, depend on plants, and can hear ultrasonic frequencies. The clicks may tell these animals when a plant isn’t healthy, so they can avoid it.

The team’s research has already changed our ideas about plants. As Dr. Hadany says, “Even in a quiet field, there are actually sounds that we don’t hear, and those sounds carry information.”

1. Why does the author mention flowers in Paragraph 1?
A.To prove plants can hear the sounds.B.To show plants make ultrasonic sounds.
C.To make a comparison with other plants.D.To arouse the readers’ interest in the text.
2. How do the plants possibly communicate with each other?
A.The plants convey information by touch.B.The attacked plants make ultrasonic sounds.
C.The attacked plants send poor-taste chemicals.D.The wind blows the odor of the attacked plants.
3. What’s the purpose of the researchers?
A.To prove plants can talk.B.To make a new discovery.
C.To promote plants’ better growth.D.To have more knowledge of plants.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Plants “Talk”B.Amazing Plants
C.Ultrasonic “Dances”D.Wonderful Sounds
2024-05-12更新 | 133次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般