组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:88 题号:14834576

Parents, teachers and caregivers have long believed in the magic of storytelling to calm and comfort kids. Researchers working in pediatric (儿科) have now quantified the physiological and emotional benefits of a well-told tale.

“We know that narrative has the power to transport us to another world,” says Brockington, who studies emotions and learning at Brazil’s Federal University. He adds, “Earlier research suggested that stories help children process and regulate their emotions—but this was mostly conducted in a lab, with subjects answering questions while lying inside functional MRI machines. There’s little research on physiological and psychological effects of storytelling in a more commonplace hospital setting.

So the investigators working in several Brazilian hospitals split a total of 81 patients aged 4 to 11 into two groups, matching them with storytellers who had a decade of hospital experience. In one group, the storyteller led each child in playing a riddle game. In the other, youngsters chose books and listened as the storyteller read them aloud. Before and after these sessions, the researchers took saliva (唾液) samples from each child, then asked them to report their pain levels and conducted a free-association word quiz and analyzed samples.

Children in both groups benefited measurably from the interactions. Those who heard stories also reported pain levels dropping almost twice as much as those in the riddle group, and they used more positive and light words to describe their hospital stay. The study demonstrates that playing games or simply interacting with someone can relax kids and improve their outlook—but that hearing stories has an especially dramatic effect. “The researchers really tried to control the social interaction component of the storyteller, which I think was key,” says Mar, a psychologist at York University.

1. What does Brockington say about stories?
A.The effects of them are easy to show in labs.B.They have a positive effect on kids’ emotions.
C.They cause children to become more emotional.D.The studies of them are often conducted in hospitals.
2. How did the investigators carry out the research?
A.By visiting and talking.B.By making assumptions.
C.By grouping and comparing.D.By analyzing samples from earlier research.
3. What does the last paragraph mainly tell us about the research?
A.Its finding.B.Its purpose.C.Its approachD.Its reason.
4. What is the main idea of the text?
A.Narrative skills play a role in storytelling.
B.Listening to a story does benefit kids’ health.
C.Storytelling is popular with kids and their parents.
D.Stories help kids communicate better with their parents.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了一项研究表明,现代欧洲人来自三个主要的古人类群体,而不是之前认为的两个。

【推荐1】Modern Europeans came from three major groups of ancient humans, not two as was thought before, according to a study published on Wednesday.

Until now, it was widely believed that Europeans evolved (进化) from two prehistoric groups. One was early farmers who moved into Europe from the Middle East about 7,500 years ago. The other was local hunter-gatherers who had lived in Europe for more than 40,000 years.

But a new study in the journal Nature says there was a third group in the mix: people from northern Eurasia. They lived in today’s Russia and northern Asia. The finding means that northern Eurasians contributed to the human genes (基因) both in Europe and North America.

Their influence on the Americas has been proved by previous studies which showed that they reached modern-day Alaska in the US more than 15,000 years ago. They crossed an “ice bridge” that connected islands in the Bering Strait, a narrow passage of water between Asia and North America, at the time.

Researchers collected genetic information in nine ancient humans’ bones. The remains were found in Sweden, Luxembourg and Germany. They were one farmer from about 7,000 years ago and eight hunter-gatherers who lived about 8,000 years ago, before the coming of agriculture.

The researchers compared the information with the gene pool of 2,345 present-day people living all over the world. They found almost all Europeans have ancestry from all three of those ancient groups.

The ancient northern Eurasians contributed up to 20% of the genetics of Europeans, although this was the smallest percentage among the three ancestral groups.

People in northern Europe, especially the Baltic states, have the highest percentage of western European hunter-gatherer ancestry. Up to 50% of the DNA of Lithuanians of northeast Europe comes from this group.

Southern Europeans had more of their genetic ancestry from the ancient farmers. Up to 90% of the DNA of Sardinians of Italy can be traced back to (追溯到) these early European immigrants.

Looking ahead, the researchers plan to find out when the ancient northern Eurasians arrived in Europe.

1. Ancient people from northern Eurasia _____.
A.brought agriculture into EuropeB.reached Europe about 7,000 years ago
C.were hunter-gatherers in northern AsiaD.were also ancestors of modern Europeans
2. When did northern Eurasians arrive in America?
A.About 7,500 years ago.B.About 8,000 years ago.
C.More than 15,000 years ago.D.More than 40,000 years ago.
3. How did the researchers conduct the study?
A.By analysing genes.B.By visiting ancient sites.
C.By doing medical experiments.D.By comparing studies in different periods.
4. What do “these early European immigrants” refer to?
A.Hunter-gatherers in western Europe.B.Hunter-gatherers in northern Europe.
C.Ancient farmers from the Middle East.D.Ancient farmers from northern Eurasia.
2022-07-02更新 | 23次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约240词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要讲的是研究表明音乐课对语言理解很有帮助,甚至可能比阅读课更好。

【推荐2】It’s hard to say why, but it’s just true: music is good for you. It can calm your spirit and help you vent (发泄) your anger.     1     But there’s one surprising yet well-documented effect that has really surprised us. Music lessons are very good for language comprehension -- and they might even be better than reading lessons.

    2     But in this new study from MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology), researchers were able to see music lessons improve word comprehension right before their eyes. Led by Robert Desimone, the director of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research, the team tested 74 children between the ages of four and five to see how their growing language skills were affected by piano lessons.

The 74 participants were divided into three groups.     3     The other two had their weekly academic lessons supplemented with three 45-minute lessons per week -- the first got piano lessons and the second took part in reading lessons.

The results? The ones who received a little extra learning every week outperformed those who just continued on with their normal studies.     4     Perhaps even more surprisingly, the children who took the music lessons even outperformed the ones who took the reading lessons when it came to telling the difference between two words that were very similar.

“That’s a big thing for kids in learning language: being able to hear the differences between words,” Desimone said in a statement. “They really benefited from that.” To the researchers, the results point to one clear conclusion:     5    

A.It can even be used to improve your memory.
B.It can bring people together and give us hope.
C.So students should have music lessons more often.
D.The control group simply carried on with their normal school classes.
E.Many studies have shown a close link between musical training and language skills.
F.If you’re a school administrator who wants kids to succeed, you’d better not cut those music programs.
G.Even the ones who only took music lessons turned out to perform better on language puzzles than those who didn’t have extra lessons.
2022-04-25更新 | 343次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,介绍了研究发现语音比文字(打电话比发短信)能建立更强的社交纽带。

【推荐3】A new study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, found that communication that included voice, like a phone call or video chat, created stronger social bonds than communication through typing, like text messaging or email.

In the study, researchers used various experiments to measure connectedness. In one, they asked 200 people to make predictions about what it would be like to reconnect with an old friend by email or by phone and then asked people at random to do one or the other. Although people expected that a phone call would be more awkward, hearing someone’s voice actually made the experience better.

“People reported they did form a significantly stronger bond with their old friend on the phone than by email, and they did not feel more awkward,” study co-author Amit Kumar, an assistant professor of marketing at the McCombs School of Business, said in a statement.

In another experiment, the researchers had strangers connect by either texting, talking over video chat, or talking using only audio. They found that both forms of voice communication—whether video or audio only—made the strangers feel significantly more connected than when they communicated by texting.

Sabrina Romanoff, a Harvard trained clinical psychologist based in New York City, says people tend to text or email instead of calling because of convenience, as they see it as a controlled form of communication where they can “exchange information exactly in the way they intend without unexpected additions by the other person.”

Romanoff says that in reality, texting can make it hard to determine the true meaning behind a conversation. “A phone call is actually more convenient when considering the exact effects of the message.” she explains. “Each party is more present, and therefore, able to measure the meaning behind the content without reflecting on the endless possible meanings behind words.”

1. How was the study carried out?
A.By analyzing data.B.By interviewing experts.
C.By doing experiments.D.By doing online research.
2. What did people expect before making a phone call in the experiment?
A.Email would help them form a stronger bond.
B.Hearing someone’s voice would be awkward.
C.A stronger bond would be formed on the phone.
D.Hearing someone’s voice made the experience better.
3. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Texting helps to exchange information exactly.
B.People can keep the message under control by texting.
C.Romanoff doesn’t agree with the result of the study.
D.Calling makes it easier to get the exact message.
4. What does the text focus on?
A.Speeech forms stronger social bonds than texting.
B.Making a phone call is significantly convenient.
C.Calling and texting become obviously different.
D.Introduction leads to the result of a new study.
2023-05-11更新 | 58次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般