组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:139 题号:14925938

Hundreds of millions have rolled up their sleeves for the COVID-19 vaccine, but why haven’t they rolled up their pants instead? What’s he science behind why we get most vaccines in our arm?

Most vaccines are given in the muscle—this is known as an intramuscular injection (肌肉注射). Some vaccines, are given orally. Others are given just beneath the skin.

But why is he muscle so important, and does location matter?

Muscles make an excellent vaccine administration (药物的施用) site because muscle tissue contains important immune cells Thee immune cells recognize the antigen, a tiny piece of a virus or bacteria introduced by the vaccine that stimulates an immune response. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine the immune cells in the muscle tissue pick up these antigens(抗原) and present therm to the lymph nodes(淋巴结). Injecting the vaccine into muscle tissue keeps the vaccine localized, allowing immune cells to sound the alarm to other immune cells and get to work. Once a vaccine is recognized by the immune cells in the muscle, these cells carry the antigen to lymph vessels, which transport the antigen-carrying immune cells into the lymph nodes. Lymph nodes, important parts of our immune system, contain more immune cells that recognize the antigens in vaccines and start the immune process of creating antibodies.

Muscle tissue also tends to keep vaccine reactions localized. Injecting a vaccine into the deltoid (三角肌) muscle may result in local inflammation(红肿) or soreness at the injection site. If certain vaccines are injected into fat issue, the chance of irritation (刺激) and inflammation reaction increases because fat tissue has poor blood supply, leading to poor absorption of some vaccine components.

Yet another deciding factor in vaccine administration location is the size of the muscle. Adults and children aged three and older tend to receive vaccines in their upper arm in the deltoid. Younger children receive their vaccines mid-thigh(大腿) because their arm muscles are smaller and less developed.

Another consideration during vaccine administration is convenience and patient acceptability. Can you imagine taking down your pants at a clinic with strangers around? Rolling up your sleeve is much easier and more preferred.

1. How many reasons are mentioned for the vaccines given in the muscle?
A.2B.3C.4D.5
2. According to the passage, for most people, ______is the preferred vaccination site.
A.the lymph nodesB.the mouth
C.the armD.the thigh
3. What does the underlined expression “pick up” in the fourth paragraph probably ______ mean?
A.recognizeB.gather
C.clean upD.come down with
4. What may be the best title for the passage?
A.Don’t be afraid of injection
B.why we get shots in the arm
C.An interesting secret to injection
D.How vaccines are given into the muscle

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。 文章主要介绍了“选择悖论”这一现象,即过多的选择会让人们感到困惑和不满,从而降低消费者的满意度。文章还介绍了“最大化者”和“满足者”的区别,以及心理学和行为经济学在解决这一问题中的作用。

【推荐1】Imagine you need milk, so you go to the grocery store to pick some up, only to find there are dozens of options. These days, you have to make a decision on not only the percentage of fat you want, but also what source you want your milk to be coming from: cows, soybeans... You have no idea what milk to pick. There are so many choices that you are confused.

This phenomenon is known as the paradox (悖论) of choice and it is becoming a concern in the modern world, where more and more options are becoming easily available to us. While we might believe that being presented with multiple options actually makes it easier to choose one that we are happy with, and thus increases consumer satisfaction, having too many options actually requires more effort to make a decision and can leave us feeling unsatisfied with our choice.

The idea was popularized by American psychologist Barry Schwartz when he published his book, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Schwartz, who has long studied the ways in which economics and psychology intersect (交叉), became interested in seeing the way that choices were affecting the happiness of citizens in Western societies. He identified that the range of choices that we have available to us these days is far greater than that people had in the past; however, consumer satisfaction has not increased as much as traditional economics theories might expect.

Schwartz identified that the paradox of choice carries the most consequence for people that are maximizers. Maximizers, unlike satisficers, are concerned with making the best choice instead of simply making a choice that they are happy with. When there are many options available to maximizers, it becomes harder for them to determine which is the best, which can cause them to feel a great deal of regret after they have made a choice.

Instead of believing that freedom of choice is unlimited, Schwartz advocates that the role of psychology and behavioral economics should be to find the kind of limitations on freedom that can lead to the greatest level of happiness within society.

1. What’s the author’s purpose in mentioning buying milk in paragraph 1?
A.To lead in the topic.
B.To draw a conclusion.
C.To show that we have more choices when shopping.
D.To indicate that people pay greater attention to health when shopping.
2. What does the paradox of choice suggest?
A.More options mean less satisfaction.
B.Consumer satisfaction has greatly increased.
C.People are happy with more choices.
D.Modern people are happier than their ancestors.
3. What can be learned about satisficers?
A.They aim for the very best.B.They tend to follow their feelings.
C.They often regret their decisions.D.They have trouble making a decision.
4. What does Schwartz suggest people do?
A.Hold on to their beliefs.B.Accept their own behavior.
C.Give up freedom.D.Limit their own choices.
2024-02-13更新 | 283次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约500词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要内容是关于人类的跑步能力和进化问题。

【推荐2】An article published recently in the scientific journal Nature is shedding new light on an important, but so far little has been appreciated, aspect of human evolution. In this article, Professors Dennis Bramble, and Daniel Lieberman suggest that the ability to run was a decisive factor in the development of our species. According to the two scientists, humans possess a number of anatomical (人体结构的) features that make them surprisingly good runners. “We are very confident that strong selection for running, which came at the expense of the historical ability to live in trees — was helpful in the origin of the modern human body form,” says Bramble, a biology professor at the University of Utah.

Traditional thinking up to now has been that the upright body form of modern humans has come about as a result of the ability to walk, and that running is simply a by-product of walking. Furthermore, humans have usually been regarded as poor runners compared to such animals as dogs, horses or antelopes. However, this is only true if we consider fast running over short distances. Even Olympic athlete can hardly run as fast as a horse can gallop, and can only keep up a top speed for fifteen seconds or so. Horses and antelopes, on the other hand, can run at top speed for several minutes, clearly outperforming us in this respect. But when it comes to long-distance running, humans do astonishingly well. They can maintain a steady pace for miles, and their overall speed compares favorably with that of horses or dogs.

Bramble and Lieberman examined twenty-six anatomical features found in humans. One of the most interesting of these is the nuchal ligament (颈背的韧带). When we run, it is this ligament that prevents our head from pitching back and forth or from side to side. Therefore, we are able to run with steady heads held high. The nuchal ligament is not found in any other surviving primates (灵长类动物), although the fossil (化石) record shows that Homo erectus, an early human species that walked upright, much as we do, also had one. Then there are our Achilles tendons (跟腱) at the backs of our legs, which have nothing to do with walking. When we run, these tendons behave like springs, helping to push us forward. Furthermore, we have low, wide shoulders, virtually disconnected from our skulls (the bony part of the head), another anatomical adaptation which allows us to run more efficiently.

But what evolutionary advantage is gained from being good long-distance runners? One assumption is that this ability may have permitted early humans to obtain food more effectively. “What these features and fossil facts appear to be telling us is that running evolved in order for our direct ancestors to compete with other carnivores (animals that eat meat) for access to the protein needed to grow the big brains that we enjoy today.” says Lieberman.

1. We can learn from the passage that the human ability to run _______.
A.was only recently described in a scientific journal
B.played an important part in human evolution
C.was considered more natural than the ability to live in trees
D.contributed to the form of human language
2. According to the second paragraph, humans _______
A.are better runners than most other animals
B.are not good at running short distances
C.compare unfavorably with horses and dogs
D.are poor long-distance runners
3. It appears that the nuchal ligament _______.
A.enables us to run with steady heads
B.is found in modern primates only
C.prevents the head from being held high
D.is a unique feature of carnivores
4. The passage does NOT tell us that _______
A.early humans had an advantage in obtaining food thanks to the running ability
B.fossils help us better understand human evolution.
C.our Achilles tendons are an adaptation for running efficiently
D.big brains may have been evolved for running long-distance
2016-11-26更新 | 227次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约240词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了蜜蜂的作用和人们应该怎样对待蜜蜂。

【推荐3】How do you feel about bees? Do you get annoyed when they fly around you and do you fear their mission is just to sting (叮) you?     1     Without them, we might starve (饿死).

Bees deserve some respect. They give us honey, and they play their part either pollinating (授粉) the many vegetables and fruits we eat directly or pollinating the food for the animals that we then consume.     2     That’s not all — a study in the UK, found bees and other pollinating insects have a global economic value of around £120bn ($150bn) and contribute around £690m ($850m) to the UK economy every year. So, bees are worth protecting.

    3     But experts say we should be taking care of all our bees. Researchers say conservation efforts should be aimed at a wide number of species — even those that currently contribute little to crop pollination — in order to maintain biodiversity and ensure future food security.     4     It’s something we should be worried about because, as Gill Perkins, chief executive of the Bumblebee Conservation Trust, said, “They provide a whole ecosystem service.” The recent lockdowns caused by the coronavirus pandemic (流行病) seem to have given bee populations a little boost because they faced less human disturbance, traffic and polluting fumes.

Conservationists hope, going forward, people will appreciate bees more and encourage them to do well as they reconnect with nature. Gill Perkins says, “They are beginning to realise how their mental health and wellbeing is supported by nature — particularly by bumblebees (大黄蜂), which are so beautiful and buzzy.”     5    

A.A small number of bee species are essential for crops such as apples and strawberries.
B.The bees busied themselves at making honey.
C.So, it really seems time to give bees a second chance.
D.In fact, they are the world’s most important pollinators.
E.The words remind people of this saying “honey is sweet but the bee stings”.
F.Love them or dislike them, these little insects are extremely important creatures.
G.Unfortunately, in recent times, bee populations have been declining due to pesticides, disease and habitat loss.
2022-11-10更新 | 217次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般