组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:122 题号:15056938

In the United States alone, over 100 million cell-phones are thrown away each year. Cell-phones are part of a growing mountain of electronic waste like computers and personal digital assistants. The electronic waste stream is increasing three times faster than traditional garbage as a whole.

Electronic devices contain valuable metals such as gold and silver. A Swiss study reported that while the weight of electronic goods represented by precious metals was relatively small in comparison to total waste, the concentration (含量) of gold and other precious metals was higher in so-called e-waste than in naturally occurring minerals.

Electronic wastes also contain many poisonous metals. Even when the machines are recycled and the harmful metals removed, the recycling process is often carried out in poor countries which allow many poisonous substances to escape into the environment, or in practically uncontrolled ways which make more wastes generated.

Creating products out of raw materials creates much more waste material, up to 100 times more, than the material contained in the finished products. Consider again the cell-phone, and imagine the mines that produced those metals, the factories needed to make the box and packaging it came in. Many wastes produced in the producing process are harmful as well.

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency notes that most waste is dangerous in that “the production, distribution, and use of products -as well as management of the resulting waste-all result in greenhouse gas release.” Individuals can reduce their contribution by creating less waste at the start -for instance, buying reusable products and recycling.

In many countries the concept of extended producer responsibility is being considered or has been put in place as an incentive(动机)for reducing waste. If producers are required to take back packaging they use to sell their products, would they reduce the packaging in the first place?

Governments’ incentive to require producers to take responsibility for the packaging they produce is usually based on money. Why, they ask, should cities or towns be responsible for paying to deal with the bubble wrap(气泡垫)that encased your television?

From the governments’ point of view, a primary goal of laws requiring extended producer responsibility is to transfer both the costs and the physical responsibility of waste management from the government and tax-payers back to the producers.

1. What do we know from the Swiss study?
A.Natural minerals contain more gold.
B.The weight of electronic goods was by no means small.
C.Precious metals account for a great proportion in e-waste.
D.The percentage of precious metals is small in electronic goods.
2. Which way is incorrect to reduce waste?
A.Recycling machines without control.
B.Making as few purchases as possible.
C.Creating products out of finished products.
D.Simplifying the process of manufacturing products.
3. The responsibility of e-waste treatment should be extended ________.
A.from individuals to distributors
B.from producers to governments
C.from governments to producers
D.from distributors to governments
4. What does the passage mainly talk about?
A.The creation of e-waste.
B.The increase in e-waste.
C.The seriousness of e-waste.
D.The management of e-waste.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了一项有关融化的陨石的研究发现融化的陨石含水量极低,它们不可能是地球上水的来源,这使得人们更接近水的起源的答案。

【推荐1】Water makes up 71% of the Earth’s surface, but no one knows how or when such massive quantities of water arrived on the Earth. A new study published in the journal Nature brings scientists one step closer to answering that question.

Led by University of Maryland Assistant Professor of Geology Megan Newcombe, researchers analyzed melted meteorites (熔化的陨石) that had been floating around in space since the solar system’s formation 4.5 billion years ago. They found that these meteorites had extremely low water content — in fact, they were among the driest materials ever measured outside the Earth.

These results, which let researchers rule them out as the primary source of the Earth’s water, could have important information for the search for water — and life — on other planets. It also helps researchers understand the unlikely conditions making the Earth a livable planet.

Researchers wanted to understand how our planet managed to get water because it’s not completely obvious. Getting water and having surface oceans on a planet that is small and relatively near the sun is a challenge.

“We knew that plenty of outer solar system objects were differentiated, but it was sort of secretively assumed that because they were from the outer solar system, they must also contain a lot of water,” said Sune Nielsen, a study co-author and geologist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. “Our paper shows this is definitely not the case. As soon as meteorites melt, there is no remaining water.”

The findings have applications beyond geology. Scientists of many fields — and especially exoplanet (系外行星) researchers — are interested in the origin of the Earth’s water because of its deep connections with life.

“Water is considered to be a must for life to be able to exist, so as we’re looking out into the universe and finding all of these exoplanets, we’re starting to work out which of those planetary systems could be potential hosts for life,” said Newcombe. “In order to be able to understand these other solar systems, we want to understand our own.”

1. What did the new study focus on?
A.The history of the Earth.B.The origin of the Earth’s water.
C.The source of meteorites.D.The structure of solar system.
2. What did researchers prove from melted meteorites?
A.The driest materials coming from other planets.
B.An impossible source of the Earth’s water.
C.The challenge of getting water near the sun.
D.The likely conditions making the Earth habitable.
3. Why does the subject of the Earth’s water appeal to scientists?
A.Because it is closely related to life.
B.Because it can make them famous.
C.Because it concerns many disciplines.
D.Because it is deeply connected with outer space.
4. Where is the text probably taken from?
A.A science fiction.B.A geography textbook.
C.A book review.D.A research report.
2023-12-03更新 | 78次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】A new study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, found that communication that included voice, like a phone call or video chat, created stronger social bonds than communication through typing, like text messaging or email.

In the study, researchers used various experiments to measure connectedness. In one, they asked 200 people to make predictions about what it would be like to reconnect with an old friend by email or by phone and then asked people at random (随机地) to do one or the other. Although people expected that a phone call would be more awkward, hearing someone’s voice actually made the experience better.

“People reported they did form a significantly stronger bond with their old friend on the phone than by email, and they did not feel more awkward,” study co-author Amit Kumar, an assistant professor of marketing at the McCombs School of Business, said in a statement.

In another experiment, the researchers had strangers connect by either texting, talking over video chat, or talking using only audio. They found that both forms of voice communication-whether video or audio only-made the strangers feel significantly more connected than when they communicated by texting.

Sabrina Romanoff, a Harvard trained clinical psychologist based in New York City, says people tend to text or email instead of calling because of convenience, as they see it as a controlled form of communication where they can “exchange information exactly in the way they intend without unexpected additions by the other person.”

Romanoff says that in reality, texting can make it hard to determine the true meaning behind a conversation. “A phone call is actually more convenient when considering the exact effects of the message,” she explains. “Each party is more present, and therefore, able to measure the meaning behind the content without reflecting on the endless possible meanings behind words.”

1. How was the study carried out?
A.By analyzing data.B.By interviewing experts.
C.By doing experiments.D.By doing online research.
2. What did people expect before making a phone call in the experiment?
A.Email would help them form a stronger bond.B.Hearing someone’s voice would be awkward.
C.A stronger bond would be formed on the phone.D.Hearing someone’s voice made the experience better.
3. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Texting helps to exchange information exactly.B.Calling makes it easier to get the exact message.
C.Romanoff doesn’t agree with the result of the study.D.People can keep the message under control by texting.
4. What is the best title of the text?
A.Reasons for calling instead of texting.B.Convenience of making a phone call.
C.Differences between calling and texting.D.Introduction to the result of a new study.
2021-01-30更新 | 94次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是说明文。最新研究发现,人们在消费时选择越多,购买东西的可能性也许会越小。

【推荐3】Marketers assume the more choice they offer, the more likely customers will be able to find just the right thing. For instance, offering fifty styles of jeans instead of two increases the chances that shoppers will find a pair they really like. Nevertheless, research now shows when there is too much choice, consumers are less likely to buy anything at all, and if they do buy, they are less satisfied with their selection.

It all began with jam. In 2000, psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper published a remarkable study. On one day, shoppers saw a display table with 24 varieties of jam. Those sampling the jam received a coupon for $1 off any jam. On another day, shoppers saw a similar table, but only six varieties of jam were on display. The large display attracted more interest than the small one. But when the time for purchase came, people seeing the large display were one-tenth as likely to buy as people seeing the small one.

Other studies have confirmed this result that more choice is not always better. As the variety of snacks, soft drinks and beers offered at convenience stores increases, for instance, sales volume and customer satisfaction decrease. These results challenge our opinions about human nature and the determinants of well-being.

Choice is good for us, but its relationship to satisfaction appears to be more complicated than we assumed. What’s more, psychologists and business academics have largely ignored another outcome of choice: More of it requires increased time and effort and can lead to anxiety, regret, excessively high expectations and self-blame if the choice doesn’t work out.

Without doubt, having more options enables us, most of the time, to achieve better objective outcomes. Again, having fifty styles of jeans rather than two increases the likelihood that customers will find a pair that fits. But the subjective outcome may be that shoppers will feel dissatisfied, which creates a significant challenge for retailers and marketers. Choice can no longer be used to justify a marketing strategy. More isn’t always better, either for the customer or for the retailer.

1. How does the author mainly support the topic?
A.By quoting sayings.B.By giving examples.
C.By stating arguments.D.By making comments.
2. Why does too much choice sometimes bring challenges to customers?
A.It always wastes customers’ time.B.It’s difficult to accept the bad results.
C.It may result in some negative feelings.D.It makes the business more complicated.
3. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.More choice leads to shopping themselves.
B.Choice plays an important role in marketing strategies.
C.Having fifty styles of jeans is extremely better than two.
D.More choice causes the decline in consumption to some degree.
4. What may be the best title for the text?
A.Less choice does harmB.More isn’t always better
C.More purchase is betterD.Less choice favors consumption
2024-03-18更新 | 36次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般