Environmental pollution and other human activities are leading to thousands of deaths among seabirds, a new study has warned.
Ecological experts tracked the behavior of British and Irish seabirds. They used satellites to track hundreds of the creatures to find out where they went to catch fish at sea. The study can help assess potential impact from human activities and where protected areas of the seas should be.
Lightweight GPS tags were fitted to more than 1,300 adult birds from 29 different colonies around the UK and Ireland, including kittiwakes, shags, razorbills and guillemots. Results from the five-year study show the large areas of sea the four seabird species use. They found it was at least 600,000 square miles, an area three times the size of Spain. It shows how far they travel from their nests in search of food for their chicks. And it shows the use of the seas by all four species concentrated in the coastal waters of Scotland, highlighting the importance of conservation measures there.
The four species studied require conservation help, with kittiwake numbers declining 71 percent in the past 25 years and shag populations down 61 percent. This means both seabirds are "red listed" and need urgent protection. Razorbills and guillemots are "amber listed", which means they are considered to need conservation action.
Dr. Ewan, lead author of the research, said, “Many seabirds are at the top of the marine food web. They feed on some small fish but that prey is declining because of human pressures, including climate change. The result is that thousands of sea baby birds are dying each year because their parents can't feed them. For the first time, this study provides us with a full map for the feeding areas for some of our most important seabird species.”
The analysis provides critical data to inform marine management, the experts said.
1. Which is one of the purpose of the study?A.To find out where to catch more fish. |
B.To judge which sea should be protected. |
C.To know the seabirds’ impacts on human beings. |
D.To study the behaviour of British and Irish seabirds. |
A.With the help of satellites. | B.With help of the fishermen. |
C.By observing human activities. | D.By tying GPS tags on the ship. |
A.France. | B.Ireland. | C.Spain. | D.Scotland. |
A.Puzzled. | B.Doubtful. | C.Positive. | D.Disappointed. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】It’s a question that has been asked for years: Is a dishwasher or washing dishes by hand greener? Which uses less energy and water?
A few years ago, the answer was that the dishwasher was better but a very careful hand-washer could probably use about the same amount of water and less energy. However, much has changed since then. Technology combined with good design has made the dish washer greatly better over the years, to the point where there’s hardly a question. Studies are showing that modern dishwashers can save more water than most hand-washers.
Dishwashers are even more efficient. Modern dishwashers have pre-heaters that increase the water temperature up to 140 degrees Fahrenheit to sanitize them. The dishwasher also has a timer that lets you set it to turn on at a later time when the power rates are lower.
On the other hand, none of the studies do an analysis of what it takes in terms of energy and water to actually build the dishwasher and replace it every 10 years or so. Nor does it take into account a Swedish study that found that children in families that wash dishes by hand are less likely to develop fever probably due to the “hygiene hypothesis”, which says the reason why kids fall ill is that their surroundings are actually too clean. If you’re not willing to fill up the sinks, the researchers point out that maybe the dishwasher is one labor-saving machine that does a better job than you can especially if you value your time. The researchers write, “When a user’s time spent washing dishes is valued, machine dishwashers pay for themselves within a year of use.”
1. Why does the author raise two questions in the first paragraph?A.To express the author’s doubts. | B.To introduce the topic. |
C.To show different ways to wash dishes. | D.To compare various ideas about dishwashers. |
A.It is more environment-friendly. | B.It takes less time to wash the dishes. |
C.It uses less water to wash the dishes. | D.It is more efficient than hand-washers. |
A.Their effect on kids’ health. | B.Their effect on water and energy saving. |
C.Their help in keeping the environment healthy. | D.Their help in improving kids’ health condition. |
A.The Advantage Of The Dishwasher | B.How To Choose A Proper Way To Do The Dishes |
C.The New Technology For Washing Dishes | D.How Dishwashers Benefit Our Lives |
【推荐2】Researchers in China have developed a robotic chemist powered by AI that might be able to obtain oxygen from water on Mars. The robot uses materials found on the red planet to produce catalysts (催化剂) that break down water, releasing oxygen.
“If you think about the challenge of going to Mars, you have to work with local material,” says Andy Cooper, a chemist at the University of Liverpool. “So I can see the logic behind it.”
The study was led by Jun Jiang at the University of Science and Technology of China Jiang and his team used a mobile machine the size of a refrigerator with a robotic arm to analyse five meteorites (陨石) that had come from Mars. The team’s goal was to investigate whether the machine could produce useful catalysts from the material.
The AI-powered system used some chemicals to dissolve (溶解) and separate the material, then analysed the resulting substances that consists of two or more elements. These then formed the basis of a search of more than 3.7 million formulae (公式) for a chemical that could break down water—known to exist as ice at Mars’ poles and under the planet’s surface-a process the team said would have taken a human researcher 2, 000 years. The result was a catalyst that could release oxygen from water, with the potential for use on a future Mars mission.
If a catalyst that can produce oxygen from water can be made on Mars, this would remove the need for missions to carry such a catalyst from Earth. Jiang says that for every square metre of Martian material, his group’s system could make nearly 60 grams of oxygen per hour, potentially removing the need for astronauts on future missions to the planet to carry oxygen from Earth to use when they get there. “The robot can work continuously for years, ” says Jiang.
Jiang points out that his group’s robotic chemist could also be used to produce other useful catalysts on Mars, for processes like fertilizing (施肥) plants. “Different chemicals can be made by this robot,” he says. And Mars isn’t the only place where it could be used. “Maybe lunar soil is another direction,” Jiang says.
1. What can we learn about the study?A.A chemist with a robotic arm is involved. |
B.Researchers aim to purify the water on Mars. |
C.Oxygen is of vital importance in space travels. |
D.Materials from Mars are analysed to produce catalysts. |
A.Approving. | B.Unclear. | C.Dismissive. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Precise calculation. | B.Integration of materials. |
C.High-speed operation. | D.Flexibility of movement. |
A.The robot can stand endless working time. |
B.Martian catalysts can produce more oxygen. |
C.The system can make 60 grams of oxygen per day. |
D.The robotic chemist can be applied in a broader way. |
【推荐3】In late May, America announced a plan to produce more offshore(近海的)wind energy along the Pacific, Atlantic, and Gulf coasts, with the final goal of adding enough clean energy to supply power to 10 million homes by 2030. But is it practical?
Those answering yes to this question understand that creation is the key to completing the project successfully. Unlike the open grassland and rounded hills, analyzing the seafloor situation for proper placement isn't a simple exercise. With only 20% of the ocean seafloor mapped, we know more about the surface of Mars than we do Earth's hidden depths.
The new company Bedrock is aiming to help solve this problem by detecting the seas with its new electric autonomous underwater vehicles(AUV, 水下自动机器人). Traditional ocean mapping skills are ship-based, usually limited to the surface. Thus, traditional sea surveys can take up to a year to collect and process data. But Bedrock's AUVs send data to a place where the computers start working with the results right away and from anywhere in the world.
While using AUVs to map the seafloor helps improve our understanding of Earth's oceans, Bedrock is careful that this do not damage sea life. The company uses smaller sensors that are close to the seafloor and operate in sound frequencies(声呐频率)safe for animals. In addition, the AUVs only travel at about 2. 3 mph to 3. 45 mph, which reduces the chance of animal or environmental damage as they are moving.
Beyond the offshore wind industry, Bedrock is also exploring other ways its AUVs might benefit other undersea efforts. "Currently our AUV surveys are designed for offshore wind projects and nearshore environmental mapping for coastal management," says Bedrock's CEO and co-founder DiMare. "In the future, we're also capable of serving new markets, helping to make government goals a reality.”
1. Why is the surface of Mars mentioned in paragraph 2?A.To prove how fast technology advances. |
B.To show it's a challenge to map the seafloor. |
C.To predict how important clean energy will be. |
D.To explain it's necessary to fix wind turbines. |
A.It processes data faster. | B.It is more energy-saving. |
C.It collects data in many ways. | D.It sends data in greater amount. |
A.They have served new markets. | B.They are environmentally-friendly. |
C.They are equipped with newer sensors. | D.They can travel very fast in the sea. |
A.Cautious. | B.Unclear. | C.Doubtful. | D.Confident. |
【推荐1】There are some fascinating data about the world’s forests! About 30 percent of the earth’s land is covered in forests, and 300 million people call forests home. A further 1.6billion people rely on forests to survive.
Now, keeping these numbers in mind, consider this fact: the world loses over 32million acres of forest each year. When forests disappear, we not only miss out on all the ways they make us healthier, we also lose an essential resource. This is why preserving forests, and nature, is more important than ever. The key is to connect with nature, for example, forest bathing.
In the way that forest bathing requires, we start to experience and appreciate all its beauty and benefits, through involvement with nature by using all our senses. Many governments, businesses, and institutions have realized the importance of this and have created plans to deepen mutually beneficial relationships between people and nature. It’s not just wild forests that need attention, urban parks and forests are equally important. Despite losing trees to real estate (房地产) developments and road construction, many cities have found creative ways to introduce more trees and forests. In Paris, for example, a nineteenth century railway was turned into a park that stretches nearly three miles. There’s one more thing that’s essential to the protection of forests-helping children connect with nature. Not only is this good for their overall well-being, but studies show that children who spend time in nature become adults who understand the importance of protection. Around the world, many schools have started using parks and green spaces as classrooms. Measures like these will help ensure that future generations can also enjoy the benefits of forests.
1. Why does the author list the data of the world’s forests in Paragraph 1?A.To highlight their significance. | B.To illustrate their economic value. |
C.To present their unique features. | D.To introduce their basic information. |
A.Close contact with nature. | B.Great loss of forest. |
C.Harmonious relationship with nature. | D.Creative plans for development. |
A.It benefits their future career. |
B.It improves their academic performances. |
C.It provides chances for having fun in forests. |
D.It raises their life-long environment awareness. |
A.Sports. | B.Tourism. |
C.Environment. | D.Agriculture. |
【推荐2】The need to feed a growing population is putting much pressure on the world’s supply of water. With 97% of the world’s water too salty to be drunk or used in agriculture, the worldwide supply of water needs careful management, especially in agriculture. Although the idea of a water shortage seems strange to someone fortunate enough to live in a high rainfall country, many of the world’s agricultural industries experience constant water shortages .
Although dams can be built to store water for agricultural use in dry areas and dry seasons, the costs of water redistribution(重新分配) are very high. Not only is there the cost of the engineering itself, but there is also an environmental cost to be considered. Where valleys are flooded to create dams, houses are lost and wildlife homes destroyed. Besides, water may flow easily through pipes to fields, but it cannot be transported from one side of the world to the other. Each country must therefore rely on the management of its own water to supply its farming requirements.
This is particularly troubling for countries with agricultural industries in areas dependent on irrigation(灌溉). In Texas, farmers’ overuse of irrigation water has resulted in a 25% reduction of the water stores. In the Central Valley area of southwestern USA, a huge water engineering project provided water for farming in dry valleys, but much of the water use has been poorly managed.
Saudi Arabia’s attempts to grow wheat in desert areas have seen the pumping of huge quantities of irrigation water from underground reserves. Because there is no rainfall in these areas, such reserves can only decrease, and it is believed that fifty years of pumping will see them run dry.
1. From the first two paragraphs we learn that ________.A.much of the world’s water is available for use | B.the costs of water redistribution should be considered |
C.people in high rainfall countries feel lucky | D.water can be easily carried through pipes across the world |
A.The water stores in Texas have been reduced by 75%. |
B.Most industries in the world suffer from water shortages. |
C.The underground water in Saudi Arabia might run out in 50 years. |
D.Good management of water use resulted from the project in the Central Valley. |
A.Steps to improving water use management. |
B.Ways to reduce the costs of building dams. |
C.Measures to deal with worldwide water shortages. |
D.Approaches to handling the pressure on water supply. |
A.water supply and increasing population |
B.water use management and agriculture |
C.water redistribution and wildlife protection |
D.water shortages and environmental protection |
【推荐3】It has been over 150 years since the Great Chicago Fire. The 1871 fire killed an estimated 300 people. It turned the heart of the city, wood-frame buildings quickly constructed on wooden sidewalks, into ruins, and left 100,000 people homeless. Like the Great Fire of London in 1666, the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, and Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the Great Chicago Fire reminds us that big cities can still be frail.
But that same night, about 250 miles north of Chicago, more than 1,200 people died in and around Peshtigo. It was the deadliest wildfire in U.S. history. Survivors said the fire moved like a hurricane, jumping across Green Bay to light forests on the opposite shore.
Chicago’s fire came to be seen as a disaster that also led to the invention of steel skyscrapers, raised up on the city’s ashes. It has overshadowed the Peshtigo Fire. And for years, the two were seen as separate disasters. However, many of those houses and sidewalks that burned in Chicago had been built with trees grown around Peshtigo.
Chicago’s fire was long blamed - falsely - on an Irish-immigrant family’s cow kicking over a lantern. Some people thought the Peshtigo Fire started when pieces of a comet (彗星) landed in the forest, which has never been proven.
What we understand better today was that the Midwest was historically dry in the summer of 1871. When a low-pressure front with cooler temperatures rolled in, it produced winds, which can fan sparks (火星) into wildfires. The fires themselves generated more winds. Several parts of nearby Michigan also burned during the same few days ; at least 500 people were killed there.
At present, all of those fires on an autumn night in 1871 might help us see even more clearly how rising global temperatures and severe droughts, from Australia to Algeria to California, have made forests easier to burn, and people more likely to be harmed by the climate changes we’ ve helped create.
1. What does the underlined word “frail” in the first paragraph probably mean ?A.Regularly enlarged. | B.Heavily populated. |
C.Safely reached. | D.Easily damaged. |
A.By presenting research findings. | B.By making comparisons. |
C.By following time order. | D.By making classifications. |
A.A careless cow. | B.A passing comet. |
C.A low-pressure front | D.A paper lantern. |
A.To warn people of the forest fire threat. | B.To show signs of global warming. |
C.To attract more tourists to Chicago. | D.To introduce an unknown city. |
【推荐1】Healthcare staff and bank clerks have been on the front line of the health and economic crises striking the UK, but behind the scenes, another group of workers robots have been toiling away and overcoming both emergencies with no fear of COVID-19. But will COVID-19 speed up the rise of robots?
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is software that robotizes repetitive back-office tasks. The National Health Service (NHS) has used it during the widespread disease to con-trol demand and capacity planning in caring for all levels of patients day and night. Jason Kingdon, Blue Prism's new chief executive who is recovering from COVID-19, says, “Before RPA, these were manual processes. You had to train a number of staff to put them in place. Now, you only need to train a single robot to manage the administration.” More than two fifths of bosses across 45 countries that responded to a survey by EY (Ernst & Young) said they were planning on accelerating spending on automation technology to prepare for a post-Covid world.
COVID-19 has already left tens of millions unemployed, so firms won't be short of cheap labour on the other side of the crisis. But experts still think Al will be the more cautious choice for companies. One of them said, “It's important to remember that even in China, which has much lower wages, 12.5 million manufacturing jobs have been cut over the past four years as more robots have been adopted.”
However, Al is overhyped (过分提倡)in many ways and poor application could lead to a rise in anxiety towards automation. Again, we should think of history as a guide. A lot of, workers riots(暴动) in the early 19th century happened during the continental blockade of the Napoleonic Wars when there was significant mess to trade in Britain. These things are not unrelated.
1. What does the underlined phrase “toiling away” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Walking slowly. | B.Working lazily. |
C.Working hard. | D.Walking toughly. |
A.He prefers to use robot workers. |
B.He has refused to accept robots' service. |
C.He wishes to employ more human staff. |
D.He dislikes the survey by EY. |
A.Supportive. | B.Worried. |
C.Indifferent. | D.Opposed. |
A.Robots Have Taken the Place of Humans |
B.COVID-19 Has Terrible Effects on Our Life |
C.It’s Time to Stop Robots from Taking the Place of Humans |
D.COVID-19 Speeds up the Trend of Robots Replacing Humans |
【推荐2】You Ask: Is Yoga Good Exercise? By almost any measure, the answer is yes, but don't let it be all you do. Research shows regular yoga practice lowers your risk for heart disease and tension. Yoga may also lessen symptoms of depression, headaches, diabetes, some forms of cancer and pain-related diseases.
Yoga also seems to prevent weight gain. One 4-year study from Seattle’s Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center found middle-aged adults who practiced yoga at least once a week gained 3 fewer pounds than those who stuck with other forms of exercise. The same study found overweight adults who practice yoga lost 5 pounds, while a non-yoga group gained 13 pounds.
How can a little bending and stretching do all that? Unlike exercises like running or lifting weights, “yoga puts you in a parasympathetic(副交感神经系统的) state, so your heart rate goes down and blood pressure goes down,” says Dr. Tiffany Field, director of the Touch Research Institute at the University of Miami School of Medicine.
Yoga is tied to a healthier heart, as well as its ability to reduce your stress, improve your mood, and help you sleep more soundly. When you consider the extra health benefits linked to each of those brain and body benefits-lower pain, lower body weight, lower disease risk-you could make an argument that few activities are as good for you as yoga.
One thing yoga doesn’t do, though, is burn loads of calories. Even hot forms of yoga like Bikram result in the spending of modest energy—roughly the number of calories you’d burn during a brisk walk. While more and more research suggests calories shouldn’t be your only focus when it comes to diet and exercise, there’s no question that running, swimming, lifting weights and other more vigorous forms of exercise are great for your brain and body.
"Yoga is unquestionably good for you," Field says, "but it should be done along with traditional forms of physical activity-not in place of them."
1. For those who practise it, what can yoga not do?A.Consume a lot of calories | B.Reduce stress |
C.Lessen symptoms of depression | D.Help sleep better |
A.People tend to pay too much attention to calories when exercising or on a diet. |
B.People shouldn’t go on a diet if they do regular yoga practice. |
C.Vigorous exercises are good for people’s brain and body. |
D.Yoga is a better form of exercise than those vigorous ones. |
A.Practise yoga daily to stay healthy. |
B.Give up other forms of exercise and practise yoga alone. |
C.Do other forms of exercise in addition to practising yoga. |
D.Consult an expert before practising yoga. |
A.Recommending | B.Doubtful | C.Indifferent | D.Objective |
【推荐3】In 1999, Google hired its 53rd employee called Charlie Ayers. This employee was unique. He didn’t develop software, nor did he have business knowledge. In fact, he just worked for a famous band. But Charlie won a cooking competition held by the company. Then, he became the company’s chef. He would help Google feed its employees. Since then, Google’s policy of free snacks has been copied.
This policy may make sense for some companies since employees don’t need to travel far to eat. The companies think it can also improve traffic during lunch hour. But firms’ free-snack policy has been attacked by politicians. They believe it extremely reduces the number of customers of local restaurants, which causes many of them to break down and eventually harms the relevant industry. So, officials are preventing Facebook opening a canteen at its new campus.
There have been many theories explaining what motivate firms to provide free snacks. Some argue it’s a firm’s dirty trick to keep workers working for longer hours. Others argue it’s about helping the firm attract talents. Still others say rich firms are just generous and that their generosity, in turn, makes their workers happier and more productive. All of these may contribute to the firms’ free snacks.
Google says its food system is about promoting teamwork and. creativity. The idea is that it provides chances to bond and exchange ideas when employees randomly meet and eat together. This, they believe, encourages creativity. While free snacks might increase the amount of time employees spend in the office, the theory that it increases creativity lacks evidence. Actually, evidence suggests unlimited candy and chips in the break room will affect people’s cognitive performance, which might eventually prevent workers from thinking intelligently. It’s no wonder that some. Google’s competitors rejected the food policy.
If companies want workers to exchange ideas, regular meals can make it. A better food system for companies is one where workers would be given a credit card for food purchases. Some colleges have a similar food system, which offers discount to fruits and vegetables and places an extra cost on junk food—junk food, after all could end up increasing the company’s health insurance bills.
There’s no such thing as a free lunch. The same is true for snacks.
1. Why does the author mention Charlie Ayers in Paragraph 1?A.To offer the background of the text. | B.To introduce the topic of the passage. |
C.To expand understanding of the topic. | D.To show the structure of the passage. |
A.It does increase the employees’ creativity. | B.It’s beneficial to local transportation. |
C.It strengthens the unity of the firms’ employees. | D.It brings negative effect on local restaurants. |
A.The possible causes of some firms’ free-snack policy. | B.The importance of the free snack policy. |
C.The benefits of free-snack policy to workers. | D.The oppositions to the free snack policy. |
A.They are unaware of its positive influence. | B.They consider it a big financial burden. |
C.They think it weakens employees’ creativity. | D.They find it unattractive to many employees. |
A.Companies should increase their insurance bills on workers. |
B.Colleges’ food systems tend to be superior to companies’. |
C.A good food system can give discounts to any food. |
D.Free snacks are unnecessary in the companies. |