While psychologists have studied topics like happiness, optimism, and other human strengths for decades, positive psychology wasn’t officially identified as a branch of psychology until 1998 when Martin Seligman was elected president of the American Psychological Association (APA). Seligman suggested that psychology had become too focused on mental illness. While this had brought about valuable treatments that enabled psychologists to treat a number of diseases and disorders that made people less unhappy. It meant that psychology was neglecting what was good about life—and what the average person could improve.
Seligman called for research into what makes normal people’s lives positive and fulfilling and suggested that the field should develop interventions that could make people happier. He stated that psychology should be just as concerned with nurturing (滋养) the good things in life as it was with healing the bad.
Seligman made positive psychology the theme of his term as APA president and used his role to popularize the word. From there the field took off. It received a great deal of attention from mainstream media outlets. Meanwhile, the first Positive Psychology summit was held in 1999, followed by the first International conference on Positive Psychology in 2002.
Interest in positive psychology has remained high ever since. In 2018, a quarter of the undergraduate students at Yale University enrolled in a course devoted to the subject of happiness. In 2019, 1,600 individuals attended the World Congress of Positive Psychology and research in the field has generated tens of thousands of academic papers.
Psychologist Christopher Peterson pointed out that positive psychology is meant to serve as an extension of the areas of psychology that focus on mental illness and human weakness. Positive psychologists don't wish to replace or abandon the study of human problems, they simply wish to add the study of what’s good in life to the field.
1. What should positive psychology focus on according to Seligman?A.Solving human problems. | B.Treating bad emotions. |
C.Healing mental illnesses. | D.Helping develop good things. |
A.Seligman’s effort in spreading it. | B.International conferences’ being held. |
C.Attention from the media. | D.Further research in this field. |
A.Ambiguous. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Objective. | D.Critical. |
A.The Limitation of Positive Psychology |
B.Seligman, Father of Positive Psychology |
C.Psychology: Past, Present and Possible Future |
D.Positive Psychology: A New Subfield of Psychology |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Researchers studied a group of black-legged kittiwakes that nest in an abandoned radar tower on Middleton Island, Alaska. They attached GPS-accelerometers onto kittiwakes to track their flight performance and discovered that they sometimes travel as far as 155 miles (250 kilometers) a day to find food.
By combining data from the GPS tracker with minute muscle samples from some of the birds, the researchers found that — despite beating their wings less frequently — birds with larger muscle fibers were able to fly as fast as those with smaller fibers. The team also found that birds that flew faster had a higher number of nuclei — which produce the proteins to power flight — in their muscle cells, allowing the birds to increase more muscle fibers to power their flight.
Athletes exercise to maintain muscle tone. The same may be happening with kittiwakes, with those individuals that exercise the most — that is, fly the most — having better developed muscles than those that move less.
“Past studies have focused on hormone levels, body mass, or levels of red blood cells as a predictor of flight performance. We found that muscle structure and body mass together predict performance, says study coauthor Kyle Elliott, an assistant professor in McGill University's department of natural resource sciences in the Bieler School of Environment.
“With the data from the GPS-accelerometers, we can understand a lot about these birds, like where they're going to find food, how fast they're flying, and how frequently they're beating their wings in flight," says Kristen Lalla, the first author of the paper, which she co-wrote as an undergraduate student under Elliott's guidance. “In the past, one of the challenges of measuring muscle structure in small birds was that it usually requires dissecting (解剖)the muscle."
1. What do the first two paragraphs tell us about kittiwakes?A.They nest in an abandoned Island of Alaska. |
B.With smaller muscle fibers, they can fly faster. |
C.They often travel as far as 250 kilometers a day. |
D.Muscle fibers play an important role in their flight. |
A.Body mass. |
B.Hormone levels. |
C.Levels of red blood cells. |
D.Muscle structure and body mass. |
A.The influential factors of kittiwakes' flight performance. |
B.The importance of protecting kittiwakes. |
C.The reasons for Kittiwakes flying so far. |
D.The process of kittiwakes' flying. |
A.Sport. | B.Nature. | C.Health. | D.Entertainment. |
【推荐2】Based on bone and tooth records, mammoths(猛犸象)were thought to have gone extinct about 12,000 years ago. But a new genetic sampling technique suggests the great beasts may have stuck around a lot longer. The story is in the soil.
Bones are rich sources of prehistoric genetic information, but not the only ones; items ranging from shed Ice Age skin cells to pine needles can contribute to the genetic record stored in dirt. Paleogeneticists(古遗传学家)have been analyzing "environmental DNA" from soil for a long time, but getting rid of non-DNA material without destroying these fragile clues is daunting(使人气馁的).
"Environmental samples contain a huge range of other chemical substances that are hard to separate from the DNA," says McMaster University geneticist Tyler Murchie. "We can't afford to lose whatever we can get."
In the new approach, soil samples are got and then broken into smaller portions, stirred and run through a "cold spin method" to separate as much DNA as possible. The DNA is then compared against an existing genetic library to detect species matches.
The method is limited because researchers using it need to know what DNA to look for. If a saber-toothed cat species is not already in the genetic library, the analysis cannot detect that animal. For known species, however, the process may yield exciting information. In their study, the researchers detected about 2,100 kinds of plants and 180 animals.
Not yet published results from other field sites are yielding similar results, Murchie says, and future fossil discoveries could strengthen the case. "We can use this approach to identify species in places and times we never knew they existed," he adds.
1. Why does the author mention "mammoths" in Paragraph 1?A.To present a fact. | B.To show us an extinct animal. |
C.To correct a mistake. | D.To introduce the topic of the passage. |
A.Challenging. | B.Interesting. |
C.Boring. | D.Satisfying. |
A.It is very slow. |
B.It can't detect unknown animals. |
C.It is not very accurate. |
D.It can only be carried out in the genetic library. |
A.A news report. | B.A short story. |
C.A book review. | D.A research report. |
【推荐3】Ten years ago, a typical patient at my plastic surgery clinic in McLean, Va., was 47 or 48. They generally wanted to look like a younger version of themselves. This might mean a face or neck lift, eyelid lifts, a skin-resurfacing procedure or Botox (肉毒杆菌) injections. ''What do you recommend? '' they'd ask. This is the kind of work I am expecting to do, and these are the consultations I am expecting to give.
Today, my average patient, according to my office records, is 38 or 39. They'll come in with a specific ''flaw'' on their faces and often know exactly what procedure they want. They are pretty sure that their noses are too big, their chins are too large, or their eyebrows appear dull. And these patients are much less realistic about what I can achieve. They will ask for Kim Kardashian's nose, even if their facial structure looks nothing like hers.
There’s a reason for this rapid and radical change: selfies. The self-taken photograph is greatly attacking the confidence of many younger people. They come to my offices, show me their selfies and point to a defect on their faces, which is a totally normal shape to me. Often they will have already searched online till they’ve found someone with a similar “issue” who fixed it with surgery. Once, a 20-year-old, having studied countless images of herself and searched hundreds of pictures of the ideal looks she wanted, said she needed a facelift. But to me, no 20-year-old needs a facelift.
Selfies also mislead people about how they look. Smartphone cameras get better each year, but photos taken at arm’s length or closer often produce a ''fish eye'' effect: whatever's at the center of the photo is bigger, and things on the edge are smaller. A study published in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery last year found that selfies make noses look 30 percent larger than they are.
A survey done by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons last year found that social media was driving more plastic surgery requests than any other social influence: more than TV, movies or magazines. People are spending more time looking at themselves, in an online environment where comparisons with others seem inevitable. Academic psychologist Brian Feinstein, who studied a sample of 268 college-age adults, has found that the more people use social media, the more they reflect on their own supposed drawbacks, and therefore causes self-confidence to drop.
1. Why did the author's typical patients want plastic surgery ten years ago?A.They were recommended to do so. |
B.They were unsatisfied with the faces they were born with. |
C.They’d like to look younger than they really were. |
D.The author expected them to do so. |
A.She is a patient of the author's. |
B.She is a model who has a beautiful nose. |
C.She is a doctor of plastic surgery. |
D.She is a fan of plastic surgery. |
A.Smartphone cameras can help people take better selfies. |
B.Smartphone cameras make people look at their selfies through a fish eye. |
C.People usually take photos at arm's length or closer. |
D.Smartphone cameras make people's faces in a selfie unreal. |
A.Selfies Are Weakening Self-confidence. |
B.Young People Like to Take Selfies. |
C.More People Are Getting Plastic Surgery. |
D.People Like to Look Better in Selfies. |
【推荐1】Someday soon an emoji (表情符号)might really save lives.
Hiroyuki Komatsu is a Google engineer who suggested adding a series of new emojis to the standard emoji library. It could help those with food allergies (过敏)understand what they are eating anywhere in the world. Emojis should cover characters representing major food causing allergies. They make people understand what are used in foods even in foreign countries and safely select meals.
Emojis are universal because they are chosen and developed by the Unicode Consortium, a non-profit company that oversees, develops and maintains how text is represented. This is in regards to all software products and standards. It's thanks to the Unicode Standard that when you text a friend six pizza emojis, they’ll see those six pizza pieces on their phone. This is true regardless of whether they use an iPhone or an Android.
Because emojis are everywhere and visual(视觉的),they could be helpful for restaurants and food packaging designers. They can communicate whether a product is made with common causing-allergy food. But as Komatsu’s advice argues, many of the most common causing-allergy foods are missing or poorly represented by the present emoji library. For example, there is an emoji for octopus, but nothing for squid. There is a loaf of bread that could symbolize grain, but a picture of wheat could be clearer. The emojis can be more direct when symbolizing foods.
It’s not uncommon for the Unicode Consortium to add new emojis to the library: several food-related emojis were put into use last June, including some long-waited food emojis. Apple included support for multiracial emojis in a recent iOS update. An artist even recreated Moby-Dick in emoji characters. Some might be sorry for the continuing death of the written word if Komatsu’s suggestion is accepted, but look on the bright side: if you ever see that happy poop on a box, you’ll know to stay away.
1. How will emojis save lives according to the text?A.By showing what the food contains visually. | B.By telling the safest places in the world. |
C.By teaching people how to treat allergies. | D.By adding standard emojis about safety. |
A.Emojis have the same meanings around the world. |
B.The Unicode Consortium is a non-profit company. |
C.What emojis represent is different in different places. |
D.Different mobile operating systems have different emojis. |
A.Emojis are easy to mix up. | B.Present emojis are not enough. |
C.Emojis can't interest most users. | D.Emojis can't represent foods directly. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Worried. | C.Supportive. | D.Uninterested. |
【推荐2】All day long, litter builds up between brain cells.A study now finds that trash(垃圾)is washed away by fluids in the brain during sleep.That's potentially good news because such garbage(废物) includes a substance linked to Alzheimer's disease.
Evidence of this brain washing emerged in a study on mice.But the finding gave researchers an idea of what may happen in the brains of sleeping people.
A sleep researcher at the University of WisconsinMadison, Chiara Cirelli called the new finding “eyeopening and exciting”.
Maiken Nedergaard is a neuroscientist.Her team had been studying a drainage process in the brain that acts like a sewer system(排水系统). What the scientists hadn't expected was to find that this system performs a different role during sleep than it does while animals are awake.As animals slept, fluids began flowing from the brain into the spaces between brain cells.These fluids washed away the junk that had built up while animals were awake.
Other studies had shown that during waking hours, brain cells pump out bits of protein and other substances.The longer someone stays awake, the more litter builds up.That trash includes proteins that gather in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease, which causes people to lose the ability to think, learn and remember.
Once mice fell asleep, fluids flowed into their brains.“It was almost like you opened a tap”, Nedergaard said.As the fluid passed through the spaces between brain cells, it washed away the litter.The tap slowed to a trickle(涓流) when mice woke up.
The scientists then looked closely at the brain cells.They found that the cells shrank during slumber(睡眠)—enough to open space through which the fluid can flow freely.When mice were awake, the cells swelled, lessening the fluid's flow.
The newfound housecleaning activity occurs in a part of the brain that few people study, noted scientist Houzel.“That space between brain cells is usually disregarded.It's considered just space, ”she said.
The new discovery also may help scientists solve an ageold mystery:Why do animals sleep?Every animal does it.Without it, they die, although no one knows why.Some studies suggest that the brain solidifies memories during sleep.However, Nedergaard notes, “You don't die from forgetting what you learned yesterday.”
1. According to the text, Maiken's discovery was________.A.a real surprise | B.a natural result |
C.a big reward | D.a personal purpose |
A.brain cells take in more proteins |
B.litter of proteins build up in our brains |
C.fluids in the brain continue flowing |
D.our brains have more fluids flow |
A.is in fact a kind of space |
B.has ever been carefully studied |
C.used to be regarded as unimportant |
D.is where litter is stored in the end |
【推荐3】The world produces around 359 million tons of plastics each year. Plastics are certainly a big problem, but they don’t necessarily have to be. There are many ways we could set plastics on a different lifecycle. One that I have been working on is turning plastics into a hardy, reliable and sustainable building material.
Most people believe that plastics recycling is severely limited: only a few types can be recycled at all. This is unsurprising. The proportion(比例)of plastics that are recycled is minimal. But all polymers(聚合物)are, technologically, recyclable. Some of them can be used again and again to produce the same goods. Some can technically be reprocessed into new materials for different applications.
The problem is that recycling much of this plastic waste is currently unprofitable. But the amount of these materials all over the world is large and keeps on growing. What if this plastic waste could be used to produce something useful to the society? Many universities and business people are attempting to do this. Most solutions target mixed plastic waste and suggest applications different from the original ones. For example, several groups have developed building materials made of plastic waste. Plastics are strong, durable, waterproof, lightweight and recyclable—all key properties for construction materials. So what if all of this plastic waste could be turned into building materials for low-income populations? Existing initiatives are promising, but not yet reproducible on an industrial scale.
I study plastic waste with the aim of finding interesting ways to remove it from the environment. From agricultural waste to concrete waste, mixed with recycled plastics, there are many ways to obtain materials to produce bricks and other useful elements for buildings. So perhaps plastics are not necessarily the problem. They can be part of a pathway towards a more sustainable way of living.
1. What’s people’s common belief about plastic recycling?A.Almost all plastic waste can be reused. | B.The methods are quite limited. |
C.Not many kinds of plastics are recyclable. | D.The amount is unbelievably large. |
A.Plastic waste is on the decline globally. |
B.Recycling plastics doesn’t make money now. |
C.Plastic buildings have been largely constructed. |
D.New applications of plastics haven’t been found. |
A.They can resist water and won’t last long. |
B.They can be reproduced in large quantity. |
C.They satisfy the needs of low-income people. |
D.They meet most demands of building materials. |
A.Positive. | B.Anxious. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Critical. |