Working out can help teenagers improve their grades, a new study suggests. Adolescents who regularly participated in exercise showed long-term improvements in their academic performance, the British Journal of Sports Medicine study reported.
“Our study suggests that the effect of physical activity may be quite large,” John Reilly, a professor at the University of Strathclyde said. The researchers looked at a sample of about 5000 children who were involved in a long-term study that tracks children born in the U.K. between 1991 and 1992. When children reached 11 years old, their daily physical activity levels were measured using an device (装置) for three to seven days. The device, similar to a pedometer (计步器) tracking the number of steps taken. recorded the average time children exercised, which was 29 minutes a day for boys and 18 for girls.
“The actual levels of daily physical activity at age 11 were quite low.” Mr. Reilly noted. The children had their academic performance tested at ages 11 and 13 with national tests, and also at 15 or 16 with GCSE exam. The tests assessed the children’s abilitics in English, math and science subjects. The results showed that the more children participated in physical activity, the higher their test scores were at age 11 in all three subjects. For girls, science scores were most strongly linked to exercise.
When children were tested again at age 13, their academic scores were still linked to how much they had exercised when they were 11 years old. By the time the youngsters took the GCSE exam. each 17-minute-per-day increase in physical activity for the boys was linked to an improvement in their scores. Every additional 12-minute increase a day in exercise for the girls was also linked to an increased score, especially in the science category.
The researchers have called for more studies to look at the possible academic benefits that could be derived if students exercised the recommended 60 minutes or more a day.
1. What is the function of the device used in the study?A.To record how long students exercise. |
B.To record the walking speed of students. |
C.To record how many steps students walk. |
D.To record the number of calories students consume. |
A.Students at age 11 do more exercise than at other ages. |
B.Boys at age 13 get more benefits by doing more exercise. |
C.Girls’ science scores are more closely related to exercise. |
D.More and more students do exercise to improve their scores. |
A.judged. | B.gained. | C.announced. | D.reduced. |
A.The benefits of students’ participating in sports |
B.The secret of students’ ranking high in class |
C.The influence of exercise on students’ scores |
D.The ways of improving students’ physical conditions |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】If there were an app on your phone that could improve your memory, would you try it? Who wouldn’t want a better memory? After all, our memory can be easily damaged by diseases, injuries, bad mental health conditions and, most particularly for all of us, aging.
Nowadays, there are a large number of apps that provide memory training. Can they help you remember to take medicine, do better on a school exam, remember the name of the person whom you met yesterday? Some scientists question whether this is possible. Undoubtedly, many of the brain training companies today exaggerate(夸大) the benefits of using their apps.
Scientists have provided proof that brain training does not benefit everyone in the same way. It is suggested that little consideration has been given to who would benefit most from those brain training apps. Will they only be those who have some forms of memory impairment(缺陷),or those eager for self-improvement even though they are already functioning very well?
To overcome these limitations, our team has started a new study aiming to find 30,000 volunteers to help us decide which form of training may be the best for individuals. Our goal is to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. Instead of focusing on the simple question of whether brain training works, we are considering covering the whole population in a new challenge to test for whom brain training works, and under which conditions.
1. What can affect our memory in particular?A.Getting ill. | B.Being injured. |
C.Being upset. | D.Getting old. |
A.Supportive. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Objective. | D.Optimistic. |
A.To test whether brain training works. |
B.To develop a training that suits all the people. |
C.To compete with other memory training organizations. |
D.To find the best form of training for different people. |
A.A fashion magazine. | B.A tour guide. |
C.A science website. | D.A personal blog. |
【推荐2】Have you ever found yourself starting to yawn just because you saw someone else do it? It’s not your imagination: Yawns really are contagious (传染的)!
Scientists have been trying for a while to figure out why yawns are so easy to “catch”. But for now, they’re not even sure why the yawns you let out when you’re sleepy or bored happen. It’s possible that a yawn serves to cool down your brain or other parts of your body. It might serve to keep your body alert (警惕的) when you’re tired.
That’s one theory about why yawns are contagious. If they’re meant to perk (振作) us up when we might be in danger, it’s useful for them to spread quickly through a group. It’s common for social animals such as humans to copy one another’s behaviors to fit in, especially when that behavior is something that might be useful to their survival. That’s why some research focuses on whether contagious yawning is related to empathy (同理心).
“Empathy can be defined by the ability to understand, share and be affected by the states or emotions of others. So, if seeing someone yawn makes you yawn in response, this action could be placed within a category (范畴) of empathy,” says Andrew C. Gallup, a professor of psychology. Some studies have tried to see whether people and animals with more empathy are more likely to catch yawns. But Gallup says more study is needed to know for sure.
While yawns and their catchiness remain unclear, we do know we’re not alone in spreading them around. Scientists have seen evidence of monkeys and dogs catching yawns. Dogs actually catch yawns from humans, not other dogs. If we can figure out why these animals share yawns with their friends, it might help us understand why we do it, too.” There are a number of other behaviors that are contagious, such as laughing and itching.” Gallup says. One thing is certain: reading this story probably made you yawn!
1. Why does the author ask a question in the first paragraph?A.To introduce how yawns are copied |
B.To stress the importance of empathy. |
C.To let readers notice the fact that yawns can be caught. |
D.To show the influence of yawning on social relationships. |
A.By giving examples | B.By analyzing reasons. |
C.By describing processes. | D.By making comparisons. |
A.It increases understanding between each other. |
B.It should be avoided in social occasions. |
C.It has something to do with empathy. |
D.It helps lift people’ s spirits. |
A.Dogs catch yawns from other dogs. |
B.Humans can catch yawns from their pets. |
C.Laughter is more contagious than yawns. |
D.Reading about yawns can also make people yawn. |
【推荐3】Scientists are working to stop a deadly virus that infects(感染)pigs. The virus is causing huge losses for farmers in China and other Asian countries. Many farmers have tried to contain African swine flu by quarantining(隔离)pigs and destroying infected animals. But the spread of the disease into East Asia has stepped up the search for other ways to deal with the problem.
The virus had not been considered a major concern for researchers until it appeared in China last year. Chinese farmers raise about half of the world's pigs. Some researchers think the virus might have come from infected animals in Eastern Europe or Russia. Since then, it has spread to China, Vietnam and other Asian countries. Millions of pigs have been destroyed.
Although swine flu does not sicken people, it is very infectious and deadly to pigs. "Today's situation, where you have this global danger, puts a lot more emphasis on this research,” said Doctor Luis Rodriguez. He spoke to The Associated Press. Rodriguez leads the United States government laboratory for foreign animal diseases at Plum Island , New York. As a deadly virus kills pigs across Asia, scientists are accelerating efforts to develop a vaccine (疫苗).
Vaccines often are developed by killing a virus before it is put into an animal. The disabled virus does not make the animal sick, but it activates the body's natural defenses against disease. The immune(免疫的)system is then able to identify the virus and produce antibodies against it.
However, this method is not effective with all viruses including the one that causes African swine flu. For swine flu, scientists have been working on a different kind of vaccine. It is made from a weakened virus, not a dead one. The problem for researchers has been how to change the virus so it can be safely used.
Vietnam's government reported a few weeks ago that it was testing vaccines, but provided few details of its programs. In China, the government said scientists are working on a vaccine that genetically changes the virus. That is similar to a method being used by scientists in the United States.
1. Why did the virus cause the researchers' concern when appearing in China?A.The virus may infect people. |
B.The number of pigs raised in China is huge. |
C.The virus may be completely out of control. |
D.Chinese science and technology is not advanced. |
A.Eastern Europe or Russia. | B.Vietnam. |
C.African countries. | D.America. |
A.It makes people fall ill. |
B.It destroys the immune system of animals. |
C.It helps the body produce antibodies against disease. |
D.It makes the body's natural defense against disease work. |
A.The Emphasis of the Virus Research |
B.Swine Flu Leads to the Deaths of Lots of Pigs |
C.Scientists Hurry to Develop Vaccine for Swine Flu |
D.New Results About Government Laboratory for Animal Diseases |
【推荐1】Our world is full of sounds. Sound is so essential to life and survival that it made Tel Aviv University researcher Lilach Hadany ask: What if it wasn't just animals that could sense sound—what if plants could, too?
“Sounds are a natural resource-one that plants would be wasting if they didn’t take advantage of it as animals do,”said Hadany. If plants had a way of hearing and responding to sound, she figured, it could help them survive and reproduce.
Hadany's team started their study by investigating flowers. Evening primrose(夜来香), which grows wild on the beaches and in parks around Tel Aviv, emerged as a good candidate, since it has a long bloom time and produces measurable quantities of nectar(花蜜).
To test the primroses in the lab, Hadany's team exposed plants to five sound treatments: silence, recordings of a honeybee from four inches away, and computer generated sounds in low, intermediate(中等的), and high frequencies. Plants given the silent treatment had no significant increase in nectar sugar concentration. The same went for plants exposed to high-frequency(158 to 160 kilohertz)and intermediate-frequency(34 to 35 kilohertz)sounds.
But for plants exposed to playbacks of bee sounds(0.2 to 0.5 kilohertz)and similarly low-frequency sounds(0.05 to 1 kilohertz), the final analysis revealed an unmistakable response. Within three minutes of exposure to these recordings, nectar sugar concentration in the plants increased by 20 percent.
A sweeter treat for pollinators(传粉者), their theory goes, may draw in more insects, potentially increasing the chances of successful cross-pollination. Indeed, in field observations, researchers found that pollinators were more than nine times more common around plants another pollinator had visited within the previous six minutes.
“We were quite surprised when we found out that it actually worked.” said Hadany.“But after repeating it in other situations, in different seasons, and with plants grown both indoors and outdoors, we feel very confident in the result.”
1. Why did Hadany's team expose plants to sound treatments?A.To see if they would respond to sound. |
B.To develop their ability to receive sound. |
C.To help them benefit from different sounds. |
D.To detect the difference between plants and animals. |
A.Flowers like primroses | B.Sounds like those of bees. |
C.Visits from other pollinators. | D.Exposure to different sounds |
A.Plants can identify different sounds. | B.Sound attracts more pollinators to flowers. |
C.Plants produce nectar when pollinators come. | D.Sound plays an important role in insects’ survival. |
A.It was doubtful. | B.It was unexpected. | C.It was acceptable | D.It was satisfactory. |
【推荐2】Coal burning deep underground in China,India and Indonesia is threatening the environment and human life, scientists have warned. These large-scale underground fires cause the ground temperature to heat up and kill surrounding vegetation, produce greenhouse gases and can even bring about forest fires, a panel(专门小组)of scientists told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Denver. They warned the resulting release of poisonous elements like arsenic (砷)and mercury(汞)can also pollute local water sources and soils “Coal fires are a global disaster,” said Associate Professor Glenn Stracher of East Georgia College in Swainsboro, U.S.A. But surprisingly few people know about them.
Coal can heat up on its own, and eventually catch fire and burn, if there is a continuous oxygen supply. The heat produced is not caused to disappear and under the right combinations of sunlight and oxygen, can trigger spontaneous(自然产生的)catching fire and burning. This can occur underground in coal stockpiles(煤堆), abandoned mines or even as coal is transported. Such fires in China destroy up to 200 million tons of coal per year, delegates were told. In comparison, the U. S. economy consumes about one billion tons of coal annually, said Stracher, whose analysis of the likely effect of coal fires has been accepted for publication in the International journal of Coal Ecology. Once underway, coal fires can burn for decades, even centuries. In the process, they release large volumes of greenhouse gases, poisonous fumes and black particles into the atmosphere.
The members of the panel discussed the effect these fires may be having on global and regional climate change, and agreed that the underground nature of the fires makes them difficult to detect(发现). One of the members of the panel, Assistant Professor Paul Van Dijk of the International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation in the Netherlands, has been working with the Chinese government to detect and monitor fires in the northern regions of the country.
The remote sensing and other techniques will allow scientists to estimate how much carbon dioxide these fires are emitting. One suggested method of controlling the fires was presented by Gary Colaizzi, of the engineering firm Goodson, which has developed a beat-resistant grout designed to be pumped into the coal fire to cut off the oxygen supply.
1. According to Paragraph 2, what will happen when the underground heat does not disappear? ________.A.Coal heats up on its own and catches fire and burns. |
B.The underground oxygen will be used up. |
C.Poisonous fumes and greenhouse gases will be accumulated underground. |
D.There will be an increase of abandoned mines. |
A.Annual consumption of coal in US. |
B.Annual consumption of coal in China. |
C.How long coal fires have lasted in the northern region of China. |
D.Coal fires may have an effect on the environment. |
A.He was one of the scientists who have warned against the threats of underground fires. |
B.He has detected and monitored underground fires in the Netherlands. |
C.He has worked with the Chinese government on the underground fires issue. |
D.He works for a research institute in the Netherlands. |
A.Using remote sensing technique. |
B.Controlling the release of carbon dioxide. |
C.Cutting off the oxygen supply. |
D.Making the soil heat resistant. |
【推荐3】If you easily make mistakes when in a hurry, a new study from Michigan State University—the largest of its kind to date-found that meditation (冥想) could help you improve the situation.
The research tested how open monitoring meditation (OMM)—or, meditation that focuses awareness on feelings or thoughts as they unfold in one’s mind and body—altered brain activity in a way that suggested increased error recognition.
“People’s interest in meditation is outpacing what science can prove in terms of effects and benefits.” said Jeff Lin, MSU psychology doctoral candidate and study co-author. “But it’s amazing to me that we were able to see how one session of a guided meditation could produce changes to brain activity in non-meditators.”
“Some forms of meditation have you focus on a single object, commonly your breath, but open monitoring meditation is a bit different,” Lin said, “It has you tune inward and pay attention to everything going on in your mind and body. The goal is to sit quietly and pay close attention to where the mind travels without getting too caught up in the scenery.”
Lin and his MSU co-authors—William Eckerle, Ling Peng and Jason Moser—hired more than 200 participants to test how open monitoring meditation affected how people detect and respond to errors.
The participants, who had never meditated before, were taken through a 20-minute open monitoring meditation exercise while the researchers measured brain activity through electroencephalography (脑电图), or EEG. Then, they completed a computerized distraction (分心) test.
“The EEG can measure brain activity at the millisecond level, so we got precise measures of brain activity right after mistakes compared to correct responses,” Lin said. “A certain neural signal occurs about half a second after an error called the error positivity, which is linked to conscious error recognition. We found that the strength of this signal is increased in the meditators relative to controls.”
“These findings show what just 20 minutes of open monitoring meditation can do to improve the brain’s ability to detect and pay attention to mistakes,” Moser said.
1. What does the underlined word “altered” in paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Changed. | B.Prevented. | C.Started. | D.Recorded. |
A.It is just aimed at a single object. | B.It clears your mind of everything. |
C.It gets too caught up in the scenery. | D.It focuses on where the mind travels. |
A.They hired people who had meditated before. | B.They measured the participants’ brain activity. |
C.They reminded the participants to avoid errors. | D.They had non-meditators design a distraction test. |
A.Turn to OMM to Avoid Acting in a Hurry | B.You’re Able to Recognize Errors Consciously |
C.Meditators’ Brain Proves Much More Active | D.OMM Can Help You Make Fewer Mistakes |