Most of us have heard the term "runner's high," but what exactly does this mean? Exercise creates chemical responses in the brain, which lead to both temporary and long-term mental health benefits. Here is how it works:
What happens when we are stressed?
●Cortisol(皮质醇): This stress hormone is linked to mood, motivation and fear. It also alters immune system responses and suppresses the digestive system.
●Adrenaline(肾上腺素): This stress hormone raises your heart rate, elevates blood pressure, and boosts energy stores.
●Hypothalamus(下丘脑): This region of the brain is the body's natural alarm system which stimulates the production of cortisol and adrenaline.
●Hippocampus(海马体): Too much cortisol cuts cell production in the brain's hippocampus region, damaging thought organization and memory formation.
Feeling overwhelmed? Hit the gym!
As your heart begins to pound, your brain chemistry reacts almost immediately to get you feeling better both physically and mentally.
Brain derived neurotrophic factor: BDNF protects the brain from emotional disorders and repairs damage from stress and depression. | Norepinephrine: This neurotransmitter works with dopamine(多巴胺)as a "feel good" mood-boosting chemical. It is also critical in the decision-making process. |
GABA: Exercise lowers stress levels, which triggers the release of this calming neurotransmitter(神经递质). Frequent boosts of GABA build immunity to stress, enhancing your ability to take on life's challenges. | Antibodies(抗体): Both exercise and happiness increase antibody production. Antibodies are special proteins produced by the immune system to help fight viruses, bacteria and diseases. |
Endocannabinoids: These natural chemical compounds play a role in processing appetite, pain sensation, mood and memory. They are very closely related to the active ingredients of the cannabis(大麻)plant. | Dopamine: This neurotransmitter is a "feel good" mood-boosting chemical. It also controls the brain's reward and pleasure center and is responsible for feelings of relaxation and great joy. |
Endorphins: Endorphins naturally get most of the credit for feelings of extreme happiness, but they play only a small part in the exercise-induced rush. These pain fighting peptides increase with as little as 20 minutes of exercise. | Serotonin(血清素): This neurotransmitter is responsible for feelings of calmness and hopefulness. Low levels are linked to depression. Antidepressants increase these levels, and so does exercise. |
A.frequently get sick | B.have a poor memory |
C.easily lose his temper | D.lose his appetite |
A.GABA | B.dopamine |
C.endorphins | D.norepinephrine |
A.In a fashion magazine. | B.In a physics textbook. |
C.In a popular science book. | D.In an academic paper. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】If you have always suspected that you might just be a mosquito magnet (招蚊子的人),scientists now have evidence for you: Mosquitoes indeed are attracted to certain humans more than others, according to a new study.
A research team at Rockefeller University sought to identify why certain people seem to draw more mosquitoes than others. Over the course of three years, researchers asked a group of 64 volunteers to wear nylon stockings on their arms for six hours a day over multiple days. Maria Elena De Obaldia, the study’s first author, constructed a glass container in which researchers put two of the stockings. The study team then released yellow fever mosquitoes into the container and observed which stocking drew more insects.
This test allowed researchers to separate study participants into mosquito magnets, whose stockings drew lots of mosquitoes, and low at tractors, who didn’t seem attractive to the insects. The scientists examined carefully the skin of the mosquito magnets and found 50 molecular compounds (分子化合物) that were higher in these participants than the others.
“We didn’t hold certain expectations about what we would find,” said Vosshall, one of the researchers. But one difference was particularly distinctive: The mosquito magnets had much higher rates of carboxylic acid (羧酸) on their skin than the low at tractors. Carboxylic acids are found in sebum, the oily substance that creates a barrier and helps protect our skin.
“The carboxylic acids are large molecules,” Vosshall explained. “They’re not that smelly by themselves,” she said. But beneficial bacteria on the skin chew on these acids that produce the characteristic smell of humans, which may be what attracts mosquitoes, according to Vosshall.
Carboxylic acids are just one piece of the puzzle in explaining how the annoying insects might choose their targets. Body heat and the carbon dioxide we release when we breathe also attract mosquitoes to humans.
Scientists still don’t know why carboxylic acids seem to attract mosquitoes so strongly. The next step might be to explore the effects of reducing carboxylic acids on the skin.
1. Why did the researchers carry out the test in the container?A.To free people from mosquitoes. | B.To identify mosquito magnets. |
C.To distinguish certain mosquitoes. | D.To better attract other insects. |
A.The feature of human skin. | B.The definition of acid. |
C.The expectation of the researchers. | D.The finding of the study. |
A.Beneficial bacteria. | B.Body heat. |
C.Carbon dioxide. | D.Human sweat. |
A.They never wear stockings in summer. | B.They feature higher body temperature. |
C.Their root cause has remained unclear. | D.Their daily routine differs from others’. |
【推荐2】Owning a dog is associated with a significantly lower risk of heart disease and death, according to a comprehensive new study published by a team of Swedish researchers on Friday in the journal Scientific Reports.
The scientists followed 3.4 million people over the course of 12 years and found that adults who lived alone and owned a dog were 33 percent less likely to die during the study than adults who lived alone without dogs. In addition, the single adults with dogs were 36 percent less likely to die from heart disease.
“Dog ownership was especially prominent as a protective factor in persons living alone, which is a group reported previously to be at higher risk of heart disease and death than those living in a multi-person household,” Mwenya Mubanga, a Ph.D. student at Uppsala University in Uppsala, Sweden, and the lead junior author of the study, said in a statement announcing its findings. The link between dog ownership and lower mortality(死亡率)was less pronounced in adults who lived either with family members or partners, but still present, according to the study. “Perhaps a dog may stand in as an important family member in the single households,” Mubanga added. “Another interesting finding was that owners of dogs which were intended originally for hunting were most protected.”
The study, which is the largest to date on the health relations of owning a dog, suggested that some of the reasons dog owners may have a lower risk of mortality and heart disease were because dog owners walk more. “These kind of epidemiological (流行病学的)studies look for associations in large populations but do not provide answers on whether and how dogs could protect their owners from heart disease,” Tove Fall, a senior author of the study and a professor at Uppsala University, said in a statement
“We know that dog owners in general have a higher level of physical activity, which could be one explanation to the observed results,” Fall added. “Other explanations include an increased well-being and social contacts or effects of the dog on the bacterial microbiome(微生物菌群) in the owner.” Fall added that because all participants of dog owners in Sweden or other “European populations with similar culture regarding dog ownership.”
1. Why did the researchers do the study related to 3.4 million people’s health and the dogs?A.To help Europeans, |
B.To find their association. |
C.To protect unhealthy adults. |
D.To reduce risk of heart disease. |
A.Universal. | B.Confusing. |
C.Appealing. | D.Important |
A.Adults living with dogs are less likely to die. |
B.Swedish people are very fond of animal pets. |
C.Keeping a dog is a popular and healthy hobby. |
D.Owning dogs reduces the risk of heart disease. |
A.Positive. | B.Negative. |
C.Objective. | D.Contradictory. |
【推荐3】New research in monkeys may provide a clue about how the brain manages vast amounts of information and remembers what it needs.
The researchers found that when monkeys were taught to remember computer clip art pictures, their brains reduced the level of detail by sorting the pictures into categories for recall, such as images that contained "people," "buildings," "flowers," and "animals." The categorizing cells were found in the hippocampus, an area of the brain that processes sensory information into memory. In the experiment each monkey was shown one clip art picture, and after a delay of one to 30 seconds, picked the original out of two to six different images to get a juice reward.
By recording cell activity during hundreds of these trials in which the pictures were all different, the researchers noticed that certain cells were more active when the pictures contained similar features, such as images of people – but not other objects. They found that different cells coded images that fit different categories. The category cells grouped images based on common features – a strategy to improve memory. For example, the same cell responded to both tulips and daisies because they are both flowers."
“While such categorization is a highly efficient memory process, it may also have a downside,” said Deadwyler Ph.D., “ when the trials included more than one picture with people in it, instead of different images, the monkeys often confused the image with a picture of other people." So learning more about how the brain remembers could have far-reaching benefits. "If we can understand in advance how the brain works when decisions are made, we can predict when the brain will make a mistake, and correct it," said Tim Pons, Ph.D., "This finding about how large amounts of information are processed by the brain will help us to ultimately achieve that goal."
1. The purpose of the experiments on monkeys is to find out _________.A.how the brain processes amounts of information into memory |
B.the area of the brain that processes sensory information into memory |
C.how the monkeys respond to different things |
D.what is the monkeys most likely to remember |
A.remembering the details |
B.separating it into categories |
C.showing a lot of pictures |
D.remembering all features |
A.Books, toys and cars |
B.Plants, animals and people |
C.Tulips, daisies and roses |
D.People, buildings and flowers |
A.Further study on how the brain remembers has more benefits |
B.Categorization is the best way to improve memory |
C.We can predict when the brain will make a mistake |
D.How the brain remembers has been found out |
【推荐1】The Sanxingdui Ruins site is one of the greatest archaeological (考古学的) discoveries of the 20th century in the world. It is located near the Yazihe River at Guanghan City, Sichuan Province and as Sichuan is where the ancient state of Shu (蜀国) was located, it is believed that Sanxingdui was the capital of the ancient “Shu culture”.
The site was originally discovered in the 1920s by a farmer. A huge surprise came in 1986 when two sacrificial pits (祭祀坑) filled with more than 1,000 cultural relics, including gold masks, bronze sacred trees, bronze ware, jade ware and ivory, were discovered by local workers excavating (挖掘) clay for bricks.
On March 20, 2021, officials announced that they had discovered six new sacrificial pits at the Sanxingdui Ruins site and have found nearly 500 important cultural relics to date. The finding quickly gained attention worldwide.
During about a year of hard work, nearly 2,000 cultural relics were unearthed in these six newly discovered sacrificial pits. In September, officials held another media briefing and announced the discovery of 1,771 cultural relics from the number three and number four pits, of which 557 relics were relatively complete and the rest are fragments.
Among the items, the gold mask is the most impressive. It was found in June. After restoration, it turned out to be the biggest complete gold mask found at the site, with fine texture and quality. Three bronze figures (雕像) with their palms pressed together and their heads twisted to the right, were also a unique find among Sanxingdui items in terms of their shape and decorative pattern.
Experts said that these new discoveries provided further material for studying the bronze casting (铸造) technology of the Shu people as well as their art, religious beliefs, social system and cultural exchanges with surrounding areas.
1. Who was the first to have discovered the Sanxingdui Ruins?A.An official. | B.A farmer. | C.A worker. | D.An archaeologist. |
A.Large items. | B.Broken pieces. | C.Good qualities. | D.Impressive looks. |
A.The religious symbols. | B.The fine texture and quality. |
C.Their size and material. | D.Their shape and decorations. |
A.The importance of the new discoveries. | B.The further studies of Sanxingdui Ruins. |
C.The casting technology of the Shu people. | D.The cultural exchanges with other countries. |
【推荐2】Yes, having a big name in science will help get your paper published, a new study confirms. Just 10% of reviewers of a test paper recommended acceptance when the only listed author was not well-known — but 59% endorsed the same paper when it carried the name of a Nobel winner.
The study, which involved inviting hundreds of researchers to review an economics paper, is incredible”, says Mario Malicki, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University and editor-in-chief of Research Integrity and Peer Review, who was not involved in the research. “It is the largest randomized controlled trial we have seen on publication bias (发表偏见).”
For years, scientists complained about the Matthew effect, a term invented in 1968 by sociologists Robert Merton and Harriet Zuckerman to describe how high-status researchers tend to get disproportionately (不成比例地) more of the same.
But efforts to document such bias often had weaknesses, such as a small sample size or lack of randomization. To avoid those problems, a team led by Jürgen Huber of the University of Innsbruck emailed some 3300 researchers, asking whether they could review an economics study prepared for a real journal. The study had two authors, both at Chapman University: Vernon Smith, a 2002 Nobel winner in economics and Sabiou Inoua, one of Smith’s former Ph.D. students. The potential peer reviewers were sent one of three descriptions of the paper. One named only Smith, listing him as the corresponding author, another, only Inoua; and a third, no author.
Ultimately, 821 researchers agreed to review, the team reported last week at the International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication in Chicago. Smith’s fame appeared to influence the responses: Of the researchers given just his name, 38.5% accepted the invitation to review; the figures were 30.7% for those given no name and 28.5% for those given just Inoua’s.
1. Which can replace the underlined word “endorsed” in the first paragraph?A.Approved of. | B.Contradicted. |
C.Ignored. | D.Tolerated. |
A.He once won a Nobel prize. | B.He thinks highly of the study. |
C.He is an editor of Stanford University. | D.He is the leader of the study. |
A.To prove the value of science publication. |
B.To overcome the weaknesses of previous studies. |
C.To review an economics study for a journal. |
D.To compare the achievement of two economists. |
A.Complaints about publication bias. | B.The discovery of Matthew effect. |
C.Fame matters in publication. | D.Ways to document publication bias. |
【推荐3】Who do you count as your friends? From our BFF (best friend forever) to a work mate, it’s good to have someone to chew the fat with or offer comfort and support. But when it comes to friendship, is it more important to have quantity or quality?
The recent isolation we have endured due to the coronavirus pandemic has made some of us question our friendships. We’ve fallen out of touch with friends and acquaintances, and it may feel awkward, but do we actually have to rekindle every relationship we once had? It might be time to take stock and think about who you kept in touch with, who you missed talking to, and who you didn’t. In short, maybe it’s time to reset your list of real mates.
There’s no obligation to stay friends, and writing for the programme Worklife, Bryan Lufkin says, “While people have known for years that friendships are unquestionably good for your health, experts say it’s only natural for acquaintances and even friends to fall by the wayside as time goes on — and it’s nothing to feel guilty about.”
Of course, it can be hard to choose who’s in your friendship circle. This is what Suzanne Degges-White, professor of counselling at Northern Illinois University, calls our “friendscape”. She says, “In life, as we go through certain stages and ages, our attention shifts, and we want to be around people who are like us.”
So, changing friends is normal, but we still need those special pals who’ve known us long term. These are friendships we invest time in. According to Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology at the University of Oxford, these are your inner circle of friends — your “shoulders to cry on” — and you have to see them at least once a week to keep them in that circle. He adds that the friends that do drift are mostly “friendships of convenience”. But the advice for maintaining a good friendship is to share how you feel with someone you trust — this can help strengthen your friendship as well as giving you both a chance to support each other.
1. According to Bryan Lufkin, how should we feel about losing contact with a friend?A.Guiltless. | B.Ashamed. | C.Blameworthy. | D.Indifferent. |
A.The recent isolation we have endured due to the coronavirus pandemic, has enabled some of us to make contact with some friends. |
B.Suzanne Degges-White says we want to be around people who differ from us. |
C.Sharing how you feel with someone you trust maintains a good friendship. |
D.Your inner circle of friends are just friends of convenience. |
A.What is friendship? | B.Why should we have friends? |
C.Are friends helpful to our health? | D.Is there a friend for life? |