Do you know that forests cover an estimated 38 percent of the total land surface of the European Union (EU)? And that these extensive areas covered with trees and underbrush need to be protected so they can continue to do good for the environment for the next generation? Now the EU has just come up with is ambitious new “Forest Strategy”.
Forests can fight against climate change and prevent biodiversity loss They can reduce the impacts of climate change by cooling down cities, protecting us from heavy flooding, and reducing drought impacts. They are valuable ecosystems that are home to a major part of the world’s plants and animals. But forests also improve our health and well-being through functions like water regulation, erosion (侵蚀) control and air purification. And they serve as ideal settings for “recreation, relaxation and learning, as well as securing livelihoods”.
This new European- wide forest conservation vision takes in an impressive commitment to plant a minimum of three billion additional trees over the next decade. This is an ambitious plan but a long overdue one because forests have been battered by severe weather and human impacts, particularly the demand for wood over the last ten years. As the EU Observer puts it,“extreme weather events and the increasing demand for forest services and products, driven by wood-based bioenergy and international trade, have accelerated tree cover loss in the last decade.”
This EU strategy takes into account the complexity of ; forest sustainability. Observation, knowledge exchange, ongoing monitoring and close cooperation between public and private organizations and individuals are also key elements in this new continent- wide forest protection strategy.
This is a future- focused blueprint, designed to protect these precious green areas, and ensure that the trees and greenery are here to stay!
1. Why are two questions raised in the beginning?A.To tell us the EU’s forest coverage. |
B.To call on people to protect forests. |
C.To explain the reason for the strategy. |
D.To encourage more forest expansion. |
A.The urgency of the strategy. |
B.The importance of forests. |
C.The background of the strategy. |
D.The environmental role of forests. |
A.Preserved. | B.Controlled. | C.Removed. | D.Damaged. |
A.Planting Trees for the World |
B.Irreplaceable Benefits of Forests |
C.EU’s Action to Protect the Earth |
D.Taking Forests into the Future |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Back in 2001,Pen Hadow and I traveled to the North Pole.One morning we’d just taken down our tent and started skiing. Pen was in front,and I was following him.Suddenly I got a strange feeling that something was behind us. I stopped,looked back and saw a polar bear, walking towards us.
Pen and I planned to stay where we were, try and look big, and frighten it away. Pen had a shotgun that we’d bought in Russia.That was his job. My job was to look big and to take off my skis, hold the skis in the air, make lots of noise,and frighten away the bear. Pen raised the gun and fired into the air. However, it jammed and failed to work.
The bear was walking towards us. Pen tried again, but again it didn’t work.Then he walked towards the bear, and I thought,“Wow,Pen’s gone completely mad. He’s going to get eaten.What should I do?”
I thought maybe I could throw a ski at it or stab(刺) it with a ski pole or something.Suddenly, the bear stopped. Pen stopped. Bang! The gun went off in the air. There was a big cloud of smoke that I thought surprised Pen and me more than it surprised the bear.The animal looked up, looked down, turned around and walked off. Pen turned round and said, “Quick,get the camera and take a photograph,” and that was when suddenly I felt really nervous. I couldn’t even undo the zip on our bag.
That was the morning of the second day of this journey. We were out there for two months—fifty-nine days, but we never saw another bear that close.
1. What happened to the author and Pen?A.They lost their way. | B.They felt terribly ill. | C.They broke their tent. | D.They were followed by a bear. |
A.Calm and brave. | B.Caring and proud. | C.Honest and friendly. | D.Careful and humorous. |
A.The author. | B.A hunter. | C.Pen. | D.Another animal. |
A.his discovery in the North Pole | B.his experience in the North Pole |
C.why he traveled to the North Pole | D.how he traveled across the North Pole |
【推荐2】Diving in the ocean, marine biologist Erika Woolsey has seen how coral reefs (珊瑚礁) are being damaged by climate change. It has made her decide to find a way to share her experience —including those who can’t easily explore the ocean.
Through her non-profit, The Hydrous, Woolsey is using virtual reality to bring the ocean to everyone. Scientists, filmmakers and divers are taking people on immersive (沉浸式的) virtual dives, attracting attention to reef damage and expecting action to protect our sea. About 25% of marine species depend on coral reefs. However, climate change, pollution and overfishing have done harm to around half the world’s shallow water coral reefs.
Twenty years of underwater exploration has given Woolsey a detailed understanding of the dangerous situations facing reefs. “I’ve seen this first-hand shift. Healthy colourful coral reefs become what look like the moonscape step by step,” Woolsey says.
It is through this experience that The Hydrous team set out to recreate with their award-winning film Immerse. Intended to watch with a VR headset, viewers join Woolsey for a nine-minute guided virtual div e on the coral reefs, immersed in a 360-degree underwater view.
They swim alongside sea turtles and sharks before witnessing the worsening of the reefs. The experience often brings out strong feelings. “As soon as people take off that headset and look me in the eye, they want to tell me a story about their ocean experience,” Woolsey says. “It’s that human connection to our ocean that will solve our ocean problems.”
Woolsey hopes advances in camera technology will allow her team to take more and more people to places in the ocean that are underexplored and places further away from human civilization. They are developing a virtual experience that will put the people in the role of a marine biologist, carrying out biodiversity surveys underwater, and even transporting the viewers to space to monitor global sea surface temperatures.
1. Why did Erika Woolsey set up The Hydrous?A.To collect money for ocean protection. |
B.To let the public know about coral reefs better. |
C.To help people enjoy the ocean’s beauty. |
D.To encourage people to protect the ocean. |
A.change. | B.experience. |
C.material. | D.scene. |
A.The story about the ocean. | B.The situation of coral reefs. |
C.The connection with sea life. | D.The way to protect the ocean. |
A.To bring more fun during the lockdown. |
B.To train talents for environment protection. |
C.To help people learn more about the ocean. |
D.To discover more places that need protection. |
【推荐3】A new study warns that about thirty percent of the world’s people may not have enough water by the year 2025.
A private American organization called Population Action International did the new study. It says more than 335 million people lack enough water now. The people live in 28 countries. Most of the countries are in Africa or the Middle East.
P-A-I researcher Robert Engelman says by the year 2025, about 3,000 million people may lack water. At least 18 more countries are expected to have severe water problems. The demand for water keeps increasing. Yet the amount of water on the earth stays the same.
Mr. Engelman says the population in countries that lack water is growing faster than in other parts of the world. He says population growth in these countries will continue to increase.
The report says lack of water in the future may result in several problems. It may increase health problems. Lack of water often means drinking water is not safe. Mr Engelman says there are problems all over the world because of diseases, such as cholera, which are carried in water. Lack of water may also result in more international conflict. Countries may have to compete for water in the future. Some countries now get sixty percent of their fresh water from other countries. This is true of Egypt, the Netherlands, Cambodia, Syria, Sudan, and Iraq. And the report says lack of water would affect the ability of developing to improve their economies. This is because new industries often need a large amount of water when they are beginning.
The Population Action International study gives several solutions to the water problem. One way, it says, is to find ways to use water for more than one purpose. Another way is to teach people to be careful not to waste water. A third way is to use less water of agriculture.
The report also says long-term solutions to the water problem must include controls on population growth. It says countries cannot provide clean water unless they slow population growth by limiting the number of children people have.
1. The first four paragraphs mainly tell us .A.the study of the global water condition | B.the fact of the global lack of water |
C.the seriousness of water shortage | D.the importance of water resources |
A.It may influence the development of the economics. |
B.It may bring about a lot of health problems. |
C.It may result in more international conflict. |
D.It may lead to the improvement of new industries. |
A.To use water in a variety of ways. | B.To become aware of the water problem. |
C.To reduce the use of agricultural water. | D.To limit the rising birthrate of the earth. |
A. | B. |
C. | D. |
【推荐1】Profits from cutting down rainforests are surprisingly small. A freshly cleared square kilometer of the Amazon rainforest fetches an average price of only around $ 12. By contrast, the social costs of clearing it are huge. Some 500 tons of carbon dioxide are pumped into the atmosphere. By an estimate, that does $ 25,000 of harm by accelerating climate change.
Yet still the world’s trees are disappearing. The senseless men cutting down trees receive the profits, but all 8 billion people on the planet pay for the costs. Clearly, if the owners of the rainforest were paid not to destroy it, everyone would be better off. If rainforests were in places with clear landownership and a firm rule of law, the world would no doubt already have funded such a deal. Sadly, they are not.
Local officials are often in league with the loggers, and may be loggers themselves. Consider Brazil. It had a leader, who sided with illegal loggers and ranchers (大农场主). He stopped fining forest criminals and told illegal miners on local reserves he would legalise the mining. On his watch the pace of deforestation rose by 60%. Local communities often refuse to follow the law and order since they see more benefit from deforestation than protecting it. And the land ownership is a mess. When it’s unclear who owns a piece of land, it’s unclear whom to pay to protect it, or whom to fine for destroying it.
Leadership matters. But even under better leaders, people living there should see benefits in protecting them. That will require a big, reliable flow of cash which should come from rich-country governments and from private firms buying carbon credits to make up for their emissions (排放).
Such carbon credits could be used to promote a greener local economy, and clean up local land registration. If there’s enough cash, conditionally paid, locals will be encouraged to protect trees and less likely to elect irresponsible leaders. To preserve such a huge carbon sink — never mind the biodiversity it contains — this would be a bargain.
1. What does the author intend to tell in Paragraph 1?A.Climate change is accelerating. | B.Rainforest clearing is rather profitable. |
C.Carbon dioxide is harmful to the atmosphere. | D.The costs of deforestation outweigh the profits. |
A.Clear landownership. | B.The absence of related law. |
C.Profit-driving logging. | D.People’s willingness to buy trees. |
A.More landownership funds. | B.Bringing in more private firms. |
C.Awareness of saving biodiversity. | D.Paying the locals for the preservation efforts. |
A.Cash for Saving Rainforests | B.Fight Illegal Logging in Brazil |
C.Dilemmas of Rainforest Protection | D.Rainforest Deforestation and Climate Change |
【推荐2】One might expect that the ever-growing demands of the tourist trade would bring nothing but good for the countries that receive the holiday-makers. Indeed, a rosy picture is painted for the long-term future of the holiday industry. Every month sees the building of a new hotel somewhere. And every month another rock-bound Pacific island is advertised as the last paradise (天堂) on earth.
However, the scale and speed of this growth seem set to destroy the very things tourists want to enjoy. In those countries where there was a rush to make quick money out of sea-side holidays, over-crowded beaches and the concrete jungles of endless hotels have begun to lose their appeal.
Those countries with little experience of tourism can suffer most. In recent years, Nepal set out to attract foreign visitors to fund developments in health and education. Its forests, full of wildlife, and rare flowers, were offered to tourists as one more untouched paradise. In fact, the nature all too soon felt the effects of thousands of holiday-makers traveling through the forest land. Ancient tracks became major routes for the walkers, with the consequent exploitation (开采) of precious trees and plants.
Not only can the environment of a country suffer from the sudden growth of tourism. The people as well rapidly feel its effects. Farmland makes way for hotels, roads and airports; the old way of life goes. The one-time farmer is now the servant of some multi-national organization; he is no longer his own master. Once it was his back that bore the pain; now it is his smile that is exploited. No doubt he wonders whether he wasn't happier in his village working his own land.
Thankfully, the tourist industry is waking up to the responsibilities it has towards those countries that receive its customers. The protection of wildlife and the creation of national parks go hand in hand with tourist development and in fact obtain financial support from tourist companies. At the same time, tourists are being encouraged to respect not only the countryside they visit but also its people.
The way tourism is handled in the next ten years will decide its fate and that of the countries we all want to visit. Their needs and problems are more important than those of the tourist companies. Increased understanding in planning world-wide tourism can preserve the market for these companies. If not, in a few years' time the very things that attract tourists now may well have been destroyed.
1. The example of Nepal is used to suggest _______.A.its natural resources are untouched | B.its forests are exploited for farmland |
C.it develops well in health and education | D.it suffers from the heavy flow of tourists |
A.They are happy to work their own lands. |
B.They have to please the tourists for a living. |
C.They have to struggle for their independence. |
D.They are proud of working in multi-national organizations. |
A.optimistic | B.doubtful | C.objective | D.negative |
【推荐3】Lisa Gautier receives nearly a dozen parcels of human hair every day. With her San-Francisco-based non-profit organization Matter of Trust, Gautier turns donated hair into mats used to soak up oil spills on land, and booms (long tubes) used for spills at sea.
A standard way to clean up oil from land is to use mats made from polypropylene (聚丙烯). But polypropylene is a non-biodegradable plastic, and producing it ultimately means more drilling for oil. Hair, by contrast, is an environmentally friendly resource that can soak up around five times its weight in oil, according to Matter of Trust, and it is abundant.
Oil spills can pollute drinking water, endanger public health, harm plants and wildlife, and damage the economy. According to Gautier, the spills that hit the headlines only make up 5% of global oil pollution.
Megan Murray, an environmental biologist at the University of Technology Sydney, develops sustainable technologies to tackle oil spills. Her research indicates that as well as being biodegradable, human hair is often just as effective as polypropylene, and in some circumstances even better. “The hair mats are very beneficial to land spills,” says Murray but adds that when raw oil is spilled on beach sand, it is very difficult to absorb it using any of the materials she has tested. Another advantage of hair is that it costs less than conventional materials and is “globally accessible as a recycled material,” she says.
However, Murray cautions that hair mats are not a perfect solution, because they are single-use, and can only be dealt with by burning or by burying into soil which then isn’t suitable for growing food. She is now researching methods to extract the oil from a used hair mat, meaning both can be reused.
As the hair mat designs aren’t under patent, other groups have begun producing their own mats and booms. Gautier is pleased to see the movement growing. “Anyone can make a hair mat,” she says. “It creates green jobs, it cleans water, it reduces waste in landfill, and it’s promoting renewable resources.”
1. What do we know about polypropylene according to the passage?A.People need more oil to produce polypropylene. |
B.Polypropylene can soak up five times its weight in oil. |
C.It is biodegradable and environmentally friendly. |
D.People seldom use mats made from it to clean up oil from land. |
A.Hair mats do no harm to soil after being burnt. |
B.Hair mats are not a perfect solution because they can’t be recycled now. |
C.People spend more to make hair mats than conventional materials. |
D.The effect of hair mats on terrestrial (陆地上的) spills is not very good. |
A.Most oil-spill events have received widespread media coverage. |
B.Lisa Gautier donated her hair to soak up oil spills on land and at sea. |
C.Megan Murray goes all out to make the hair mats and the oil extracted from them reused. |
D.There are many other materials used to treat oil spills on beach sand besides hair. |
A.How to Tackle Oil Spills |
B.A Perfect Recycled Material—Human Hair |
C.Take Action to Make Hair Mats And Booms |
D.Human Hair Is Being Used to Clean Up Oil Spills |
【推荐1】Jet lag, a sleepy side effect of travel, happens when our body clock is out of step with the time of day, causing tiredness and difficulty sleeping. It’s commonly caused by long flight, but it takes more than just a long journey to give you jet lag. If you flew from England to South Africa, even though it’s a long flight, there’s no jet lag because there’s no change in time zone. The difference with jet lag is that it messes up the body clock.
Animals, plants and bacteria all have a body clock. What it does in humans is make us active in the daytime, and inactive and able to go to sleep at night. This clock gives you stability (稳定) so that if you do wake up in the middle of the night, you’ve got a better chance of getting back to sleep.
When we fly to a different time zone, the change is too sudden for our clocks. The body clock is slow to adjust, and that mismatching causes jet lag. Environmental factors like mealtimes and the light-dark cycles of the days help the clock to adapt, but how long it takes depends on how far you’ve travelled. It’s equal to about one or two time zones per day. If you fly to Los Angeles, which is eight time zones to the west of you, it’ll take you about four days to adjust.
Medical experts generally agree that flying eastward may cause more extreme jet lag symptoms than flying toward the west. That’s because our body can adapt more quickly to staying up late than going to bed earlier than usual.
It’s still not clear why jet lag hits some people harder than others, but genetics (遗传学), fitness and age have all been suggested.
1. Which of the following is true?A.A long journey will definitely cause jet lag. |
B.Flying different time zones will definitely cause jet lag. |
C.The mess of body clock in flying different zones may cause jet lag. |
D.The difficulty in sleeping while flying may cause jet lag. |
A.Our body clock is in step with the time of the day. |
B.Our body clock mismatches the time of the day. |
C.We fly for a long time. |
D.We are tired. |
A.Three days. | B.Two days. | C.Six days. | D.One day. |
A.Flying eastward may cause less jet lag. |
B.Flying westward may cause more jet lag. |
C.It’s clear that genetics plays a key role in jet lag. |
D.Flying towards the east causes more jet lag than flying westward. |
【推荐2】Sleep,considered as a luxury by many, is essential for a person’s well-being. Researchers have found that insufficient sleep and tiredness increase a person’s risk of developing severe medical conditions, such as obesity, high blood sugar levels and heart disease. Now, a new study has found that getting sufficient sleep is also the key to improving academic performance.
Jeffery Gross, the university science professor who led the research, was not trying to find the relationship between sleep and grades when he handed out smartwatches to the 100 students in his chemistry class. Instead, the professor hoped the wrist-worn devices, which track a person’s physical activity, would show a connection between exercise and academic achievements.
While Gross’s data showed no relationship between these two factors, the study found something surprising. As the researchers were analyzing the data, they noticed a linear(线性的)relationship between the average amount of sleep the students got and their results in the course’s 11 quizzes, three midterm tests and the final exam.
Even more interesting, it was not sufficient for students to just head to bed early the night before the test. Instead, it’s the sleep you get during the days when learning is happening that matters most.
When students went to bed each night was similarly important. Those went to bed in the early hours of the morning performed poorly, even if the total sleep time was the same as higher-performing student. “When you go to bed matters,” Gross says. “If you go to bed at 10, or 12, or 1 at night, and sleep for 7 hours, your performance is the same. But if you go to bed after 2, your performance started to go down even if you get the same seven hours’ sleep. So, quantity isn’t everything.”
Perhaps the most interesting was the huge impact that small differences in sleep patterns had on the students’ grades. The overall course grades of students averaging six and a half hours of sleep each night were 25% lower than students who averaged just one hour more sleep. Similarly, students who varied their bedtime by even one hour each night had grades that dropped 45% below those with more regular bedtime.
Who knows getting straight A’s just required some extra sleep?
1. Based on his original objective, which best describes Professor Gross’s research findings?A.Accidental | B.Complete |
C.Convincing | D.Doubtful |
A.Middle school chemistry students |
B.Professor Gross’s own students |
C.Volunteers from different universities |
D.University student athletes |
A.Making the students wear special watches |
B.Using students’ university entrance test results |
C.Giving the students regular quizzes after class |
D.Using the students’ normal test and quiz grades |
A.A student who has a good night’s sleep the night before an important test. |
B.A student whose normal bedtime varies between 9 p.m. and 12 p.m. |
C.A student who sleeps from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. each day. |
D.A student who sleeps for a total of 7 hours each night. |
【推荐3】Innovation has pretty much finished with car tires (轮胎) right, I mean, what’s left to change? How about the whole “air” part?
Michelin Company’s attempt to tackle tire rubbish around the world witnessed them roll out puncture-proof “airless” tires, which they say should help reduce the 18% of all world tires that are abandoned early due to punctures (轮胎漏气). Deserted tires arc a huge worldwide waste problem — the US produces 260 million abandoned tires per year, many of which end up in landfills or on the sides of the freeway where they release harmful gases and microplastic pollutants as they break down.
Michelin Company's Unique Puncture Proof Tire System or “UPTIS” is designed using 46% recycled material, and made from a plastic matrix (母体) mixed with glass fibers that provide a flexible outer layer with a strong inner one. “The truly distinctive structure of the Michelin UPTIS prototype (原型), or its “strangeness” as we have often heard it called, really attracted the eye of many visitors and left a lasting impression on them,” stated Cyrille Roget, Michelin Group Technical and Scientific Communications Director. “It was an unusual experience for us, and our greatest satisfaction came at the end of the demonstration when our passengers, who were undoubtedly a little alert (警觉) at first, said they felt no difference compared with conventional tires.”
Michelin Company believes airless tires will improve everyone's lives. Maintenance (保养) costs for company’s vehicle fleets will be less expensive, and inexperienced car owners won’t accidentally ruin their rubbers when driving them because they are over-or under-inflated (充气). Although they are still in development stage and using at a large scale within years is unlikely to be available, Michelin Company is not in the least doubtful about their tires’ future.
1. Why does the author ask questions in the first paragraph?A.To explain a strange phenomenon. | B.To clarify a difficult concept. |
C.To present a well-known fact. | D.To introduce a new topic. |
A.The new tire runs more smoothly. |
B.The world greatly needs airless tires. |
C.Traditional tires threaten the environment. |
D.Michelin Company battles the issue of wasted tires. |
A.Its structure distances visitors. | B.It only uses recycled materials. |
C.It combines plastic and glass fibers. | D.Its comfortableness beats ordinary tires. |
A.Tolerant. | B.Positive. | C.Mixed. | D.Objective. |