A species of iguana (鬣蜥) that went extinct nearly 200 years ago on one of the Galápagos Islands appears to be making a comeback, with some help from a team of conservationists. The last person to spot a Galápagos land iguana on Santiago Island in Ecuador was Charles Darwin in 1835. When an expedition team from California arrived in 1906, the iguanas were nowhere to be found. And though this kind of iguana can still be found on the other Galápagos Islands, it’s believed to have been extinct on Santiago for the past 187 years—until now.
A team of scientists and park guardians discovered new lizards (蜥蜴) of various ages while walking the island in late July, which suggests the species has been successfully reintroduced. And according to Jorge Carrión, director of conservation of the Galápagos Conservancy, the ecosystem is thriving as a result. The evidence is in the details, he explained. Seeing lizards of different ages and coming across unmarked specimens means the iguanas are breeding (繁殖) in their natural environment.
Before joining the Galápagos Conservancy, Carrión worked for the Galápagos National Park Directorate, the caretakers of the islands’ ecosystems and resources. The GNPD is also the authority spearheading the iguana reintroduction project, with funding and assistance coming from the Conservancy. He said the collaborative has released more than 3,000 land iguanas on the island since January 2019.
Conservationists decided to reintroduce the land iguana after carefully considering how a return of the species would affect the ecosystem. These lizards are what’s known as an engineering species, like the Galápagos giant tortoise, in that they play a key role in keeping a healthy balance in an ecosystem.
“This kind of species are key for ecosystem in general,” Carrión said. “In this case it was the justification for the reintroduction of land iguanas, to return the natural dynamic to Santiago Island. When engineer species are not present, many imbalances occur in the ecosystem.”
1. What does the author want to tell us about iguanas in Paragraph 1?A.They get help from an expedition team. |
B.They have returned to Santiago Island. |
C.They have disappeared for a few years. |
D.They were found on Santiago in 1906. |
A.Growing strong. | B.Becoming active. |
C.Working perfectly. | D.Breaking down. |
A.They can live on Santiago Island. |
B.They can help engineering species. |
C.They can keep the balance of nature. |
D.They play a role in Galápagos National Park. |
A.To show his concern about iguanas. |
B.To introduce the present situation of iguanas. |
C.To call on people to protect iguanas. |
D.To explain the reasons for iguanas extinction. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】It is easy for us to know the difference between our friends and our enemies. But can other animals do the same? Elephants can! They can use their sense of vision and smell to tell the difference between people who pose a threat and those who do not. In Kenya, researchers find that elephants react differently to clothing worn by men of the Maasai and Kamba ethnic groups. Young Maasai men spear(刺)animals and thus pose a threat to elephants; Kamba men arc mainly farmers and are not a danger to elephants.
In an experiment conducted by animal scientists, elephants were first presented with clean clothing or clothing that had been worn for five days by either a Maasai or a Kamba man. When the elephants noticed the smell of clothing worn by a Maasai man, they moved away from the smell faster and took longer to relax than when they noticed the smells of either clothing worn by Kamba men or clothing that had not been worn at all.
Clothing color also plays a role. In the same study, when the elephants saw red clothing not worn before, they reacted angrily, as red is typically worn by Maasai men. Rather than running away as they did with the smell, the elephants acted aggressively toward the red clothing.
The researchers believe that the elephants’ emotional reactions are due to their different senses of the smells and the sights. Smelling a potential danger means that a threat is nearby and the best thing to do is run away and hide. Seeing a potential threat without its smell means that risk is low. Therefore, instead of showing fear and running away, the elephants express their anger and become aggressive.
1. What character does the author want to express about elephant?A.Friendly. | B.Clever. | C.Dangerous. | D.Naughty. |
A.The color of Kamba men’s clothes. |
B.The smell of Kamba men’s clothes. |
C.The red clothes not worn before. |
D.The smell of Maasai men’s clothes. |
A.Elephants learn from their experience. |
B.Elephants have sharper sense of smell than sight. |
C.Elephants are more intelligent than other animals. |
D.Elephants tend to attack rather than escape when in minor danger. |
A.Nature | B.Business Weekly | C.Fashion | D.News Week |
【推荐2】Plants go into a state of complete “panic” when it rains, according to surprised scientists. This response is so unusual because plants obviously need water to live. The researchers think that the “panic” response is due to the fact that moisture creates the number one way for diseases to spread in vegetation.
Biochemist Harvey Millar from the University of Western Australia explained: “When a raindrop splashes across a leaf, tiny droplets of water go in all directions. These droplets can contain bacteria, or viruses. A single droplet can spread these up to 10 meters to surrounding plants.” The longer a leaf is wet, the greater the chance that a disease can take hold.
So this is why the researchers think plants react to rain like humans would react to someone sneezing on them. They conducted an experiment in which they mimicked rain with a spray bottle and noticed rapid microscopic reactions from the plants that are invisible to the human eye. After the first 10 minutes of artificial raining, over 700 genes in the plants were said to respond in a panic-like manner and most of them continued to do so for around 15 minutes. In this time chemical reactions like how the plant creates proteins and its hormone balance were affected.
A single touch of water activated an immediate response from plants. The reactions created warning signals that travelled from leaf to leaf and resulted in the plant producing a range of protective measures. Plants that were repeatedly watered eventually suffered from stunted growth and delayed flowering.
Interestingly, the plants were also found to be communicating their “fears” with nearby vegetation. They did this by producing airborne chemicals that can be picked up by other plants and inform them what’s going on and how they’re coping. Millar said: “If a plant’s neighbors have their defence systems turned on, they are less likely to spread disease, so it’s in their best interest for plants to spread the warning to nearby plants.”
1. Paragraph 2 mainly talks about ________.A.how droplets spread bacteria or viruses |
B.why plants get into a “panic” when it rains |
C.how tiny drops of water go in all directions |
D.that longer leaves can take hold of more diseases |
A.poured | B.fetched |
C.contained | D.imitated |
A.To question the ideas mentioned above. |
B.To introduce a new topic for discussion. |
C.To offer additional topic-related information. |
D.To compare it with previous experiments. |
A.Plants respond to water slowly. |
B.Plants shut their defence systems when it rains. |
C.Plants only communicate within their own species. |
D.Plants may not grow well when watered too frequently. |
【推荐3】Cold weather not only threatens the life of human beings but also the survival of wild animals. In Houston, it has claimed some unusual animal victims-bats.
Mary Warwick is the wildlife director at the Houston Humane Society. She was doing shopping when the freezing winds reminded her that she had not heard how the area’s bats were going. So she drove to the bridge where over 100 bats looked to be dead as they lay frozen on the ground. But during her 40-minute drive home, they began to come back to life. The bats made sounds and moved around in a box she had placed on her heated passenger seat for warmth. She returned to the bridge twice a day to collect more.
Two days later, she got a call about more than 900 bats rescued from a bridge in nearby Pearland, Texas. On the third and fourth days, more people showed up to rescue bats from the Waugh Bridge, and a special transportation effort was set up to get the bats to Warwick, which touched her a great deal. Each of the bats was warmed in an incubator (恒温箱) until their body temperature rose.
However, there were too many bats for one person to care for. The society’s current buildings did not have the necessary space, so Warwick and others put the bats in her attic (阁楼). The bats were separated by group in containers usually used for dogs. There, they were able to reach a state of hibernation (冬眠). Over 100 bats died because of the cold and the fall from the bridge but the others are being or have been released.
The society is now raising money to build a special room for bats at the society. The society’s entire animal rescue team will be vaccinated (接种疫苗) and trained in rescuing bats as they prepare to move into a larger building with the special bat room. “That would really help in these situations where we continue to see strange weather come through,” she said. “We could really use more space to rescue the bats.”
1. Why did Mary War wick drive to the bridge?A.To get rid of the dead bats. | B.To check what happened to the bats. |
C.To reach home a little earlier. | D.To monitor the surviving bats. |
A.More people were willing to donate. |
B.More people showed concern about her. |
C.More people came up with good ideas. |
D.More people joined her rescue. |
A.There was not enough space to warm the bats. |
B.An increasing number of bats died from the cold. |
C.It was difficult for her to get bats into hibernation. |
D.The bats’ body temperature didn’t rise as expected. |
A.Critical. | B.Grateful. | C.Positive. | D.Doubtful. |
【推荐1】The memory of elephants is the stuff of lore (传说), and now it seems they can recall the smell of a relative even after a decade apart.
When Franziska Hörner at the University of Wuppertal in Germany and her colleagues heard about planned reunions between two mother-daughter pairs at zoos in Germany, the took advantage of the chance to test the elephants’ memories. One pair had been separated for two years, while the other had spent 12 years apart.
Hörner collected faecal (排泄物的) samples from these African elephants and others at German zoos, hauling the stinking 10-to-15-kilogram samples around in her tiny car.
Her team presented these samples one at a time to the four elephants in advance of their reunions with family members. When they encountered faeces from unrelated elephants, cither those in the same zoo or unfamiliar animals, they sniffed and walked away.
But when presented with a sample from the mother or daughter they were due to be reunited with, the female elephants repeatedly sniffed the samples and showed a variety of reactions, from making sounds to flapping their ears.
Such reactions may be linked to positive emotions, the researchers say. “That was amazing and really intense,” says Hörner. “We were sure they do remember, and they know exactly what they are smelling there.”
The sample size was small, but it would be cruel to do similar tests on elephants that weren’t being reunited, says Hörner.
“I am not surprised that elephants have memories, especially in social contexts, that last a long time,” says Joshua Plotnik at Hunter College in New York, who wasn’t involved with the work. Elephants live in groups that split up and come back together over long periods of time.
But Plotnik says the experiment may not be a true test of memory. There may be scent cues (线索,提示) common to all relatives that can trigger recognition not linked to memory, he says, and presenting the elephants with other smells would help make sense of their responses.
1. Why did Hörner collect faecal samples from elephants at German zoos?A.To figure out mother and daughter elephants. |
B.To haul samples in the tiny car. |
C.To help elephants reunite with their family. |
D.To test elephants’ memories. |
A.They sniffed and walked away. |
B.They responded actively. |
C.They recognized their family members. |
D.They showed no reactions. |
A.There is no experimental preparation. |
B.Samples are of different age level. |
C.The experiment is immoral. |
D.There are only four samples. |
A.Drawing a conclusion according to the findings. |
B.Making use of the findings. |
C.Conducting further research. |
D.Clarifying the purpose of the study. |
【推荐2】The food chain is the order in which animals and plants eat each other in order to survive. Every living creature(生物) needs to eat other creatures below it. Every ecosystem(生态系统) has a different food chain, depending on which animals and plants live there.
The lowest part of the food chain are the plants. They are called producers because they produce their own food by using the sunlight's energy. This process is called photosynthesis(光合作用). Animals are the consumers(消费者) of the food chain.They eat other plants and animals.
Some animals only eat plants.Among this group of herbivores are rabbits,mice and cows. Carnivores are animals that eat other animals,like wolves,foxes and lions.
Each food chain has a predator,the strongest animal that is not eaten by others. Hawks or polar bears are such predators that dominate(支配)their habitats.
Many creatures belong to more than one food chain. Grass,for example,is eaten by many other animals. Food chains that are connected to each other are called food webs.
When an animal dies it is eaten up by worms,bacteria(细菌) and other organisms. These so-called decomposers break down dead animals and plants into small parts and enrich soil so that other plants can grow better. The nutrients of dead animals and plants are converted(转换) back to the soil so that plants can use them again.
The balance of plants and animals within a food chain is determined by nature. For example,if there are too many zebras in an area, many of them will die because they cannot get enough food to feed on. This also means that there is less food for predators, like lions, to eat. And when there are fewer lions the zebra population will grow again.
1. What does the food chain of a certain ecosystem depend on?A.Which animals and plants live there. |
B.Whether animals and plants eat each other. |
C.How many kinds of plants are living there. |
D.Whether a living creature needs to eat other creatures. |
A.Animals and plants eat each other in order to survive. |
B.Every living creature needs to eat other creatures below it. |
C.Plants make use of the sunlight's energy to produce their own food. |
D.Animals are the consumers of other plants and animals in a food chain. |
A.Animals that eat other animals. |
B.Animals that get on well with other animals. |
C.Animals that only eat plants. |
D.Animals that eat plants and other animals. |
A.bacteria→insects→mice | B.grass→insects→foxes |
C.bacteria→grass→insects | D.grass→rabbits→lions |
【推荐3】When scientists and the public worry about sea level rise, they mostly focus on when and where communities will be permanently flooded. But there’s another consequence of rising seas that will affect many more people much sooner: getting cut off from roads and other critical infrastructure (基础设施). It’s a threat that society has not paid nearly enough attention to, says Allison Reilly, a civil engineer at the University of Maryland.
In a new paper, Reilly and her colleagues show the width and pace of the isolation (隔离) threat. Inspired by her work on the eastern shore of Maryland, where people already need to adjust their travel and work schedules to account for tides that frequently flood roads, Reilly and her colleagues calculated that, with one meter of sea level rise, twice as many people across the coastal United States will be isolated than will be fully flooded.
Worse still, many places currently considered at low risk of sea level rise suddenly become much riskier when isolation is taken into account, Reilly says. While planners know that low-lying Florida will be severely flooded, Maine, with its high rocky coasts, is generally thought to be at low risk. But Reilly’s work shows many Mainers are in great danger of being cut off by flooding in coastal communities and river valleys.
This far more immediate effect of rising seas needs to become part of the broader planning process. That kind of planning is starting to happen around the Chignecto Isthmus, an interprovincial land bridge in Canada, connecting New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The New Brunswick and Nova Scotia governments are considering a variety of plans to raise or replace the dikes (坝). For Ollerhead, a Nova Scotian, that work can’t start soon enough. “It will take a lot of sea level rise before Nova Scotia becomes an island, but you could have a storm that cuts off the major transportation links for days, weeks, or months,” he says. “It’s nearly impossible to predict when, but it will happen eventually.”
1. What is the threat Allison Reilly mentioned in paragraph 1?A.The rising sea level. | B.Flood-related isolation. |
C.Permanent flooded areas. | D.Irreparable infrastructure. |
A.Conclusions of a new paper. | B.Calculations of collected data. |
C.Situations of Eastern Maryland. | D.Influences on coastal United States. |
A.To clarify a point. | B.To offer a solution. |
C.To present an assumption. | D.To illustrate a reason. |
A.Dismissive. | B.Doubtful. | C.Favorable. | D.Unclear. |
【推荐1】In 2018, social scientist Roger Tyers decided to take the train from Southampton to Shanghai, a journey of almost two weeks, when he won a research fellowship in China. Tyers used to fly a lot. He changed his mind when he read a report warning that extraordinary societal changes would be needed if humanity wanted to keep global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.
Tyers’s trip, by his calculations, generated just 10% of the emissions(排放) that the flights would, which pleases him, even though his train tickets came close to three times the price of the flights.
Tyers is one of many climate scientists who are advocating less air travel and following their own advice. Today, as the coronavirus continues to ravage(蹂躏) much of the world, Tyers’s concerns have declined — at least temporarily — because nearly all conferences and meetings have switched to virtual models.
But the carbon-footprint issue will remain in the long term. Once the pandemic is brought to control, scientists will again wrestle with how to balance the need to fly to meetings and fieldwork sites with their desire to limit air travel. A study in October showed that climate scientists tend to fly more often for work compared with their peers, because of their remote fieldwork locations and their travel to international conferences, including those addressing climate change.
Many feel strongly that virtual networking cannot adequately replace actual face-to-face time, and that opportunities to meet in person with peers(同行)and senior colleagues in their field are essential for career advancement. Yet they point out that climate change is already having disastrous effects.
So what do climate scientists advise? There are multiple ways, they say, to connect with colleagues, peers and others without boarding an airplane. Some are encouraging conference organizers to continue to offer virtual versions of all sessions, noting that attendance rose dramatically for many conferences that went online—only last year. Others are calling for a regular series of online meetings to help people connect virtually. Many researchers were already using video platforms such as Zoom and Skype for meetings, as well as text and messaging platforms such as Slack and Twitter for networking and posting updates and articles.
1. Roger Tyers took the train to Shanghai because ________.A.he could save a large amount of money | B.he could contribute to emission reduction |
C.he could enjoy the scenery along the way | D.he was afraid of travelling by airplane |
A.Many hands make light work. | B.Actions speak louder than words. |
C.Rome wasn’t built in a day. | D.Every coin has two sides. |
A.It is impossible for scientists to limit air travel. |
B.Virtual meetings don’t help with attendance. |
C.Some climate scientists’ actions are not eco-friendly. |
D.Twitter is a video platform to connect with colleagues. |
A.urge scientists to rethink air travel in a post-pandemic world |
B.blame the climate scientists for their irresponsible behavior |
C.suggest different online platforms during the pandemic |
D.call on all people to change planes for trains when traveling |
The holidays are a wonderful, cheerful time when most people wait for Santa to bring them presents. But I’m not like most people. I spend my time wondering just what the environmental impacts of Santa Claus and his reindeer(驯鹿)are, and more importantly, how I can calculate those impacts.
Lately I’ve been particularly curious as to whether Santa’s old sled is a clean green flying machine, or if he should be replacing his 8 reindeer with an environmentally-friendly car.
I should mention that, surprisingly, I was unable to find statistics specific to Santa’s magical flying reindeer, so these calculations use numbers from various sources and may not represent actual pollution caused by Santa and his animals. In other words, don’t complain to the authorities about the damage Santa is causing the environment based on this article.
Santa’s yearly trip around the globe is 44,000km long, twice the average of a North American driver. If we assume that the magic provides the altitude for this trip, then reindeer power only needs to push Santa’s sled forward. To complete the trip in 12 hours, I estimate they must travel at a speed of about 3100km/h. To travel at this speed, for this length of time, the reindeer need to eat an incredible 980 million calories each!!
So the next question is how much food is in 980 million calories? Well, if they’re eating corn, they’d need to eat 16,500 lbs each — or 1.6 acres of food. Growing 12.8 acres of corn has its own implications for the environment that we’ll leave for another calculation.
We now need to consider that during the global trip the reindeer are “letting out” some of that corn in the form of methane (甲烷,沼气). A resting cow produces 110 kg of methane per year, so flying reindeer would each let out about 4.8 tons. With methane causing 20 times the global warming damage of CO2, and the altitude increasing that damage by 1000% that another 20 times, we can put Santa’s round-trip emissions at 15,488 tons. This is much more than the 100 tons an environmentally-friendly car would release on the same trip!
Bad Santa.
1. Which aspect does the writer NOT include in her analyses about reindeer’s influence on environment?
A.Distance covered. | B.Calories consumed. |
C.Tons of waste let out. | D.Money spent on food. |
A.1.6. | B.16. | C.12.8. | D.128. |
A.Christmas celebrations are really a waste of money. |
B.Vegetarians are more likely to survive than meat-eaters. |
C.Raising animals has a negative influence on environment. |
D.The car industry does less harm to environment than farming. |
A.Academic and formal. | B.Cheerful and friendly. |
C.Humourous and concerned. | D.Serious and boring. |
A.Santa Claus is coming to town! |
B.Santa, watch where you’re going! |
C.Is Santa driving clean and green? |
D.Let’s reduce waste on Christmas celebrations! |
【推荐3】The fishermen of Senegal have joined forces to protect one of the ocean’s most endangered species — the sea turtle, a classic case of “poacher turned gamekeeper”.
The coastal waters of Senegal in West Africa are home to several species of sea turtles which are all beautiful creatures but are affected by pollution, poaching and even fishing nets.
“Once we were the biggest eaters of turtles, now we have become their biggest protectors,” said Abdou Karim Sall, a fisherman who led the Management Committee for the Marine Protected Are (MPA) of Joal-Fadiouth.
The Joal-Fadiouth MPA, covering about 174 square kilometers, was founded in 2004, and it’s backed by the government, local authorities and several associations. It is an area aimed at protecting marine ecosystem, habitats and species, including endangered species like the sea turtle. Its benefits are obvious: maintaining biodiversity, increasing fish catches on fishing grounds, as well as economic development.
For a long time, Sall has been working to raise local awareness of sea turtle protection. “Even former turtle sellers have been ‘changed’ by receiving three small boats to take tourists to sea,” he said. Instead of strict restrictions, the Joal-Fadiouth MPA has been trying to educate local communities about the economic benefits so that they would join the project. “It’s after they are told: ‘It’s an endangered species’,” Sall said.
Local residents have also set out to protect the nests. During summer and fall, a few dozen turtles may stop to lay eggs on the beaches of Joal-Fadiouth. MPA agents and village volunteers protest their nests with fences. “People come at 6 a. m. so that other animals do not take the young.” said Sall.
Sall added the number of turtles had decreased by about 30% in the past 20 years, and chances of survival of a young turtle were no higher than one in a thousand. But the fisherman-conservator agreed, “Awareness has not worked 100%.”
1. What do the underlined words “poacher turned gamekeeper” in Paragraph 1 probably refer to?A.A person beginning to hunt animals illegally. |
B.A person switching from a hunter to a protector. |
C.A person changing completely from good to bad. |
D.A person continuing to protect endangered species. |
A.Building more nests for turtles to lay eggs. |
B.Publicizing the economic benefits of the project. |
C.Placing strict restrictions to educate the communities. |
D.Providing different means of transportation for turtle sellers. |
A.The measures the MPA will take in the future. |
B.The argument about the Marine Protected Area. |
C.The danger sea turtles still face from fishermen. |
D.The benefits brought by the Marine Protected Area. |
A.Fishermen of Senegal have joined together to protect sea turtles. |
B.Sea turtles in Senegal are endangered because of human activities. |
C.The situation of sea turtles in Senegal has been improves significantly. |
D.The Marine Protected Area has played an important role in protecting sea turtles. |
【推荐1】Most people who know about diabetes think there are two kinds: type l, which you are born with, and type 2, which you get later in life from eating too much. This isn't quite right, since the two types can occur at different life stages and for a number of reasons, but the broad distinction is well rooted in the public's mind.
Now some doctors want to change that and break the disease down into five subtypes (子类型), each with its own set of risk factors, outcomes and treatments. The new claim was made by researchers based in Sweden and Finland who assessed almost 15,000 people with diabetes in those countries. They found that these people fell into one of five categories based on their blood sugar, insulin (胰岛素) production and sensitivity, and their body mass index and age. The subgroups also vary genetically.
The researchers say that two of the subtypes are mild and can be largely treated with lifestyle changes and small amounts of a standard drug. People with the three more severe forms are more likely to develop eye and kidney disease, so treating them is a must.
So far, so good. After all, this is the way medicine is heading. The more we learn about common diseases, the more we realize there is huge variation in the way they present themselves. For example, research into the genetics of several cancers has helped identify which treatments might work best for individuals.
The idea that a cheap and fairly straightforward blood test could help doctors predict the cause and prognosis (预断) of that individuals' diabetes is appealing. This is especially the case given that an estimated 9 percent of the global population are affected by the disorder and many aren’t getting the right treatment.
But the five subgroups aren't the end of the story. Diabetes just isn't that simple. For a long time, we considered the condition as being either “childhood-onset” or “adult-onset”, and this is how many people still think of the disease. Yet in the last decade, this classification was questioned as it was discovered that adults in their 40s and 50s could develop a form of the disease that looked very “childhood” like, while more children are developing type 2 diabetes. It is also quite likely that the risks and outcomes of diabetes will look different in people who live outside Sweden and Finland, such as in the Middle East whose nations have some of the highest rates of the condition in the world.
1. What can we learn from Paragraph 1?A.It is believed that diabetes type 1 results from a bad diet. |
B.The popular classification of diabetes is not so scientific. |
C.Children catch diabetes type 1 easily when born. |
D.People are not fully convinced of the different types of diabetes. |
A.it helps researchers find out the risk factors of each type |
B.it makes it possible to find the best treatment for each type |
C.it helps to make the knowledge of diabetes popular |
D.it leads people to believe treating diabetes is a piece of cake |
A.It has found a quick solution for curing diabetes. |
B.The outcome of the research is sure to be widely applied. |
C.More researches are needed to know diabetes well enough. |
D.It confirms that three of the five subtypes are mild form. |
A.stress the necessity of carrying out researches on diabetes |
B.correct people's knowledge of classifying diabetes |
C.advise doctors on how to treat diabetes scientifically |
D.inform people of a brand-new view on diabetes |
【推荐2】Whether you realize it or not, you probably practice certain rituals (惯例) every day of your life. When we say ritual, we do not mean simple daily tasks like brushing your teeth or washing your dishes. Those are routines. The difference between rituals and routines is the attitude behind the action. A routine is a task performed out of necessity, and a person can do it without really thinking about it. A ritual, on the other hand, is far more purposeful. The purpose can vary from health to relaxation to entertainment. When a person is doing a ritual, it’s more about focusing on the experience than just finishing it.
Rituals not only help us become more aware of the present moment, but they can also reduce anxiety. Studies have shown that people about to perform a difficult task are likely to have lower levels of anxiety if they perform a ritual before the task. This is because the repeated performance of a certain action can signal the human brain that everything is normal and predictable, even under uncertain situations. In other words, rituals bring a sense of stability. This is why many famous sportspeople have well-known pre-competition rituals. Spanish tennis legend Rafael Nadal, for example, has an on-court ritual of positioning his water bottles in a certain way. He states that it helps him gain a sense of order in the high-level competition.
With the calming effects of rituals, it is no wonder that so many people perform them every single day. Why not try out a new ritual yourself? Popular rituals which people perform every day include taking a walk, gardening, taking a bath before bed, or performing a series of stretches facing the sun.
1. What’s the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To compare different habits. | B.To explain what ritual is. |
C.To entertain readers. | D.To discuss daily tasks. |
A.Duty. | B.Puzzle. | C.Strength. | D.Happiness. |
A.They are meaningful actions. | B.They are connected with religions. |
C.They ensure success for competitors. | D.They have to be performed every day. |
A.By presenting medical evidence. | B.By giving example of popular rituals. |
C.By stating rituals are better than routines. | D.By giving examples of famous sport rituals. |
【推荐3】Many of you should not own dogs. It’s that simple. The reason is that, if you own a dog, you must train a dog, and many dog owners out there, it is safe to say, have little or no control over their dogs, because they do not train them.
Strong words? Maybe. But they are simple, honest words, as untrained dogs living in residential neighborhoods bark at will, run loose, and visit and damage neighboring properties with their owners’ blessings as they let them run on purpose.
Take note of the fact that you, the dog owner, cannot control your dog causing a continual nuisance(麻烦事)that damages the quality of life in your neighborhood. There’s nothing more annoying to most people than a dog that barks and nothing more confusing than trying to understand the deficient(有缺陷的)mentality of the dog owner who allows his dog to do so.
After all, the irresponsible dog owner hears the barking too, and so those who must put up with it are continually left wondering-what are they thinking, are they deaf?
Many dog owners believe it is not possible for their dog to be trained, an indication that the owners themselves lack self discipline, and most likely have never really tried to apply discipline to other issues in their lives, not with consistency, or that they are simply lazy and inattentive(疏忽的) to their own adult responsibilities at the expense of others.
Irresponsible dog owners, though, do train their dogs. A dog is a reflection of its owner. Whatever a dog does (run loose, bark at will, jump on guests entering the front door, soil neighboring lawns) is a result of the decisions of the owner. The choice not to do something is indeed a choice.
The good news is that with mere consistency(一致性), a dog can be trained rather quickly, in a couple of weeks if the owner takes his responsibility seriously. Again, that process will be a reflection of the owner’s behavior, and the primary ingredient(要素) in that behavior is not allowing the dog, not even once, to repeat the bad behavior without consequences when told and directed not to. You can stop your dog from barking with simple firm voice commands, direct eye contact, and force of will in a relatively short time, as long as you are consistent and a reasonably mature person.
Dogs, what’s more, love this training because pleasing you, their owner, is what they are all about. The upshot(结果,要点) will be that you have a more connected relationship you’re your dog, a better dog that is suitable for its environment.
1. Which is NOT the reason for dog owners to have little or no control over their dogs?A.They are lazy and unwilling to train their dogs. |
B.They think their dogs can act well without training. |
C.They lack self-control over many issues in daily life. |
D.They don't give enough attention to their responsibilities. |
A.Prejudiced. | B.Unclear. | C.Disapproving. | D.Curious. |
A.instruct dog owners how to train dogs |
B.call on dog owners to train their dogs |
C.sing high praise for responsible dog owners |
D.analyze the relationship between dog owners and their dogs |
A.responsible dog owners can put up with dogs’ barking |
B.irresponsible dog owners train their dogs to do something wrong on purpose |
C.we should not own dogs because they can damage the quality of our daily life |
D.whether a dog can be trained properly may depend on the dog owner's behavior |