In a former gold mine a mile underground, inside a titanium tank(钛储罐)filled with a rare liquified gas, scientists have begun the search for what so far has been unfindable: dark matter.
Scientists are trying to understand why the universe is not what it seems. One part of the mystery is dark matter, which has by far most of the mass in the universe. Astronomers know it’s there even though it’s nowhere to be seen, because when they measure the stars and other regular matter in galaxies, they find that there is not nearly enough gravity to hold them together. If nothing else was out there, galaxies would be quickly flying apart.
The race to solve this enormous mystery has brought one team to the depths under Lead, South Dakota.
The idea is that a mile of dirt and rock, a giant tank, a second tank and the purest titanium in the world will block nearly all the cosmic rays and particles (粒子) around us every day. But dark matter particles, scientists think, can avoid all those obstacles. They hope one will fly into the liquid xenon (疝气) in the inner tank and smash into a xenon nucleus (原子核), revealing its existence in a flash of light seen by a device called “the time projection chamber.”
Scientists announced Thursday that the five-year, $60 million search finally got underway two months ago after a delay caused by the pandemic. So far the device has found...nothing. At least no dark matter.
And if all their calculations and theories are right, they figure they’ll see only a couple signs of dark matter a year. By the time the experiment finishes, the chance of finding dark matter with this device is probably less than 50% but more than 10%.
While that’s far from a sure thing, “you need a little enthusiasm,” said Kevin Lesko, a physicist at Lawrence Berkeley Naonal Laboratory. “You don’t go into rare search physics without some hope of finding something.”
These scientists tried to a similar, smaller experiment here years ago. After coming up empty, they figured they had to go much bigger. Another large-scale experiment is underway in Italy run by a rival team, but no results have been announced so far.
1. What do we know about dark matter?A.It is a rare liquified gas. |
B.It is invisible and hard to find. |
C.It is unknown to scientists. |
D.It is a form of gravity in the galaxies. |
A.The result of the experiment. |
B.The design of the experiment. |
C.The reason for conducting the experiment. |
D.The importance of the experiment. |
A.Its success is guaranteed. |
B.It is almost finished. |
C.It has been fruitless so far. |
D.It is the first attempt in the field. |
A.Don’t count your chickens. |
B.Two heads are better than one. |
C.Strike while the iron is hot. |
D.Every cloud has a silver lining. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】A few years ago, the City Council of Monza, Italy, barred pet owners from keeping goldfish in curved fishbowls. The sponsors of the measure explained that it is cruel to keep a fish in such a bowl because the curved sides give the fish a distorted view of reality. Aside from the measure’s significance to the poor goldfish, the story raises an interesting philosophical question: How do we know that the reality we perceive is true?
Physicists are finding themselves in a similar trouble to the goldfish’s. For decades they have been pursuing an ultimate theory of everything—one complete and consistent set of fundamental laws of nature that explain every aspect of reality. It now appears that this pursuit may generate not a single theory but a family of interconnected theories, each describing its own version of reality, as if it viewed the universe through its own fishbowl. This concept may be difficult for many people to accept. Most people believe that there is an objective reality out there and that our senses and our science directly convey (传达) information about the material world. In philosophy, that belief is called realism.
In physics, realism is becoming difficult to defend. Instead, the idea of alternative realities is a mainstay of today’s popular culture. For example, in the science-fiction film The Matrix the human race is unknowingly living in a simulated (模拟的) virtual reality created by intelligent computers. How do we know we are not just computer-generated characters living in a Matrix-like world? If—like us—the beings in the simulated world could not observe their universe from the outside, they would have no reason to doubt their own pictures of reality.
Similarly, the goldfish’s view is not the same as ours from outside their curved bowl. For instance, because light bends as it travels from air to water, a freely moving object that we would observe to move in a straight line would be observed by the goldfish to move along a curved path. The goldfish could form scientific laws from their frame (框架) of reference that would always hold true and that would enable them to make predictions about the future motion of objects outside the bowl. If the goldfish formed such a theory, we would have to admit the goldfish’s view as a reasonable picture of reality.
The goldfish example shows that the same physical situation can be modeled in different ways, each employing different fundamental elements and concepts. It might be that to describe the universe we have to employ different theories in different situations. It is not the physicist’s traditional expectation for a theory of nature, nor does it correspond to our everyday idea of reality. But it might be the way of the universe.
1. What does the underlined word “distorted” in Paragraph most probably mean?A.Original. | B.Accurate. | C.Distant. | D.False. |
A.The need for a complete theory. | B.The lasting conflict in physics. |
C.The existence of the material world. | D.The conventional insight of reality. |
A.Nature’s mysteries are best left undiscovered. |
B.An external world is independent of the observers. |
C.People’s theories are influenced by their viewpoints. |
D.It is essential to figure out which picture of reality is better. |
A.various interpretations of the universe are welcomed |
B.physicists have a favorite candidate for the final theory |
C.multiple realities can be pieced together to show the real world |
D.there is still possibility to unify different theories into a single one |
【推荐2】If you live on this planet, there’s a decent chance you’ve seen the classic Star TrekEpisode, in which captain Kirk and several members find themselves in what appears to be another universe.
These days, it seems the idea of the multiverse—many worlds—is having its Hollywood moment. Its appeal as a storytelling device is obvious—characters explore a multi-world with varying degrees of similarity to our own, as well as different versions of themselves. Hence, it has been fully established in mainstream pop culture.
While Hollywood can’t seem to get enough of the multiverse, it remains deeply controversial (有争议的) among scientists. Advocates on the two sides show no mercy toward each other in their books, on their blogs. But physicists didn’t pull the idea out of thin air—rather, several distinct lines of reasoning seem to point to the multiverse’s existence. However, critics warn that making the multiverse legal could make it harder for the public to distinguish speculative (推测性的) theories from established fact, making it more difficult to keep pseudo-science (伪科学) at bay. Giving credit to such speculation risks “turning fundamental physics into pseudo-science”.
The multiverse controversy is rooted in the idea of test ability. If we can’t interact with these other universes, or detect them in any way, some experts insist that reduces them to mere philosophical speculation. But Carroll, an advocate for “many worlds”, argues that mathematics is the language describing our physical theories. Since Schrdinger’s equation (方程), on which Quanturr (量子) mechanic rests, predicts the existence of many worlds, so be it.
Could a more expansive view of the universe itself be the next breakthrough? As Siegfried puts it: “Every time in the past that we’ve thought, ‘We’ve got it; this is what the whole universe is’—the people who’ve said, ‘Maybe there’s more than one of those’ have always turned out to be right.”
1. Why is Hollywood so occupied with the multiverse?A.It makes for engaging plots. |
B.It is a much-talked-about topic. |
C.It is helpful to popularize science. |
D.It dominates the mainstream pop culture. |
A.Out of date. | B.Out of place. | C.Out of nowhere. | D.Out of question. |
A.it can be detected somehow |
B.it can be reasoned logically |
C.it can be interpreted philosophically |
D.it can be predicted by mathematics equation |
A.Doubtful. | B.Dismissive. | C.Unclear. | D.Approving. |
【推荐3】Japanese officials say they are pleased with the quality of the asteroid (小行星) material collected by a spacecraft and returned to Earth.
Last week, officials from Japan described the samples (样品), which were collected from the Ryugu asteroid in July 2019. Ryugu sits more than 300 million kilometers from Earth. Japan’s unpiloted Hayabusa2 spacecraft removed the material after making a hole into the asteroid.
The space agency said the July 2019 mission (任务) aimed to collect samples from below the surface of Ryugu. During an earlier operation in February 2019, Hayabusa2 collected material from a different part of the asteroid. The second collection effort resulted in sample pieces as big as 1 centimeter. The black material looked similar to charcoal and was very hard. It did not break apart when picked up or poured into another container.
Earlier this month, space officials described the samples Hayabusa2 removed on its first mission as smaller, sandy pieces. They were collected from the surface of Ryugu. Hayabusa2 was launched in December 2014 and arived near Ryugu in June 2018. The Japanese space mission aims to use the samples to learn more about how our solar system formed.
To get the second set of samples in July, Hayabusa2 used an impactor to knock the asteroid’s surface. The aim was to collect material unaffected by space radiation or other environmental conditions. The size differences suggest different hardness of the bedrock of the asteroid. One possibility is that the place of the second touchdown was a hard bedrock and larger particles broke and entered the container.
Hayabusa2 is now on another mission to a smaller asteroid, called 1998KY26. The Japanese government expects the aircraft to take 11 years to reach that asteroid. Hayabusa2’s new mission aims to study possible ways to prevent large meteorites (陨石) from hitting Earth.
1. What are these asteroid materials used to do?A.Study how the solar system was born. | B.Determine the movement of asteroids. |
C.Study the environment on the asteroid. | D.Uncover when the asteroid was formed. |
A.To discover new planets. | B.To fetch more materials in space. |
C.To travel around the solar system. | D.To explore ways to protect the earth. |
A.They were collected in the same place. | B.They both were black and hard. |
C.They came in different shapes. | D.They were of equal weight. |
A.Japan Makes Progress in Studying Solar System |
B.Japan Is Pleased with Latest Asteroid Samples |
C.The Secret of an Asteroid Comes to Light |
D.The Earth Faces Threats from Space |
【推荐1】While dogs openly show joy or displeasure through different expressions, judging a cat’s feelings from its face is often hard, even for its owners. Now, researchers from Canada’s University of Guelph declare that cats also express emotions (心情) on their faces — one just has to learn how to interpret them!
For their study, Professors Lee Niel and Georgia Mason recruited (招募) 6300 people from 85 countries. The participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire and watch 20 short cat videos, obtained mostly from YouTube. Each video highlighted just the cat’s face — its eyes, nose, and mouth — and gave no clues to its surroundings or circumstances. The viewers did not have to determine the cat’s exact emotion, but just decide whether it was in a positive state or a negative state.
The researchers, who published their findings in the November 2019 issue of Animal Welfare, found that only 13 percent, or 819 participants, were able to read the cats’ emotions accurately over 75 percent of the time. Further research showed that the so-called “ cat whisperers ” were primarily women. Younger adults also seemed to be able to read the expressions better than older individuals.
“ The fact that women generally scored better than men is consistent with previous research that has shown that women appear to be better at understanding non-verbal displays of emotion, both in humans and dogs, ” said Mason. And the answer to both results lies in the fact that they are gifted in doing these. Surprisingly, being a cat owner did not help study participants, indicating that a strong attachment to the animal did not necessarily mean better understanding of its emotions.
Fortunately, all is not lost for cat owners who are unable to tell their pet’s emotions. The researchers believe the skills are not inborn but learned over time. “ This is important to be able to do because it could help strengthen the bond between owners and cats, and so improve cat care and welfare, ” said Niel.
1. What were participants required to do after watching cat videos?A.Decide the cat’s emotion state. | B.Judge the cat’s exact emotion. |
C.Analyse the cat’s living conditions. | D.Determine the cat’s personality. |
A.An old man. | B.A middle-aged man. | C.A young woman. | D.A cat owner. |
A.Women have more time to spend with pets. | B.Women have a talent for understanding emotions. |
C.Women have strong affection for animals. | D.Women have a strong will to understand animals. |
A.It can be obtained through studying. | B.It is necessary for those raising pet cats. |
C.It is difficult especially for cat owners. | D.It improves the owner’s social bond. |
【推荐2】For reasons that are deeply rooted in culture and tradition, men significantly outnumber (比... 多)women in mathematics-based careers. As students progress through the mathematics courses, girls and boys show little difference in ability, effort, or interest in mathematics until adolescent years when course and career choices begin influencing school effort. Then, as social pressure increases and career goals are formed, girls' decisions to reduce effort in the study of mathematics progressively cut them off from many professional careers in the future.
Many girls drop mathematics in high school or in the transition to college. Others drop out later. Women perform virtually as well as men in college mathematics courses, but beyond the bachelor’s degree women drop out of mathematics at twice the rate of men. Women now enter college nearly as well prepared in mathematics as men, and 46 percent of mathematics baccalaureates (学士学位)go to women. Despite this record, only 35 percent of the master's degrees and 17 percent of the Ph. D degrees in the mathematical sciences are earned by women.
Overall, women receive approximately one third of university degrees in science and engineering. The highest percentages of women are found in those sciences with the least mathematical prerequisite: psychology, biology, and sociology. The lowest percentages of women enter fields requiring the most mathematics, namely, physics, engineering, economics, geo- science ,and chemistry. Evidence from many sources suggest that it is differences in course patterns rather than lack of ability that matter most in limiting women's access to careers in mathematically intensive sciences.
Widely reported studies concerning the high percentage of boys among mathematical prodigies (天才)---those who at age 12 perform at the level of average college students-often convey the impression that gender differences in mathematics are biologically determined. But evidence from the vast majority of students shows almost no difference in performance among male and female students who have taken equal advantage of similar opportunities to study mathematics. Inferences from very exceptional students——child prodigies—mean little about the performance of the general population.
1. Males and females probably have great difference in the learning abilities of in mathematics when they.A.enter high school | B.acquire their bachelor’s degree |
C.enter college | D.acquire their master's degree |
A.master’s degree in economics | B.doctor's degree in economics |
C.master’s degree in biology | D.doctor's degree in biology |
A.boys and girls usually lake unequal advantage of opportunities to study mathematics |
B.boys are cleverer in mathematics than girls |
C.gender differences in mathematics are biologically determined |
D.boys work harder than girls |
A.Many girls decide to reduce effort in the study of mathematics as social pressure increases. |
B.Course pattern is the factor that limits women's access to careers in mathematically intensive sciences. |
C.Women's less interest in mathematics limits their access to some careers. |
D.More women drop out of mathematics than men beyond the bachelor’s degree. |
【推荐3】Sitting down in front of the television with a meal or snack after a long day is a very popular recreational pastime. But is it sloth that keeps us chewing, or something else? Is it possible the experience of watching TV can stimulate our appetite?
According to the Cleveland Clinic, television isn’t so much an appetite stimulant as it is an appetite distraction. When we watch TV, we’re engaged in the program, which means we’re paying less attention to the cues that tell us we’re getting full. Instead of taking note of how we’re eating, we’re engaged in somewhat passive consumption.
In 2015, a study surveying 591 undergraduates at the University of Houston showed that the more students watched, the more they snacked. The study also found evidence that increased television viewing was associated with a “fatalistic” view of healthy food intake and poor nutritional knowledge.
Combining television and snacking also creates a cognitive association in your brain that may prompt you to consider the two activities intertwined. In other words, you might reach for some pizza or chips not because you’re all that hungry, but because you’ve come to identify television with eating. You might even eat more depending on the length of a program. If you’re watching Friends, a half-hour sitcom, you might eat less than if you were watching a super-sized episode of a drama like Mad Men.
That’s not to say the content of a program isn’t influential. In 2013, a study in the journal Appetite looked at a group of 80 subjects, half of whom were told to watch a cooking program and half who were told to watch a nature show. Both groups were presented with equal amounts of chocolate-covered candies, cheese curls, and carrots. Researchers found that viewers of the cooking show tended to eat more chocolate-covered candies than the nature show viewers.
So is snacking while watching television that bad? Like most things, is OK in moderation. Eating meals away from the TV can encourage mindful eating, which directs your attention to the food in front of you. You’ll be able to pick up on satiety cues when you’re not fully focused on your screen. Better yet, you won’t have to struggle to hear your favorites how over all that chewing.
1. How does television affect our appetite?A.By stimulating our appetite. |
B.By distracting our attention on eating. |
C.By making us realize the signal of being full. |
D.By engaging us in positive food consumption. |
A.Predetermined. | B.Contemporary. | C.Ambiguous. | D.Controversial. |
A.Those watching a nature show. | B.Those watching a half-hour sitcom. |
C.Those watching a super-sized drama. | D.Those eating snacks away from the TV. |
A.Watching TV makes you hungrier. | B.TV programs influence your appetite. |
C.Watching TV does good to your health. | D.The length of programs relates to snacking. |
【推荐1】Doctors could have an unexpected new animal assistant in the fight against disease. A recent report showed that ants are surprisingly good at sniffing(嗅) out cancer. Although many types of cancers can be treated, finding cancer early is the best way to cure it.
Dogs are well known for their ability to sniff out certain cancers as well as other diseases. However, training dogs can take a long time, and medical tests can be uncomfortable and they cost a lot of money. So a team of French scientists wondered if they could find a simpler way. Their research looked at a common species of black ant called Formica fusca. Despite their tiny size, these ants have developed a great sense of smell to sniff out food in their natural environment. Studies have also shown that ants are speedy learners, quickly remembering a certain smell. What’s more, ants have really good memories. Dogs tend to forget a particular smell if they don’t get the treat that they’d learned to expect in their training. By contrast, once an ant has learned that a smell can sometimes be associated with food, it never forgets.
Dr.Piqueret and his colleagues trained individual ants to link the smell of lab-grown cancer cells with food. After just 30 minutes of training, the ants would sniff out cancer cells and could even tell the difference between types of the disease. It’s just a first step to using ants to sniff out cancer in real patients, but according to Dr.Piqueret, this proves that ants can learn extremely fast-less than 30 minutes for most of the ones his team tested. It also doesn’t cost very much and anyone can learn how to teach the ants after just a couple of days of training.
1. Which of the following can describe the best way to cure cancer?A.Blood is thicker than water. | B.Always prepare for a rainy day. |
C.A living dog is better than a dead lion. | D.God helps those who help themselves. |
A.By giving examples. | B.By giving definitions. |
C.By making comparisons. | D.By introducing concepts. |
A.5. | B.4. | C.3. | D.2. |
A.Ants training is time-saving. | B.Ants are cleverer than we think. |
C.Ants should be trained individually. | D.Ants can only find lab-grown cancer cells. |
【推荐2】It’s nothing unusual for people to multitask nowadays. But the ability to do a number of things at the same time could be different between the two sexes.
A team of UK researchers recently compared the performances of 120 women and 120 men in a computer test about switching(转换) between tasks of counting and shape recognition.
Men equalled women when tasks were done one at a time. But when the tasks were mixed up, there was a clear difference. According to the paper published in the journal BMC Psychology, both women and men slowed down and made more mistakes as the switching became more rapid. But men were slower, taking 77 percent longer to answer, while women took 69 percent longer.
To make the experiment more connected to day-to-day life, researchers tried a second test. A group of women and men were given eight minutes to complete a series of everyday tasks, such as finding restaurants on a map, doing simple math problems, answering a phone call, or deciding how they would search for a lost key in a field.
Once again, women performed better than men in the test, especially in the key-searching task.
Where do women get the ability to keep organized under pressure better than men? Researchers believe that it has its origins in evolution(进化). In ancient times, women had to keep an eye on children while cooking meals. Meanwhile, men only needed to focus on hunting.
However, as with all studies, the results don’t necessarily apply to every single person in the world. “We don’t mean that men can’t multitask, or that only women can,” researcher Keith Laws of the University of Hertfordshire, UK, told BBC News. “We are saying that the average woman is better able to organize her time and switch between tasks than the average man.”
1. In the tests, researchers found that ________.A.women were better at switching between tasks than men |
B.women made more mistakes than men when multitasking |
C.men were better at counting and shape recognition than women |
D.men completed a series of daily tasks more quickly than women |
A.To give advice on how to improve the ability to multitask. |
B.To show how men and women think and respond otherwise. |
C.To compare the roles of men and women in human communities. |
D.To explain why men and women perform differently in multitasking. |
A.All women are born to be good at multitasking. |
B.Some men are as good at multitasking as women. |
C.Men shouldn’t do jobs that call for multitasking skills. |
D.Every woman is better able to multitask than every man. |
【推荐3】Teachers are conditioned to tolerate a lot of bad treatment — it’s a professional suffering — but what teachers at Sir G.E. Cartier Elementary School in London went through last spring seems beyond the call of duty: a few of them agreed to be tied to a rail in the gym while students hit them in the face with cream pies. Why on earth would they do that? To raise $3,000 — enough cash for an interactive whiteboard, the most desirable piece of educational technology on the market right now. These Internet-age boards are essentially giant computer touchscreens, and they are all the fashion in schools. But with little room for them in school budgets, many educators are doing whatever it takes to raise the money themselves. “We are a desperate breed, aren’t we?” says Sharon Zinn, one of three teachers who volunteered for Cartier Elementary’s whipped- cream-flavored activity.
At schools fortunate enough to have them, interactive-white boards are a blessing for educators struggling to attract a generation of students who got accustomed to using the Web from the early age. In the UK — where 70 percent of all primary and secondary classrooms have interactive whiteboards, compared with just 16 percent in the United States — students in those classrooms made the equivalent of five months’ additional progress in math. So far, the data on the efficacy (有效性) of touchscreens in US classrooms is inconclusive, but promising. Multiple recent studies suggest that the devices advance attendance rates and classroom participation. Ever since Dorchester School District 2 in Summerville installed 1,200 interactive boards in its classrooms, disciplinary incidents are cut down. “Students were bored” before the touchscreens arrived, says Superintendent Joe Pye.” Trips to the principal’s office are almost nonexistent now.”
But for some teachers, learning to use the device is not easy, and a generation gap has opened with teachers who are still used to writing lesson plans with a pen and paper. Many older educators are terrified by the boards, says Peter Kornicker, a media specialist in Harlem, where despite a student poverty rate of 98 percent, all 35 classrooms are equipped with touchscreens.”As always, it comes back to the ability of teachers to master this technology,” says Andy Rotherham of Education Sector in Washington, D.C. “We have to train them to use it. Otherwise, it’s just another underused, expensive thing.”
1. How does the author view the deed of some teachers at Sir G.E.Cartier Elementary School?A.It is what most teachers are going through. |
B.It is something worth praise. |
C.It is too much for most teachers to tolerate. |
D.It is due to the conflict between teachers and students. |
A.They are heavily influenced by the Web. |
B.They don’t respect teachers and observe disciplines. |
C.They are bored with the way teachers teach. |
D.They are only good at mathematics. |
A.A high percentage of schools are using touchscreens. |
B.The effectiveness of touchscreens has been proved. |
C.Touchscreens promote attendance and classroom participation. |
D.All teachers are receiving training to use touchscreens. |
A.To get enough financial budget to equip classrooms with touchscreens. |
B.To give up the traditional way of writing lesson plans with a pan and paper. |
C.To familiarize more students with the use of interactive touchscreens. |
D.To train teachers to master and use the modern device. |