组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 天体和宇宙
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:343 题号:16846194

In a former gold mine a mile underground, inside a titanium tank(钛储罐)filled with a rare liquified gas, scientists have begun the search for what so far has been unfindable: dark matter.

Scientists are trying to understand why the universe is not what it seems. One part of the mystery is dark matter, which has by far most of the mass in the universe. Astronomers know it’s there even though it’s nowhere to be seen, because when they measure the stars and other regular matter in galaxies, they find that there is not nearly enough gravity to hold them together. If nothing else was out there, galaxies would be quickly flying apart.

The race to solve this enormous mystery has brought one team to the depths under Lead, South Dakota.

The idea is that a mile of dirt and rock, a giant tank, a second tank and the purest titanium in the world will block nearly all the cosmic rays and particles (粒子) around us every day. But dark matter particles, scientists think, can avoid all those obstacles. They hope one will fly into the liquid xenon (疝气) in the inner tank and smash into a xenon nucleus (原子核), revealing its existence in a flash of light seen by a device called “the time projection chamber.”

Scientists announced Thursday that the five-year, $60 million search finally got underway two months ago after a delay caused by the pandemic. So far the device has found...nothing. At least no dark matter.

And if all their calculations and theories are right, they figure they’ll see only a couple signs of dark matter a year. By the time the experiment finishes, the chance of finding dark matter with this device is probably less than 50% but more than 10%.

While that’s far from a sure thing, “you need a little enthusiasm,” said Kevin Lesko, a physicist at Lawrence Berkeley Naonal Laboratory. “You don’t go into rare search physics without some hope of finding something.”

These scientists tried to a similar, smaller experiment here years ago. After coming up empty, they figured they had to go much bigger. Another large-scale experiment is underway in Italy run by a rival team, but no results have been announced so far.

1. What do we know about dark matter?
A.It is a rare liquified gas.
B.It is invisible and hard to find.
C.It is unknown to scientists.
D.It is a form of gravity in the galaxies.
2. What is Paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.The result of the experiment.
B.The design of the experiment.
C.The reason for conducting the experiment.
D.The importance of the experiment.
3. What can we learn about the experiment?
A.Its success is guaranteed.
B.It is almost finished.
C.It has been fruitless so far.
D.It is the first attempt in the field.
4. Which of the following might Kevin Lesko agree with?
A.Don’t count your chickens.
B.Two heads are better than one.
C.Strike while the iron is hot.
D.Every cloud has a silver lining.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是篇议论文。文章以鱼缸里的金鱼为例,讨论了现实主义以及人们应该如何描述宇宙。

【推荐1】A few years ago, the City Council of Monza, Italy, barred pet owners from keeping goldfish in curved fishbowls. The sponsors of the measure explained that it is cruel to keep a fish in such a bowl because the curved sides give the fish a distorted view of reality. Aside from the measure’s significance to the poor goldfish, the story raises an interesting philosophical question: How do we know that the reality we perceive is true?

Physicists are finding themselves in a similar trouble to the goldfish’s. For decades they have been pursuing an ultimate theory of everything—one complete and consistent set of fundamental laws of nature that explain every aspect of reality. It now appears that this pursuit may generate not a single theory but a family of interconnected theories, each describing its own version of reality, as if it viewed the universe through its own fishbowl. This concept may be difficult for many people to accept. Most people believe that there is an objective reality out there and that our senses and our science directly convey (传达) information about the material world. In philosophy, that belief is called realism.

In physics, realism is becoming difficult to defend. Instead, the idea of alternative realities is a mainstay of today’s popular culture. For example, in the science-fiction film The Matrix the human race is unknowingly living in a simulated (模拟的) virtual reality created by intelligent computers. How do we know we are not just computer-generated characters living in a Matrix-like world? If—like us—the beings in the simulated world could not observe their universe from the outside, they would have no reason to doubt their own pictures of reality.

Similarly, the goldfish’s view is not the same as ours from outside their curved bowl. For instance, because light bends as it travels from air to water, a freely moving object that we would observe to move in a straight line would be observed by the goldfish to move along a curved path. The goldfish could form scientific laws from their frame (框架) of reference that would always hold true and that would enable them to make predictions about the future motion of objects outside the bowl. If the goldfish formed such a theory, we would have to admit the goldfish’s view as a reasonable picture of reality.

The goldfish example shows that the same physical situation can be modeled in different ways, each employing different fundamental elements and concepts. It might be that to describe the universe we have to employ different theories in different situations. It is not the physicist’s traditional expectation for a theory of nature, nor does it correspond to our everyday idea of reality. But it might be the way of the universe.

1. What does the underlined word “distorted” in Paragraph most probably mean?
A.Original.B.Accurate.C.Distant.D.False.
2. What does Paragraph 2 mainly tell us?
A.The need for a complete theory.B.The lasting conflict in physics.
C.The existence of the material world.D.The conventional insight of reality.
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Nature’s mysteries are best left undiscovered.
B.An external world is independent of the observers.
C.People’s theories are influenced by their viewpoints.
D.It is essential to figure out which picture of reality is better.
4. According to the passage, the author may agree that ________.
A.various interpretations of the universe are welcomed
B.physicists have a favorite candidate for the final theory
C.multiple realities can be pieced together to show the real world
D.there is still possibility to unify different theories into a single one
2023-01-05更新 | 453次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文,主要讲述了虽然近来好莱坞似乎对多元宇宙欲罢不能,但它在科学家中仍然存在着深刻的争议。

【推荐2】If you live on this planet, there’s a decent chance you’ve seen the classic Star TrekEpisode, in which captain Kirk and several members find themselves in what appears to be another universe.

These days, it seems the idea of the multiverse—many worlds—is having its Hollywood moment. Its appeal as a storytelling device is obvious—characters explore a multi-world with varying degrees of similarity to our own, as well as different versions of themselves. Hence, it has been fully established in mainstream pop culture.

While Hollywood can’t seem to get enough of the multiverse, it remains deeply controversial (有争议的) among scientists. Advocates on the two sides show no mercy toward each other in their books, on their blogs. But physicists didn’t pull the idea out of thin air—rather, several distinct lines of reasoning seem to point to the multiverse’s existence. However, critics warn that making the multiverse legal could make it harder for the public to distinguish speculative (推测性的) theories from established fact, making it more difficult to keep pseudo-science (伪科学) at bay. Giving credit to such speculation risks “turning fundamental physics into pseudo-science”.

The multiverse controversy is rooted in the idea of test ability. If we can’t interact with these other universes, or detect them in any way, some experts insist that reduces them to mere philosophical speculation. But Carroll, an advocate for “many worlds”, argues that mathematics is the language describing our physical theories. Since Schrdinger’s equation (方程), on which Quanturr (量子) mechanic rests, predicts the existence of many worlds, so be it.

Could a more expansive view of the universe itself be the next breakthrough? As Siegfried puts it: “Every time in the past that we’ve thought, ‘We’ve got it; this is what the whole universe is’—the people who’ve said, ‘Maybe there’s more than one of those’ have always turned out to be right.”

1. Why is Hollywood so occupied with the multiverse?
A.It makes for engaging plots.
B.It is a much-talked-about topic.
C.It is helpful to popularize science.
D.It dominates the mainstream pop culture.
2. What do the underlined words in paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Out of date.B.Out of place.C.Out of nowhere.D.Out of question.
3. According to the opponents, the basic standard of fundamental physics is that ______.
A.it can be detected somehow
B.it can be reasoned logically
C.it can be interpreted philosophically
D.it can be predicted by mathematics equation
4. What might be the author’s attitude toward the multiverse?
A.Doubtful.B.Dismissive.C.Unclear.D.Approving.
2024-03-12更新 | 568次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】Japanese officials say they are pleased with the quality of the asteroid (小行星) material collected by a spacecraft and returned to Earth.

Last week, officials from Japan described the samples (样品), which were collected from the Ryugu asteroid in July 2019. Ryugu sits more than 300 million kilometers from Earth. Japan’s unpiloted Hayabusa2 spacecraft removed the material after making a hole into the asteroid.

The space agency said the July 2019 mission (任务) aimed to collect samples from below the surface of Ryugu. During an earlier operation in February 2019, Hayabusa2 collected material from a different part of the asteroid. The second collection effort resulted in sample pieces as big as 1 centimeter. The black material looked similar to charcoal and was very hard. It did not break apart when picked up or poured into another container.

Earlier this month, space officials described the samples Hayabusa2 removed on its first mission as smaller, sandy pieces. They were collected from the surface of Ryugu. Hayabusa2 was launched in December 2014 and arived near Ryugu in June 2018. The Japanese space mission aims to use the samples to learn more about how our solar system formed.

To get the second set of samples in July, Hayabusa2 used an impactor to knock the asteroid’s surface. The aim was to collect material unaffected by space radiation or other environmental conditions. The size differences suggest different hardness of the bedrock of the asteroid. One possibility is that the place of the second touchdown was a hard bedrock and larger particles broke and entered the container.

Hayabusa2 is now on another mission to a smaller asteroid, called 1998KY26. The Japanese government expects the aircraft to take 11 years to reach that asteroid. Hayabusa2’s new mission aims to study possible ways to prevent large meteorites (陨石) from hitting Earth.

1. What are these asteroid materials used to do?
A.Study how the solar system was born.B.Determine the movement of asteroids.
C.Study the environment on the asteroid.D.Uncover when the asteroid was formed.
2. What is the Japanese spacecraft’s next mission?
A.To discover new planets.B.To fetch more materials in space.
C.To travel around the solar system.D.To explore ways to protect the earth.
3. What can be learnt about the two samples?
A.They were collected in the same place.B.They both were black and hard.
C.They came in different shapes.D.They were of equal weight.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Japan Makes Progress in Studying Solar System
B.Japan Is Pleased with Latest Asteroid Samples
C.The Secret of an Asteroid Comes to Light
D.The Earth Faces Threats from Space
2021-05-03更新 | 211次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般