组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:329 题号:17206650

For most of our history, humans have been short, a study has found. Until around 150 years ago, few people grew taller than 170 centimetres.

Christiane Scheffler at the University of Potsdam and Michael Hermanussen in Altenhof have spent several years studying the height of people from a wide range of populations. In their latest paper, they combined an existing data of more than 6000 prehistoric human skeletons with multiple studies of more recent historical populations from Europe and the US. They also included their own data on 1666 present-day school children from Indonesia.

In the prehistoric populations, the maximum height for men was 165 to 170 centimetres, while women topped out at 160cm. Today, men in England have an average height of around 175 cm, while for women it is about 162 cm.

But there is significant variation between modern countries. The Indonesian school children in the study were shorter than similarly aged children from the US, despite being well-nourished.

Scheffler and Hermanussen argue that height can be a signal of dominance(显赫地位), so in societies where it is possible to move up through the social classes, evolution favours individuals who reach a greater height.

Subramanian at Harvard University isn’t convinced by the pair’s interpretation. His team previously showed that the best predictor of a child’s height is the height of their parents. This suggests that the influence of other factors, such as social mobility, is limited.

After assessing nearly 163,000 children living in 55 low and middle-income countries, Subramanian’s team found that 42.9 percent had poor nutrition but’ no ‘sign of stunting(阻碍发育) or other physical indicators of this fact.

This implies there is a lot of hidden malnutrition that doesn’t reveal itself through stunting. A person’s nutritional condition should be assessed by looking at their diet not their height, says Subramanian.

1. How did Scheffler and Hermanussen conduct the research?
A.Studying the skeletons of prehistoric human.
B.Combining existing data with recent research.
C.Assessing children living in various income areas.
D.Analyzing the results of other scientists’ researches.
2. What’s Subramanian’s attitude towards the explanation of Scheffler and Hermanussen?
A.Worried.B.Cautious.C.Doubtful.D.Supportive.
3. What can we infer from Subramanian’s study?
A.Poor nutrition delays physical development.
B.A balanced diet contributes to growing taller.
C.High social classes can reach a greater height.
D.A human’s height has little to do with nutrition.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.The significance that lies in nutrition.
B.The factors that influence human’s height.
C.The importance that humans attach to height.
D.The reasons why prehistoric humans were short.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一项新的研究发现,根据南丹麦大学的一项新研究,小型哺乳动物将很难在与气候变化相关的压力源中生存。

【推荐1】Small mammals will have a hard time surviving the stressors associated with climate change, according to a new study from the University of Southern Denmark. The experts found that large, long-lived animals are better able to cope with extreme weather such as long-time drought and heavy rainfall.

The researchers analyzed historical population variations among 157 mammal species from around the world. These fluctuations (波动) were compared with weather and climate date from the same time period. The results are providing new insight into how animals respond to extreme weather. In particular, the experts have identified which animal populations will be the hardest hit by climate change.

“We can see a clear pattern: Animals that live a long time and have few offspring are less vulnerable (脆弱的) when extreme weather hits than animals that live for a short time and have many offspring,” said study Professor Owen.

Large animals that live longer can cope better with an extreme event such as a persistent drought because these animals have the option to wait until conditions improve to reproduce. The same weather event would affect small mammals differently, as food sources like insects, flowers, and fruits would disappear quickly.

On the other hand, populations of small mammals may also take advantage when weather conditions improve by producing many offspring.

“These small mammals react quickly to extreme weather, and it goes both ways. Their weakness to extreme weather should therefore not be equated (等同) with a risk of extinction. Our analysis helps predict how different animal species might respond to future climate change based on their general characteristics.” said study co-author Jackson. He emphasized that the ability of animals to endure climate change is not the only factor for their extinction. Habitat destruction, pollution, poaching and invasive species are factors that threaten many animal species — in many cases even more than climate change,” he added.

1. What contributes to certain small mammals’ survival in extreme weather?
A.Their natural lifespan.B.Their high reproductive ability.
C.Their unique body temperature.D.Their small appetite for food.
2. What affects animals’ survival possibility in extreme weather according to paragraph 4?
A.Food sources.B.High temperatures.C.Birthrates.D.Ages.
3. What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
A.Many factors influence the animals characteristics.
B.Climate change is not a factor for the species’ extinction.
C.The animals’ survival ability will improve in the future.
D.Ecology protection is the key to saving species from extinction.
4. What’s the best title of the text?
A.What Influences Animals’ Birth Rate?
B.What Will Animals Do in Extreme Weather?
C.Which Animals Are Mort Affected by Extreme Weather?
D.How Does the Climate Change Influence Weak Animas?
2023-07-09更新 | 63次组卷
阅读理解-七选五 | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Charisma

Are leaders born or made? Many leaders throughout history-such as Gandhi, Churchill, Napoleon, and Martin Luther King-seem to have a special quality that made them powerful and persuasive. We can identify that quality as charisma, but can we explain it?

Charisma means a natural ability to attract other people and make them admire you. It is a complex mixture of social and emotional (情感的) skills.     1    Richard Wiseman, a famous psychologist, points out that there are three key qualities of a charismatic person: they feel their own emotions strongly; they inspire strong emotions in other people; and they are unaffected by the influences of other charismatic people.

You needn’ t worry if you don’ t have these qualities.    2     Wiseman says that when you come upon someone who is charismatic, you can copy his or her body language and facial expressions without realizing it. This is called mirroring, and it works partly because people’ s behavior influences their emotions.     3     He proves his point by giving the example of smiling back at someone who smiled at you. Your smiling back suggests that you accept the goodwill from the other person and hope to give it back to him.

    4     For example, if you stand up straight and raise your chest, you are more likely to feel confident and inspire others to feel confidence in you. Another expert says that the most charismatic people are usually good listeners. They give others the impression of being focused and modest.

Charisma plays a large part in success because it is linked to self-confidence.     5       One successful leadership coach points out that you need to come by your skills and techniques naturally, she warns-if the personality you project is not real, you may come across as insincere.

A.This type of physical presence can be used to great effect.
B.Today there is growing evidence that charisma can be learned.
C.Charismatic persons should be active and sensitive to their surroundings.
D.It needs to be recognized that charisma is more than just being positive.
E.It helps to make strong personal connections and communicate effectively with others.
F.But it is worth noting that charisma can’ t be a pretended ability although it can be learned.
G.He adds you’ re unaware of picking up others’ gestures, but you know it makes you feel good.
2020-07-07更新 | 65次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】There is no such thing as a “safe" level of drinking, with increased consumption of alcohol associated with poorer brain health, according to a new study.

In an observational study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, researchers from the University of Oxford studied the relationship between the self-reported alcohol intake of some 25,000 people in the UK, and their brain scans. The researchers noted that drinking had an effect on the brain's gray matter-regions in the brain that make up "important bits where information is processed," according to lead author Anya Topiwala, a senior clinical researcher at Oxford.

“The more people drank, the less the volume of their gray matter,“ Topiwala said via email. "Brain volume reduces with age and more severely with dementia(痴呆症).Smaller brain volume also predicts worse performance on memory testing,“ she explained. "While alcohol only made a small contribution to this(0. 8%), it was a greater contribution than other "modifiable" risk factors," she said, explaining that modifiable risk factors are “ ones you can do something about, in contrast to aging.”

The team also investigated whether certain drinking patterns, beverage types and other health conditions made a difference to the impact of alcohol on brain health. They found that there was no "safe" level of drinking-meaning that consuming any amount of alcohol was worse than not drinking it. They also found no evidence that the type of drink— such as wine, spirits or beer—affected the harm done to the brain. However, certain characteristics, such as high blood pressure, obesity or binge-drinking, could put people at higher risk, researchers added.

The risks of alcohol have long been known: Previous studies have found that there's no amount of liquor, wine or beer that is safe for your overall health. Alcohol was the leading risk factor for disease and premature death in men and women between the ages of 15 and 49 worldwide in 2016, accounting for nearly one in 10 deaths, according to a study published in The Lancet in 2018.

“It has been known for decades that heavy drinking is bad for brain health," Sadie Boniface, head of research at the UK's Institute of Alcohol Studies, said via email. "We also shouldn't forget alcohol affects all parts of the body and there are multiple health risks. ”

1. What is the function of gray matter?
A.Control the mount of alcoholB.Process information
C.Scan the brainD.Predict the performance on memory
2. Which is NOT true in the following statements according to the study?
A.Drinking alcohol is worse than not drinking.
B.With people getting older, brain volume reduces.
C.Alcohol was the major risk factor for disease and premature death.
D.The less people drink alcohol, the more the volume of their gray matter.
3. Which is one of the "modifiable" risk factors?
A.SmokingB.AgingC.DeathD.Disease
4. What is the main idea of the text?
A.The mount of alcohol is not related to people's health.
B.People drinking alcohol do harm to their brain health.
C.People drinking alcohol lead to dementia.
D.Theresa great deal of liquor, wine or beer that is safe for health.
2021-07-04更新 | 163次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般