组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:180 题号:17811136

About 6 million to 12 million creatures are dissected (解剖) in U. S. classrooms every year, according to the National Anti-Vivisection Society, an animal rights group. While many students eagerly look forward to the chance to examine real animals up close, others say that there’s no educational value in cutting into animals’ bodies. Should students dissect real animals?

David Evans, the director of the National Science Teachers Association, argues that students should be given the chance to dissect animals in the classroom. Students learn best in a hands-on environment where they can work together to explore and discover. Interacting with organisms (生物) is an effective way to help students develop skills of observation and comparison and learn the unique structures (结构) and processes of organisms. As good as many models or simulations might be, they are very different from real organisms. And he believes they fall short of producing the respect for living things that comes from the actual dissection experience.

Jonathan Balcombe, a biologist and a life-long animal rights supporter, says, “I spent many years as a biology lab teacher. I remember the horrible feeling I had when it came time for my class to dissect animals. The lesson required that students cut open and examine dead frogs, fetal pigs, sparrows, and other creatures. I felt pity for these animals, who probably suffered before being killed. And I knew their pain could have been avoided. If students and teachers saw how these animals typically end up on their desks, I believe that dissections would soon stop.”

He points out there are many effective choices for learning animal dissection and physiology, including 3-D models, videos, and computer software. Hundreds of programs are free through lending services like The Science Bank. The simulated dissections can be repeated, and the programs provide feedback. Several studies have shown that computer models and other choices teach students just as well as or better than traditional animal dissection.

I’m not surprised that no state requires dissection to graduate from high school, and no college or university demands it as part of the admissions process. In fact, laws in 18 U. S. states and Washington, D. C. support a student’s right to use other choices. However, dissection could have a legal place in education if the animals did not suffer and were not intentionally killed. For example, some schools have students dissect animals that “were put to sleep” for medical reasons and whose bodies were donated to science.

1. Which of the following may Evans agree with?
A.Models are as effective as actual dissections.
B.Students are short of chances to dissect animals.
C.Dissecting animals helps people respect creatures.
D.Students benefit much more when learning in groups.
2. What do we know about Balcombe’s view on dissecting animals?
A.It causes pain to animals.
B.It advances medicine research.
C.It should be more educational.
D.It should be put in school programs.
3. What is the passage mainly about?
A.The nature of dissection.
B.The necessity of dissection.
C.The result of dissecting animals.
D.The research on dissected animals.
【知识点】 人与动植物 议论文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】“Human activity has wiped out two-thirds of the world’s wildlife since 1970,” CNN reported on September 10, 2020. Later that month, the Guardian reported that “40 percent of the world’s plant species are at risk of extinction”. Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich and his colleagues argued that “the ongoing sixth mass extinction may be the most serious environmental threat to the persistence of civilization”. Around the same time, the Daily Mail warned that “human civilization stands a 90 percent chance of collapse within decades due to deforestation”.

These horrible calculations and projections come from authoritative-sounding reports issued by international agencies, conservation groups, and peer-reviewed scientific journals. But is the future of wild nature and human civilization really so poor?

Data from uncontroversial mainstream sources strongly indicate that both humanity and the natural world are likely to be flourishing rather than collapsing at the end of this century. Humanity is becoming an urban species, and that’s good for the environment, since urban dwellers generally use less electricity, produce less globe-warming carbon dioxide, and have smaller land footprints than people living in the countryside. By 2100, it is estimated that 85 percent of people will be city dwellers, which would leave only 1.2 billion still living in the countryside. That means more space for the wildlife and less pollution from the agriculture.

The global tree-covering area increased by 865,000 square miles between 1982 and 2016. The researchers found that gains in forest area in the mild, subtropical and northern climatic zones are offsetting declines in the tropics. The Maryland researchers owe much of that increase to “natural afforestation on abandoned agricultural land”. “Furthermore, forests in mountainous regions are expanding as climate warming enables trees to grow at higher altitudes,” they added.

Humanity does face big environmental challenges in the coming century. But the scientific and economic evidence shows that most of the trends are positive or can be turned in positive direction by human wisdom. Rather than an age of extinction, the 21st century promises to be an era of environmental renewal.

1. Why does the author mention the reports in Paragraph 1?
A.To give examples.B.To introduce the topic.
C.To make a contrast.D.To support his opinion.
2. What will happen according to Paragraph 3?
A.No one will choose to live in the countryside.
B.More space will be available for the wildlife.
C.Neither humanity nor the natural world will develop quickly.
D.Urban residents will do more walking than those in the countryside.
3. Which of the following statements will the researchers agree with about forest area?
A.The expanding and disappearance in forest area aren’t evenly matched.
B.The forest area in the mild, tropic and northern zones is increasing.
C.There are more forests in mountainous regions due to the climate warming.
D.The plan of “natural afforestation on abandoned agricultural land” is unfavorable.
4. What might be the best title of the passage?
A.The Bright Future of Humanity
B.The Challenges in the Coming Century
C.Better Environment, Better Future of Human
D.21st Century: An Era of Environmental Renewal
2021-05-08更新 | 220次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】A shark that walks in water instead of swimming might sound like a creature straight out of science fiction. However, that is precisely how the fish -- found in the waters of Northern Australia moves across the seafloor .The unique ocean animals were discovered by a team of scientists led by Dr. Christine Dudgeon from Australia's University of Queensland during a 12 year global conservation study.

The newly-found sharks have evolved (进化) to survive in low oxygen environments, enabling them to hunt during low tides. The researchers believe their ability to use their fins (鳍) to walk affords the sharks a remarkable edge over the smaller animals they try to bunt. “While they are super hunters in their shallow habitat, the tiny sharks present no threat to people," says Dudgeon.“At less than a meter long on average, they're incredibly cute little animals that do not look like sharks at all," she adds.

A DNA analysis of skin samples from the live fish suggests that walking sharks broke away from their original population and became a distinct species about nine million years ago. Though that may appear to be a long time ago, it is relatively recent given that sharks have been around for more than 400 million years. In fact, Dudgeon and her team believe walking sharks are the youngest kind of sharks on Earth!

The researchers say that the sharks' small numbers and small habitat make them extremely vulnerable (易受伤害) to natural disasters and overfishing. They are currently on the Nature Red List, which lists species at risk. Dudgeon and her team believe sensible conservation management plans are urgently needed to protect the walking sharks and other endangered animals from further threats.

1. What is the most noticeable feature of the newly-found sharks?
A.They are cute and harmless to humans.
B.They can survive in their shallow habitat.
C.They walk on their fins across the seafloor.
D.They are the youngest kind of sharks on Earth.
2. What is Paragraph 3 mainly about?
A.The evolution of the shark.B.The behavior of the sharks.
C.The population of the sharks.D.The DNA samples of the sharks.
3. What should be done without delay according to Dudgeon and her team?
A.Adjusting the methods of fishing.
B.Putting the sharks on the Nature Red List
C.Changing the sharks' living environments.
D.Adopting necessary measures to protect the sharks.
4. In which part of a website can we read the text?
A.Environment.B.Nature.
C.Education.D.Geography.
2021-07-05更新 | 60次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约440词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】We see a woman swimming at night in a dark sea. Suddenly, she is pulled underwater. She surfaces, cries in fear, then disappears forever. This is the opening scene from the 1975 film Jaws, showing a shark attack. It tells the story of a great white shark that attacks and kills swimmers. Jaws was a great success, attracting huge audiences and winning many awards. It strengthened people's long - held idea of the great white shark as a dangerous animal.

People have always been scared of sharks, bur Jaws made things worse. It made people frightened of sharks, especially of the great white shark. Many people who saw the film started to believe that sharks were bad animals that ate humans. Some people stopped swimming in the sea, afraid of the horrible creature from the film. Other people started fishing for sharks, killing as many as they could. At that time, nobody cared if sharks were killed, or how many were killed. People just wanted them killed.

After 1975, the number of large sharks around America fell quickly, and soon fell around the world. This was not only due to fear of sharks, but also finning. Finning is a type of fishing where sharks are caught and their fins cut off. The sharks are thrown back into the sea where they die slowly and painfully. The fins are used in shark fin soup. Finning kills millions of sharks a year.

Finning would have an unexpected effect upon Peter Benchley, the man who wrote the book the film Jaws was based on. In 1980, Benchley was diving when he came across an awful sight. It was an area where fishermen were finning, and the sea floor was covered with dead sharks. Benchley saw sharks being killed and this caused a deep change in him. He came to see people as a danger to sharks, rather than the other way round. From that day on, he fought to protect sharks. He admitted that his book was wrong about sharks' behavior. “Sharks don't target humans,” he said. Experts have proved that sharks do not see people as food, and they attack us by mistake. Only around six people are killed by sharks every year.

Fortunately, not everyone who watched the film Jaws became afraid of sharks — some became interested in understanding them. Today, as we learn more about sharks, more people than ever want to protect them from extinction.

1. Which of the following is true of the 1975 film Jaws?
A.A woman swam gracefully along with a shark in the opening scene.
B.The film challenged people's long-held belief of the great white shark.
C.Many awards were given to the film due to the frightening killing scenes.
D.The shark was described as a cruel and dangerous animal to swimmers.
2. What did people begin to do after they saw the film?
A.Some became more fascinated in swimming in the sea.
B.Some were eager to fish sharks for their delicious meat.
C.Some killed as many sharks as possible for no reason.
D.Some called on others to protect the endangered sharks.
3. What happens to a shark when it is finned?
A.It will be served onto the table as soups.
B.It will suffer a lot and die slowly in the sea.
C.Its fins will grow again after some time.
D.Its fins will be thrown away into the ocean.
4. What caused a deep change to Peter Benchley?
A.Seeing the finning scene and many dead sharks.
B.Joining the fishermen who were killing and finning.
C.Writing the book the film Jaws was based on.
D.Knowing that sharks do not target and eat humans.
5. What is the author's purpose in writing the passage?
A.To inform people about sharks and recommend the film and the book to them.
B.To describe the cruel finning scene and prove that sharks are dangerous animals.
C.To explain people's misunderstanding of sharks and raise awareness of shark protection.
D.To criticize Peter Benchley's misleading description of sharks in his book and advocate the protection of sharks.
2021-07-03更新 | 222次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般