组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:154 题号:18005443

3D printing is becoming more and more popular. We are now able to create things we need very quickly and easily using 3D printers. But can you imagine printing food?

Some scientists are trying to revolutionize the dining experience by doing this. They hope that having a 3D printer in the kitchen will be as common as the microwave oven or blender.

Scientists say that it’ll be quite easy: You simply have to select a recipe and put the raw food “inks” into the printer. You can also modify the instructions to make the food exactly how you want it. This means that it would be very quick and easy to create tasty and nutritious meals.

Using 3D printers to create your meals would also be saving the environment. There would be less need for traditional growing, transporting and packaging processes as food production would be a lot more efficient. For example, alternative ingredients(原料)such as proteins from algae, beetroot leaves and insects could be converted into tasty products.

Printing food could also help people who suffer from dysphagia (a swallowing disorder). They could program the printer to print softer versions of their favorite foods so that they would not have trouble swallowing them.

However, some people think that a future of 3D food printing would be a disaster. It could take away many jobs, including those from growing, transporting and packaging food. Imagine a world where there was no need for farming or growing crops and the same tastes could be printed from a raw “food ink”. Likewise, traditional cafes and restaurants might lose business. Also, there are concerns about the nutritional value of printed food: Is it really possible to get the nutrients we need from food-based inks and gels(凝胶)?

What’s more, cooking and eating together with family and friends has long been a traditional and enjoyable activity. It is hard to imagine a world where the pleasure of cooking is dead and meals can be created at the touch of a button.

1. Which of the following best describes 3D food printing?
A.Quick and popular.B.Easy and efficient.
C.Nutritious and tasty.D.Soft and convenient.
2. Why do some think that 3D food printing would be a disaster?
A.Traditional food would disappear.B.Many people could lose their jobs.
C.It would affect the people’s health.D.We could all eat the same food.
3. What can we infer from the passage?
A.3D food printing will replace traditional cooking.
B.3D printing food can treat dysphagia.
C.3D food printing would hurt our tradition of food culture.
D.3D food printing would be a failure.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.3D Food “Printing”: Coming to the Kitchen.
B.Can 3D Printing Create Everything?
C.3D Printing Food Will Be in Fashion!
D.The Disadvantage of 3D Food Printing.
【知识点】 科学技术 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。本文介绍了一种新的土壤改良方法,该方法可以同时清除多种污染物,且对土壤没有损害。

【推荐1】Filtration (过滤) systems are designed to remove multiple harmful substances from water or air at the same time, but pollutants in soil can only be tackled individually or a few at a time — at least for now. A method developed by research center could help turn soil improvement processes from piecemeal to wholesale.

Current methods of removing pollutants from soil take a lot of time and are expensive. Some purification techniques also generate secondary waste streams and use up significant amounts of water or electricity. A team of researchers from the research center showed that mixing polluted soil with non-poisonous compounds that drive electrical current, then destroying the mix with short bursts of electricity does flush out both organic pollutants and heavy metals without using water or generating waste.

The electricity bring soil temperature up to 1000 – 3000 degrees Celsius as needed in seconds, turning organic pollutants into non-poisonous minerals and poisonous heavy metals into steam. Moreover, the process is beneficial to soil fertility (肥沃).

“This newly established method, which we called high-temperature electrothermal process (HET), can remove multiple pollutants at a time,” said Bing Deng, the leader of research team. “It was surprising to us that we do not damage the soil in the process. Being able to regenerate the soil and put it right back where it was is a huge advantage over existing technologies,” said Tour, “Plants actually like it more, because of the minerals that get freed up in the thermal cycling.”

According to researchers, the process worked equally well on wet soil and it was economical and environmentally friendly. They developed two models for both off-and on-site experiments, and were looking forward to taking this process to the next stage—field testing.

1. What is the problem of the existing filtration system?
A.It is hard to operate.B.It worsens pollution.
C.It is costly to repair.D.It consumes more time.
2. What does the underlined words “flush out” in paragraph 2 most probably mean?
A.Leave out.B.Make up for.C.Get rid of.D.Mix up.
3. How does HET help improve soil quality?
A.By heating the soil.B.By adding new minerals.
C.By integrating pollutants.D.By pouring in more water.
4. What may the researchers agree?
A.The new technology is still at experimental stage.
B.The new methods have proved useful to economy.
C.The two models have been widely used in the field.
D.The soil is greatly improved because of the research.
2023-12-31更新 | 40次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了澳大利亚的科学家认为他们开发了一种新的追踪装置来帮助他们监控喜鹊,却意外发现喜鹊在同伴的帮助下将所有的追踪器移除了。该团队没有得到他们想要的数据,但他们的实验仍然产生了有趣的结果。

【推荐2】Scientists in Australia thought they had developed a new tracking device to help them monitor magpies, but these intelligent birds had other ideas.

Initially, researchers planned a pilot study to learn more about the movements and social dynamics of magpie. The study was also designed to test the effectiveness of a new tracking device that would fit on small birds. “Instead, the birds outsmarted us,” explained Dominique Potvin, a zoologist at the University of the Sunshine Coast.

Most trackers are too big to fit on small sized birds, and small trackers tend to be limited when it comes to data storage, battery life, and reusability. The new trackers, which weighed less than one gram, would charge and send data wirelessly without needing to recapture the birds. They were attached to a rigid belt that could only be released with a magnet. The design was meant to be durable, except for a weak point where the magnet needed to function. Once the trackers were on, researchers could attract the previously trained birds back to an outdoor ground “feeding station” where the trackers could charge, and the team could download the data.

The team placed trackers on five magpies using their special belt. However, just ten minutes after setting up the last magpie, they noticed something unusual: an adult female without a tracker was busy trying to remove the device from a younger bird, eventually succeeding. This pattern was repeated in the following hour, and by the third day all trackers had been removed.

Researchers are unsure if the same female magpie removed all the devices or if multiple birds cooperated. However, “what we have observed is the first documented case of rescue behaviour in magpies”, according to the paper — something the researchers hadn’t considered going into the project.

But that’s how science works sometimes. The team didn’t get the data they wanted, but their experiment still produced interesting results.

1. Which is one of the purposes of the research?
A.To test magpie’s intelligence.B.To design a creative device.
C.To compare different magpies.D.To try out a new tracker.
2. What do we know about the new device?
A.It is for single use.B.It is powered by the sun.
C.It is very convenient.D.It is attached to a magnet.
3. How did the five magpies get rid of the trackers?
A.By rubbing them on the ground.B.By getting help from other magpies.
C.By waiting for the belt to loosen.D.By going back to the feeding station.
4. Which word best describes the research outcome?
A.Unexpected.B.Misleading.C.Unreliable.D.Misunderstood.
2022-05-10更新 | 90次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。世界老年人口正在增加,随之而来的是,不仅在医院或疗养院,而且在私人家庭,对能够提供24小时护理的护理人员的需求也越来越大,本文对3D打印老年人护理机器人进行了介绍。

【推荐3】The world’s elderly population is increasing. The number of older people—those aged 60 or older—is expected to double by 2050 and is growing faster than all younger age groups across the world. That comes with an increasing need for caregivers who can provide 24-hour care, not only at hospitals or nursing homes, but also at private homes.

Already, caregiving robots are programmed to ask questions a nurse would ask and can keep an eye on patients for falls. These robotic assistants are expected to become increasingly marketable and reach 450,000 by 2045 because of the expected caregiver shortage in the USA.

“Unluckily, the hard structure of present caregiving robots prevents them from a safe human-robot interaction, limiting their assistance to only social interaction and not physical interaction,” said Ramses Martinez, an assistant professor in Purdue University’s College of Engineering. “After all, would you leave babies or old people in the hands of a robot?”

Recent advances in material science have enabled the production of soft robots with deformable (可变形的) bodies or the ability to reshape themselves when touched, but today the complex design prevents the use of this technology at home.

However, Martinez and other researchers have developed a new design method which shows promise in enabling the production of soft robots using a 3D printer. “The soft machines move like humans. Their ability to change their body structure and movement to adapt to different environments will improve caregiving greatly,” said Martinez. The researchers are looking for partners to test the robots and bring their technology to the market.

1. What does the underlined word “That” in paragraph 1 refer to?
A.The younger age group.B.The group of older people.
C.The population across the world.D.The growth of the elderly population.
2. What is the disadvantage of the present caregiving robots?
A.They can’t offer safe physical interaction.
B.They can’t watch patients for falls.
C.They can’t communicate with patients.
D.They can’t provide 24-hour care.
3. What do we know about Martinez’s new design method?
A.It is hard for users to understand.
B.It has brought the robots to the market.
C.It makes the production of soft robots simpler.
D.It works with a special kind of 3D printer.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.Effects of population ageing.
B.The robot industry in the future.
C.The development of caregiving robots.
D.Robots for the elderly created with 3D printers.
2022-11-04更新 | 131次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般