The world is a stage, and now men and women aren’t the only players. A Microsoft researcher’s analysis using artificial intelligence to break down Shakespeare is a great trick showing off some shiny software. But it’s also a reminder in an increasingly automated age of what exactly makes us human.
The Microsoft project uses natural language-processing techniques to map out emotions in William Shakespeare’s text. The test is designed to prompt people who already (at least sort of) understand Shakespeare to consider his works in new ways, and to help those who have trouble understanding his works, to become better in interpreting their complexity. Romeo, it reveals in colorful graphs, feels everything more keenly than his Capulet lover Juliet, despite prevailing stereotypes of stoic masculinity (斯多葛派的男子气概). King Lear tells a story of steady decline, whereas Coriolanus has highs and lows to signal its twisty narrative-driven ride.
As useful an educational tool as this system might be, the Bard’s greatest admirers may be unable to resist raising an eyebrow. Do readers really need an algorithm (算法) to tell them that Romeo is eye-rollingly mopey (无精打采) or that things go more or less right for Macbeth until they start going very wrong? Isn’t it part of the point of studying Shakespeare today that it’s overwhelming and foreign until, suddenly, it’s familiar? These objections might all be secondary to a more powerful fear: The thought that a computer can read Shakespeare just as well as we can seems to take the human out of the humanities.
Therefore, it is reassuring to learn that, advanced as machine-learning has become and as far- reaching as the implications of the technology may be, Microsoft’s tool thought that The Comedy of Errors was, well, a tragedy. That’s because the slapstick physicality in the play confused it. Algorithms have trouble distinguishing friendly teasing from cruel mockery (嘲弄), which would puzzle any computer that tried to make sense of Mercutio. Sarcasm is an ongoing computational dilemma. None of this should surprise anyone who follows social media sites losing battles against racist trolls, whose tendency to mask racism in irony makes their posts difficult to delete through the use of automated content moderation tools. In that context, algorithmic shortcomings are a burden.
Balancing the benefits more humanlike AI could bring with the risk for abuse is a tough task from a practical point of view. From a more human one, however, it can be hard not to hope the tide of technological change will roll in slowly. Those hidden meanings, mystifying relationships and even groan-worthy puns (双关) that beat machines are what make Shake-speare Shakespeare. They’re also what make us us.
1. In paragraph 2, the writer mentions Romeo, Juliet, King Lear and Coriolanus in order to ________.A.highlight Al’s different understanding of Shakespeare |
B.prove that there are various ways to understand Shakespeare |
C.illustrate the complexity in understanding Shakespeare |
D.show how technology may help us better understand Shakespeare |
A.Because AI can only read more familiar literary works. |
B.Because reading Shakespeare is like a walk in the park. |
C.Because human beings are a must in literature analysis. |
D.Because computers often misinterpret how a character feels. |
A.It is quite uncertain whether technological change will occur. |
B.We should take Al’s advantages and disadvantages into account. |
C.That the Al wrongly classified The Comedy of Errors is fearsome. |
D.Algorithms often fail to identify the true intentions behind human language. |
A.Interpretation of Shakespeare Suffers-Is There Any Fix? |
B.Machines Can’t Quite Crack Shakespeare-That’ s a Relief! |
C.Shakespeare No Longer Exists in Automation-Is That True? |
D.AI Revitalizes Shakespeare—What an Amazing Breakthrough! |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】As free as they make us, mobile phones still need to stay close to a power source. Soon that may change with "green" power.
Three Chilean students got the idea for a plant-powered device(装置) to charge their cellphones, while sitting in their school's outdoor courtyard during a break from exams, with dead mobile phones. Then, one of them had an "aha" moment.
“It occurred to Camila to say about plants, "said inventor Evelyn Aravena. “‘Why don't you have a socket, if there are so many plants? ’After that, we thought, ‘why don't they have a charging outlet? Because there are so many plants and living things that have the potential to produce energy, why not?’”
Their invention—a small biological circuit called E-Kaia—uses the energy plants to produce during photosynthesis(光合作用). A plant uses only a small part of that energy and the rest goes into the soil, and that's where the E-Kaia collects it. The device plugs into the ground and then into your phone.
"It's the most amazing project I've ever seen in my life, plain and simple. They brought this original model, and it worked — and that's when it all changed, at least from my personal point of view and I began to support them." said Mauricio Cifuentes.
The device solved two problems for the engineering students — they needed an idea for a class project, and an outlet to plug in their phones.
"Looking for a place to charge the notebook, which had no power, and the mobile phones, we weren't able to find anything because all the other students were in the same state of madness trying to find a place to charge their devices," said Aravena.
But plants are everywhere, and the bio-circuit makes the best of their excess(过多的) power.
The E-Kaia doesn't carry much charge but it's powerful enough to completely recharge a mobile phone in less than two hours.
The student inventors have applied for patents on their technology, and expect the E-Kaia to go on sale in December 2016.
1. How could the students get the "green" power idea?A.By carrying out an experiment. |
B.Just from an occasional thought. |
C.With the support of their professors. |
D.Inspired by the information in a science book. |
A.photosynthesis |
B.a small biological circuit |
C.energy plants |
D.the electricity stored in the device |
A.He intended to buy the patent. |
B.He invented the original device. |
C.He showed great interest in the device. |
D.He attempted to produce the device in large numbers. |
A.A New Device to Change the World |
B.Green Power - A New and Potential Source |
C.Chilean Students Find A Green Way to Charge Phones |
D.A New Device Invented by Chilean Students Will Be on Sale |
【推荐2】Professor Veena Sahajwalla, 2022 Australian of the year, has created a solution to our massive trash problem: waste microfactories. These little trash processors (处理器)-some as small as 500 square feet- house a scries of machines that recycle waste and transform it into new materials with thermal technology (热技术). The new all-in -one approach could leave our current recycling processes in the dust.
In 2018 she launched the first microfactory, establishing a model of recycling that enables businesses and communities to develop commercial opportunities while addressing local waste problems. A second one began recycling plastics in 2019. Now, her lab group is working with university and industry partners to commercialize their patented Microfactory technology. “The small scale of the machines will make it easier for them to one day operate on renewable energy, unlike most large manufacturing plants. The approach will also allow cities to recycle waste into new products on location, avoiding the long, often international, high-emission journeys between recycling processors and manufacturing plants. With a microfactory, gone are the days of needing separate facilities to collect and store materials, extract (提取) elements and produce new products,” says Sahajwalla.
Traditionally, recycling plants break down materials for reuse in similar products-like melting down plastic to make more plastic things. Sahajwalla’s invention advances this idea by taking materials from an old product and creating something different. “The kids don’t look like the parents,” she says. Sahajwalla refers to this process as “the fourth R,” adding “re-form” to the common phrase “reduce, reuse, recycle”.
Professor Veena Sahajwalla’s programs help to develop innovation and promote cooperation with industry, ensuring that sustainable materials and processes become commercially practical solutions for dealing with waste.
1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To introduce a new type of trash processor. |
B.To introduce the process of recycling waste. |
C.To prove the seriousness of the trash problem. |
D.To show the current situation of trash recycling. |
A.The origin of waste microfactories. |
B.The advantages of waste microfactories. |
C.The influences of waste microfactories. |
D.The shocking scale of waste microfactories. |
A.Generating new materials with waste. |
B.Extracting materials from the waste. |
C.Updating the whole recycling process. |
D.Transforming waste into similar products. |
A.A fiction novel. |
B.A business report. |
C.A science magazine. |
D.A chemical textbook. |
【推荐3】While we’re busy seeing world governments and car makers try to increase the use of electric vehicles, there’s one thing of a sci-fi future that no one has quite been able to deliver on: the promise of a flying car. Now it turns out that the reality of a winged car doesn’t look as far-off as it once did, but it’s not going to be anywhere near affordable.
Having factored in the various expensive elements needed to make a flying car a reality, including wings that can be hidden, jet engines and large fuel tanks, the Pentagon Motor Group did the math. The result is a model that, if available for selling, would be pricier than Ferrari’s 986-HP SF90 Stradale hybrid supercar.
The estimated asking prices have been calculated (计算) to be $686, 455 while the 2022 SF90 Stradale has an MSRP (manufacturer’s suggested retail price) of $625,000 in the U. S. According to a report by Fox Business, Pentagon Motor Group’s marketing chief Shakeel Hussian says that the cost of owning a flying car isn’t realistic for most, with it being identified as an expensive machine whose calling card is technology. But he expects costs to decrease as time goes on, like electric vehicles. “The cost of the first electric cars started high and has slowly become more affordable and widely available.”
If you’re in the market for a flying car, Pentagon Motor Group shortlisted some of the cars they looked at when estimating a price. They include the likes of AeroMobil, PAL-V, Aska, the Moller M400 Skycar, Terrafugia, and the SkyDrive. All of them are expected to cost you a small fortune. But the expenses don’t stop there. Between a flying license, insurance, as well as parking and fuel, owners can expect to pay $69,000 more during their very first year of ownership. It is convincing enough to conclude that, at least in the beginning, flying cars will only be aimed at the wealthy few.
1. What do we know about flying cars from Paragraph 1?A.The demand for them is larger than that for electric vehicles. |
B.The idea is warmly welcomed by world governments. |
C.They are likely to become a reality in the near future. |
D.They are often seen in sci-fi movies. |
A.A flying car needed extremely large fuel tanks. | B.Only rich people were interested in flying cars. |
C.The making of a flying car was too challenging. | D.The cost of a flying car would be very high. |
A.Flying cars’ prices can see some reduction in the future. |
B.Electric cars are becoming increasingly popular now. |
C.Technology can help lower the production costs. |
D.Electric vehicles has amore promising future than flying cars. |
A.Are flying cars really coming? | B.Can you really afford a flying car? |
C.Do you really want an expensive car? | D.What cars are worth buying in the future? |
【推荐1】A great many people, when they speak of home, tend to connect it with a certain atmosphere,certain physical surroundings (环境), and certain emotional attitudes within themselves. This sentimentality (多愁善感) toward home is something that has come down to us from the past. Many modern people do not have it, and I think it is a good thing that they do not.
In the old days, life was difficult. Enemies could attack you and kill or rob you, and you had little protection against them. People did not live in well-built houses where doors could be locked. They did not have the protection of an organized police force or telephones which could call the police instantly. How did this influence the way people felt about home? Small family groups clung (贴近) tightly together for protection against beasts and against other men.
Today, thanks to modern transportation and well-organized society, thousands of people willingly and eagerly leave the surroundings where they were born, and the oftener they do so, the less sentiment (情绪) they are likely to have for those surroundings. I lived in England for three years, and I noticed that boys and girls left their parents’ homes and lived in places of their own. There they could just telephone and ask an agency to provide them with a house or an apartment, which was their home. How has the meaning of this word “home” been changed by such activity? What does home mean to those people or to families who often move about, living in first one hotel and then another? I believe that for them home means a place where they can have privacy.
As for me, the atmosphere and surroundings of the place where my parents live have no sentimental (情感的) attachment (依恋). Home is where I can shut the door and be by myself. When I left my parents several years ago, I was anxious to leave. You might call it unfeeling, but that was the way I felt. On the day of my departure for the United States, my grandmother cried. My father, however, showed that he knew how I felt. “Son,” he said, “I am not sorry that you are leaving us. I only hope that you make the most of your time.”
1. Which of the following is NOT the reason for difficult life in the old days?A.No attack or killing or robbery from enemies. |
B.People had no protection of a police force. |
C.People lived in poorly-built houses. |
D.People had no telephones. |
A.Because they can afford the money to live outside. |
B.Because there are no wild animals or enemies around. |
C.Because the society provides them with the feeling of safety. |
D.Because they are not actually satisfied with their environment. |
A.Surroundings influence the way that people act. |
B.Not many modern people have sentimentality toward home. |
C.Rights to privacy are well protected in modern society. |
D.Older people can hardly understand the leaving of the young. |
A.The History of Home | B.People and Home |
C.Different Ideas of Home | D.Ideas of Home Have Changed |
【推荐2】Some people say that friendship is the only channel through which human beings can ever experience the value of life. In our daily life, it is likely that you share some common interests with others-they may like the same sport, go to the same school or like the same kind of music as you do. Since you often meet them, they become your acquaintances (相识的人). Although some people develop many acquaintances, only a few become their good friends in their lifetime because there are differences between acquaintances and friends.
It is said that true friendship begins when someone knows what you are really like, but still likes you anyway. A true friend shows loyalty (忠诚)from the very beginning of the relationship. A friend will go through challenges to help you without expecting anything in return. A "friend" today may probably become a "true friend" tomorrow when they get involved in unexpected circumstances (条件)together with you-for example, when you are going through a difficult experience and your friend is there to help you out. However, some acquaintances might leave you when you badly need their help. At this time, you can experience what true friendship is.
In our life, some people seem to go through life with plenty of friends. They may be funny or they may have a bright and pleasant personality (性格). For these people, wherever they go, people seem to like them and welcome their company. But when they go through challenging life experiences, some of their friends are not there to help them. Therefore we can say some of their friends are not real friends and their friendship is just skin-deep.
However, others seem to go through life with no friends at all. They like to be alone, to travel by themselves or to do their own things. It's a pity that few of these people find success in life because they have no friends. They lack the best gift in life-friendship.
1. What can we learn about acquaintances from the passage?A.You seldom meet them in your life. |
B.Not all of them can become your friends. |
C.They are sure to become your good friends. |
D.They have all of the same interests as you do. |
A.it's easier to lose a friend than to get one |
B.people without friends are always successful |
C.it doesn't matter whether one has friends or not |
D.people with bright personality are easy to have friends |
A.Very deep. | B.Not deep at all. |
C.As precious as skin. | D.Hidden under the skin. |
A.Interested. | B.Angry. | C.Hopeful. | D.Regretful. |
【推荐3】A proverb(谚语)says:Time is money. But in my opinion, time is even more valuable than money. Why?Because when money is spent,we can earn it back. However,when time is gone,it will never return. This is the reason why we must value time.
There is no doubt that the time we have is unusually limited. So even an hour is extremely precious. We should make full use of our time to do useful things. As students, we must not relax our efforts to engage(从事于)in our studies so as to serve our society and our nation in the future.
But it is a pity that there are a lot of people who do not know the importance of time. They spend their valuable time smoking,drinking and so on. They do not realize that wasting time is equal to wasting a part of their valuable life.
In a word, we should get into a good habit of saving time. Do not put off what can be done today until tomorrow. Laziness will not only bring us failure but also lead us to the road of poverty.
1. When we say “Time is money”,we mean“________”.A.Time is equal to dollars,pounds etc. |
B.Time is gold |
C.Time is valuable |
D.We must spend time in buying goods |
A.do not know how to kill time as clearly as others |
B.doubt that they will become more dangerous to society |
C.realize how important their lives are |
D.waste their whole lives without realizing the importance of time |
A.work hard at our subjects |
B.do whatever we want to do |
C.not always engage ourselves in our lessons |
D.have a rest now,then we can get relaxed from our busy studies |